$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 지식경영을 기반으로 하는 기록관리 통합 운영방안에 관한 연구
Study on Integrated Plan for Records Management based on Knowledge Management 원문보기

한국기록관리학회지 = Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, v.21 no.1, 2021년, pp.163 - 187  

채민훈 (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원 기록관리 전공) ,  이해영 (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원 기록관리 전공)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

한국의 기록관리는 행정적 발전을 이룬 데 반하여, 민간기업은 물론이고 기록관리가 정착되고 있는 공공기관에서도 경영진은 물론 직원들의 기록관리에 대한 인식이 상당히 부족하다. 이는 기록관리 영역이 기관의 경영 전략의 하나로 포함되어야 할 필요성을 보여주고 있다. 반면 지식경영은 경영의 한 축으로 오랜 시간 연구되어 왔다. 이에 이 연구에서는 ISO 15490-1:2016의 기록관리 프로세스와 지식경영 프로세스를 비교 분석하였다. 또한, ISO 30301에서 제시한 기록경영 구성 요소와 ISO 30401에서 제시한 지식경영의 구성 요소를 비교 분석하여서 기록경영이 지식경영과 같이 경영의 한 축이 될 수 있는지 확인하였다. 마지막으로 프로세스들과 경영 요소들의 비교 분석 내용을 토대로 기록관리와 지식경영의 통합모델을 제시하였고 통합모델 실행방안을 경영의 관점, 정보 거버넌스 관점으로 제시하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Although Korea's records management has achieved administrative development not only in private companies but also in public institutions, administrators and employees still lack awareness in records management. Nevertheless, knowledge management has been studied for a long time as a pillar of admin...

주제어

표/그림 (13)

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Choi, Jae-Hwa (2009). Knowledge management: Theory and practice. Seoul: Business and management. 

  2. Dalkir, K. (2012). Knowledge management in theory and practice, 2nd ed. Translated by Seo Woo Jong. Seoul: Hankyungsa. 

  3. Dictionary of records and archival terminology (2008). Edited by Korean Society Of Archival Studies. Seoul; Yuksabipyungsa. 

  4. DiMS Record Management Research Institute (2009). A study on establishing a response base according to the establishment of national standards and records management system standards (MSS) to respond to the activation of international standardization of records management. Chungcheongbuk-do: Archives and Standards. 

  5. Jeong, Ki-Ae & Kim, You-Seung (2009). A study on the between record management and management quality in public institutions: Based on the malcolm baldrige model and ISO 15489. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(3), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.3.031 

  6. Jeong, Ki-Ae (2012). Major presentation of management training in specialized library: Integration strategy for information management and record management-Records management case of KEPCO. KSLA bulletin, 4, 40-44. 

  7. Kim, Hyogun, Kwon, Hee-Young, & Jeong, Seong-Hwi (2001). Development of an instrument to measure the readiness of an organization for knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research, 2(1), 45-63. 

  8. Kim, Hyo-Sun & Kim, Ji-Hyun (2014). A study on perception of adoption of ISO 30301 management system for records standard certification. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 42, 73-134. https://doi.org/10.20923/KJAS.2014.42.073 

  9. Kim, Hyo-Sun & Kim, Ji-Hyun (2020). A study on the Major Characteristics and Implications of the Revisions in ISO 30301:2019 Standard. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 65, 397-457. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2020.65.397 

  10. Kim, Ik-Han (2004). Directions for developing integrated knowledge management systems based on records management. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 21(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.2.153 

  11. Kim, Myoung-hun (2007). A Critical approach to 'Business-friendly' record management in electronic records environment. Journal of Information Management, 38(4), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2007.38.4.145 

  12. Kim, Myoung-hun (2017). Record, information, knowledge: A preliminary study for knowledge & information resources of records. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 54, 47-72. https://doi.org/10.20923/KJAS.2017.54.045 

  13. Lee, Gemma (2016). Effects of ISO 15489 Amendments on record management in the future. Kirokin, 2016 Winter, 37, 46-55. 

