[논문]멧돼지(Sus scrofa) 서식지 및 이동 특성을 고려한 연결성 모델링 연구

이현정; 김휘문; 김경태; 정승규; 김유진; 이경진; 김호걸; 박찬; 송원경

doi:10.13087/kosert.2022.25.4.33

멧돼지(Sus scrofa) 서식지 및 이동 특성을 고려한 연결성 모델링 연구
A Study on the Connectivity Modeling Considering the Habitat and Movement Characteristics of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) 원문보기

環境復元綠化 = Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, v.25 no.4, 2022년, pp.33 - 47

이현정 (단국대학교 환경원예.조경학과 대학원) , 김휘문 (단국대학교 환경원예.조경학과 대학원) , 김경태 (단국대학교 환경원예.조경학과 대학원) , 정승규 (국립생물자원관 동물자원과) , 김유진 (국립생물자원관 동물자원과) , 이경진 (국립생물자원관 동물자원과) , 김호걸 (청주대학교 휴먼환경디자인학부 조경도시계획전공) , 박찬 (서울시립대학교 조경학과) , 송원경 (단국대학교 환경원예.조경학부)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Wild boars(Sus scrofa) are expanding their range of behavior as their habitats change. Appearing in urban centers and private houses, it caused various social problems, including damage to crops. In order to prevent damage and effectively manage wild boars, there is a need for ecological research considering the characteristics and movement characteristics of wild boars. The purpose of this study is to analyze home range and identify land cover types in key areas through tracking wild boars, and to predict the movement connectivity of wild boars in consideration of previous studies and their preferred land use characteristics. In this study, from January to June 2021, four wild boars were captured and tracked in Jinju city, Gyeongsangnam-do, and the preferred land cover type of wild boars was identified based on the MCP 100%, KDE 95%, and KDE 50% results. As a result of the analysis of the home range for each individual, it was found that 100% of MCP was about 0.68km2, 2.77km2, 2.42km2, and 0.16km2, and the three individuals overlapped the home range, refraining from habitat movement and staying in the preferred area. The core areas were analyzed as about 0.55km2, 2.05km2, 0.82km2, and 0.14km2 with KDE 95%., and about 0.011km2, 0.033km2, 0.004km2, and 0.003km2 with KDE 50%. When the preferred land cover type of wild boar was confirmed based on the results of analysis of the total home range area and core area that combined all individuals, forests were 55.49% (MCP 100%), 54.00% (KDE 95%), 77.69% (KDE 50%), respectively, with the highest ratio, and the urbanization area, grassland, and agricultural area were relatively high. A connectivity scenario was constructed in which the ratio of the land cover type preferred by the analyzed wild boar was reflected as a weight for the resistance value of the connectivity analysis, and this was compared with the connectivity evaluation results analyzed based on previous studies and wild boar characteristics. When the current density values for the wild boar movement data were compared, the average value of the existing scenario was 2.76, the minimum 1.12, and the maximum 4.36, and the weighted scenario had an average value of 2.84, the minimum 0.96, and the maximum 4.65. It was confirmed that, on average, the probability of movement predictability was about 2.90% better even though the weighted scenario had movement restrictions due to large resistance values. It is expected that the identification of the movement route through the movement connectivity analysis of wild boars can be suggested as an alternative to prevent damage by predicting the point of appearance. In the future, when analyzing the connectivity of species including wild boar, it is judged that it will be effective to use movement data on actual species.

주제어

표/그림 (8)

그림 Figure 1. Study area and Analysis area
표 Table 1. Information for 4 Wild boars (Sus scrofa)
표 Table 2. Resistance value by land cover type
표 Table 3. Home range size (km²) of wild boars by individual
그림 Figure 2. Analysis for wild boars (Sus scofa) home range (Dotted line is MCP and Contours represent 95, 50% from outside line, respecitively)
표 Table 4. Area (km²) and ratio (%) for each type of land cover preferred by all wild boars
그림 Figure 3. Current map as a result of connectivity analysis
표 Table 5. Weight calculation and reflection in resistance value

참고문헌 (55)

Acevedo, P. .M. A. Escudero.R. Munoz and C Gortazar. 2006. Factors affecting wild boar abundance across an environmental gradient in Spain. Acta Theriologica, 51(3) : 327-336.

