$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 환자안전보고학습시스템 자료를 활용한 의료정보기술 및 전자의무기록시스템 관련 환자안전사건 분석
Analyzing Health Information Technology and Electronic Medical Record System-Related Patient Safety Incidents Using Data from the Korea Patient Safety Reporting and Learning System 원문보기

Quality improvement in health care : QIH = 한국의료질향상학회지, v.27 no.2, 2021년, pp.57 - 72  

조단비 (연세대학교 의료법윤리학협동과정) ,  이유라 (울산대학교 의과대학 정보의학교실) ,  이원 (중앙대학교 간호학과) ,  이의선 (울산대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ,  이재호 (울산대학교 의과대학 정보의학교실)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Purpose: At present, there are a variety of serious patient safety incidents related to problems in health information technology (HIT), specifically involving electronic medical records (EMRs). This emphasizes the need for an enhanced electronic medical record system (EMRS). As such, this study ana...

주제어

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The Patient Safety Act will be enforced on July 29, 2016! [Internet]. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID04&MENU_ID0403&page1&CONT_SEQ333635&SEARCHKEYTITLE&SEARCHVALUE%ED%99%98%EC%9E%90%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84 

  2. Korea Patient Safety Reporting & Learning System. Patient safety incidents caused by wrong administration of neuromuscular blocker [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute for Healthcare Accreditation; 2019 [cited 2021 Jul 8]. Available from: https://www.kops.or.kr/portal/aam/atent/atentAlarmCntrmsrList.do 

  3. Han HW. Current status and future of hospital information system in Korea [Internet]. Cheongju, Korea: Korea Health Industry Development Institute; 2021 [cited 2021 sept 24]. Available from: https://www.khidi.or.kr/board/view?linkId48858596&menuIdMENU02183 

  4. Lee JH. 2020 Health informatization survey report. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare, Seoul, Korea: Korea Health Information Service; 2021. 

  5. Park YT. Current status and future directions of electronic medical record systems in hospital in Korea. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service Policy Brief. 2017;11(2):52-61. 

  6. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, Blumenthal D. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2011; 30 (3):464-535. 

  7. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;348(25):2526-60. 

  8. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2006;144(10):742-52. 

  9. Kim MO, Coiera E, Magrabi F. Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017;24(2):246-50. 

  10. Magrabi F, Liaw ST, Arachi D, Runciman W, Coiera E, Kidd MR. Identifying patient safety problems associated with information technology in general practice: an analysis of incident reports. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2016;25(11):870-80. 

  11. Sittig DF, Singh H. Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2011;171(14):1281-4. 

  12. Magrabi F, Ong MS, Coiera E. An overview of HIT-related Errors. In: Agrawal A, editor. Safety of health IT: clinical case studies. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016, p.11-23. 

  13. Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowles JB. "e-Iatrogenesis": the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007;14(3):387-8. 

  14. Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2006;13(5):547-56. 

  15. Harrison MI, Koppel R, Bar-Lev S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care-an interactive sociotechnical analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007;14(5):542-9. 

  16. Castro GM, Buczkowski L, Hafner JM. The contribution of sociotechnical factors to health information technology-related sentinel events. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2016;42(2):70-6. 

  17. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2010;19(Suppl 3):i68-74. 

  18. Martin G, Ghafur S, Cingolani I, Symons J, King D, Arora S, et al. The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1(3):127-35. 

  19. Cheung KC, van der Veen W, Bouvy ML, Wensing M, van den Bemt PM, de Smet PA. Classification of medication incidents associated with information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014;21(e1):63-70. 

  20. Magrabi F, Ong MS, Runciman W, Coiera E. An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2010;17(6):663-70. 

  21. Magrabi F, Ong MS, Runciman W, Coiera E. Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2012;19(1):45-53. 

  22. Palojoki S, Makela M, Lehtonen L, Saranto K. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety incidents. Health Informatics Journal. 2017;23(2):134-45. 

  23. Lee JH, Lee W, Lee YR, Lee ES, Jang SG. Reports of patient safety incidents. Ulsan, Korea: University of Ulsan; 2018. 

  24. Classen DC, Resar R, Griffin F, Federico F, Frankel T, Kimmel N, et al. 'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2011;30(4):581-9. 

  25. Korea Patient Safety Reporting & Learning System. 2020 statistical yearbook of patient safety [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute for Healthcare Accreditation; 2021 [cited 2021 sept 10]. Available from: https://statistics.kops.or.kr/portal/board/stat/boardDetail.do. 

  26. Warm D, Edwards P. Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents-an approach used in Wales. Applied Clinical Informatics. 2012;3(2):248-57. 

  27. Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. A review of medical error reporting system design considerations and a proposed cross-level systems research framework. Human Factors. 2007;49(2):257-76. 

  28. Amato MG, Salazar A, Hickman TT, Quist AJ, Volk LA, Wright A, et al. Computerized prescriber order entry-related patient safety reports: analysis of 2522 medication errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017;24(2):316-22. 

  29. Meeks DW, Smith MW, Taylor L, Sittig DF, Scott JM, Singh H. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014;21(6):1053-9. 

  30. Roehr B. US hospital incident reporting systems do not capture most adverse events. BMJ. 2012;344:e386. 

  31. Korean Law Information center. Enforcement rule of the Patient Safety Act [Internet]. Sejong, Korea: Korean Law Information center; 2021 [cited 2021 Sept 10]. Available from: https://law.go.kr/lsSc.do?section&menuId1&subMenuId15&tabMenuId81&eventGubun060101&query%ED%99%98%EC%9E%90%EC%95%88%EC%A0%84%EB%B2%95#undefined. 

  32. PSO Privacy Protection Center. AHRQ common formats for surveillance-hospital version 0.3 beta: event description [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2019 [cited 2021 sept 8]. Available from: https://www.psoppc.org/psoppc_web/publicpages/surveillancecommonformats. 

  33. Choudhury A, Asan O. Role of artificial intelligence in patient safety outcomes: systematic literature review. JMIR Medical Informatics. 2020;8(7):e18599. 

  34. Kim CH. Hallym University Medical Center, development real-time predictive AI model to identify falls and pressure ulcers [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: Cheongnyeon Uisa; 2020 [cited 2021 oct 13]. Available from: https://www.docdocdoc.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno2002897. 

  35. Korea Health Information Service. EMR certification standards [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: Korea Health Information Service; 2021 [cited 2021 sept 10]. Available from: https://emrcert.mohw.go.kr/menu.es?mida10102010000. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로