  14. Lee, Jung-eun & Youn, Eun-ha (2018). A study on the major characteristics of the revised ISO 15489 in 2016. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 57, 75-111. https://doi.org/10.20923/KJAS.2018.57.075 

  15. Myongji University, Digital Archiving Institute (2012). Records management system certification system implementation detailed standard development project [Final report], Ministry of the Interior and Safety. 

  16. National Archives of Korea (2011). Introduction to records. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. 

  17. National Archives of Korea (2012). International standard for records management. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. 

  18. Oh, Hyeon-Jin (2016). Study on the usage of knowledge management system based on record management system: Focusing on origin verification, Unpublished master's thesis, Major of Records and Archival Information Management. Graduate School of Records, Archives & Information Science, Myongji University. 

  19. Park, Sun-Hyung (2007). Knowledge management: Critical issues and developing ideas. The Journal of Educational Administration, 25(3), 1-27. 

  20. Park, Yong-Gee (2016). A study on development of factors of management for records in public enterprises, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Ewha Womans University, Department of Library and Information Science. 

  21. Rieh, Hae-young (2005). The current status and direction in knowledge management architecture. Journal of Information Management, 36(1), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2005.36.1.103 

  22. Roh, Jeong Rran (2005). A study on the relation between record and information management and knowledge management from the perspective of knowledge management: Focused on the definition and management process. Korea Society for Library and Information Science, 39(4), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2005.39.4.005 

  23. Suh, Do Won, Lee, Deog-Ro, & Kim, Chan-Jung (2006). An empirical study on success factors of knowledge management in korean firms: Focus on comparison by company size and industry type. Knowledge Management Research, 7(2), 69-96. 

  24. ARMA (2000). Knowledge management: An overview. Information Management Journal, 34(3). 

  25. Dalkir, K. (2012). 지식경영 이론과 실무. 2nd ed. (서우종 역). 서울: 한경사. (원전 발행년 2011). 

  26. Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School. 

  27. De Jager, M. (1999). The KMAT: Benchmarking knowledge management. Library Management, 20(7), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129910285136 

  28. Duffy, J. (2001) Knowledge management and its influence on the records and information manager. Information Management, 35(3). 

  29. Duranti L. & Xie, S. (2012). Knowledge management & records management - Establishing relationships for common development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2012), 247-250. DOI: 10.5220/0004110302470250 

  30. EDRM (2011). White Paper. How the Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) complements ARMA International's Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles (GARP®). EDRM(The Electronic Discovery Reference Model). Retrieved Dec. 25, 2020, from https://fdocuments.in/document/information-governance-reference-model-igrm-and-how-the-information-governance.html 

  31. Hare, C. E. (1998). Records management in the next millennium: Conference report. Records Management Journal, 8(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007234 

  32. Hinton-plain, Brad (2008). On records, information and knowledge management strategy. https://bradhinton.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/on-records-information-and-knowledge-management-strategy 

  33. Hughes, C. (2003). Blurred lines: Records management in the knowledge management arena. Records Management Journal, 13(1), 5-8. 10.1108/rmj.2003.28113aaf.001 

  34. Manisha, K. (2018). Difference between management and administration. Retrieved Dec. 30, 2020, from http://www.differencebetween.net/business/difference-betweenmanagement-and-administration/ 

  35. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, USA. 

  36. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosiere, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child and I. Nonaka(Eds.). Handbook of Organizational Learning and knowledge, 491-517. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (박선형, 2007에서 재인용) 

  37. Saffady, W. (1998) Knowledge management: A manager's briefing. Kansas: ARMA. (김명훈, 2007에서 재인용) 

  38. Scott-Jones, D. (2016). From records management to knowledge management. https://blog.soprasteria.co.uk/2016/12/13/from-records-management-to-knowledge-management. 

  39. Tombs, K. (2004). Knowledge management is dead: Long live records management. Records Management Journal, 14(2), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690410546145 

  40. Yakel, E. (2000). Knowledge management: The archivist's and records manager's perspective. Information Management Journal, 34(3), 24-24. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로