참고문헌 (62)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy - Toward unifying theory of behavior change. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191 

   

2. Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child development, 74(3), 769-782. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00567 

   상세보기

3. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 

4. Cha, Y., Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2022, May). [럭럭셔리 시장을 이끄는 뉴럭셔리 비즈니스 트렌드 [New luxury business trends leading the luxury market. KPMG Samjong]. Retrieved September 9, 2022, from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/kr/pdf/2022/issue-monitor/kr-im-new-luxury-business-trends-20220520.pdf 

5. Chung, I. G., Sun, Z., & Yoon, S. (2020). A study on the customer's intention to accept the innovative products - Focused on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology(UTAUT), technology readiness index(TRI) and value-based acceptance model(VAM). Journal of Marketing Management Research, 25(4), 89-121. doi:10.37202/KMMR.2020.25.4.89 

   상세보기

6. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy - Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. doi:10.2307/249688 

   상세보기

7. Danziger, P. N. (2018, February 26). 5 Brands that reveal the future of luxury online. Forbes. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2018/02/26/5-brands-thatreveal-the-future-of-luxury-online/?sh1d7a94053c7e 

8. Dash, S., & Saji, K. B. (2008). The role of consumer self-efficacy and website social presence in customers' adoption of B2C online shopping. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 20(2), 33-48. doi:10.1300/J046v20n02_04 

   상세보기

9. DeAcetis, J. (2020, July 9). Digitize or die - Technology makes luxury brands more accessible. Forbes. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/josephdeacetis/2020/07/09/digitize-or-die-technology-makes-luxury-brands-more-accessible/?sh399d859169e5 

10. Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations - Where millennials end and generation z begins. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ 

11. Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x 

    상세보기

12. Faccioli, G., & Sheehan, E. (2021). Global powers of luxury goods 2021 - Breakthrough luxury[PDF]. Deloitte. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/consumerbusiness/articles/gx-cb-global-powers-of-luxury-goods.html 

13. Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018, November 12). 'True gen' - Generation Z and its implications for companies. Mckinsey & Company. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gengeneration-z-and-its-implications-for-companies 

14. 'From the baby boomer to the post-millennial generations - 50 years of change'. (n. d.). Iberdrola. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://www.iberdrola.com/talent/generation-x-y-z 

15. 'Generation Z'. (n. d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Z 

16. Glassman, M., & Kang, M. J. (2012). Intelligence in the internet age - The emergence and evolution of open source intelligence (OSINT). Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 673-682. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.014. 

    상세보기

17. Gunasinghe, A., Abd Hamid, J., Khatibi, A., & Azam, SM. F. (2018). Does the lecturer's innovativeness drive VLE adoption in higher education institutes?. Journal of Information Technology Management, 10(3), 20-42. doi:10.22059/jitm.2019.285648.2382 

    

18. Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2011). Purchase behavior in virtual worlds: -An empirical investigation in second life. Information & Management, 48(7), 303-312. doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.07.004 

    상세보기

19. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling - Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53 - 60. doi: 10.21427/D7CF7R 

    

20. Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C.-M. (2004). Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support System, 38(2), 369-381. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2003.08.001 

    상세보기

21. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis - Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 

    상세보기

22. IGI Global. (2021). What is internet self-efficacy? IGI Global Publisher of Timely Knowledge. Retrieved August 09, 2022, from https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/internet-self-efficacy/37397 

23. Jang, S. (2022). A study on the influence of service and platform attribute, satisfaction and continuance usage intention in OTT - Focus on MZ generation. Journal of Speech, Media and Communication Research, 21(3), 71-114. doi:10.51652/ksmca.2022.21.3.3 

    

24. Jena, R. K. (2022). Exploring antecedents of peoples' intentions to use smart services in a smart city environment - An extended UTAUT model. Journal of Information Systems, 36(1), 133-149. doi:10.2308/ISYS-2020-050 

    상세보기

25. Jeong, D. (2022). A study on consumer behavior on online luxury platforms using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology - Focusing on the extended UTAUT(2) theory. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 24(4), 386-398. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2022.24.4.386 

    원문보기 상세보기

26. Joyce, M. (2013). Development of a general internet attitude scale and internet self-efficacy scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College Cork, Ireland. 

27. Kang, Y. R., & Kim, M. Y. (2022). An exploratory study on the lifestyle characteristics of the MZ generation - A focus on the 2010-2020 studies. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 24(1), 81-94. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2022.24.1.81 

    원문보기 상세보기

28. Kapferer, J. N., & Bastien, V. (2012). The luxury strategy - Break the rules of marketing to build luxury brands. London, UK: Kogan page publishers. 

