This study examined the names, usage patterns, and types of fence(Ultari) in the Joseon Dynasty. The results of this study are as follows. First, it was confirmed that in the Joseon Dynasty, fences were generally recorded as 籬, but in Yeonggeonuigwe, they were recorded as 圍排. Second, during the Jose...
This study examined the names, usage patterns, and types of fence(Ultari) in the Joseon Dynasty. The results of this study are as follows. First, it was confirmed that in the Joseon Dynasty, fences were generally recorded as 籬, but in Yeonggeonuigwe, they were recorded as 圍排. Second, during the Joseon Dynasty, fences were common facilities in both private houses and state-run buildings such as palaces, and shrines. However, many of them were destroyed in the 1930s as the housing improvement prevailed and is now a rare facility. Third, the usage patterns of fences differed between private houses and government buildings. In private houses, fences were mainly installed along the boundary of the property separating the inside and outside of the house. In state-run architecture, it was used for dividing areas and blocking the sight between areas in the building site. Fourth, in state-run buildings, fences were mainly installed for temporary use, but sometimes built as regular facilities as well. Fifth, various forms of fences could be identified according to the material and the construction method. The study can be significant because it dealt with in depth the historical and structural aspects centering on the fences that were commonly used in the traditional spaces of the Joseon Dynasty, but are now lost and cannot be found.
This study examined the names, usage patterns, and types of fence(Ultari) in the Joseon Dynasty. The results of this study are as follows. First, it was confirmed that in the Joseon Dynasty, fences were generally recorded as 籬, but in Yeonggeonuigwe, they were recorded as 圍排. Second, during the Joseon Dynasty, fences were common facilities in both private houses and state-run buildings such as palaces, and shrines. However, many of them were destroyed in the 1930s as the housing improvement prevailed and is now a rare facility. Third, the usage patterns of fences differed between private houses and government buildings. In private houses, fences were mainly installed along the boundary of the property separating the inside and outside of the house. In state-run architecture, it was used for dividing areas and blocking the sight between areas in the building site. Fourth, in state-run buildings, fences were mainly installed for temporary use, but sometimes built as regular facilities as well. Fifth, various forms of fences could be identified according to the material and the construction method. The study can be significant because it dealt with in depth the historical and structural aspects centering on the fences that were commonly used in the traditional spaces of the Joseon Dynasty, but are now lost and cannot be found.
Kim, Y. (2012). A Dictionary of Traditional Landscape Facilities, Dongnyeok, 4, 39.
Kim, W., & Jung, S. (1986). Korea 100 years ago in photographs, Catholic Publishing House, 225.
Lee, E., Cheon, D., & Yoo, U. (2019). Study on the Construction Method of Traditional Fence in the Late Joseun Dynasty in the 「Imwon Gyeongjeji」, Journal of Architectural History, 28(5), 7-18.
Oh, J. (2016). A Study on the Pan-Jang in the Joseon Dynasty, MUNHWAJAE : Korean Journal of Cultural Heritage Studies, 49(1), 68-83.
Seoul Historiography Institute (2019). Korean translation : Gyeongbokgung yeonggeon ilgi, Seoulbookshop, 155~156
Son, S. (2009). The movable partitions and screens described on DolGwol-Do painting, Kyungpook University, 1.
Yeonggeoneuigwe Research Society (2010). Yeonggeoneuigwe : Joseon Dynasty Architecture, Dongnyeok, 20.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.