[논문]The Effect of the Delivery Format on Teaching Presence, Learning Presence, and Learning Outcomes in Distance Learning of Nursing Students: Synchronous versus Asynchronous Learning

Kim, Min-A; Choi, So-Eun

doi:10.12799/jkachn.2022.33.3.312

The Effect of the Delivery Format on Teaching Presence, Learning Presence, and Learning Outcomes in Distance Learning of Nursing Students: Synchronous versus Asynchronous Learning 원문보기

지역사회간호학회지 = Journal of korean academy of community health nursing, v.33 no.3, 2022년, pp.312 - 320

Kim, Min-A (Department of Nursing, Mokpo Catholic University) , Choi, So-Eun (Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Purpose: This study was performed to explore the effect of the delivery format on teaching presence, learning presence, and learning outcomes in distance learning of nursing students. Methods: A descriptive survey was conducted to understand teaching presence, learning presence, and learning outcomes depending on the delivery format of distance learning. Quota sampling methodology was used to recruit 295 nursing students from all over the country, and data collection was done from July 27 to September 10, 2020. The first delivery format for distance learning was synchronous learning in which communication between the instructor and students occurred simultaneously. The second delivery format was asynchronous learning in which prerecorded videos were provided and communication did not occur simultaneously. Results: In synchronous learning, teaching presence (especially direct facilitation) and learning presence (especially emotional expression) had a statistical significance that was higher than in asynchronous learning. However, in learning outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference. There were significant positive correlations between teaching presence, learning presence, and learning outcomes, and there were significant positive correlations. Conclusion: It can be suggested that learning outcomes can be improved if presence is improved in the distance learning environment based on the results of this study. It is necessary to add contact with nursing students and instructors to improve teaching presence in the asynchronous learning, and it is necessary to help students express their emotions to improve learning presence.

주제어

참고문헌 (30)

Bainbridge WS. Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. 1st ed. Great Barrington, MA U.S.A.: Berkshire Publishing Group; 2004. 520 p.
Han SL, Lee GY. Comparative analysis of instructors' perception of synchronous online classes: A case study of a university. Culture and Convergence. 2020;42(7):395-418. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2020.07.42.7.395

상세보기
Shahabadia MM, Uplaneb M. Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;176(20):129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.453

상세보기
Kim JS, Kang MH. Structural relationship among teaching presence, learning presence, and effectiveness of e-learning in the corporate setting. Asian Journal of Education. 2010;11(2):29-56. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2010.11.2.002
Witmer BG, Singer MJ. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1998;7(3):225-240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686

상세보기
Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education. 2001;15(1):7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

상세보기
Cha MJ. Investigation on how teacher and learner behaviors affect teaching presence in higher education e-learning [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Korea University; 2018. 135 p.
Kang MH, Jung JY, Park MS, Park HJ. Impact of learning presence on learner interaction and outcome in web-based project learning. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices. 2009;2:62-64. https://doi.org/10.3115/1599503.1599524
Garrison DR, Arbaugh JB. Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education. 2007;10(3):157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001

상세보기
Astin AW. Assessment for excellence: the philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. 2nd ed. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing Company; 2012. 367 p.
Kim NY, Joo YJ. The structural relationship among learner motivation, program, organizational support, interaction, flow and learning outcome in cyber education. Journal of Education Technology. 2010;26(2):53-82. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.26.2.53

상세보기
Tan JA, Hal RJ, Boyce C. The role of employee reactions in predicting training effectiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2003;14(4):397-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1076

상세보기
Chung JS, Lim KY. Effect analysis of factors related to the leaner participation, achievement, and satisfaction in the web-based online discussion. Journal of Education Technology. 2000;16(2):107-135.
Muller T. Persistence of woman in online degree-completion programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2008;9(2):1-18. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.455
Agudo-Peregrina AF, Iglesias-Pradas S, Conde-Gonzalez MA, Hernandez-Garcia A. Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relations with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;31:542-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.031

상세보기
Martinez M. High attrition rates in e-Learning: Challenges, predictors, and solutions. The E-Learning Developers' Journal. 2003;14:1-9.
Schoenfeld-Tacher RM, Dorman DC. Effect of delivery format on student outcomes and perceptions of a veterinary medicine course: Synchronous versus asynchronous learning. Veterinary Sciences. 2021;8(2):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8020013

상세보기
Lin Xi, Gao Li. Students' sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 2020;15(1):169-179. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881614
Kang MH, Kim NY, Kim MJ, Kim JY, Lim HJ. A structural relationship among teaching presence, learning presence, and learning outcomes of e-learning in cyber university. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media. 2011;17(2):153-176.
Swan K, Richardson JC, Ice P, Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M, Arbaugh JB. Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor. 2008;2(24):1-12.
Kang MH, Kim JS, Park MS. Investigating presence as a predictor of learning outcomes in e-Learning environments [Internet]. Vienna: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, c2008 [cited 2022 March 1]. Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28965/
Shin NM. Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education. 2003;24(1):69-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303048

상세보기
Gu H. Examination on difference in cognitive presence, achievement and learning satisfaction depending on tutor delivery modes in online lectures [master's thesis]. [Seoul]: Ewha Womans University; 2006. 114 p.
Park HJ, Yu BM. An analysis of the structural relationships among learning presence, learning flow, learning satisfaction, and learning persistence with the use of SNS in university classes. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media. 2014;20(4):649-674. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.20.4.649
Han SL, Nam YO. Faculty competency factor needs analysis to improve the quality of online classes for higher education. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction. 2020; 20(13):1129-1149. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.13.1129

상세보기
Dzubinski LM. Teaching presence: Co-creating a multi-national online learning community in an asynchronous classroom. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 2014;18 (2):150-154. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i2.412
Choi KS. What is the evaluation of Seoul medical students and professors who are satisfied with non-face-to-face classes? Youth doctor. 2020 July 2; Sect. 01. https://www.docdocdoc.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno2000540
Reilly JR, Gallagher-Lepak S, Killion C. "Me and My Computer": Emotional factors in online learning. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2012;33(2):100-105. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-33.2.100

상세보기
Cooke M, Watson B, Blacklock E, Mansah M, Howard M, Johnston A, et al. Lecture capture: First year student nurses' experiences of a web-based lecture technology. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2012;29(3):14-21.
Hart C. Development of a persistence scale for online education in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2014;35(3):150-156. https://doi.org/10.5480/12-993.1

상세보기

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

The Effect of the Delivery Format on Teaching Presence, Learning Presence, and Learning Outcomes in Distance Learning of Nursing Students: Synchronous versus Asynchronous Learning 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (30)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

원문 URL 링크

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

연관된 기능

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트