참고문헌 (86)

1. 야오즈옌, 박지영, 홍태호 (2021). 레스토랑의 온라인 리뷰를 통해 감성과 감정이 리뷰 유용성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 지식경영연구, 22, 243-267. 

   원문보기 상세보기

2. 이민철, 윤현식 (2020). 머신러닝을 활용한 가짜리뷰 탐지 연구: 사용자 행동 분석을 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 21(3), 177-195. 

   원문보기 상세보기

3. 이중원, 박철 (2021). 글로벌 호텔시장에서 온라인 리뷰유용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 다수준 분석. 경영학연구, 50(3), 585-609. 

4. 정희정, 이현애, 정남호, 구철모 (2018). 유용한 온라인 리뷰에서 어느 것이 더 중요한가? 휴리스틱-체계적 모델 관점. 지식경영연구, 19(4), 3-19. 

5. Aghakhani, N., Oh, O., Gregg, D. G., & Karimi, J. (2021). Online review consistency matters: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(5), 1287-1301. 

   상세보기

6. Ahmad, S. N., & Laroche, M. (2015). How do expressed emotions affect the helpfulness of a product review? Evidence from reviews using latent semantic analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(1), 76-111. 

   상세보기

7. Baek, H., Ahn, J., & Choi, Y. (2014). Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers' objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(2), 99-126. 

   상세보기

8. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192-205. 

   상세보기

9. Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the "helpfulness" of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511-521. 

   상세보기

10. Cenfetelli, R. T., & Schwarz, A. (2011). Identifying and testing the inhibitors of technology usage intentions. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 808-823. 

    상세보기

11. Chatterjee, S., Goyal, D., Prakash, A., & Sharma, J. (2021). Exploring healthcare/health-product ecommerce satisfaction: A text mining and machine learning application. Journal of Business Research, 131, 815-825. 

    상세보기

12. Chen, C. C., & Tseng, Y. D. (2011). Quality evaluation of product reviews using an information quality framework. Decision Support Systems, 50(4), 755-768. 

    상세보기

13. Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477-491. 

    상세보기

14. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354. 

    상세보기

15. Chou, Y. C., Chuang, H. H. C., & Liang, T. P. (2022). Elaboration likelihood model, endogenous quality indicators, and online review helpfulness. Decision Support Systems, 153, 113683. 

    상세보기

16. Chua, A. Y., & Banerjee, S. (2015). Understanding review helpfulness as a function of reviewer reputation, review rating, and review depth. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 354-362. 

    상세보기

17. Chung, C., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological functions of function words. Social Communication, 1, 343-359. 

18. Clemons, E. K., Gao, G. G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149-171. 

    상세보기

19. Clore, G. L., & Storbeck, J. (2006). Affect as information about liking, efficacy, and importance. London, UK: Psychology Press. 

20. Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687-693. 

    상세보기

21. Dogan, O., Kem, F. C., & Oztaysi, B. (2022). Fuzzy association rule mining approach to identify e-commerce product association considering sales amount. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8, 1551-1560. 

    상세보기

22. Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales-An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 233-242. 

    상세보기

23. Filieri, R. (2015). What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1261-1270. 

    상세보기

24. Filieri, R. (2016). What makes an online consumer review trustworthy? Annals of Tourism Research, 58, 46-64. 

    상세보기

25. Filieri, R., Hofacker, C. F., & Alguezaui, S. (2018). What makes information in online consumer reviews diagnostic over time? The role of review relevancy, factuality, currency, source credibility and ranking score. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 122-131. 

    상세보기

26. Filieri, R., Raguseo, E., & Vitari, C. (2019). What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 333-341. 

    상세보기

27. Forman, C., Ghose, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2008). Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 291-313. 

