최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기디지털융복합연구 = Journal of digital convergence, v.19 no.9, 2021년, pp.19 - 31
김가영 (국민대학교 경영학) , 정애린 (국민대학교 혁신기업연구센터) , 김도현 (국민대학교 경영학부)
The influence of online platforms has become even more powerful than ever and there has been growing calls to regulate its enormous market power. Issues relating to platform monopolies have been discussed in Korea and recently the Online Platform Intermediary Transactions Fairness Bill has passed th...
World Economic Forum. (2019). Competition Policy in a Globalized, Digitalized Economy. Cologny/Geneva : World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/competition-policy-in-a-globalized-digitalized-economy/
D. S. Hong. (2021). Online platform and fair economy policy - issues of transactions fairness regulation -. Yonsei Law Review, 31(1), 317-352.
K. J. Boudreau, & L. B. Jeppesen, (2015). Unpaid crowd complementors: the platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1761-1777. DOI : 10.1002/smj.2324
M. Y. Park. (2018). Necessity of understanding platform functions for online platform regulation. Distribution Law Review. 5(2), 111-141.
H. S. Son. (2019). Review of the competitive effect of digital platform operators' zero-pricing. Seoul: Korea Fair Trade Mediation Agency
Richard A. Posner. (2001). Antitrust in the new economy. Antitrust Law Journal, 68(3), 925-943.
M. S. Hong. (2006). A study on the comparative analysis and harmony of regulations of tying and bundling. Regulatory Research. 15(1), 157-188.
K. Y. Choi. (2020). Economics of Digital Platforms I : Competition issues in the digital market in the era of big data and AI. Seoul: KISDI.
P. Van Cayseele, & S. Vanormelingen. (2019). Merger analysis in two-sided markets: the Belgian newspaper industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 54(3), 509- 541. DOI : 10.1007/s11151-018-9650-z
C. Farronato, J. Fong, A. & Fradkin. (2020 November). Dog eat dog: measuring network effects using a digital platform merger. Working paper 28047. National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI : 10.3386/w28047
D. Evans & R. Schmalensee. (2013. February). The antitrust analysis of multi-sided platform businesses. Working paper 18783. National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI : 10.3386/w18783
D. O'Connor. (2016). Understanding online platform competition: common misunderstandings (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2760061). Social Science Research Network. DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2760061
R. Dewenter, U. Heimeshoff, & F. Low. (2017). Market Definition of Platform Markets. Working Paper 176/2017. Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ris/vhsuwp/2017_176.html
Y. Park, W. Shin, & M. Kang. (2017). Changes in Market Structure when Introducing Mobile Platforms. Sejong : KIET.
OECD. (2018). Rethinking Antitrust Tools for Multi-Sided Platforms 2018. https://www.oecd.org/competition/rethinking-antitrus t-tools-for-multi-sided-platforms.htm
J. Correia-da-Silva, B. Jullien, Y. Lefouili, & J. Pinho. (2019). Horizontal mergers between multisided platforms: insights from Cournot competition. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 28(1), 109-124. DOI : 10.1111/jems.12309
A. Cosnita-Langlais, B. O. Johansen, & L. Sorgard. (2021). Upward pricing pressure in two-sided markets: incorporating rebalancing effects. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 74. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102692
M. Ivaldi & J. Zhang. (2020). Platform mergers: lessons from a case in the digital TV market. CEPR Discussion Papers 14895, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/124370.html
G. Niels. (2019). Transaction versus non-transaction platforms: a flase dichotomy in two-sided market definition. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 15(2-3), 327-357. DOI : 10.1093/joclec/nhz016
K. Wong-Ervin. (2020). Assessing monopoly power or dominance in platform markets (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3525727). Social Science Research Network. DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.3525727
M. C. Wasastjerna. (2018). The role of big data and digital privacy in merger review. European Competition Journal, 14(2-3), 417-444. DOI : 10.1080/17441056.2018.1533364
E. Argentesi, P. Buccirossi, E. Calvano, T. Duso, A. Marrazzo, & S. Nava. (2019). Merger policy in digital markets: an ex-post assessment. CESifo Working Paper, No. 7985. Munich : Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/214987
A. Gautier, & J. Lamesch. (2020). Mergers in the digital economy. Information Economics and Policy, 100890. DOI : 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100890
E. Deutscher. (2017). How to measure privacy-related consumer harm in merger analysis? a critical reassessment of the EU Commission's merger control in data-driven markets (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3075200). Social Science Research Network. DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.3075200
M. C. Buiten. (2019). Regulating Data Giants: Between Competition Law and Data Protection Law. In: Mathis K., Tor A. (eds) New Developments in Competition Law and Economics. Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, vol 7. Springer, Cham. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-030-11611-8_13
D. S. Tucker, & H. Wellford. (2014. December). Big mistakes regarding big data. The Antitrust Source, 1-12.
D. Cutolo, A. Hargadon, & M. Kenney. (2021. Spring). Competing on Platforms. Issues in New Strategies for the Platform Economic, MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(3). https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/competing-on-platforms/
R. Schmalensee, & D. S. Evans. (2007). Industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy International, 3, 151-179.
D. S. Evans. (2017). Why the dynamics of competition for online platforms leads to sleepless nights but not sleepy monopolies (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3009438). Social Science Research Network. DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.3009438
P. Belleflamme, & M. Peitz. (2019). Platform competition: who benefits from multihoming? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 64, 1-26. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.03.014
B. Jullien, & W. Sand-Zantman. (2020). The economics of platforms: a theory guide for competition policy. Information Economics and Policy, 100880. DOI : 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100880
J. Pohle. (2020). Digital sovereignty. A new key concept of digital policy in Germany and Europe. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.