29. KDI. (2021, December). [온라인 명품 플랫폼으로 보는 소비 트렌드의 변화] Changes in consumption trends as online luxury platforms. Korea Development Institute. Retrieved August 12, 2022, from https://eiec.kdi.re.kr/material/pageoneView.do?idx1501 

30. Kim, Y., & Glassman, M. (2013). Beyond search and communication: Development and validation of the Internet Self-efficacy Scale (ISS). Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1421-1429. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.018 

    상세보기

31. Lee, H. B., & Kwon, N. K. (2006). The role of internet self-efficacy in Internet shopping. Asia Marketing Journal, 8(2), 27-62. UCI:G704-001118.2006.8.2.004 

32. Lee, J. S. (2020). The factors affecting MZ generation's acceptance of YouTube based beauty health information - Focusing on the application of the technology readiness and acceptance model. Journal of Investigative Cosmetology, 16(4), 367-375. doi:10.15810/jic.2020.16.4.007 

    

33. Lee, S. H., & Park, C. W. (2021). A study of the intention to use the key drivers and user acceptance on omnichannel service based on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology(UTAUT). The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 21(2), 1-34. doi:10.37272/JIECR.2021.04.21.2.1 

    상세보기

34. Lian, J. W., & Yen, D. C. (2014). Online shopping drivers and barriers for older adults - Age and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 133-143. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.028 

    상세보기

35. Liljander, V., Gillberg, F., Gummerus, J., & Van Riel, A. (2006). Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of selfservice technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(3), 177-191. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2005.08.004 

    상세보기

36. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-49. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 

    상세보기

37. Meola, A. (2022, January 5). Generation Z news - Latest characteristics, research, and facts. Insider Intelligence. Retrieved August 12, 2022, from https://www.insiderintelligence.com/insights/generation-z-facts/ 

38. 'Millennials'. (n. d.). Wikipedia. Retrieved February 2, 2021, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials 

39. Miltiadou, M., & Yu, C. Y. (2000). Validation of the online technologies self-efficacy scale (OTSES). Retrieved June 2, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228467955_Validation_of_the_online_technologies_self-efficacy_scale_OTSES 

40. Moran, K. (2022, May 29). Why so many luxury brands are terrible at ecommerce. Niel Norman Group. Retrieved September 8, 2022, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/luxury-terrible-ecommerce/ 

41. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index(Tri) - A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. doi:10.1177/109467050024001 

    상세보기

42. Park, H. H. (2019). A study on the consumer use effect of AR fashion retail technology - Moderating effect of technology readiness. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 21(6), 730-742. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2019.21.6.730 

    원문보기 상세보기

43. Park, S., & Yang, J. (2021). 세대별 온라인 소비행태 변화와 시사점 [Changes in online consumption behavior by generation and implications]. Hanaif. Retrieved May 13, 2022, from http://www.hanaif.re.kr/boardDetail.do?hmpeSeqNo34896 

44. Roumeliotis, M., & Maria, T. (2014). Perception and adoption of technology based services by students of higher education. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(3) 1-5. 

45. Song, E. (2021). A study on the perception of fashion platforms and fashion smart factories using big data analysis. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 23(6), 799-809. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2021.23.6.799 

    원문보기 상세보기

46. Statista. (2022, March). Consumer markets - Luxury goods. Statista. Retrieved May 13, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/luxury-goods/worldwide 

47. Statistics Korea. (2020, October 7). 통계로 보는 MZ 세대 트렌드 [Statistics on MZ generation trends]. Statistics Korea. Retrieved August 12, 2022, from https://blog.naver.com/hi_nso/222109361424 

48. Sun, Y., Liu, L., Peng, X. M., Dong, Y., & Barnes, S. J. (2014). Understanding Chinese users' continuance intention toward online social networks - An integrative theoretical model. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 57-66. doi:10.1007/s12525-013-0131-9 

    상세보기

49. Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Wamba, S. F., & Dwivedi, R. (2021). The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2) - A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102269. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269 

    상세보기

50. 'The state of smooth - Unpacking luxury in 2022'. (n. d.). Klarna. Retrieved August 10, 2022, from https://www.klarna.com/assets/sites/2/2022/01/18104911/LuxuryReport_US-2.pdf 

51. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning - The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 43-50. doi:10.1080/1355800032000038822 

    상세보기

52. Tsai, C. C., Chuang, S. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, M. J. (2011). Selfefficacy on internet-based learning environment - A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 222-240. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.14.4.222 

53. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model - Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 

    상세보기

54. Venkatesh, V., Moris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology - Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. doi:10.2307/30036540 

    상세보기

55. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology - Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. doi:10.2307/41410412 

    상세보기

56. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology - A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376. doi:10.17705/1jais.00428 

    상세보기

57. Wang, T., Jung, C. H., Kang, M. H., & Chung, Y. S. (2014). Exploring determinants of adoption intentions towards enterprise 2.0 applications - An empirical study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1048-1064. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2013.781221 

    상세보기

58. Wang, Y. S., & Wang, H. Y.(2008). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring mobile computing self-efficacy. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 11(4), 405-413. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0061 

    상세보기

59. Watanabe, C., Akhtar, W., Tou, Y., & Neittaanmaki, P. (2021). Amazon's new supra-omnichannel - Realizing growing seamless switching for apparel during COVID-19. Technology in Society, 66, 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101645 

    상세보기

60. Xin, T. R., & Yoo, H. J. (2021). Chinese consumers intention to use paid online video services - Focused on E-TAM model. Journal of Human Ecology, 25(1), 1-21. doi:10.36357/johe.2021.25.1.1 

    상세보기

61. Yoo, S. J. (2015). New fashion platform - Technology & connecting. Fashion Information and Technology, 12, 80-88. UCI(KEPA):I410-ECN-0102-2016-590-000704527 

62. Yoo, S. J., Han, S. H., & Huang, W. H. (2012). The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace - A case from south Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 942-950. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.015 

    상세보기