참고문헌 (29)

1. An JA, Lee BH. Reliability of joint angle during sit-to-stand movements in persons with stroke using portable gait analysis system based wearable sensors. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2019;8(3):146-151. 

   원문보기 상세보기

2. Ahn SN, Hwang S. An investigation of factors influencing the participation of stroke survivors in social and leisure activities. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci. 2018;7(2):67-71. 

   원문보기 상세보기

3. Jacobs JM, Cohen A, Hammerman-Rozenberg R, Azoulay D, Maaravi Y, Stessman J. Going outdoors daily predicts long-term functional and health benefits among ambulatory older people. J Aging Health. 2008;20(3):259-272. 

   상세보기

4. de Rooij IJM, van de Port IGL, Visser-Meily JMA, Meijer JWG. Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):89. 

   상세보기

5. Kuntapun J, Silsupadol P, Kamnardsiri T, Lugade V. Smartphone monitoring of gait and balance during irregular surface walking and obstacle crossing. Front Sport Act Living. 2020;2:560-577. 

6. Ho S, Mohtadi A, Daud K, Leonards U, Handy TC. Using smartphone accelerometry to assess the relationship between cognitive load and gait dynamics during outdoor walking. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3119. 

   상세보기

7. Praschiv-lonescu A, Newman CJ, Carcreff L, Gerber CN, Armand S, Aminian K. Locomotion and cadence detection using a single trunk-fixed accelerometer: validity for children with cerebral palsy in daily life-like conditions. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):24. 

   상세보기

8. Storm FA, Buckley CJ, Mazza C. Gait event detection iin laboratory and real life settings: accuracy of ankle and waist sensor based methods. Gait Posture. 2016;50:42-46. 

   상세보기

9. Tamburini P, Storm F, Buckley C, Bisi MC, Stagni R, Mazza C. Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait. Gait Posture. 2018;59:248-252. 

   상세보기

10. Toda H, Maruyama T, Tada M. Indoor vs. outdoor walking: does it make any difference in joint angle depending on road surface? Front Sports Act Living. 2020;2:119. 

    상세보기

11. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther. 1986;66(10):1530-1539. 

    상세보기

12. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the funtional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(10):1314-1319. 

    상세보기

13. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984;64(1):35-40. 

    상세보기

14. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-148. 

    상세보기

15. Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75-82. 

    상세보기

16. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability fro falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896-903. 

    상세보기

17. Andersson AG, Kamwendo K, Seiger A, Appelros P. How to identify potential fallers in a stroke unit: validity indexes of 4 test methods. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(3):186-191. 

    상세보기

18. Watson MJ. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiother. 2002;88(7):386-397. 

    상세보기

19. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12(1):6-9. 

    상세보기

20. Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM, Richards L, Subashan P, et al. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Stroke. 2007;38(7):2096-2100. 

    상세보기

21. Severinsen K, Jakobsen JK, Overgaard K, Andersen H. Normalized muscle strength, aerobic capacity, and walking performance in chronic stroke: a population-based study on the potential for endurance and resistance training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(10):1663-1668. 

    상세보기

22. Hess RJ, Brach JS, Piva SR, VanSwearingen JM. Walking skill can be assessed in older adults: validity of the Figure-of-8 Walk test. Phys Ther. 2010;90(1):89-99. 

    상세보기

23. Wong SST, Yam MS, Ng SSM. The Figure-of-Eight Walk test: reliability and associations with stroke-specific impairments. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1896-1902. 

    상세보기

24. Walker ML, Austin AG, Banke GM, Foxx SR, Gaetano L, Gardner LA, et al. Reference group data for the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2007;87(11):1468-1477. 

    상세보기

25. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Hsu HW, Wu HC, Hsieh CL. Psychometric comparisons of 3 functional ambulation measures for patients with stroke. Stroke. 2010;41(9):2021-2025. 

    상세보기

26. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr So. 2006;54(5):743-749. 

    상세보기

27. Beninato M, Fernandes A, Plummer LS. Minimal clinically important difference of the Funtional Gait Assessment in older adults. Phys Ther. 2014;94(11):1594-1603. 

    상세보기

28. Hirota C, Wantanabe M, Sun W, Tanimoto Y, Kono R, Takasaki K, et al. Association between the trail making test and physical performance in elderly Japanese. Geriati Gerontol Int. 2010;10(1):40-47. 

    상세보기

29. Sun W, Watanabe M, Hirota C, Tanimoto Y, Kono R, Takasaki K. Obstacle-negotiating gait and related physical measurement indicators for the community-dwelling elderly in Japan. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50(3):e41-e45. 

    상세보기