[논문]주관적 에이징웰 척도의 타당화

홍지웅; 주해원

doi:10.14400/jdc.2021.19.11.415

주관적 에이징웰 척도의 타당화
Psychometric Properties of the Subjective Agingwell Scale 원문보기

디지털융복합연구 = Journal of digital convergence, v.19 no.11, 2021년, pp.415 - 424

홍지웅 (중앙대학교 인적자원개발학과) , 주해원 (국립안동대학교 심리과학전공)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 노년의 행복을 측정하기 위해 개발된 주관적 에이징웰 척도(Subjective Agingwell Scale: SAS)를 타당화하고자 하였다. 척도의 타당성을 검증하기 위해, 수도권에 거주하는 노인을 대상으로 주관적 에이징웰, 주관적 안녕감, 낙관주의, 지각된 통제력, 건강준수 행동을 측정하는 질문지를 실시하였다. 자료 분석에는 최종 342명의 응답결과가 사용되었다. 결과를 살펴보면, 첫째, 신뢰도 분석결과, 11문항의 SAS의 전체 및 하위 척도 신뢰도는 수용할만한 수준이었다. 둘째, 확인적 요인분석 및 상관분석 결과, SAS는 구성타당도가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 3요인(인지, 정서, 영) 구조의 적합도는 양호한 편이었고, 주관적 에이징웰과 주관적 안녕감, 낙관성은 정적 상관을 보였다. 마지막으로 회귀분석 결과, 주관적 에이징웰은 건강행동 준수를 예측하였고 준거타당도가 지지되었다. 본 연구는 주관적 관점의 에이징웰 측정도구를 국내 노인에게 적용할 수 있도록 타당화했다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of the current study is to to examine the psychometric properties of the Subjective Agingwell Scale (SAS). Three hundred and forty two elders completed the SAS and the scales assessing subjective well-being, optimism, perceived control and adhering to healthy behavior. The 11-item SAS that displays good internal reliability and good fit to the three-factor model consisting of cognitive satisfaction, positive affect, and spiritual fullness. Correlational analyses with measures of subjective agingwell, subjective well-being, and optimism provide evidence for construct validity. Moreover, the results from hierarchical regression analyses show criterion-related validity of the SAS. This scale could be used in the field to measure and promote subjective agingwell.

주제어

표/그림 (5)

표 Table 1. Demographic characteristics (N=342)
표 Table 3. Bivariate correlations between measures
표 Table 2. Results of structural equation modeling analysis (N=342)
표 Table 4. Bivariate correlations between measures (N=250)
표 Table 5. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis (N=250)

참고문헌 (47)

H. Ju, & M. H. Hyun. (2016). Effects of Acceptance and Downward Contrast on Subjective Agingwell. The Korean Journal of Stress Research, 24(3), 201-209. DOI: 10.17547/kjsr.2016.24.3.201

상세보기
C. Ferri, I. James, & R. Pruchno. (2009). Successful aging: Definitions and subjective assessment according to older adults. Clinical Gerontologist, 32(4), 379-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317110802677302

상세보기
E. A. Phelan, L. A. Anderson, A. Z. Lacroix, & E. B. Larson. (2004). Older adults' views of "successful aging"-how do they compare with researchers' definitions? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(2), 211-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52056.x

상세보기
R. A. Pruchno, M. Wilson-Genderson, & F. Cartwright. (2010). A two-factor model of successful aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(6), 671-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq051

상세보기
W. J. Strawbridge, M. I. Wallhagen, & Cohen, R. D. (2002). Successful aging and well-being: Self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn. The Gerontologist, 42(6), 727-733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.6.727

상세보기
I. V. Vahia, W. K. Thompson, C. A. Depp, M. Allison, & D. V. Jeste. (2012). Developing a dimensional model for successful cognitive and emotional aging. International Psychogeriatrics, 24(4), 515-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610211002055

상세보기
P. McCann Mortimer, L. Ward, & H. Winefield. (2008). Successful ageing by whose definition? Views of older, spiritually affiliated women. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 27(4), 200-204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00305.x

상세보기
J. Reichstadt, G. Sengupta, C. A. Depp, L. A. Palinkas, & D. V. Jeste. (2010). Older adults' perspectives on successful aging: Qualitative interviews. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(7), 567-575. DOI: 10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181e040bb

상세보기
R. S, Lazarus. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124

상세보기
H. K. Beecher. (1956). Relationship of significance of wound to pain experienced. Journal of the American Medical Association, 161(17), 1609-1613. doi:10.1001/jama.1956.02970170005002

상세보기
L. Brannon, J. Feist, & J. Updegraff. (2013). Health psychology: An introduction to behavior and health. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
S. J. Heintzelman. et al. (2020). ENHANCE: Evidence for the efficacy of a comprehensive intervention program to promote subjective well-being. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 26(2), 360. DOI:10.1037/xap0000254

상세보기
E. Diener, & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x

상세보기
E. Diener, & R. Biswas-Diener. (2008). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Wiley-Blackwell.
S. Cohen, W. J. Doyle, R. B. Turner, C. M. Alper, & D. P. Skoner. (2003). Emotional style and susceptibility to the common cold. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 652-657. doi: 10.1097/01.PSY.0000077508.57784.DA

