$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 수학교사의 노티싱(Noticing) 분석을 통한 중심신념 탐색
Exploring Central Beliefs through Noticing Analysis of Mathematics Teachers 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, v.35 no.4, 2021년, pp.377 - 411  

강성권 (동국대학교사범대학부속고등학교) ,  홍진곤 (건국대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 교수학습 맥락에서 수학교사의 중심신념과 주변신념의 탐색을 목적으로 한다. 이러한 목적을 위해 본 연구는 고등학교 현직교사 8명을 대상으로 가상의 수학 수업 동영상을 활용하여 수학적 신념 측면에서 교사 노티싱(noticing)을 분석하였다. 분석결과, 노티싱하는 교사는 동영상 속 수업교사의 교수학습 문제 상황에 대하여 자신의 수학적 신념을 반영하여 비판하고, 교수학습 대안을 제시하였다. 그리고, 본 연구의 노티싱 분석은 '교수학습의 학생참여'와 같은 특정 노티싱 주제에 반영된 교사들의 수학적 신념을 비교하여 교사 개인의 상대적 중심신념과 주변신념을 드러내었다. 이러한 연구 결과를 통하여 본 연구는 노티싱을 활용하여 교수학습 맥락의 제약조건에서 수학교사의 중심신념과 주변신념을 추출하는 모형을 제안하였으며 부가적으로 수학교사의 교수학습-의사결정-전문성을 관찰할 수 있었다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study aims to explore central and peripheral beliefs of mathematics teachers in the context of teaching and learning. For this purpose, this study analyzed teacher noticing of 8 mathematics teachers who are in-service in terms of mathematical beliefs using video-clips of math lessons. When the ...

Keyword

표/그림 (31)

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Kang, S., Hong, J. (2020a). Analysis of Belief Types in Mathematics Teachers and their Students by Latent Class Analysis. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(1), 17-39. 

  2. Kang, S., Hong, J. (2020b). Analysis of the Effect in Mathematics Teachers Beliefs on their Students Beliefs by Latent Class Regression Model. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 485-506. 

  3. Koh, C. (2013). Lesson Contents Which Elementary School Teachers Don't Notice at a Lesson Evaluation: Focused on the Evaluation of 'Park' Teacher's Lesson Case. Journal of Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(6), 569-597. 

  4. Kim, G. (2019). Construction of Framework for Mathematics Lesson Observation and Analysis. Ministry of Education. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. 

  5. Kim. Y., Ryu. H. (2019). An Analytical Study on the Changes in the Mathematical Beliefs of Elementary Pre-service Teachers, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 29(4), 783-803. 

  6. Kim, Y., Lee, C. (2014). Analysing High School Students' Mathematical Belief System and Core Belief Factors. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(1), 111-133. 

  7. Kim, J., Kang, E., Kim, S. Kwon, S., Park, M., Cho, S. (2019). Study on Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Beliefs about the Nature of Mathematics and the Mathematics Learning. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 22(1), 49-64. 

  8. Pang, J., Kwon, M., Sun, W. (2017) Trends and Issues in Research on Noticing in Mathematics Education. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 19(4), 795-816. 

  9. Song, H. (2013). Humanities refers to semiotics. Seoul: Esoope Publishing. 

  10. Yoon, C. (2012). Students' Epistemological Beliefs: Theoretical Issues and Pedagogical Implications. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(1), 327-351 

  11. Lee, E., Lee, K. (2016). A Study on Teacher's Pre-Noticing and Actual Noticing in Mathematics Classroom. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics, 18(4), 773-791. 

  12. Jeon, G. (2021). Qualitative research, From planning to writing. Seoul: CommunicationBooks. 

  13. Han, Y. (2020). Qualitative data analysis a guide for novice researchers. Seoul: ParkYoungstory 

  14. Aljaberi, N. M., & Gheith, E. (2018). In-service mathematics teachers' beliefs about teaching, learning and nature of mathematics and their mathematics teaching practices. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5), 156-173. 

  15. Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83-93. 

  16. Buck, R. (1992). Teachers' goals, beliefs, and perceptions of school culture as predictors of instructional practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 20-24 

  17. Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and teachers' practices. International Handbook of Research on Teachers' Beliefs, New York: Routledge 

  18. Ernest, P. (1989a). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art, 249, 254. 

  19. Ernest, P. (1989b). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33. 

  20. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2), 130-132 

  21. Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731-767. 

  22. Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition Psychology Press. 

  23. Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59-72) Springer. 

  24. Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York(State): McGraw-Hill,Book Company. 

  25. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12. 

  26. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwy, NJ: Erlbaum, 

  27. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202. 

  28. Mason, J. (2002). Researching Your Own Practice: The Discipline of Noticing. London: Routledge Falmer. 

  29. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. 

  30. Purnomo, Y. W. (2017). The complex relationship between teachers' mathematics-related beliefs and their practices in mathematics class. The New Educational Review, 47(1), 200-210. 

  31. Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher's mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550-576. 

  32. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco,: Jossey-Basss. 

  33. Roose, I., Vantieghem, W., Vanderlinde, R., & Van Avermaet, P. (2019). Beliefs as filters for comparing inclusive classroom situations. connecting teachers' beliefs about teaching diverse learners to their noticing of inclusive classroom characteristics in videoclips. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 140-151. 

  34. Sherin, M. G, & Van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. 

  35. Smith, A. C. T. (2016). Cognitive mechanisms of belief change Palgrave MacMillan. 

  36. Schon, D. A. (1987) The reflective practitioner : How professionals think in action. New York : Basic Books 

  37. Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

  38. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 11(2), 107-125. 

  39. Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers' beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213-226. 

  40. Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers' beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. Zdm, 52(7), 1411-1422. 

  41. Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596. 

  42. Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers'"learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276. 

  43. Van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 164-181). Routledge. 

  44. Wang, T., & Hsieh, F. (2014). The cultural notion of teacher education: Comparison of lower-secondary future teachers' and teacher educators' beliefs. International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn (pp. 255-277) Springer. 

  45. Wilkins, J. L. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers' content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139-164. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로