$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

개별화 맞춤형 수학 학습을 지원하는 AI 기반 플랫폼 분석
AI-Based Educational Platform Analysis Supporting Personalized Mathematics Learning 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, v.36 no.3, 2022년, pp.417 - 438  

김세영 (서강대학교) ,  조미경 (이화여자대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 개별화 맞춤형 수학 학습을 지원하는 AI 기반 플랫폼 활용 시 고려해야 할 교수·학습에 관한 시사점을 제안하는 것이다. 이를 위해 국내·외 공교육에서 활용되고 있는 플랫폼 5개(똑똑!수학탐험대, 노리AI스쿨수학, 칸 아카데미, MATHia, CENTURY)를 분석대상으로 선정하여, AI 기반 수학교육 플랫폼이 개별화 맞춤형 학습을 지원하기 위한 세 가지 요소(PLP, PLN, PLE)를 어떻게 반영하고 있는지를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 각 플랫폼에서 구현하고 있는 PLP, PLN, PLE의 특징은 다양했지만, PLP와 PLN을 바탕으로 학습자가 자율적으로 학습에 대한 의사결정을 내릴 수 있는 PLE를 형성할 수 있도록 설계된 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구의 의의는 AI 기반 수학교육 플랫폼을 활용하는 개별화 맞춤형 수학 학습에 대한 이해도와 실천 가능성을 높였다는 데에서 찾을 수 있다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to suggest implications for mathematics teaching and learning when using AI-based educational platforms that support personalized mathematics learning. To this end, we selected five platforms(Knock-knock! Math Expedition, knowre, Khan Academy, MATHia, CENTURY) and analyz...

주제어

표/그림 (13)

참고문헌 (56)

  1. Joint Ministries (2020). Education Policy Direction and Core Tasks in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID294&lev0&statusYNW&smoe&m020402&opTypeN &boardSeq82674 

  2. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum (Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74 [Attachment 8]). Retrieved from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.index2.do 

  3. Kim, T. E., Kwon, S. K., Park, J., Lee, M., Jo, Y. D., & Lee, K. H. (2020). The process of elementary and middle school underachievers' growth in learning: a longitudinal case study (IV). KICE. 

  4. Kim, H., & Jeong, W. Y. (2021). A Qualitative Study on the Distance Education Class Experiences of Early Childhood Preservice Teachers due to COVID-19. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(2), 485-508. 

  5. Park, M. (2020a). The trends of using artificial intelligence in mathematics education. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(Supplement), 91-102. 

  6. Park, M. (2020b). Applications and possibilities of artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 545-561. 

  7. Part, M., Lim, H., Kim, J., Lee, K., & Kim, M. (2020). The effects on the personalized learning platform with machine learning recommendation modules: Focused on learning time, self-directed learning ability, attitudes toward mathematics, and mathematics achievement. The Mathematical Education, 59(4), 373-387. 

  8. Park, S. I. (2008). Retrospect and prospect of 'individualized learning'. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 20(1), 1-22. 

  9. Park, H. Y., Son, B. E., & Ko, H. K. (2022). Study on the mathematics teaching and learning artificail intelligence platform analysis. Communications of Mathematical Education, 36(1), 1-21. 

  10. Bang, M. (2018). The Educational Implementation of e-Learning System Applying the Theory of Motivation - With Focus on "Interest" and the "Self-Determination Theory". Journal of digital convergence, 16(11), 69-79. 

  11. Bae, Y. J. (2010). A qualitative study on self-directed Learning in cyber space. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 205-223. 

  12. Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education (2019). Artificial Intelligence Based Education for Future. Uhga. 

  13. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2022.03.30.). The Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education signed an agreement on Alef Education business. Retrieved from https://enews.sen.go.kr/news/view.do?bbsSn175745&step13&step21 

  14. Son, T. (2022). Development and application of intelligent tutoring system applying a cognitive diagnosis model: Focused on number and operation area in middle school [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education]. 

  15. Shin, D. (2020a). Artificial intelligence in primary and secondary education: A systemic review. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 30(3), 531-552. 

  16. Shin D. (2020b). Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Perception on the Use of Artificial Intelligence(AI) in Mathematics Education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 215-234. 

  17. Youn, J., Kang, M., & Kim, E. (2013). A relationship among task value, academic self-efficacy, motivation, self-regulated learning and academic procrastination in a college e-learning course. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 16(1), 81-95. 

  18. Lee, J., & Kwon, S. (2021). EduTech's Current Issues, Overcoming Strategies, and Prospects. The Magazine of the IEIE, 48(4), 44-51. 

  19. Lee, J. H., & Huh, N. (2020). Developing adaptive math learning program using artificial intelligence. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 36(2), 273-289. 

  20. Lim, K. Y., Kim, H. J., Choi, J., & Kim, Y. J. (2020). Usability test of learner dashboard: Visualization of multi-dimensional interaction information. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 26(2), 395-424. 

  21. Lim, K., Eun, J., Jung, Y., & Park, H. (2018). Exploratory study on the information design of online dashboard for learner-centered learning. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 21(3), 35-50. 