    상세보기

28. Fullerton, L. (2017). Online reviews impact purchasing decisions for over 93% of consumers, report suggests. The Drum, Retrieved from https://www.thedrum.com/news/2017/03/27/online-reviews-impact-purchasing-decisions-over-93-consumers-report-suggests 

29. Godes, D., Mayzlin, D., Chen, Y., Das, S., Dellarocas, C., Pfeiffer, B., Libai, B., Sen, S., Shi, M., & Verlegh, P. (2005). The firm's management of social interactions. Marketing Letters, 16(3), 415-428. 

    상세보기

30. Goes, P. B., Lin, M., & Au Yeung, C. M. (2014). "Popularity effect" in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 25(2), 222-238. 

    상세보기

31. Goldsmith, H. H., Scherer, K. R., & Davidson, R. (2003). Handbook of affective sciences. England, UK: Oxford University Press. 

32. Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3-19. 

    상세보기

33. Gundecha, P., & Liu, H. (2012). Mining social media: A brief introduction. New directions in informatics, optimization, Logistics, and Production, 1-17. 

34. Ham, J., Lee, K., Kim, T., & Koo, C. (2019). Subjective perception patterns of online reviews: A comparison of utilitarian and hedonic values. Information Processing & Management, 56(4), 1439-1456. 

    상세보기

35. Hennig-Thurau, T., Wiertz, C., & Feldhaus, F. (2015). Does Twitter matter? The impact of microblogging word of mouth on consumers' adoption of new movies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(3), 375-394. 

    상세보기

36. Hlee, S., Lee, J., Yang, S. B., & Koo, C. (2019). The moderating effect of restaurant type on hedonic versus utilitarian review evaluations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 195-206. 

    상세보기

37. Hong, H., Xu, D., Wang, G. A., & Fan, W. (2017). Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness: A meta-analytic investigation. Decision Support Systems, 102, 1-11. 

    상세보기

38. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press. 

39. Hu, H. F., & Krishen, A. S. (2019). When is enough, enough? Investigating product reviews and information overload from a consumer empowerment perspective. Journal of Business Research, 100, 27-37. 

    상세보기

40. Hu, N., Koh, N. S., & Reddy, S. K. (2014). Ratings lead you to the product, reviews help you clinch it? The mediating role of online review sentiments on product sales. Decision Support Systems, 57, 42-53. 

    상세보기

41. Hu, N., Liu, L., & Zhang, J. J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 201-214. 

    상세보기

42. Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17-27. 

    상세보기

43. Huang, L., Tan, C. H., Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2018). Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(6), 503-522. 

    상세보기

44. Humphreys, A. (2010). Megamarketing: The creation of markets as a social process. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 1-19. 

    상세보기

45. Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 549-571. 

    상세보기

46. Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E., Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39-44. 

    상세보기

47. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(21), 263-292. 

    상세보기

48. Kim, J., & Gupta, P. (2012). Emotional expressions in online user reviews: How they influence consumers' product evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 985-992. 

    상세보기

49. Lee, M., Jeong, M., & Lee, J. (2017). Roles of negative emotions in customers' perceived helpfulness of hotel reviews on a user-generated review website: A text mining approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 762-783. 

    상세보기

50. Lee, S., & Choeh, J. Y. (2016). The determinants of helpfulness of online reviews. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(10), 853-863. 

    상세보기

51. Li, S. T., Pham, T. T., & Chuang, H. C. (2019). Do reviewers' words affect predicting their helpfulness ratings? Locating helpful reviewers by linguistics styles. Information & Management, 56(1), 28-38. 

    상세보기

52. Lim, K. H., Leung, K., Sia, C. L., & Lee, M. K. (2004). Is eCommerce boundary-less? Effects of individualism-collectivism and uncertainty avoidance on Internet shopping. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 545-559. 

    상세보기

53. Liu, A. X., Xie, Y., & Zhang, J. (2019). It's not just what you say, but how you say it: The effect of language style matching on perceived quality of consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 46, 70-86. 

    상세보기

54. Liu, Z., & Park, S. (2015). What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites. Tourism Management, 47, 140-151. 

    상세보기

55. Ludwig, S., De Ruyter, K., Friedman, M., Bruggen, E. C., Wetzels, M., & Pfann, G. (2013). More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 87-103. 

