[논문]한반도 연근해를 대상으로 해양 먹이망 기반 3차원 생태모델 구축 연구

조창우; 송용식; 김창신; 윤석현

doi:10.5657/kfas.2021.0194

한반도 연근해를 대상으로 해양 먹이망 기반 3차원 생태모델 구축 연구
Study on a Three-Dimensional Ecosystem Modeling Framework Based on Marine Food Web in the Korean Peninsula 원문보기

한국수산과학회지 = Korean journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences, v.54 no.2, 2021년, pp.194 - 207

조창우 ((주)지오시스템리서치 부설연구소) , 송용식 ((주)지오시스템리서치) , 김창신 (국립수산과학원 연근해자원과) , 윤석현 (국립수산과학원 기후변화연구과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

It is necessary to assess and manage the different elements of the marine ecosystem, such as climate change, habitat, primary and secondary production, energy flow, food web, potential yield, and fishing, to maintain the health of the ecosystem as well as support sustainable development of fishery. We set up an ecosystem model around the Korean peninsula to produce scientific predictions necessary for the assessment and management of marine ecosystems and presented the usability of the model with scenario experiments. We used the Atlantis ecosystem model based on the marine food web; Atlantis is a three-dimensional end-to-end model that includes the information and processes within an entire system, from an abiotic environment to human activity. We input the ecological and biological parameters, such as growth, mortality, spawning, recruitment, and migration, to the Atlantis model via functional groups using existing research and local measurements. During the simulation period (2018-2019), we confirmed that the model reproduced the observed data reasonably and reflected the actual ecosystem characteristics appropriately. We thus identified the usability of a marine ecosystem model with experiments on different environmental change scenarios.

주제어

표/그림 (12)

그림 Fig. 1. The procedure of set-up for the polygons based on depth (a), current (b), catch (c), boundary location (d) and the final polygon (e) applied to the Atlantis model.
표 Table 1. Outlines of input data for Atlantis model
그림 Fig. 2. Food web in the Atlantis model.
표 Table 2. Biological functional groups and codes in the Atlantis model
표 Table 3. Biological parameters for the functional groups in the Atlantis model
표 Table 4. Methods of the assessment for model validation
그림 Fig. 3. Site map of the polygons in the Atlantis model (red number) with observed points (black dots).
표 Table 5. Results of the validation for primary production and biomass of phyto-, zoo-plankton
그림 Fig. 4. Comparison model results with the observed data for primary production (top), biomass of the phyto-plankton (mid) and zooplankton (bottom) by box.
그림 Fig. 5. SAD diagram, comparison of biomass for the functional groups between the observed data (gray bar) and the model results (red dot). Here, C is catch and B is biomass by the functional groups. Refer to table 2 for the name and code of the functional groups.
표 Table 6. Results of the scenario experiments
그림 Fig. 6. The model results of the scenario experiments. Biomass ratio is the biomass change for standard run. The primary producer of the x-axis corresponds to functional group numbers 29-31 in table 2, the zoo plankton is 26-27, the invertebrate is 17-25 and the fish is 2-16, respectively. Refer to table 2 and table 6 for the functional group numbers and scenario experiments.

참고문헌 (38)

Zhang CI. 2015. Assessment and management of fishery resources. National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives Books-Blue and Note, Seoul, Korea, 245.
AFMA (Australian Fisheries Management Authority). 2007. Alternative management strategies for Southeast Australian commonwealth fisheries. Stage 2: Quantitative management strategy evaluation. AFMA, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Report, 378, 8-78.
AFMA (Australian Fisheries Management Authority). 2012. East coast SBT habitat. AFMA Report, 9, 1-8.
AFMA (Australian Fisheries Management Authority). 2015. Annual Report 2014-15. AFMA Report, 247, 62-107.
Ainsworth CH, Paris CB, Perlin N, Dornberger LN, Patterson WF, III, Chancellor E, Murawski S, Hollander D, Daly K, Romero IC, Coleman F and Perryman H. 2018. Impacts of the deepwater horizon oil spill evaluated using an end-to-end ecosystem model. PLoS ONE 13, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190840.

상세보기
Banse K and Mosher S. 1980. Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationships of field populations. Ecol Monogr 50, 355-379. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937256.

상세보기
Blanchard JL, Jennings S, Law R, Castle MD, McCloghrie P, Rochet MJ and Benoit E. 2009. How does abundance scale with body size in coupledsize-structured food webs?. J Anim Ecol 78, 270-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01466.x.

상세보기
Chassignet, EP, Harley EH, Ole MS, George RH, Patrick JH, Alan JW, Remy B and Rainer B. 2007. The HYCOM (HYbrid coordinate ocean model) data assimilative system. J Mar Syst 65, 60-83. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2005.09.016.

상세보기
CSIRO (The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation). 2017. Part I: General overview, physics and ecology. Atlantis User's Guide, 215, 95-105.
Dai ZJ, Fagherazzi S, Mei XF and Gao JJ. 2016. Decline in suspended sediment concentration delivered by the Changjiang (yangtze) river into the East China sea between 1956 and 2013. Geomorphology 268, 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.06.009.

상세보기
Elith J and Leathwick JR. 2009. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40, 677-697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159.

상세보기
Fulton EA, Bax NJ, Bustamante RH, Dambacher JM, Dichmont C, Dunstan PK, Hayes KR, Hobday AJ, Pitcher R, Plaganyi EE, Punt AE, Savina-Rolland M, Smith ADM and Smith DC. 2015. Modelling marine protected areas: insights and hurdles. Phil Trans R Soc B 370, 1-17. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0278.

