정보활용교육 주요 토픽과 교원능력개발평가 사서교사 평가지표 비교 연구 Comparative Study of Information Literacy Education and Librarian Teacher Evaluation Index in Teachers' Competency Development Evaluation원문보기
본 연구는 정보활용교육의 주요 토픽과 사서교사 역량 강화를 위해 실시되고 있는 교원능력개발 평가지표의 비교·분석을 통해서 사서교사가 적절한 요소를 통해 평가가 이루어지고 있는지 분석하였다. 이를 위해 1995년부터 2022년 5월까지 문헌정보학 분야 4대 학술지에서 출판된 정보활용교육 관련 논문들을 수집하여 LDA 토픽모델링을 실시하였다. 토픽모델링 결과 20개의 토픽 중 정보활용교육(T10)이 12.0%로 가장 활발하게 논의되고 있음을 알 수 있으며, 도서관 활용수업(T2) 10.4%, 이용자 서비스(T3) 8.8%가 그다음 순으로 나타났다. 반면 독서토론(T7) 3.3%, 독서교육(T19) 2.9%, 인력 관리(T13) 2.1%, 사서교사 직무 만족도(T17) 2.1% 등은 정보활용교육 토픽모델링에서 저조한 토픽들로 나타났다. 또한 학교도서관 사서교사의 수업모형개발(T1)과 교육과정 개발(T20)은 사서교사가 협업수업과 정보활용교육을 진행함에 있어서 필수적으로 수행하는 과정임에도 불구하고 현행 교원능력개발 평가지표에는 고유한 평가지표로 반영되어 있지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이에 본 연구에서는 교원능력개발평가 사서교사 평가지표 '교육 및 수업 지원' 요소에 '수업모형 및 교육과정 개발'을 추가 평가지표로 제안하였다.
본 연구는 정보활용교육의 주요 토픽과 사서교사 역량 강화를 위해 실시되고 있는 교원능력개발 평가지표의 비교·분석을 통해서 사서교사가 적절한 요소를 통해 평가가 이루어지고 있는지 분석하였다. 이를 위해 1995년부터 2022년 5월까지 문헌정보학 분야 4대 학술지에서 출판된 정보활용교육 관련 논문들을 수집하여 LDA 토픽모델링을 실시하였다. 토픽모델링 결과 20개의 토픽 중 정보활용교육(T10)이 12.0%로 가장 활발하게 논의되고 있음을 알 수 있으며, 도서관 활용수업(T2) 10.4%, 이용자 서비스(T3) 8.8%가 그다음 순으로 나타났다. 반면 독서토론(T7) 3.3%, 독서교육(T19) 2.9%, 인력 관리(T13) 2.1%, 사서교사 직무 만족도(T17) 2.1% 등은 정보활용교육 토픽모델링에서 저조한 토픽들로 나타났다. 또한 학교도서관 사서교사의 수업모형개발(T1)과 교육과정 개발(T20)은 사서교사가 협업수업과 정보활용교육을 진행함에 있어서 필수적으로 수행하는 과정임에도 불구하고 현행 교원능력개발 평가지표에는 고유한 평가지표로 반영되어 있지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 이에 본 연구에서는 교원능력개발평가 사서교사 평가지표 '교육 및 수업 지원' 요소에 '수업모형 및 교육과정 개발'을 추가 평가지표로 제안하였다.
This study aimed to compare and analyze librarian teacher evaluation index from evaluation of teachers' competency development with the the topics of information utilization education. To this end, LDA topic modeling was conducted by collecting papers related to information utilization education pub...
This study aimed to compare and analyze librarian teacher evaluation index from evaluation of teachers' competency development with the the topics of information utilization education. To this end, LDA topic modeling was conducted by collecting papers related to information utilization education published in four major journals in the field of literature and information from 1995 to May 2022. As a result of topic modeling, it can be seen that information utilization education (T10) was the most actively discussed at 12.0% of the 20 topics, followed by library utilization classes (T2) 10.4% and user service (T3) 8.8%.On the other hand, 3.3% of reading discussion (T7), 2.9% of reading education (T19), 2.1% of manpower management (T13), and 2.1% of librarian teacher job satisfaction (T17) showed the lowest distributions 3.3%, 2.9%, 2.1%, and 2.1%, respectively. In addition, although librarian teacher's class model development (T1) and curriculum development (T20) are essential processes for collaborative classes and information utilization education, they were not reflected in the current teacher competency development evaluation index. Therefore, this study proposed that 'instructional model and curriculum development' indicator should be added on 'training and support classes' factors in the Librarian Teacher Evaluation Index in Teachers' Competency Development Evaluation for further evaluation.
