[논문]등호의 관계적 이해를 강조한 수업에서 나타나는 학생의 노티싱 분석

이유진

doi:10.7468/mathedu.2023.62.3.341

등호의 관계적 이해를 강조한 수업에서 나타나는 학생의 노티싱 분석
Analysis of student noticing in a lesson that emphasizing relational understanding of equals sign 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.62 no.3, 2023년, pp.341 - 362

이유진 (대전흥룡초등학교)

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 초등학교 1학년 학생을 대상으로 등호의 관계적 이해를 강조한 수업에서 나타나는 학생의 노티싱을 초점의 중심, 집중하는 상호작용, 수학 과제, 수학 활동의 본질의 네 가지 측면에서 분석하였다. 구체적으로 선행연구에서 도출한 지도방안을 등호를 처음 도입하는 1학년 덧셈과 뺄셈 단원에 적용하여 등호의 관계적 이해를 강조한 수업을 실행하고, 이 과정에서 나타난 학생의 노티싱을 종합적으로 분석하였다. 그 결과 실제 수업 맥락에서 초점의 중심은 등식의 구조와 과제 형태, 교사와 학생의 상호작용, 교실 관행 등에 영향을 받았으며, 특히 학생이 등호를 관계적으로 인식할 수 있도록 돕는 특정한 교사와 학생의 상호작용을 발견할 수 있었다. 또한 크기가 같은 두 양에 주목하는 경우와 양변의 관계에 주목하는 경우 등식을 관계적으로 추론할 수 있었던 것과 같이 등식에 대한 학생의 노티싱은 등식을 추론하는 방식에 영향을 미친다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 연구결과를 통해 등호의 지도 방안에 대한 시사점을 제시하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study analyzed student noticing in a lesson that emphasized relational understanding of equal signs for first graders from four aspects: centers of focus, focusing interactions, mathematical tasks, and nature of the mathematical activity. Specifically, the instructional factors that emphasize the relational understanding of equal signs derived from previous research were applied to a first-grade addition and subtraction unit, and then lessons emphasizing the relational understanding of equal signs were conducted. Students' noticing in this lesson was comprehensively analyzed using the focusing framework proposed in the previous study. The results showed that in real classroom contexts centers of focus is affected by the structure of the equation and the form of the task, teacher-student interactions, and normed practices. In particular, we found specific teacher-student interactions, such as emphasizing the meaning of the equals sign or using examples, that helped students recognize the equals sign relationally. We also found that students' noticing of the equation affects reasoning about equation, such as being able to reason about the equation relationally if they focuse on two quantities of the same size or the relationship between both sides. These findings have implications for teaching methods of equal sign.

주제어

표/그림 (10)

표 Table 1. Teaching methods that emphasize relational understanding of equals signs.
표 Table 2. Lesson plan for a reorganized lesson 3
표 Table 3. Lesson plan for unit 13 that emphasizes relational understanding of equal sign.
표 Table 4. Data analysis for the focusing framework with examples.
표 Table 5. Inductive code used to identify center of focus in the classroom videotaped data.
표 Table 6. Used to identify focusing interactions in the classroom videotaped data.
그림 Figure 1. Mathematical task 1
그림 Figure 2. Mathematical task 2
그림 Figure 3. Response in Task 2
그림 Figure 4. Changes in students noticing

참고문헌 (31)

Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., & Dougherty, B. (2011). Developing essential understanding of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in？grades 3-5. NCTM.
Blanton, M., Otalora, Y., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K. B., Gibbins, A., & Kim, Y. (2018). Exploring kindergarten students' early？understandings of the equal sign. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(3), 167-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1474534

상세보기
Campbell, T. G., & Yeo, S. (2023). Student noticing of collaborative practices: exploring how college students notice during small group interactions？in math. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113, 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10206-3

상세보기
Cowie, B., Harrison, C., & Willis, J. (2018). Supporting teacher responsiveness in assessment for learning through disciplined noticing. The？Curriculum Journal, 29(4), 464-478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1481442

상세보기
Dominguez, H. (2019). Theorizing reciprocal noticing with non-dominant students in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09896-5