상세보기
Algeo, T. P.D. Slate.R. M. Caron.T. Atwood.S. Recuenco.M. J. Ducey, ... and M. Palace. 2017. Modeling raccoon (Procyon lotor) habitat connectivity to identify potential corridors for rabies spread. Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2(3) : 44.

상세보기
Allwin, B. .R. Swaminathan.A. Mohanraj.G. N. Suhas.S. Vedaminckam.S. Gopal and M. Kumar. 2016. The wild pig (Sus scrofa) behavior-a retrospective study. Journal of Veterinary Science Technology, 7(4).

상세보기
Amici, A. .F. Serrani, F.C. M. Rossi and R. Primi. 2012. Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the "refuge effect". Agronomy for sustainable development, 32(3) : 683-692.

상세보기
Barrios-Garcia, M. N. and S. A. Ballari. 2012. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions, 14(1 ) : 2283-2300.
Cai, J. .Z. Jiang.Y. Zeng.C. Li and B. D. Bravery. 2008. Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54(4) : 723-728.

상세보기
Carroll, K. A. .A. J. Hansen.R. M. Inman.R. L. Lawrence and A. B. Hoegh. 2020. Testing landscape resistance layers and modeling connectivity for wolverines in the western United States. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01125.

상세보기
Caruso, N. .A. E. Valenzuela.C. L. Burdett.E. M. Luengos Vidal.D. Birochio and E. B. Casanave. 2018. Summer habitat use and activity patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa in rangelands of central Argentina. PLoS One, 13(10), e0206513.

상세보기
Choi, TY.YS Lee and CH Park. 2006. Home-range of wild boar, Sus scrofa living in the Jirisan National Park, Korea. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 29(3) : 253-257. (in Korean with English summary)
Desrochers, A., .M. Belisle.J. Morand-Ferron and J. Bourque. 2011. Integrating GIS and homing experiments to study avian movement costs. Landscape Ecology, 26(1) : 47-58.

상세보기
Gortazar, C. .E. Ferroglio.U. Hofle.K. Frolich and J. Vicente. 2007. Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 53(4) : 241-256.

상세보기
Gimenez-Anaya, A. .J. Herrero.C. Rosell.S. Couto and A. Garcia-Ser ano. 2008. Food habits of wild boars (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean coastal wetland. Wetlands, 28(1) : 197-203.

상세보기
Han, SH.JG Oh.IC Cho.MS Ko.TW Kim.MH Chang, ... and HS Oh. 2011. A molecular genetic analysis of the introduced wild boar species (Sus scrofa coreanus) on Mount Halla, Jeju Island, Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 25(5) : 658-665. (in Korean with English summary)
Jinju. 2022. Jinju City Press Release. https://www.jinju.go.kr/00130/02730/00138.web?amodeview&gcode1004&idx39497584&artiSno. (accessed 19. May. 2022)
Ju, DU.K Jung.CS Ohk.SS Kim and GH Ahn. 2020. A survey for prevalence of infectious diseases in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in northern Gyeonggi province, South Korea. Korean Journal of Veterinary Service, 43(3) : 155-159. (in Korean with English summary)

원문보기 상세보기
Keuling, O. .N. Stier, N and M. Roth. 2008. How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.?. European Journal of Wildlife research, 54(4) : 729-737.

상세보기
Keuling, O. .E. Baubet.A. Duscher.C. Ebert.C. Fischer.A. Monaco, ... and H. Thurfjell. 2013. Mortality rates of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in central Europe. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 59(6) : 805-814.

