참고문헌 (52)

1. Kang, H. I., & Choi Eun Ah(2015). Teacher knowledge necessary to address student erros and difficulties about ratio and rate. School Mathematics, 17(4), 613-632. 

2. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74 [supplement 8]. 

3. Ministry of Education (2018). National plans for diversification of textbooks and free publication system, Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID295&lev0&statusYNW&smoe&m020401&opTypeN&boardSeq76393 (2021.03.15.) 

4. Ministry of Education (2019a). Korean national elementary mathematics 6-1. Seoul: Visang Education. 

5. Ministry of Education (2019b). Korean national elementary mathematics activity book 6-1. Seoul: Visang Education. 

6. Ministry of Education (2019c). Korean national elementary mathematics 6-1 teachers' guide. Seoul: Visang Education. 

7. Ku, N. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2020b). A study on middle school teachers' geometric unit curriculum material use A case of teacher community. School Mathematics, 22(2), 251-275. 

   상세보기

8. Ku, N. Y., Tak, B. J., Choi, I. Y., & Kang, H. Y. (2019). An analysis of preservice mathematics teachers' reading of curriculum materials: Focused on conditional probability. The Mathematical Education, 58(3), 347-365. 

   원문보기 상세보기

9. Park, S. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2018). The comparison and analysis of models on ratio and rate in elementary mathematics textbooks: Centering on multiplicative perspectives on proportional relationships and the structure of proportion situations. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 21(2), 237-260. 

   원문보기 상세보기

10. Park, S. A., & Oh, Y. Y. (2017). An analysis of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge about teaching ratio and rate. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 21(1), 215-241. 

11. Park, H. O., & Park, M. G. (2012). An analysis on the epistemological obstacles of elementary students in the learning of ratio and rate. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 15(2), 159-170. 

    원문보기 상세보기

12. Park, H. J., & Jeong, E. S. (2010). A comparative analysis on units about ratio and rate between Korean mathematics textbook and MIC textbook. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3), 769-788. 

13. Sang, K. A., Kim, K. H., Park, S. W., Jeon, S. K., Park, M. M., & Lee, J. W. (2020). The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): Finding form TIMSS 2019 for Korea. Chungbuk: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. 

14. Seo, E. M., Pang, J. S., & Lee, J. Y. (2017). An analysis of lessons to teach proportional reasoning with visual models-Focused on ratio table, double number line, and double tape diagram. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(4), 791-810. 

15. Yoo, H. J., Cho, Y. M., Na, G. S., Go, E. S., Go, J. H., & Lee,.D. H. (2019). Elementary Mathematics Textbook Research and Guidance. Gyeonggi: Dongmyeongsa. 

16. Yim, J. H., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Visual representations for improving proportional reasoning in solving word problems. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(2), 189-206. 

17. Chang, H. W., Lim, M. I., Yu, M. G., Park, H. M., Kim, J. S., & Lee, H. Y. (2017). A comparative analysis of ratio and rate in elementary mathematics textbook. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 21(1), 135-160. 

18. Chang, H. W., Lim, M. I., Yu, M. G., Park, H. M., Kim, J. S., & Lee, H. Y. (2018). The application of double number line in elementary school mathematics education. School Mathematics, 20(1), 227-249. 

    상세보기

19. Chong, Y. O. (2015). Teaching proportional reasoning in elementary school mathematics. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(1), 21-58. 

20. Jeong, E. S. (2003). An educational analysis on ratio concept. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 13(3), 247-265. 

21. Choi, J. S. (2019). Reflection on Korea mathematics curriculum through analyzing TIMSS 2015 'Number' Domain. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(11), 1211-1233. 

    상세보기

22. Amador, J. M., Males, L. M., Earnest, D., & Dietiker, L. (2017). Curricular noticing: Theory on and practice of teachers' curricular use. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 427-443). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 

23. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?. Educational researcher, 25(9), 6-14. 

    상세보기

24. Beckmann, S., & Izsak, A. (2015). Two perspectives on proportional relationships: Extending complementary origins of multiplication in terms of quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 17-38. 

