$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

초등교사의 과학학습부진학생 지도경험에 관한 근거이론적 연구
A Study on Elementary School Teachers' Experiences in Teaching Students with Low Achievement in Science based on Grounded Theory 원문보기

초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.41 no.1, 2022년, pp.44 - 64  

강지훈 (달산초등학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 근거이론 분석 방법을 바탕으로 초등교사의 과학학습부진학생 지도경험을 탐색하였다. 과학학습부진학생을 최근 3년 이내에 지도한 경험이 있고, 5년 이상의 현장 경험을 가진 교사 13명을 대상으로 과학학습부진학생 지도경험에 대한 자료가 이론적 포화상태에 도달할 때까지 심층면담과 분석을 진행하였다. 분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 초등교사의 과학학습부진학생 지도경험은 119개의 개념과 41개의 하위범주 및 17개의 범주로 도출하였다. 도출된 범주들을 패러다임 모형에 근거하여 '과학학습부진학생 지도의 어려움'이라는 중심현상을 바탕으로 인과적 조건, 맥락적 조건, 중재적 조건, 작용/상호작용 전략 및 결과로 구조화하여 제시하였다. 둘째, 초등교사의 과학교과 학습부진학생 지도의 핵심범주는 '어려움을 극복하며 과학학습부진학생 지도하기'로 상정하였다. 그리고 핵심범주의 속성과 차원에 따라 과학학습부진학생을 지도하는 교사유형은 '현실타협형', '현실극복형', '현실수용형', '현실갈등형'의 네 유형으로 구분되었다. 셋째, 초등교사의 과학학습부진학생 지도경험을 교사-학교-교육청 차원의 교육공급자 측면과 학생-가정 차원의 교육수요자 측면으로 구분하여 본 연구의 결과를 요약하고 통합할 수 있는 상황모형을 제시하였다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 과학교과 부진학생 지도에 대한 교육적 시사점을 논하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study explored the elementary school teachers' experiences while teaching students with low achievement in science based on the grounded theory. In-depth interviews and analysis were conducted on 13 teachers with experiences in teaching students with low achievement in science within the last t...

주제어

표/그림 (7)

참고문헌 (60)

  1. Baillie, L. (2015). Promoting and evaluating scientific rigour in qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 29(46), 36-42. 

  2. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. 

  3. Byun, C. S. (2020). Elementary teachers' perception on anxiety and depression of students with learning difficulties. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 59(1), 289-308. 

  4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications Ltd. 

  5. Cho, H. R., & Kim, B. C. (2012). A qualitative case study on the operation process of an underachiever's support policies. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 30(4), 73-102. 

  6. Cho, Y., & Kim, D. (2015). Characteristics of schools teaching underachievers well: An application of Concept Mapping. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 23(1), 55-73. 

  7. Clarke, A. E., & Friese, C. (2007). Grounded theorizing using situational analysis. In A. Bryant, & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage. 

  8. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

  9. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 

  10. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. 

  11. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergency VS Forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. 

  12. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. 

  13. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. 

  14. Holahan, G. G., McFarland, J., & Piccillo, B. A. (1994). Elementary school science for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 86-93. 

  15. Hwang, M. Y., & Won, H. Y. (2018). Structural relationship of cognitive processing style, emotional factor, learning strategy of learning maladjustment. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 30(1), 320-331. 

  16. Im, Y. J., Kim, S. H., & Park, J. A. (2021). A study on the improvement of educational support through the analysis of the actual conditions of slow learners in elementary school. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(6), 581-595. 

  17. Kang, S. J., Kwon, J. H., & Yeau, S. H. (1999). The effect of jurisprudental inquiry model-oriented STS program on the gigh school underachievers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 19(2), 248-255. 

  18. Kim, D., Shin, E., Lee, M., & Kim, H. (2011). Academic counselling and educational therapy [학습상담]. Seoul: hakjisa. 

  19. Kim, K., & Hong, Y. S. (2015). Relationships among the science learning motivation and academic stress and stress coping styles of the elementary students with low science achievement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(4), 447-457. 

  20. Kim, M. J., & Lee, K. J. (2001). The effects of STS program related to scientific attitude and scholastic achievement of slow learning high school students. Journal of Science Education, 26, 65-86. 

  21. Kim, S., Kim, K. O., Kim, S. D., Lee, S. D., Im, H. S., & Han, S. M. (2001). Understanding and education of underachievers. Seoul: Hakjisa. 

  22. Kim, S. G. (2011). A review of the application of the grounded theoretical approach in sport pedagogy studies. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(2), 371-390. 

  23. Kim, S. Y., Lee, K. R., Back, N. G., & Park, J. H. (2015). Effects on individually tailored teaching according to types of under-achievement in science. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 907-917. 

  24. Kim, Y. H., Shin, S. S., & Cho, K. S. (2008). Recognition of teachers toward teaching programs and developing supplementary learning programs for the retarded middle school students in science. Journal of Science Education, 33, 81-90. 

  25. Kim, Y. W., Lee, S. H., Ahn, J. A., & Lee, C. S. (2009). A survey on the realities of underachiever's education and teachers' notions. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6(2), 69-99. 