    상세보기

56. Malik, M., & Hussain, A. (2018). An analysis of review content and reviewer variables that contribute to review helpfulness. Information Processing & Management, 54(1), 88-104. 

    상세보기

57. Massey, A. P., Khatri, V., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2007). Usability of online services: The role of technology readiness and context. Decision Sciences, 38(2), 277-308. 

    상세보기

58. McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. D. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(3), 467-472. 

    상세보기

59. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.Com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185-200. 

    상세보기

60. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329. 

    상세보기

61. O'Mahony, M. P., & Smyth, B. (2009). Learning to recommend helpful hotel reviews. Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, NewYork, USA, 305-308. 

62. O'Mahony, M. P., & Smyth, B. (2010). A classification-based review recommender. In Research and development in intelligent systems XXVI (pp. 49-62). Springer. 

63. Otterbacher, J. (2009). 'Helpfulness' in online communities: A measure of message quality. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, USA, 955-964. 

64. Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794-803. 

    상세보기

65. Park, D. H., & Lee, J. (2008). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386-398. 

    상세보기

66. Pennebaker, J. W., & Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognition & Emotion, 10(6), 601-626. 

    상세보기

67. Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. 

68. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547-577. 

    상세보기

69. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169-190. 

    상세보기

70. Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived 'usefulness' of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548-559. 

    상세보기

71. Ren, G., & Hong, T. (2019). Examining the relationship between specific negative emotions and the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. Information Processing & Management, 56(4), 1425-1438. 

    상세보기

72. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296-320. 

    상세보기

73. Salehan, M., & Kim, D. J. (2016). Predicting the performance of online consumer reviews: A sentiment mining approach to big data analytics. Decision Support Systems, 81, 30-40. 

    상세보기

74. Schuckert, M., Liu, X., & Law, R. (2015). Hospitality and tourism online reviews: Recent trends and future directions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 32(5), 608-621. 

    상세보기

75. Srinivasan, S., Rutz, O. J., & Pauwels, K. (2016). Paths to and off purchase: Quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 440-453. 

    상세보기

76. Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54. 

    상세보기

77. Topaloglu, O., & Dass, M. (2021). The impact of online review content and linguistic style matching on new product sales: The moderating role of review helpfulness. Decision Sciences, 52(3), 749-775. 

    상세보기

78. Topaloglu, O., Dass, M., & Kumar, P. (2017). Does who we are affect what we say and when? Investigating the impact of activity and connectivity on microbloggers' response to new products. Journal of Business Research, 77, 23-29. 

    상세보기

79. Wang, X., Tang, L., & Kim, E. (2019). More than words: Do emotional content and linguistic style matching matter on restaurant review helpfulness? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 438-447. 

    상세보기

80. Wang, Y., Wang, J., & Yao, T. (2019). What makes a helpful online review? A meta-analysis of review characteristics. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(2), 257-284. 

    상세보기

81. Weiss, A. M., Lurie, N. H., & MacInnis, D. J. (2008). Listening to strangers: Whose responses are valuable, how valuable are they, and why? Journal of Marketing Research, 45(4), 425-436. 

    상세보기

82. Wu, J. (2017). Review popularity and review helpfulness: A model for user review effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 97, 92-103. 

    상세보기

83. Yang, S., Zhou, C., & Chen, Y. (2021). Do topic consistency and linguistic style similarity affect online review helpfulness? An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Processing & Management, 58(3), 102521. 

    상세보기

84. Yang, S., Zhou, Y., Yao, J., Chen, Y., & Wei, J. (2019). Understanding online review helpfulness in omnichannel retailing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(8), 1565-1580. 

    상세보기

85. Yin, D., Bond, S. D., & Zhang, H. (2014). Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 539-560. 

    상세보기

86. Zhu, L., Yin, G., & He, W. (2014). Is this opinion leader's review useful? Peripheral cues for online review helpfulness. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 267-280.