This study aimed to compare and analyze librarian teacher evaluation index from evaluation of teachers' competency development with the the topics of information utilization education. To this end, LDA topic modeling was conducted by collecting papers related to information utilization education published in four major journals in the field of literature and information from 1995 to May 2022. As a result of topic modeling, it can be seen that information utilization education (T10) was the most actively discussed at 12.0% of the 20 topics, followed by library utilization classes (T2) 10.4% and user service (T3) 8.8%.On the other hand, 3.3% of reading discussion (T7), 2.9% of reading education (T19), 2.1% of manpower management (T13), and 2.1% of librarian teacher job satisfaction (T17) showed the lowest distributions 3.3%, 2.9%, 2.1%, and 2.1%, respectively. In addition, although librarian teacher's class model development (T1) and curriculum development (T20) are essential processes for collaborative classes and information utilization education, they were not reflected in the current teacher competency development evaluation index. Therefore, this study proposed that 'instructional model and curriculum development' indicator should be added on 'training and support classes' factors in the Librarian Teacher Evaluation Index in Teachers' Competency Development Evaluation for further evaluation.
Cho, Eunnuri & Chang, Taiwoo (2020). Patent analysis on 5G technology trends from the perspective of smart factory. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 25(3), 95-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2020.25.3.095
Choi, Jaeho (2010). Teacher competency development evaluation system and teachers' professionalism. Education Gyeongnam, 180 (Spring 2010), 63-66.
Jung, Youngjoo & Kim, Heajin (2020). A study on the school library research trends using topic modeling. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3), 103-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.169 81/kliss.51.3.202009.103
Kang, Insoo (2003). The problems of and some suggestions for teachers' evaluation system in Korea. The Korean Educational Administration Society, 21(4), 1-21.
Kim, Byongju (2003). A study on redesigning of school library facilities, Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 14(2), 141-158.
Kim, Gyuwon & Cho, miah (2014). A study on the effect of discussion-cenred reading education on high school students' personality & sociality. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(2), 207-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.2.207
Kim, Heesop & Kang, Bora (2019). Analysis of fesearch topics among library, archives and museums using topic modeling. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 339-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.4.201912.339
Kim, Jeonghyen, Lee, Byeong ki, Shu, Kyung Un, & Kim, Sung Jun (2010). A study on the improvement of teacher librarians' evaluation indicators in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(3), 133-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.41.3.201009.133
Kim, Mijung & Kim, Heajin (2021). Research trends of curation based on the topic modeling technique. Studies of Korean Science, 47(3), 33-53.
Kim, Sungjun (2008). A study on problems and improvement of teacher librarians' evaluation system in korea, Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4), 421-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.421
Kim, Sungjun (2011). A study on the development of information literacy textbook, school library and information literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(3), 271-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.3.201109.271
Kim, Soojung (2015). Research trends of information literacy instruction in the library and information science field. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3), 207-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.3.207
Kim, Taekyung (2007). A study on the curricular model development for information user instruction in korean library and information science education. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(2), 387-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.2.387
Lee, Byeongki (2005). A study on the model of library assited instruction based on information activities. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 16(1), 45-74.
Lee, Byeongki (2006). A study on the model of library utilization class centered on information activity. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 37(2), 25-46.
Lee, Geumsil, Lee, In-joo & Lee, Young Kyung (2021). A LDA topic modelling analysis of virtual reality research in tourism. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 33(10), 85-105.
Lee, Jaewhoan (2009). Readers' advisory and bibliotherapy in korean library community. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(4), 5-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.4.200912.5
Lee, Soosang (2016). A Study on the application of topic modeling for the book report text. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(4), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.1
Lim, Jeonghoon, Lee, Seungmin, Kang, Bongsuk, & Lee, Byeongki (2021). A study on priority of teacher librarians' competencies using AHP (analytic hierarchy process). Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2), 127-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.2.202106.127.
Ministry of Education (2012). Teacher Competency Development Dvaluation Standard Manual (for Secondary School Teachers).
Ministry of Education (2019, April 1). The Standard Curriculum for Qualification Training for Principals, Vice Principals, Chief Teachers, and Regular Teachers. No. 2019-179.
Park, Jahyun & Song, Min (2013). A study on the research trends in library & information science in Korea using topic modeling. Journal of Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007
Park, Jongdo (2019). A study on issue tracking on multi-cultural studies using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Society, 53(3), 273-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.273
Park, Jihye & Choi, HeeJun (2009). Teacher librarians' perceptions of the importance and performance frequency of their roles inherent in the indicators and items for teacher evaluation. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(4), 93-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.4.200912.93
Park, Joonshik (2011). Information Service Theory. Revision 3rd Edition. Daegu: Keimyung University Press.
Park, Juhyeon & Kang, Bong-Suk (2020). A study on the development of media information literacy concept and educational contents. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3), 223-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.51.3.202009.223
Song, Giho (2010). A study of an instructional design strategy for improving the collaborative teaching between school librarians and subject teachers in library-assisted instruction. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 21(2), 111-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2010.21.2.111
Song, Giho (2019). An analysis of teacher librarians' role recognition. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.4.005
AASL, AECT (1998). Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learneng. Chicago: American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications and Technolgy.
Chang, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., Boyd-Graber, J., & Blei, D. (2009). Reading tea leaves: how humans interpret topic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22.
Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The Information Servie Environment Relationships and Priorities (Washington D. C.: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, NCLIS), p.6. ERIC ED100391.
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.