  26. Koh, J., Choi, Y., & Choi, Y. (2006). A model for developing and applying educational programs for the underachieved students. The Journal of Elementary Education Studies, 13(2), 25-42. 

  27. Kuk, M. K., & Jun, M. J. (1999). Comparison of learning strategy characteristics between the lower achievers and the gifted and talented child. Emotional Disturbances & Learning Disabilities, 15(2), 83-99. 

  28. Kwon, C. S., Park, B. T., & Yu. J. S. (2010). An investigation of the background factors for the science underachievers at elementary schools located in Seoul. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(1), 219-232. 

  29. Kwon, H. (2016). Understanding grounded theory. Korean Policy Sciences Review, 20(2), 181-216. 

  30. Lee, D. (2015). The characteristics and future direction of government-funded programs for enhancing basic academic abilities of low achieving students. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(3), 101-132. 

  31. Lee, D., & Kim, Y. (2012). An inquiry on the philosophical backgrounds and methodological characteristics of grounded theory as qualitative research method. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(2), 1-26. 

  32. Lee, D., & Lim, G. (2018). Perceptions and satisfaction of elementary school teachers on current state and supports for students with low achievement. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(4), 151-170. 

  33. Lee, D., & Lim, G. (2019). Opinions of elementary school teachers in Gyeonggi province on a support system for students of low academic achievement. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(1), 449-470. 

  34. Lee, J., & Shin, D. (2013). Characteristics of low achievers' earth science problem solving process. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(3), 425-454. 

  35. Lee, K. H., Han, M. J., Kim, M. J., & Choi, B. S. (2014). Development and intervention effect of customized instructional program for underachievers in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(5), 421-436. 

  36. Lee, M. A., & Park, Y. (2002). Effects of a treatment program by types of underachiever on the science achievement and attitude toward science in junior high school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 750-756. 

  37. Lee, N. M., & Yoon, J. Y. (1990). A study of the characteristics of learning disabilities and the development of a diagnostic test. Korean Educational Development Institute RR 90-12. 

  38. Lim, Y. N. (2013). Research on the elementary school teachers' recognition about the instruction for underachieved students and reinforcing method: Utilizing in-depth interview. The Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 119-147. 

  39. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 

  40. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 Revised national curriculum: science. Seoul, Korea. 

  41. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST). (2009). Supporting plan of academic ability improvement-oriented school. Press release. Seoul, Korea. 

  42. Morse, J., Barret, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spires, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1-14. 

  43. Morse, J. M. (2001). Situating grounded theory within qualitative inquiry. In R. S. Schreiber, & P. N. Stern (Eds.), Using grounded theory in nursing (pp. 1-15). New York: Springer. 

  44. Na, J. (2017). A review on verification strategies for qualitative research : Focusing on member check, peer debrief, and audit trail. Educational Research, 70, 233-254. 

  45. Noh, W. K., Lee, H. W., Oh, S. C., & Kim, H. Y. (2017). Development and utilization of diagnostic questionnaire assessing causes of underachievement. Korean Education Inquiry, 35(3), 23-47. 

  46. Oh, I., Kim, Y., & Yoo, J. (2011). Development and utilization of diagnostic questionnaire assessing characteristics of underachievement. Asian Journal of Education, 12(4), 145-170. 

  47. Oh, S. C., Kim, D. N., Kim, T. E., & Kim, Y. B. (2010). Seeking for the better instruction for low-achievers in schools: Academic coaching and motivation program development. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation RRI 2010-11. 

  48. Park, H. S., & Cho, Y. K. (2004). A Qualitative analysis on support system for students with learning disabilities based on the interviews with their teachers. Korean Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 121-142. 

  49. Park, S. (2017). Grounded theory. In Y. Kim, & H. Lee (Eds.), Qualitative Research: Fifteen Approaches. Seoul: Academy Press. 

  50. Park, S. H., & Lee, J. H. (2008). A Study on the right to education of underachievers and the accountability system for underachievers' basic learning abilities. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 40(1), 29-46. 

  51. Sabatino, D. A. (1976). Learning disabilities handbook: A technical guide to program development. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press. 

  52. Shin, E., & Lee, I. (2010). Effects of the learning coaching program for the elementary underachievers. Asian Journal of Education, 11(4), 145-165. 

  53. Shin, J. I., & Kim, C. K. (2012). A phenomenological study on experiences of attribution in underachiever. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 51(1), 127-152. 

  54. Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2014). The development of intervention program for enhancing elementary science-poor students' basic science process skills: Focus on eye movement analysis. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 795-806. 

  55. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

  56. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 

  57. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 

  58. Sung, B. C. (2009). Developing on educational administration system to get ride of underachievement. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 19(2), 61-78. 

  59. Yi, B. H., & Kim, Y. M. (1984). An investigation of the attitude toward science and scientific attitude for the underachievers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 4(1), 26-33. 

  60. Yi, H. J., Kim, M. J., Lee, D. S., & Sohn, S. H. (2009). Seeking for the better instruction and support for low achievers in schools: A framework for educational policy-making for low achievers [RRI 2009-13]. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로