상세보기
Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith DC and Johnson P. 2014. An integrated approach is needed for ecosystem based fisheries management: Insights from ecosystem-level management strategy evaluation. PLoS ONE 9, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084242.

상세보기
Hansen C, Nash RDM, Drinkwater KF and Hjollo SS. 2019. Management scenarios under climate change-A study of the Nordic and Barents Seas. Front Mar Sci 6, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00668.

상세보기
Hodgson EE, Kaplan IC, Marshall KN, Leonard J, Essington TE, Busch DS, Fulton EA, Harvey CJ, Hermann AJ and McElhany P. 2018. Consequences of spatially variable ocean acidification in the California current: Lower pH drives strongest declines in benthic species in southern regions while greatest economic impacts occur in northern regions. Ecol Model 383, 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.05.018.

상세보기
Hong JS, Seo SB, Jeon CH, Park JH, Park YG and Min HS. 2016. Evaluation of temperature and salinity fields of HYCOM reanalysis data in the East Sea. Ocean Polar Res 38, 271-286. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2016.38.4.271.

원문보기 상세보기
Jung S and Houde ED. 2005. Fish biomass size spectra in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 28, 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732857.

상세보기
Kang YH. 2003. Carrying capacity and fishery resources release in the Bangjukpo surfzone ecosystem. J Korean Fish Soc 36, 669-675. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2003.36.6.669.

원문보기 상세보기
Kim BJ, Ro YJ, Jung KY and Park KS. 2014. Numerical modeling of circulation characteristics in the Kwangyang estuarine system. J Korean Soc Coast Ocean Eng 26, 253-266. https://doi.org/10.9765/kscoe.2014.26.4.253.

원문보기 상세보기
Kim TY and Yoon HS. 2011. Skill assessments for evaluating the performance of the hydrodynamic model. J Korean Soc Mar Environ Energy 14, 107-113. https://doi.org/10.7846/jkosmee.2011.14.2.107.

원문보기 상세보기
Kim DH, Song MY and Chon TS. 2016. Inferring pollution states based on community structure of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in streams. Ann Limnol - Int J Lim 52, 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2015022.

상세보기
KMI (Korea Maritime Institute). 2019. A study on measures to strengthen fisheries resource management based on total allowable catch (TAC). Research Report, 276, 1-4.
Kwon YS, Li F, Chung N, Bae MJ, Hwang SJ, Byoen MS, Park SJ and Park YS. 2012. Response of fish communities to various environmental variables across multiple spatial scales. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9, 3629-3653. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9103629.

상세보기
Lee MW. 2014. Ecosystem-based stock assessment and fisheries management in the west coast of Korea. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea.
Magurran AE and Henderson PA. 2012. How selection structures species abundance distributions. P Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 279, 3722-3726. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1379.

상세보기
Magurran AE. 2007. Species abundance distributions over time. Ecol Lett 10, 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01024.x.

상세보기
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2011a. Atlantis model development for the northern Gulf of California. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-110 Report, 293, 12-89.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2011b. Neus-Atlantis: Construction, Calibration and application of an ecosystem model with ecological interactions, physiographic conditions, and fleet behavior. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-218 Report, 249, 2-44.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2020. The NOAA fisheries integrated toolbox. Retrieved from https://noaa-fisheries-integrated-toolbox.github.io/ on Aug 13, 2020 .
Olsen E, Kaplan IC, Ainsworth C, Fay G, Gaichas S, Gamble R, Girardin R, Eide CH, Ihde TF, Morzaria-Luna H, Johnson KF, Savina-Rolland M, Townsend H, Weijerman M, Fulton EA and Link JS. 2018. Ocean futures under ocean acidification, marine protection, and changing fishing ppressures explored using a worldwide suite of ecosystem models. Front Mar Sci 5, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00064.

상세보기
Ortega-Cisneros K, Cochrane KL, Fulton EA, Gorton R and Popova E. 2018. Evaluating the effects of climate change in the southern Benguela upwelling system using the Atlantis modelling framework. Fish Oceanogr 27, 489-503 https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12268.

상세보기
Peterson AT, Papes M and Soberon J. 2008. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol Model 213, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008.

상세보기
Peterson AT. 2003. Predicting the geograph of species invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78, 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1086/378926.

상세보기
Seo SB, Park YG, Park JH and Lee HJ. 2013. The Tsushima warm current from a high resolution ocean prediction model, HYCOM. Ocean Polar Res 35, 135-146. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2013.35.2.135.

원문보기 상세보기
Wageningen. 2020. Vectors of change in oceans and seas marine life, impact on economic sectors (VECTORS). Retrieved from https://www.wur.nl/en/show/vectors.htm on May 3, 2019.
Weijerman M, Grace-McCaskey C, Grafeld SL, Kotowicz DM, Oleson KLL and van Putten IE. 2016. Towards an ecosystem-based approach of Guam's coral reefs: The human dimension. Mar Policy 63, 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.028.

상세보기
Willmott CJ. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 63, 1309-1313. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477.
Zhang CI, Seo YI and Kang HJ. 2017. Estimation of the exploitable carrying capacity in the Korean water of the East China Sea. JFMSE 29, 513-525. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2017.29.2.513.

원문보기 상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증