$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Assessment of the willingness to pay in relation to public value in forests 원문보기

Korean journal of agricultural science, v.48 no.3, 2021년, pp.545 - 555  

Park, Jaehong (Department of Food Economics and Service, Yeungnam University) ,  Kim, Sounghun (Department of Agricultural Economics, Chungnam National University) ,  Hong, Seungjee (Department of Agricultural Economics, Chungnam National University)

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study aimed quantitatively to estimate the recent level of recognition of the public value of forests in Korea, to analyze the factors that affect their value, and to present implications. The average annual payment regarding the public value of forests estimated using the contingent valuation ...

주제어

표/그림 (5)

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Arrow KJ. 1963. Social choice and individual values. John Wiley, New York, USA. 

  2. Fleurbaey M, Abi-Rafehy R, Lee EY. 2016. The use of distributional weights in benefit-cost analysis: Insights from welfare economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10:286-307. 

  3. Han SY, Jo EK, Lee HS, Kim MK, Jeon KM, Kwon JK, Park CY. 2010. Estimating the economic impact of natural recreation forests using reginal input-output model. Korea Forest Service, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean] 

  4. Hill RC, Griffiths WE, Lim GC. 2010. Principles of econometrics 4th edition. John Wiley, New York, USA. 

  5. Hong SJ. 2016. Measuring benefits of providing water for environmental improvement in Daechi-stream and Ji-stream. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:275-287. [in Korean] 

  6. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2019. In-depth analysis of forest resource promotion projects and policy direction reset. KFS, Daejeon, Korea. [in Korean] 

  7. Kim JD, Cho MK. 2005. An economic feasibility analysis of a public project using contingent valuation method. Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy 14:101-134. [in Korean] 

  8. Kim JH, Kim KD, Kim RH, Park CY, Yoon HJ, Lee SW, Choi HT, Kim JJ. 2010. A quantification study about the function of public benefit from forest. National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean] 

  9. Kim SH, Han JH. 2019. Measuring the social effects of the origin labeling of beef in the Korean food service sector. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:323-333. [in Korean] 

  10. KOSTAT (Statistics Korea). 2019. Population projections for Korea (2017~2067). Accessed in http://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/pressReleases/8/8/index.board on 20 March 2021. 

  11. KRICT (Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology). 2018. Social awareness and expert awareness survey on climate change response policies and carbonization technologies. Accessed in http://co2platform.krict.re.kr/document/view/page/3/id/7#u on 2 June 2021. [in Korean] 

  12. Layard R, Glaister S. 1994. Cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 

  13. Louviere JJ. 1988. Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, USA. 

  14. Lynch JG. 1985. Uniqueness issues in the decompositional modelling of multiattribute overall evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research 22:1-19. 

  15. Maddala GS. 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 

  16. Minaputri EFM, Park BJ, Joung DW, Bachtiar R. 2017. Economic assessment of Cibodas botanical garden as environment and human health service-based ecotourism object. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:123-132. 

  17. Min KT. 2011. An analysis of forest cutting age considering the effect of carbon sequestration. Journal of Rural Development 34:43-54. [in Korean] 

  18. Min KT, Seok HD, Choi JY. 2017. Policy tasks to improve the profitability of forest management in Korea. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korea] 

  19. NIFS (National Institute of Forest Science). 2020. The public value of our forests is 221 trillion won. Accessed in https://nifos.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/cop/bbs/selectBoardList.do?bbsIdBBSMSTR_1036&orgIdkfri&mnUKFR_03_03&ctgryLrclsCTGRY150 on 2 June 2021. [in Korean] 

  20. O HS. 1997. Environment economics. Bobmunsa, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean] 

  21. Song HI, Bae HE, Lee EY. 2014. Study on personal information of economic value using CVM. Internet & Security Focus May:22-45. [in Korean] 

  22. Wooldridge JM. 2006. Introductory econometrics. Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio, USA. 

  23. Yoo JC, Kim MO, Kong KS, Yoo BI. 2010. Estimating the non-market value of Korean forest. Journal of Rural Development 33:43-62. [in Korean] 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로