상세보기
Donovan, A. M., Stephens, A., Alapala, B., Monday, A., Szkudlarek, E., Alibali, M. W., & Matthews, P. G. (2022). Is a substitute the same?？Learning from lessons centering different relational conceptions of the equal sign. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 54(6), 1199-1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01405-y

상세보기
Hohensee, C. (2016). Student noticing in classroom settings: A process underlying influences on prior ways of reasoning. The Journal of？Mathematics Behavior, 42, 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.03.002

상세보기
Hunter, J., & Miller, J. (2022). The use of cultural contexts for patterning tasks: Supporting young diverse students to identify structures and？generalize. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 54(6), 1349-1362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01386-y

상세보기
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics？Education, 41(2), 169-202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169

상세보기
Jones, S. R., Long, N. E., & Becnel, J. J. (2022). Design of virtual reality modules for multivariable calculus and an examination of student noticing？within them. Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2022.2045625

상세보기
Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., Konig, J., & Blomeke, S. (2015). About the complexities of video-based assessments: Theoretical and？methodological approaches to overcoming shortcomings of research on teachers' competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics？Education, 13, 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9616-7

상세보기
Kim, J. S., Choi, J. Y., & Pang, J. S. (2016). How do elementary school students understand ''? Performance on various item types. Journal of？Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(1), 79-101.
Kim, S. H., & Pang, J. S. (2023). An analysis of lessons emphasizing the relational understanding of the equal sign in introducing addition and？subtraction. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 26(1), 63-86. https://doi.org/10.54340/kseme.2022.27.1.4
Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311062

상세보기
Konig, J., Santagata, R., Scheiner, T., Adleff, A. K., Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Teacher noticing: A systematic literature review of？conceptualizations, research designs, and findings on learning to notice. Educational Research Review, 36, 100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100453

상세보기
Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Students' mathematical noticing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 809-850. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.5.0809

상세보기
Lee, J. A., & Lee, S. J. (2019). Mathematical noticing of two prospective secondary teachers in the course of planning, implementing, and reflecting？on lessons. School Mathematics, 21(3), 561-589. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.09.21.3.561

상세보기
Lee, S. J., & Park, J. H. (2018). Mathematical noticing of prospective secondary mathematics teachers in graphing functions through analyzing the？task dialogue. School Mathematics, 20(3), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.09.20.3.425

상세보기
Mason, J. (2015). Responding in-the-moment: Learning to prepare for the unexpected. Research in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1031272

상세보기
Matthews, P., Rittle-Johnson, B., McEldoon, K., & Taylor, R. (2012). Measure for measure: What combining diverse measures reveals about？children's understanding of the equal sign as an indicator of mathematical equality. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 316-350. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0316

상세보기
McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., & Dunwiddie, A. E. (2015). Arithmetic practice can be modified to promote understanding of mathematical equivalence.？Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 423-426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037687

상세보기
Molina, M., & Ambrose, R. (2008). From an operational to a relational conception of the equal sign. Thirds graders' developing algebraic？thinking. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 30(1), 61-80.
Pang, J. S., Kwon, M. S., & Sunwoo, J. (2017). Trends and issues in research on noticing in mathematics education. School Mathematics, 19(4),？795-817.
Pang, J. S., & Lee, Y. J. (2022). An analysis of teachers' knowledge on the strategies for understanding and solving equations by fourth graders. The？Mathematical Education, 61(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.7468/Matheus.2022.61.1.109
Ryu, K., Jung, J. W., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Understanding qualitative research methods. Park Young Sa
Son, T. K., & Hwang, S. H. (2021). Examining teachers' noticing competency on students' problem-solving strategies: Focusing on errors in fraction？addition and subtraction with uncommon denominators problems. The Mathematical Education, 60(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.7468/Matheus.2021.60.2.229
Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., Blanton, M. L., Isler, I., Gardiner, A. M., & Marum, T. (2013). Equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign:？The impact of task selection in eliciting elementary students' understandings. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.001

상세보기
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology？and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.

상세보기
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). How different video club designs support teachers in "learning to notice". Journal of Computing in Teacher？Education, 22(4), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2006.10784548

상세보기
Wilkie, K. J. (2022). Generalization of quadratic figural patterns: Shifts in student noticing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65, 100917.？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100917

상세보기
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증