$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

정보보안 동기, 조직 신뢰가 정보보안 준수에 미치는 영향: 업무향상초점의 조절효과 분석
The Influence of Security Motivation and Organization Trust on Information Security Compliance: Focusing on Moderation Effects of Work Promotion Focus 원문보기

한국산업정보학회논문지 = Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, v.26 no.3, 2021년, pp.23 - 39  

황인호 (국민대학교 교양대학) ,  허성호 (중앙대학교 심리학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

정보보안에 대한 투자가 지속적으로 증가하고 있지만, 조직 내부의 보안 위협은 감소하지 않고 있다. 연구 목적은 조직원의 정보보안 준수의도를 높이기 위한 방향을 제시하는 것이다. 세부적으로, 연구는 정보보안 동기와 조직 신뢰가 정보보안 준수의도에 미치는 긍정적인 영향을 제시하고, 업무 향상초점의 조절효과를 확인한다. 연구 모델 및 가설 검증은 구조방정식 모델링을 통해 실시하며, 정량적 검증을 위하여 정보보안 정책을 도입한 조직의 조직원들에게 설문을 실시하였다. 가설 검증 결과, 정보보안 처벌, 가치 일치가 조직 신뢰를 통해 정보보안 준수의도에 긍정적 영향을 미치며, 업무 향상 초점이 처벌, 가치 일치, 조직 신뢰와 준수의도간의 영향 관계에 조절 효과가 있음을 확인하였다. 연구는 내부자의 정보보안 준수 수준 향상을 위한 조직의 노력 요인을 세부적으로 제시하였다는 측면에서 학술적, 실무적 시사점을 가진다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Investment of organization in information security is increasing, but information security threats within the organization are not decreasing. The purpose of this study is to suggest a direction to increase the information security compliance intention of employees. In detail, the study presents the...

주제어

표/그림 (11)

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Agarwal, V. (2013). Investigating the Convergent Validity of Organizational Trust. Journal of Communication Management, 17(1), 24-39. DOI : 10.1108/13632541311300133. 

  2. Boss, S., Galletta, D., Lowry, P. B., Moody, G. D. and Polak, P. (2015). What Do Systems Users have to Fear? Using Fear Appeals to Engender Threats and Fear that Motivate Protective Security Behaviors, MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 837-864. 

  3. Bulgurcu, B., Cavusoglu, H. and Benbasat, I. (2010). Information Security Policy Compliance: An Empirical Study of Rationality-based Beliefs and Information Security Awareness, MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 523-548. 

  4. Burns, A. J. (2021). Protecting Organizational Information Assets: Exploring the Influence of Regulatory Focus on Rational Choices, In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 5228). 

  5. Cazier, J. A., Shao, B. B. and Louis, R. D. S. (2007). Sharing Information and Building Trust through Value Congruence, Information Systems Frontiers, 9(5), 515-529. DOI : 10.1007/s10796-007-9051-6. 

  6. Chang, K. C., Hsu, Y. T., Hsu, C. L. and Sung, Y. K. (2019). Effect of Tangibilization Cues on Consumer Purchase Intention in the Social Media Context: Regulatory Focus Perspective and the Moderating Role of Perceived Trust, Telematics and Informatics, 44, Advance online publication. DOI : 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101265 

  7. Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving Interactional Organizational Research: A Model of Person-Organization Fit, Academy of management Review, 14(3), 333-349. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1989.4279063. 

  8. Chen, Y., Ramamurthy, K. and Wen, K. W. (2012). Organizations' Information Security Policy Compliance: Stick or Carrot Approach? Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(3), 157-188. DOI : 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290305. 

  9. D'Arcy, J., Hovav, A. and Galletta, D. (2009). User Awareness of Security Countermeasures and its Impact on Information Systems Misuse: A Deterrence Approach, Information Systems Research, 20(1), 79-98. DOI : 10.1287/isre.1070.0160. 

  10. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312. 

  11. Gillespie, N. and Dietz, G. (2009). Trust Repair After an Organization-Level Failure, Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 127-145. DOI : 10.5465/amr.2009.35713319. 

  12. Gino, F. and Margolis, J. D. (2011). Bringing Ethics into Focus: How Regulatory Focus and Risk Preferences Influence (un) Ethical Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 145-156. DOI : 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.006. 

  13. Grandviewresearch. (2019). Cyber Security Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Component, by Security Type, by Solution, by Service, by Deployment, by Organization, by Application, and Segment Forecasts, 2019 - 2025. https://www.globenewswire.com. 

  14. Guo, K. H. and Yuan, Y. (2012). The Effects of Multilevel Sanctions on Information Security Violations: A Mediating Model, Information & Management, 49(6), 320-326. DOI : 10.1016/j.im.2012.08.001. 

  15. Guo, K. H., Yuan, Y., Archer, N. P. and Connelly, C. E. (2011). Understanding Nonmalicious Security Violations in the Workplace: A Composite Behavior Model, Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(2), 203-236. DOI : 10.2753/MIS0742-1222280208. 