상세보기
C. Graham, & S. Pettinato. (2002). Frustrated achievers: Winners, losers and subjective well-being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies, 38(4), 100-140. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.285811

상세보기
G. N. Marks, & N. Fleming. (1999). Influences and consequences of well-being among australian young people: 1980-1995. Social Indicators Research, 46(3), 301-323. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006928507272

상세보기
E. Diener, C. Nickerson, R. E. Lucas, & E. Sandvik. (2002). Dispositional affect and job outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 59(3), 229-259. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019672513984

상세보기
C. H. DiMaria, C. Peroni, & F. Sarracino. (2020). Happiness matters: Productivity gains from subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(1), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00074-1

상세보기
K. Heinitz, T. Lorenz, D. Schulze, & J. Schorlemmer. (2018). Positive organizational behavior: Longitudinal effects on subjective well-being. PloS One, 13(6). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0198588

상세보기
S. Appau, & S. A. Churchill. (2019). Charity, volunteering type and subjective wellbeing. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(5), 1118-1132. DOI:10.1007/s11266-018-0009-8

상세보기
J. Huang, H. Shi, & W.Liu. (2018). Emotional intelligence and subjective well-being: Altruistic behavior as a mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 46(5), 749-758. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6762

상세보기
E. Diener. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542

상세보기
E. H. Erikson, & J. M. Erikson,. (1998). The Life Cycle Completed (Extended Version). W. W. Norton & Company.
F. B. Bryant, & J. Veroff. (2007). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
X. Cui, B. Li, R. He, S. Zhang, & L. Lei. (2021). The effects of prosocial spending on subjective well-being and its mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(7), 1279. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2021.01279

상세보기
L. Tornstam. (1997) Gerotranscendence: The contemplative dimension of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 11(2), 143-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(97)90018-9

상세보기
E. Diener. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01207052

상세보기
E. Diener & K. Ryan. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391-406. DOI:

상세보기
R. F. Long, E. S. Huebner, D. H. Wedell, & K. J. Hills. (2012). Measuring school-related subjective well-being in adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(1), 50-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630903900402

상세보기
A. Campbell. (1981). The Sense of Well-Being in America. McGraw-Hill, New York.
M. A. Okun & W. A. Stock. (1987). The construct validity of subjective well-being measures: An assessment via quantitative research syntheses. Journal of Community Psychology, 15(4), 481-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(198710)15:4 3.0.CO;2-E

상세보기
H. Ju, J. W. Shin, C.-w. Kim, M.-h. Hyun, & J.-w. Park. (2013). Mediational effect of meaning in life on the relationship between optimism and well-being in community elderly. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56(2), 309-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.008

상세보기
E. Genc, & G. Arslan. (2021). Optimism and dispositional hope to promote college students' subjective well-being in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5(2), 87-96. DOI:10.47602/jpsp.v5i2.255
Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (2014). 2014 Elderly Survey. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
A. W. Korinek & R. Arredondo Jr. (2004). The spiritual health inventory (SHI) assessment of an instrument for measuring spiritual health in a substance abusing population. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 22(2), 55-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J020v22n02_05

상세보기
R. B. Trivedi, B. Ayotte, D. Edelman, & H. B. Bosworth. (2008). The association of emotional well-being and marital status with treatment adherence among patients with hypertension. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(6), 489-497. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-008-9173-4

상세보기
L. M. Lewis & G. Ogedegbe. (2008). Understanding the nature and role of spirituality in relation to medication adherence: A proposed conceptual model. Holistic Nursing Practice, 22(5), 261-267. DOI:

상세보기
A. M. Roepke, E. Jayawickreme, & O. M. Riffle. (2014). Meaning and health: A systematic review. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(4), 1055-1079. DOI: 10.1097/01.HNP.0000334919.39057.14

상세보기
M. F. Steger, A. R. Fitch-Martin, J. Donnelly, & K. M. Rickard. (2015). Meaning in life and health: Proactive health orientation links meaning in life to health variables among American undergraduates. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(3), 583-597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9523-6

상세보기
R. Schwarzer. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x

상세보기
E. K. M. Suh & J. S. Koo. (2011). A Concise Measure of Subjective Well-Being(COMOSWB): Scale Development and Validation. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25(1), 96-114. DOI: 10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.1.006
M. F. Scheier, C. S. Carver, & M. W. Bridges. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063-1078. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063

상세보기
S. N. Walker, K. R. Sechrist, & N. J. Pender. (1987). The health-promoting lifestyle profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research, 36(2), 76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002

상세보기
S. Y. Sung & S. H. Park. (2008). Validation of the Korean Version of Shapiro Control Inventory. The Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 22(4), 111-132. DOI: 10.21193/kjspp.2008.22.4.008
H. Ju. (2016) Subjective Agingwell: A Tangible Concept of Aging Well and Its Measure. Doctoral dissertation, Chung-Ang University.
H. Hawley-Hague, M. Horne, M. Campbell, S. Demack, D. A. Skelton, & C. Todd. (2013). Multiple levels of influence on older adults' attendance and adherence to community exercise classes. The Gerontologist, 54(4), 599-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt075

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증