$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

한국형 상병수당 도입을 위한 제도 설계의 원칙과 개념적 틀
Principles and Conceptual Framework for the Introduction of Korean Sickness Benefit 원문보기

Health policy and management = 보건행정학회지, v.31 no.1, 2021년, pp.5 - 16  

강희정 (한국보건사회연구원 건강보험연구센터)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Both access to healthcare services and income security in case of personal illness are being needed to achieve universal health coverage, which is enshrined in the human rights to health and social security and international standards on social protection. Income security acts on both the social det...

주제어

표/그림 (4)

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Government announces overview of Korean New Deal [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Economy and Finance; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 1]. Available from: http://english.moef.go.kr/pc/selectTbPressCenterDtl.do?boardCdN0001&seq4940. 

  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Laying the foundation for the Korean New Deal with an inclusive social safety net [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_D04&MENU_ID0403&CONT_SEQ355478. 

  3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Unification of medical insurance under the NHIC [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2000 [cited 2020 Sep 1]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID04&MENU_ID0403&CONT_SEQ19060&page1. 

  4. Ministry of Employment and Labour. Roadmap for universal employment insurance [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Employment and Labour; 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 1]. Available from: https://www.korea.kr/news/policyBriefingView.do?newsId156428888. 

  5. Organization of Economic Cooperation Development. Tackling coronavirus (COVID-19): contributing to a global effort: paid sick leave to protect income, health, and jobs through the COVID-19 crisis [Internet]. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation Development; 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 10]. Available from: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref134_134797-9iq8w1fnju&titlePaid-sick-leaveto-protect-income-health-and-jobs-through-the-COVID-19-crisis. 

  6. Kim KJ. Policy consideration for mandatory sick-leave. Korea Labour Rev 2020;9:32-43. 

  7. Nam GJ. International comparison on paid sick leave. Korea Labour Rev 2020;9:7-11. 

  8. International Labour Organization. ILO brief: social protection spotlight: sickness benefits during sick leave and quarantine [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---soc_sec/documents/publication/wcms_744510.pdf. 

  9. Seoul Metropolitan Government. Seoul-type paid sick leave support [Internet]. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government; 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 10]. Available from: https://news.seoul.go.kr/welfare/archives/508129?tr_codeshort. 

  10. Hwang JR. Flexibility and polarization of the Korea labour market. Seoul: National Assembly Budget Office; 2010. 

  11. Lee BH. Unemployment and social protection in the working poor. Proceedings of the 2017 Korea Welfare Panel Study Conference; 2017 Sep 15; Seoul, Korea. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2017. 

  12. Organization of Economic Cooperation Development. Paid sick leave to protect income, health and jobs through the COVID-19 crisis [Internet]. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation Development; 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 8]. Available from: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref134_134797-9iq8w1fnju&titlePaid-sick-leave-to-protect-income-health-and-jobs-throughthe-COVID-19-crisis. 

  13. Kang HC, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Kim HK, Ko JH, Shin KC, et al. Healthcare disabilities and the policy challenge of achieving universal health coverage. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Welfare; 2019. 

  14. Lee MS. Global health promotion efforts for achieving the UN 2030 agenda for Sustainable Development. Korean J Health Educ Promot 2018;35(4):1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2018.35.4.1. 

  15. Kang HC. Review of sickness benefit in the UHC framework. Proceedings of the Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management Conference; 2019 Nov 7-8; Jeonju, Korea. Seoul: Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management; 2019. 

  16. World Health Organization. Health system: universal health coverage [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization [cited 2020 Sep 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthsystems/universal_health_coverage/en/. 

  17. Kim CY. Publicness of health and public health care. Seoul: Hanu Academy; 2019. 

  18. Lee SY, Kim KT. Path to poverty of sick workers and fictional Korean social security. Korea Soc Policy Rev 2017;24(4):113-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17000/kspr.24.4.201712.113. 

  19. Lonnroth K, Tessier L, Hensing G, Behrendt C. Income security in times of ill health: the next frontier for the SDGs. BMJ Glob Health 2020;5(6):e002493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002493. 

  20. International Labour Organization. 'Towards universal health coverage: social health protection principles': social protection spotlight [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---soc_sec/documents/publication/wcms_740724.pdf. 

  21. Kim SJ, Kim KT. Who can't take time off when being sick? Health Welf Issue Focus 2020;(391)9:1-11. 

  22. Lee JH. Necessity of paid sick leave and sickness benefit. Seoul: People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy; 2020. 

  23. Raub A, Chung P, Batra P, Earle A, Bose B, Jou J, et al. Paid leave for personal illness: a detailed look at approaches across OECD countries [Internet]. Los Angeles (CA): UCLA World Policy Analysis Center; 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 8]. Available from: https://www.worldpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/WORLD%20Report%20-%20Personal%20Medical%20Leave%20OECD%20Country%20Approaches_0.pdf. 

