$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

상태기반정비 요구도 국방규격 반영에 관한 연구
A Study on the Reflection of Condition-Based Maintenance Requirement in the Defense Specification 원문보기

品質經營學會誌 = Journal of Korean society for quality management, v.49 no.3, 2021년, pp.269 - 279  

손민정 (국방기술품질원 개발품질연구센터 지휘정찰개발품질팀) ,  김영길 (국방기술품질원 개발품질연구센터 지휘정찰개발품질팀)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to suggest weapon system specifications for requirements of Condition-Based Maintenance(CBM/CBM+). Methods: The military documents and case studies with regard to condition-based maintenance were reviewed. Representative Korea defense specifications of weapon s...

주제어

표/그림 (7)

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Adhikari PP and Buderath M. 2016. A framework for aircraft maintenance strategy including CBM. Proceedings of European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management 3(1):1-10. 

  2. Choi CH. 2019. A case study on application of R&D quality assuarance to secure high quality for military supplies. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 47(1):151-162. 

  3. DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2017. Korean defense specification: radar set, local air defense. 

  4. DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2020. Korean defense specification: helicopter, utility. 

  5. DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2021. Korean defense specification: gun, air defense artillery, 30mm, wheeled, self-propelled. 

  6. DAPA(Defense Acquisition Program Administration). 2021. Korean defense specification: thermal imaging system. 

  7. DoD(Department of Defense). 2008. Condition Based Maintenance Plus DoD Guidebook. 

  8. DoD(Department of Defense). 2020. Instruction 4151.22 Condition-Based Maintenance Plus for Materiel Maintenance. 

  9. Gang Niu, Yang BS, and Pecht M. 2010. Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 95(7). 786-796. 

  10. Jo G, Cho Y, and Jang J. 2021. An experimental study on CBM+ of trasmission in depot maintenance for missile vehicle system. Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea 47(1):46-62. 

  11. Jung IH, Seo S, and Jang BK. 2017. A case study on the quality control strengthening in development phase of weapon systems. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 45(3):349-364. 

  12. Kilby TS, Rabeno E, and Earvey J. 2011. Enabling condition based maintenance with health and usage monitoring systems. Proceedings of 7th DSTO international conference on Health and Usage Monitoring; 2011 Feb 28 - Mar 2; Melbourne Australia. 

  13. Kim GY, Hwang JK, Im YK, and Ha SW. 2019. Roadmap configuration for technical elements acquisition of military fixed wing aircraft parts PHM and verification of parts selection phase. Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences 47(9):665-677. 

  14. Kim SJ, Choe BH, and Kim W. 2017. Prognostics for Industry 4.0 and its application to fitness-for-service assessment of corroded gas pipelines. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 45(4):649-664. 

  15. Kumar S, Goyal D, Dang RK, Dharni SS, and Mabla BS. 2018. Condition based maintenance of bearing and gears for fault detection-a review. Materials today: Proceedings 5(2):6128-6237. 

  16. MND(Ministry of National Defense). 2021. Directive on defense force development. 

  17. MND(Ministry of National Defense). 2021. Directive on total life cycle management. 

  18. Park YM, Kim BU, Kim SH, and Noh SW. 2019. A study on durability life improvement of blower for military armored vehicle and self-propelled artillery. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 47(3):453-465. 

  19. Powrie H and Novis A. 2006. Gas path debris monitoring for F-35 Joint Striker Fighter propulsion system PHM. Proceedings of aerospace conference IEEE; 2006 Mar 4-11; MT USA. 

  20. Rabeno E and Bounds M. 2009. Condition based maintenance of military ground vehicles. Proceedings of aerospace conference IEEE; 2009 Mar 7-14; MT USA. 

  21. Seo BS, Hwang TW, Jang BC, Song JH, Sohn YH, Lee DG, and Yoon BD. 2019. Introduction of the 4th industrial revolition and seccess stories through PHM technology. Journal of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers 59(1):32-37. 

  22. Seo BW, Yim SO, Choi YH, and Kim BH. 2020. A methodology research on development stage of submarine vessel through QMST/QCG system. Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 48(3):521-534. 

  23. Seo MK and Yun WY. 2019. Condition monitoring and diagnosis of a hot strip roughing mill using an autoencoder 47(1):75-86. 

  24. Seo YH, Kim SR, Kim BK, and Ma PS. 2018. Life prediction of bearing by statistical estimation of state index. Journal of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering 28(3):339-347. 

  25. Serradilla O, Zugasti E, Cernuda C, Aranburu A, Okariz JR, and Zurutuza U. 2020. Interpreting remaining useful life estimations combining explainable artificial intelligence and domain knowledge in industrial machinery. Proceedings of IEEE international conference on Fuzzy Systems;19-42 July 2020; Glasglow UK. 

  26. Shin JK and Jun HB. 2015. On condition based maintenance policy. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 2(2):119-227. 

  27. Teixeira HN, Lopes I, and Braga, AC. 2020. Condition-based maintenance implementation: a literature review. Procedia Manufacturing 51:228-235. 

  28. Tinga T. 2013. Predictive maintenance of military systems based on physical failure models. Chemical Engineering Transactions 33:295-300. 

  29. Vachtsevanos G, Lewis F, Roemer M, Hess A, and Wu B. 2006. Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. 1st ed. Huboken, New Jersey; John Wiley and Sons Inc.. 

  30. Wang Y, Zhao Y, and Addepalli S. 2020. Remaining useful life prediction using deep learning approaches: a review. Procedia Manufacturing 49:81-88. 

  31. Xiang L, Qian D, and Jian-Qiao S. 2018. Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 172:1-11. 

  32. Yu BY, Honda T, Zubair SM, Sharqawy MH, and Yang MC. 2016. A maintenance-focused approach to complex system design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 30(3):263-276. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로