상세보기
Keuling, O. .E. Strauss and U. Siebert. 2016. Regulating wild boar populations is "somebody else's problem"! - Human dimension in wild boar management. Science of the Total Environment, 5 4 : 311-319.
Killian, G. .L. Miller.J. Rhyan and H. Doten. 2006. Immunocontraception of Florida feral swine with a single dose GnRH vaccine. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 5 (5) : 378-384.
Kim, HR.TG Kim.GP Hong.JM Kim and EK Kim. 2017. Home Range analysis of Wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Heuimangbong (peak) of Hallyeohaesang National Park. Journal of National Park Research, 8(3) : 133-137. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim, MK.SI Lee.HM Park and SD Lee. 2020. Ecological Studies of Wild boars(Sus scrofa) in Yeongwol HanbandoWetland Inferred through DNA Analysis of Non-invasive Samples. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 29(3) : 230-238. (in Korean with English summary)

원문보기 상세보기
Kim, SO.KI Kwon.TS Kim.HS Ko and GS Jang. 2014. An analysis on aspects of farm lands damaged by the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Gyeongnam Province, Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 17(6) : 17-27. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim, WM. 1994. An application of radio-telemetry technique for habitat use of boars (Sus scrofa coreanus heude). Ph. D thesis of Korea University, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim WJ.CH Park and WM Kim. 1998. Development of Habitat Suitability Analysis Models for Wild Boar(Sus Scrofa) : A Case Study of Mt. Sulak and Mt. Jumbong, 6(2) : 247-256. (in Korean with English summary)
Ko, CW.WH, Cho.BM, Hwang.DW, Ko.WM, Kang. 2021. The Analysis of African Swine Fever Disease Spread using Agent-Based Model. Journal of the Korean Cadastre Information Association, 23(2) : 87-98. (in Korean with English summary)

상세보기
Koen, E. L. .C. J. Garroway.P. J. Wilson and J. Bowman. 2010. The effect of map boundary on estimates of landscape resistance to animal movement. PloS one, 5(7), e11785.

상세보기
Koen, E. L. .J. Bowman.C. Sadowski and A. A. Walpole. 2014. Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(7) : 626-633.

상세보기
Labudzki, L. .G. Gorecki.J. Skubis and M. Wlazelko. 2009. Forest habitats use by wild boar in the Zielonka Game Investigation Centre. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria, 8(4) : 51-57.
Lee, SM.EJ Lee.HB Park and CW Seo. 2018. Factors affecting Crop Damage by the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) : A case study in Geochang County, Gyeongnam Province, Korea. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 32(2) : 140-146. (in Korean with English summary)

원문보기 상세보기
Lee, SM and WS Lee. 2014. Diet of The Wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Agricultural Land of Geochang, Gyeongnam Province, Korea. Journal of Korean Forest Society, 103(2) : 307-312. (in Korean with English summary)

원문보기 상세보기
Lee, WS. 2014. Habitat Use Characteristics and Development of DamagePrevention Technique in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa). Report to Korea Environmetnal Industry & Technology Institute. (in Korean)
Lewis, J. S. .J. L. Corn.J. J. Mayer.T. R. Jordan.M. L. Farnsworth.C. L. Burdett, ... and R. S. Miller. 2019. Historical, current, and potential population size estimates of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States. Biological Invasions, 21(7) : 2373-2384.

상세보기
Marrotte, R. R. .J. Bowman.M. G. Brown.C. Cordes.K. Y. Morris.M. B. Prentice and P. J. Wilson. 2017. Multi-species genetic connectivity in a terrestrial habitat network. Movement ecology, 5(1) : 1-11.
Massei, G. and P. V. Genov. 2004. The environmental impact of wild boar. Galemys, 16(1) : 135-145.
Massei, G. .J. Kindberg. A. Licoppe.D. Gacic.N. Sprem.J. Kamler, ... and A. Nahlik. 2015. Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest management science, 71(4) : 492-500.