  24. Organization of Economic Cooperation Development. Employees by business size (indicator) [Internet]. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation Development; 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 2]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/ceaf53c9-en. 

  25. Yoe NG, Shin HW, Oh YH, Kim SH, Oh SJ, Kim HY. A study on the adequacy assessment of health insurance contribution system. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service, Korea Institute for Health and Welfare; 2020. 

  26. Shin HW, Youn SM, Choi BH, Kim JJ, Kim BD, Yeo NG, et al. A study on the enhancement of health insurance contribution system. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service, Korea Institute for Health and Welfare; 2017. 

  27. National Health Insurance Act, Law No. 31453 (Feb 17, 2021). 

  28. Enforcement Decree of the National Health Insurance Act, Law No. 30287 (Feb 17, 2021). 

  29. Jung HJ. Necessity of introduction of sickness pay [Internet]. Seoul: People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy; 2017 [cited 2020 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.peoplepower21.org/Welfare/1492725. 

  30. Kim DH, Kang SH. Effects of critical illnesses on losing income and their policy implications. Korean J Insur 2015;102:39-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17342/kij.2015.102.2. 

  31. Kim SJ, Kim KT, Jung Y, Park GR, Oh SJ, Kim SJ. Impact of ill health on employment and household economic condition and its policy implication. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Welfare; 2018. 

  32. Kwon J. Effects of health shocks on employment and income. J Labour Econ 2018;41(4):31-62. 

  33. Choi ID, Kim JS, Kong KY. Sickness benefit schemes in major countries and feasibility study for its introduction in Korea. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service; 2005. 

  34. Shim KC. Policy measures for consolidating sickness benefits. Korean Soc Secur Stud 2011;27(1):133-156. 

  35. Kim JS. A research on sickness benefit. Soc Secur Raw Stud 2016;6:1-29. 

  36. Cho SH. Income protection in the event of workers' illness: legal comparison between Korean and Germany. Seoul Law Rev 2018; 26(3):553-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15821/sir.2018.26.3.015. 

  37. Sohn MS, Kim YY, Chang JM, Chung HJ. Financial projection for sickness benefits and paid sick leave using the NHIS cohort data base. Korean J Health Econ Policy 2019;25(2):1-28. 

  38. Lim SJ, Kim NY, Lee JM, Jo JY, Kim YB, Kim YH. A basic study on the introduction of sickness benefit. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service, Health Insurance Research Institute; 2019. 

  39. Yang DW. The effects of health shock on labor supply and income and household coping strategies [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2020. 

  40. Lee HJ. Policy issues for the introduction of sickness benefit scheme. In: Kang HC, Kim S, Lee HJ, Kim HK, Ko J, Shin KC, et al. Healthcare disabilities and the policy challenge of achieving universal health coverage. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Welfare; 2019. pp. 343-359. 

  41. Ko J. Financial issues for the introduction of sickness benefit scheme. In: Kang HC, Kim S, Lee HJ, Kim HK, Ko J, Shin KC, et al. Healthcare disabilities and the policy challenge of achieving universal health coverage. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Welfare; 2019. pp. 360-373. 

  42. Hemmings P, Prinz C. Sickness and disability systems: comparing outcomes and policies in Norway with those in Sweden, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation Development; 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c768699b-en. 

  43. Shin KC. Discussions on the empirical study on health care consumptions by private health insurance policyholders. Health Soc Welf Rev 2015;35:5-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2015.35.4.5. 

  44. Moon SW, Kang TW, Oh HR, Seo NK, Kim SS. 2017 Korea Health Panel Study in-depth analysis report. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service; 2019. 

  45. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Injuries. illnesses, and fatalities [Internet]. Washington (DC): U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/iif/. 

  46. Pichler S, Ziebarth NR. The pros and cons of sick pay schemes: testing for contagious presenteeism and noncontagious absenteeism behavior. J Public Econ 2017;156:14-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.07.003. 

  47. Stoddard-Dare P, DeRigne L, Quinn L, Mallett C. Paid sick leave status in relation to government sponsored welfare utilization. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2018;88(5):608-615. DOI: https;//doi.org/10.1037/ort0000318. 

  48. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2006 [cited 2021 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/SS1978.pdf. 

  49. World Health Organization. Health promotion and disease prevention through population-based interventions, including action to address social determinants and health inequity: disease prevention [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.emro.who.int/about-who/public-health-functions/health-promotion-disease-prevention. html. 

  50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [cited 2021 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/pictureofamerica/pdfs/picture_of_america_prevention.pdf. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로