최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국문헌정보학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, v.56 no.4, 2022년, pp.181 - 203
한나은 (한국과학기술정보연구원)
This study analyzed domestic and foreign literature and examined cases of foreign Community of Practice(CoP) of experts to find out what benefits researchers can gain from participating in their CoP, how the CoP was established, and how data is shared within the CoP. In addition, this study discusse...
Framework Act on Science and Technology. Section No18727.
Han, Na-Eun (2022). Building a community of practice of research data curations: a qualitative study. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(3), 119-152.
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2019). Establishment of Research Data Sharing and Dissemination System (K-19-L01-C03).
National Research and Development Innovation Act. Section No18645.
National Research Council of Science and Technology (2019). Research Data Management Guidelines (2019-07).
Seoul National University Research Ethics Guidelines. Seoul National University School Guidelines.
Beagrie, N. & Houghton, J. (2016). The Value and Impact of the European Bioinformatics Institute, 1-96.
Belzowski, N., Ladwig, J. P., & Miller, T. (2013). Crafting identity, collaboration, and relevance for academic librarians using communities of practice. Collaborative Librarianship, 5(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.29087/2013.5.1.04
Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: a resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12(4), 346-362. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.4.346.9703
Cronin, B. (2008). On the epistemic significance of place. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1002-1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20774
Cummings, J. N. & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703-722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705055535
Gannon-Leary, P. & Fontainha, E. (2007). Communities of practice and virtual learning communities: Benefits, barriers and success factors. Barriers and Success Factors. eLearning Papers, 5.
Gusfield, J. R. (1975). Community: A Critical Response. New York: Harper & Row.
Henri, F. & Pudelko, B. (2003). Understanding and analysing activity and learning in virtual communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 474-487. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00051.x
Johnston, L. R., Carlson, J., Hudson-Vitale, C., Imker, H., Kozlowski, W., Olendorf, R., ... & Hull, E. (2018). Data curation network: a cross-institutional staffing model for curating research data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 13(1), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v13i1.616
Kazmer, M. M. (2010). Disengaging from a distributed research project: Refining a model of group departures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(4), 758-771. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21281
Ketelaar, E., McKemmish, S., & Gilliland-Swetland, A. (2005). 'Communities of memory': pluralizing archival research and education agendas. Archives and Manuscripts, 33(1), 146-174.
Kraut, R. E. & Resnick, P. (2012). Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-based Social Design. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lazar, J. & Preece, J. (2002). Social Considerations in Online Communities: Usability, Sociability, and Success factors. London: Psychology Press.
Leimeister, J. M., Sidiras, P., & Krcmar, H. (2004). Success factors of virtual communities from the perspective of members and operators: an empirical study. In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 37), Big Island, Hawaii.
National Science Foundation (2014). Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (nsf 15001).
Ramsey, D. & Beesley, K. B. (2007). ‘Perimeteritis' and rural health in Manitoba, Canada: perspectives from rural healthcare managers. Rural and Remote Health, 7(4), 1-11.
Sanchez-Cardona, I., Sanchez-Lugo, J., & VZlez-Gonzalez, J. (2012). Exploring the potential of communities of practice for learning and collaboration in a higher education context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1820-1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.385.
Tenopir, C., Rice, N. M., Allard, S., Baird, L., Borycz, J., Christian, L., ... & Sandusky, R. J. (2020). Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide. PloS one, 15(3), e0229003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229003
Tolle, K. M., Tansley, D. S. W., & Hey, A. J. (2011). The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery [point of view]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(8), 1334-1337. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2155130
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Massachusetts: Harvard business press.
Woodgate-Jones, A. (2012). The student teacher and the school community of practice: an exploration of the contribution of the legitimate peripheral participant. Educational Review, 64(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.590180
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.