상세보기
McRae, B. H. and V. B. Shah. 2009. Circuitscape User's Guide. ONLINE. The University of California, Santa Barbara.
Melis, C. .P. A. Szafranska.B. Jedrzejewska and K. Barton. 2006. Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia. Journal of biogeography, 3 (5) : 803-811.
Michez, A. .K. Morelle.F. Lehaire.J. Widar.M. Authelet.C. Vermeulen and P. Lejeune. 2016. Use of unmanned aerial system to assess wildlife (Sus scrofa) damage to crops (Zea mays). Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, 4(4) : 266-275.

상세보기
Naidoo, R. .J. W. Kilian.P. Du Preez.P. Beytell.O. Aschenborn.R. D. Taylor and G. Stuart-Hill. 2018. Evaluating the effectiveness of local-and regional-scale wildlife corridors using quantitative metrics of functional connectivity. Biological Conservation, 217 : 96-103.

상세보기
National Institute of Biological Resources. 2012. Final report onvertebrate animals of Korea (2nd stage, 3Year). Research report to National Institute of Biological Resources. (in Korean)
National Institute of Biological Resources. 2015. 2015 Wildlife Survey. Research report to National Institute of Biological Resources. (in Korean)
National Institute of Biological Resources. 2019. Wild boar management I. Research report to National Institute of Biological Resources. (in Korean)
Park, CR and WS Lee. 2003. Development of a GIS-based habitat suitability model for wild boar Sus scrofa in the Mt. Baekwoonsan region, Korea. Mammal Study, 28(1) : 17-21.

상세보기
Pelletier, D. .M. Clark.M. G. Anderson.B. Rayfield.M. A. Wulder and J. A. Cardille. 2014. Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity. PLoS One, 9(1), e84135.

상세보기
Rho, P. 2015. Using habitat suitability model for the wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus) to select wildlife passage sites in extensively disturbed temperate forests. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 38(2) : 163-173.

원문보기 상세보기
Risch, D. R. .J. Ringma and M. R. Price. 2021. The global impact of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) on terrestrial biodiversity. Scientific reports, 11(1) : 1-10.
Saaez-Royuela, C. and J. L. Telleriia. 1986. The increased population of the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe. Mammal Review, 16(2) : 97-101.

상세보기
Schley, L. .M. Dufrene.A. Krier and A. C. Frantz. 2008. Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54(4) : 589-599.

상세보기
Scillitani, L. .A. Monaco and S. Toso. 2010. Do intensive drive hunts affect wild boar (Sus scrofa) spatial behaviour in Italy? Some evidences and management implications. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56(3) : 307-318.

상세보기
Seo, CW and CH Park. 2000. Wild boar(Sus scrofa coreanus Heude) Habitat Modeling Using GIS and Logistic Regression. Journal of GIS Association of Korea, 8(1) : 85-99. (in Korean with English summary)
Song, JH.ED Choi and HJ Seo. 2018. Response of Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) to Two Attractants, and Use of Cage Traps to Capture Wild Boars in Korea. Korean Journal of Organic Agricultue, 26(3) : 381-391. (in Korean with English summary)
Thurfjell, H. .J. P. Ball.P. A. Ahlen.P. Kornacher.H. Dettki and K. Sjoberg. 2009. Habitat use and spatial patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa (L.): agricultural fields and edges. European journal of wildlife research, 55(5) : 517-523.

상세보기
Thurfjell, H. .G. Spong and G. Ericsson. 2013. Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour. Wildlife Biology, 19(1) : 87-93.

상세보기
Wilson, C. J. 2004. Rooting damage to farmland in Dorset, southern England, caused by feral wild boar Sus scrofa. Mammal Review, 34(4) : 331-335.

상세보기
Yoon, EJ.EY Kim.JY Kim and DK Lee. 2019. Connectivity Assessment Based on Circuit Theory for Suggestion of Ecological Corridor. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 28(3) : 275-286. (in Korean with English summary)

원문보기 상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증