  22. Lim, K. Y., Lim, J. Y., Kim, Y. J., Jin, M. H., & Park, M. J. (2017). Developing Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Online Dashboard: From HCI Perspective. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 23(4), 861-889. 

  23. Lim, K. Y., Lim, J. Y., & Jin, M. (2021). A systematic literature review of technology-based personalized learning: Research from 2011-2020 in Korea. Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 525-559. 

  24. Yim, M, Kim, H. M., Nam, J., & Hong, O. (2021). Exploring the application of elementary mathematics supporting system using arificial intelligence in teaching and learning. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(2), 251-270. 

  25. Yim, Y., Ahn, S., Kim, K. M., Kim, J. H., & Hong, O. (2021). The effects of an AI-based class support system on student learning: Focusing on the case of Toctoc math expedition in Korea. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 32(4), 61-73. 

  26. Lim, W., & Park, M. (2021). AI-based mathematics education: A review of issues in international research. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(14), 621-635. 

  27. Chang, H., & Nam, J. (2021). The use of artificial intelligence in elementary mathematics education-Focusing on the math class support system 'Knock-knock! math expedition'. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(Supplement), 105-123. 

  28. Chung, Y. K., & Kim, J. (2018). Factors to Disturb Adult Learner's e-Learning Persistence:A Case Study of H-Cyber University in Seoul Korea. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 109-122. 

  29. Jho, H. (2021). The Directions and Challenges of Science Education Based on the Prediction of Future Education and Schools. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 25(1), 61-78. 

  30. Joo, Y. J., Jang, M. J., & Lee, H. J. (2007). An In-depth Analysis of Dropout Factors based on Cyber University Student's Dropout Experiences. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 13(3), 209-233. 

  31. Choi, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Literature Review on Education Using Artificial Intelligence. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 24(3), 11-21. 

  32. Han, S. J., Kim, H. W., & Ko, H. K. (2022). A Case Analysis for Learning Management Systems that support Individual Students' Mathematics Learning. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 38(2), 187-214. 

  33. Heo, G. E., & Lee, D. S. (2021). A Phenomenological Study on Non-Face-to-Face Learning Experience of Elementary School Students. Journal of Education & Culture, 27(4), 495-520. 

  34. Arsarkij, J., & Laohajaratsang, T. (2021). A Design of Personal Learning Network on Social Networking Tools with Gamification for Professional Experience. International J ournal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(18), 53-68. 

  35. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher, 13(6), 4-16. 

  36. Christopoulos, A., Kajasilta, H., Salakoski, T., & Laakso, M. J. (2020). Limits and virtues of educational technology in elementary school mathematics. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 59-81. 

  37. Dabbagh, N., & Castaneda, L. (2020). The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3041-3055. 

  38. Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32. 

  39. Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., & Gasevic, D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 844-875. 

  40. Edson, A. J., & Phillips, E. D. (2021). Connecting a teacher dashboard to a student digital collaborative environment: Supporting teacher enactment of problem-based mathematics curriculum. ZDM- Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1285-1298. 

  41. Harding, A., & Engelbrecht, J. (2015). Personal learning network clusters: A comparison between mathematics and computer science students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 173-184. 

  42. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign. 정제영, 이선복 역. 인공지능 시대의 미래교육. 박영스토리. (원저 출판 2019년) 

  43. Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. 

  44. Ivanova, M. (2009). From personal learning environment building to professional learning network forming. In Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE) (Vol. 5, No. 01, pp. 27-32). Carol I National Defence University Publishing House. 

  45. Kashive, N., Powale, L., & Kashive, K. (2021). Understanding user perception toward artificial intelligence (AI) enabled e-learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(1), 1-19. 

  46. Miller, M. L., & Goldstein, I. P. (1977, August). Structured planning and debugging. In Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2, 773-779. 

  47. Montebello, M. (2021). AI Injected e-Learning:쏟 Future of Online Education. Springer International Publishing. 임유진, 홍유나, 김세영, 김보경 역. 미래의 온라인 교육. AI기반 e-러닝과 개인화 학습. 박영스토리. (원저 출판 2018년) 

  48. Root, W. B., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2021). Towards a modern-day teaching machine: the synthesis of programmed instruction and online education. The Psychological Record, 71(1), 85-94. 

  49. Shin, D. (2021). Teaching mathematics integrating intelligent tutoring systems: Investigating prospective teachers' concerns and TPACK. International J ournal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-18. 

  50. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Appleton-Century-Crofts. 

  51. Sahin, S., & Uluyol, C. (2016). Preservice teachers' perception and use of personal learning environments (PLEs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 141-161. 

  52. The Telegraph (2020. 3. 5.). 'AI teachers' to be offered to British students off school due to coronavirus. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2020/03/05/ai-teachers-offered-british-students-school-due-coronavirus/ 

  53. U. S. Department of Education (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf 

  54. Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2014). Advanced technologies for personalized learning, instruction, and performance. In M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 425-437). 

  55. Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. (2019). Personalizing algebra to students' individual interests in an intelligent tutoring system: Moderators of impact. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(1), 58-88. 

  56. Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Principles for personalized instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: The learner-centered paradigm of education (vol. 4, pp. 93-120). 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로