  16. Herath, T. and Rao, H. R. (2009). Encouraging Information Security Behaviors in Organizations: Role of Penalties, Pressures and Perceived Effectiveness, Decision Support Systems, 47(2), 154-165. DOI : 10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.005. 

  17. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond Pleasure and Pain, American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300. DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280. 

  18. Hoyle, R. H. and Kenny, D. A., (1999). Sample Size, Reliability, and Tests of Statistical Mediation, Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, 1, 195-222. 

  19. Hwang, I. (2020). A Study on the Mitigation of Information Security Avoid Behavior: From Goal Setting, Justice, Trust perspective, Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(12), 217-229. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.12.217. 

  20. Hwang, I., and Cha, O., (2018). Examining Technostress Creators and Role Stress as Potential Threats to Employees' Information Security Compliance, Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 282-293. DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.022. 

  21. Hwang, I., Kim, D., Kim, T. and Kim, S. (2017). Why Not Comply with Information Security? An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Non-compliance, Online Information Review, 41(1), 2-18. DOI : 10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0358. 

  22. Keller, P. A. (2006). Regulatory Focus and Efficacy of Health Messages, Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 109-114. DOI : 10.1086/504141. 

  23. Kim, J., Kim, K. and Park, H. (2018). The Impact of Family-Friendly Corporate Culture on Employees' Behavior, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research. 23(2), 75-92. DOI : 10.9723/jksiis.2018.23.2.075. 

  24. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D. and Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of Individuals' Fit at Work: A Meta-Analysis of Person-Job, Person-Organization, Person-Group, and Person-Superior Fit, Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342. DOI : 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x. 

  25. Lau, D. C., Liu, J. and Fu, P. P. (2007). Feeling Trusted by Business Leaders in China: Antecedents and the Mediating Role of Value Congruence, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(3), 321-340. DOI 10.1007/s10490-006-9026-z. 

  26. Liang, H., Xue, Y. and Wu, L. (2013). Ensuring Employees' it Compliance: Carrot or Stick?, Information Systems Research, 24(2), 279-294. DOI : 10.1287/isre.1120.0427. 

  27. Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A. and Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the Merits of Orthogonalizing Powered and Product Terms: Implications for Modeling Interactions among Latent Variables, Structural Equation Modeling, 13(4), 497-519. DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1304_1. 

  28. Lowry, P. B., Posey, C., Bennett, R. B. J. and Roberts, T. L. (2015). Leveraging Fairness and Reactance Theories to Deter Reactive Computer Abuse Following Enhanced Organisational Information Security Policies: An Empirical Study of the Influence of Counterfactual Reasoning and Organisational Trust, Information Systems Journal, 25(3), 193-273. DOI : 10.1111/isj.12063. 

  29. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 

  30. Mulder, L. B., Verboon, P. and De Cremer, D. (2009). Sanctions and Moral Judgments: The Moderating Effect of Sanction Severity and Trust in Authorities, European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 255-269. DOI : 10.1002/ejsp.506. 

  31. Nachmias, D. (1985). Determinants of Trust within the Federal Bureaucracy. In Rosenbloom, D. H. (Eds), Public Personnel Policy: The Politics of Civil Service, New York: Associated Faculty Press, Port Washington, 133-143. 

  32. Neubert, M. J., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., Chonko, L. B. and Roberts, J. A. (2008). Regulatory Focus as a Mediator of the Influence of Initiating Structure and Servant Leadership on Employee Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1220-1233. DOI : 10.1037/a0012695. 

  33. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill. 

  34. Park, K. (2019). A Study on the Influence of the Perception of Personal Information Security of Youth on Security Attitude and Security Behavior, Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research, 24(4), 79-98. DOI : 10.9723/jksiis.2019.24.4.079. 

  35. Pinder, C. C. (1998), Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 

  36. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. 

  37. Safa, N. S. and von Solms, R. (2016). An Information Security Knowledge Sharing Model in Organizations, Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 442-451. DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.037. 

  38. Son, J. Y. (2011). Out of Fear or Desire? Toward a better Understanding of Employees' Motivation to Follow IS Security Policies, Information & Management, 48(7), 296-302. DOI : 10.1016/j.im.2011.07.002. 

  39. van der Werff, L., Legood, A., Buckley, F., Weibel, A. and de Cremer, D. (2019). Trust Motivation: The Self-Regulatory Processes Underlying Trust Decisions, Organizational Psychology Review, 9(2-3), 99-123. DOI : 10.1177/2041386619873616. 

  40. Vance, A., Siponen, M. and Pahnila, S. (2012). Motivating IS Security compliance: Insights from Habit and Protection Motivation Theory, Information & Management, 49(3-4), 190-198. DOI : 10.1016/j.im.2012.04.002. 

  41. Verizon. (2020). Data Breach Investigations Report. https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/dbir. 

  42. West, R. (2008). The Psychology of Security, Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 34-40. DOI : 10.1145/1330311.1330320. 

  43. Wixom, B. H. and Watson, H. J. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success, MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 17-41. DOI : 10.2307/3250957. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로