    상세보기

25. Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17-37). New York, NY: Routledge. 

26. Choppin, J. (2011). Learned adaptations: teachers' understanding and use of curriculum resources. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 331-353. 

    상세보기

27. Choy, B. H., & Dindyal, J. (2021). Productive teacher noticing and affordances of typical problems. ZDM, 1-18. 

28. Choy, B. H., Thomas, M. O., & Yoon, C. (2017). The FOCUS framework: characterising productive noticing during lesson planning, delivery and review. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 445-466). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 

29. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). 조흥식, 정선욱, 김진숙, 권지성 역 (2010). 질적 연구방법론-다섯 가지 접근. 서울: 학지사. 

30. Dietiker, L., Males, L. M., Amador, J. M., & Earnest, D. (2018). Research Commentary: Curricular Noticing: A Framework to Describe Teachers' Interactions With Curriculum Materials. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(5), 521-532. 

    상세보기

31. Earnest, D. & Amador, J. M. (2019). Lesson planimation: prospective elementary teachers' interactions with mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(1), 37-68. 

    상세보기

32. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2004). Curriculum Materials: Scaffolds for New Teacher Learning? A Research Report. Document R-04-1. Center for the study of teaching and policy. 

33. Ivars, P., Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., & Choy, B. H. (2018). Enhancing noticing: using a hypothetical learning trajectory to improve pre-service primary teachers' professional discourse. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(11), em1599. 

    상세보기

34. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Phillip, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202. 

    상세보기

35. Lamon, S. J. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding : Essential context knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 

36. Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. Lester (Ed), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629-666). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 

37. Land, T. J., Tyminski, A. M., & Drake, C. (2015). Examining pre-service elementary mathematics teachers' reading of educative curriculum materials. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 16-26. 

    상세보기

38. Lloyd, G. M. (2009). School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers' learning: future elementary teachers' interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. ZDM, 41, 763-775. 

    상세보기

39. Lobato, J., Ellis, A. B., Charles, R. I., & Zbiek, R. M. (2010). Developing essential understanding of ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning. 박정숙, 강현영, 고은성, 이동환 역 (2016). 비, 비례, 비례추론의 필수 이해. 서울: 교우사. 

40. Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2006). Designing and using mathematical tasks. 권오남 외 역 (2015). 수학 과제의 설계와 활용. 서울: 경문사. 

41. NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. 류희찬 외 역 (2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준. 서울: 경문사. 

42. Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350. 

    상세보기

43. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246. 

    상세보기

44. Remillard, J. T. (2013). Examining resources and re-sourcing as insights into teaching. ZDM, 45(7), 925-927. 

    상세보기

45. Roth-McDuffie, A., Choppin, J., Drake, C., & Davis, J. (2018). Middle school mathematics teachers' orientations and noticing of features of mathematics curriculum materials. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 173-187. 

    상세보기

46. Roth-McDuffie, A., & Mather, M. (2009). Middle school mathematics teachers' use of curricular reasoning in a collaborative professional development project. In J. T., Remillar, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 302-320). New York, NY: Routledge. 

47. Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500. 

    상세보기

48. Shield, M., & Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning. Educational studies in mathematics, 82(2), 183-199. 

    상세보기

49. Streefland, L. (1985). Search for the Roots of Ratio: Some Thoughts on the Long Term Learning Process (Towards... A Theory): Part II: The Outline of the Long Term Learning Process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(1), 75-94. 

    상세보기

50. Tyminski, A. M., Simpson, A. J., Land, T. J., Drake, C., & Dede, E. (2020). Prospective elementary mathematics teachers' noticing of childrens' mathematics: a focus on extending moves. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-29. 

51. Warshauer, H., Starkey, C., Herrera, C. A., & Smith, S. (2019). Developing prospective teachers' noticing and notions of productive struggle with video analysis in a mathematics content course. Journal of Mathematcis Teacher Education, 1-33. 

52. Webb, D. C., Boswinkel, N., & Dekker, T. (2008). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Using representations to support student understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(2), 110-113 

    상세보기

활용도 Top5 논문

더보기

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.