최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기KJWHN : Korean journal of women health nursing, v.27 no.1, 2021년, pp.10 - 13
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
1 Stevens SS Handbook of experimental psychology New York John Wiley & Sons 1951
2 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Guidance for industry on patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims Fed Reg 2009 74 235 65132 65133
3 Mokkink LB Terwee CB Patrick DL Alonso J Stratford PW Knol DL The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes J Clin Epidemiol 2010 63 7 737 745 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 20494804
4 Lynn MR Determination and quantification of content validity Nurs Res 1986 35 6 382 385 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 3640358
5 Polit DF Yang FM Measurement and the measurement of change Philadelphia Wolters Kluwer 2016
6 Terwee CB Prinsen CA Chiarotto A Westerman MJ Patrick DL Alonso J COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study Qual Life Res 2018 27 5 1159 1170 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0 29550964
7 Lee HJ Song R Lee EH Ann SH Research methods and critical appraisal Seoul, KR Koonja Publishing 2017
9 Yun YH Park YS Lee ES Bang SM Heo DS Park SY Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Qual Life Res 2004 13 4 863 868 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021692.81214.70 15129896
10 Lee EH Chun M Wang HJ Lim HY Choi JH Multidimensional constructs of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-c30) in Korean cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses Cancer Res Treat 2005 37 3 148 156 10.4143/crt.2005.37.3.148 19956496
12 Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1991
13 Lawshe CH A quantitative approach to content validity Pers Psychol 1975 28 4 563 575 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
14 Polit DF Beck CT The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations Res Nurs Health 2006 29 5 489 497 10.1002/nur.20147 16977646
15 Wynd CA Schmidt B Schaefer MA Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity West J Nurs Res 2003 25 5 508 518 10.1177/0193945903252998 12955968
16 Polit DF Beck CT Owen SV Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations Res Nurs Health 2007 30 4 459 467 10.1002/nur.20199 17654487
17 Beckstead JW Content validity is naught Int J Nurs Stud 2009 46 9 1274 1283 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.04.014 19486976
18 Lee EH Kang EH Kang HJ Evaluation of studies on the measurement properties of self-reported instruments Asian Nurs Res 2020 14 5 267 276 10.1016/j.anr.2020.11.004
19 Lee J Lee EH Chae D Kim CJ Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties Int J Nurs Stud 2020 105 103498 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103498 32203756
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.