[논문]물리적 녹조 제거 장치의 제거 효율 평가 방안

박별님; 김경미; 조영철

doi:10.14249/eia.2023.32.6.419

[국내논문] 물리적 녹조 제거 장치의 제거 효율 평가 방안
Evaluation Methods for the Removal Efficiency of Physical Algal Removal Devices 원문보기

환경영향평가 = Journal of environmental impact assessment, v.32 no.6, 2023년, pp.419 - 430

박별님 , 김경미 (충북보건환경연구원) , 조영철 (충북대학교 환경공학과)

초록
AI-Helper

국내 상수원에서 주기적으로 발생하는 녹조에 대응하기 위하여 다양한 종류의 녹조제거기술이 개발되어 적용 중이다. 이러한 기술들은 녹조제거 원리가 다르기 때문에 이들의 제거 효율을 비교·평가하기는 어렵다. 본 연구에서는 대청호 서화천 수역에서 이동식 녹조제거장치를 사용하여 제거 작업을 시행한 결과를 활용하여, 녹조제거 효율을 평가할 수 있는 표준화된 방법을 제안하였다. 녹조 제거 작업시 수거된 슬러지의 양, 함수율, 클로로필-a의 농도로부터 작업 구간 중 클로로필-a의 농도 감소량(ΔChl-a)을 계산하였다. 또한 작업 대상 수역의 면적, 일일 최대 작업 면적과 ΔChl-a로부터 대상 수역에서 1 mg/m³의 클로로필-a 농도를 저감하는데 필요한 작업일수(WD)를 계산하였다. 작업 전후 수체에서 클로로필-a의 농도 저감율, 제거 기술의 처리 용량, 작업 대상 수역의 수체 용량으로부터 녹조제거능을 계산하는 방법을 제안하였다. 본 연구에서 사용된 이동식 녹조제거장치의 녹조제거능은 6.64%/day (대청호 서화천 수역 대상, 약 500,000 m²)이었으며, 이는 다른 물리·화학적 녹조제거 기술의 녹조제거능(0.02~4.72%/day)에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 조류제거효율 평가 방법을 활용하여 국내에서 적용되고 있는 녹조제거 기술의 비교 평가가 가능할 것이며, 국립환경과학원이 운영하고 있는 「조류제거시설 설치·운영 및 살포용 조류제거물질 사용지침」에서 물리적 또는 물리·화학적 복합 조류제거기법의 조류제거 성능 및 제거 효율 평가를 판정하는 방법으로 활용이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In response to the periodic occurrence of cyanobacterial blooms in Korean freshwaters, various types of cyanobacteria removal technologies are being developed and implemented. Due to the differing principles behind these technologies, it is difficult to compare and evaluate their removal efficiencies. In this study, a standardized method for evaluating cyanobacteria removal efficiency was proposed by utilizing the results of removal operations using a mobile cyanobacteria removal device in the Seohwacheon area of Daechung Reservoir. During removal operations, the decrease in chlorophyll-a (chl-a) concentration (ΔChl-a) in the working area was calculated based on the amount of collected sludge, the efficiency rate, and the concentration of chl-a. Additionally, the required working days (WD) to reduce the chl-a concentration to 1 mg/m3 in the target area was calculated based on the area of the target zone, the maximum daily working area, and the efficiency rate. A method for calculating the cyanobacteria removal capacity was proposed based on the reduction rate of chl-a concentration in the water before and after the operation, the treatment capacity of the removal technology, and the water volume of the target area. The cyanobacteria removal capacity of the mobile cyanobacteria removal device used in this study was 6.64%/day (targeting the Seohwacheon area of Daechung Reservoir, approximately 500,000 m2), which was higher compared to other physical or physicochemical cyanobacteria removal technologies (0.02~4.72%/day). Utilizing the evaluation method of cyanobacteria removal efficiency presented in this study, it will be possible to compare and evaluate the cyanobacteria removal technologies currently being applied in Korea. This method could also be used to assess the performance and efficiency of physical or physicochemical combined cyanobacteria removal techniques in the "Guidelines for the Installation and Operation of Algae Removal Facilities and the Use of Algae Removal Agents" operated by the National Institute of Environmental Research.

Keyword

표/그림 (7)

그림 Figure 1. Structure of physical algal removal devices. Module 1 (① buoyant, ②main frame); Module 2 (③ algae thickener, ④ transfer hopper); Module 3 (⑤ screen conveyor); Module 4 (⑥ sludge remover); Module 5 (⑦ separator of algae and waste, ⑧ algae collector)
표 Table 1. Amount of collected sludge and water content and chlorophyll-a concentration in sludge
표 Table 2. Change of environmental parameters in operation area according to algal removal operation
그림 Figure 2. Change of chlorophyll-a concentration in operation area according to algal removal operation.
그림 Figure 3. Change of algae (a) and Microcystis (b) concentrations according to algal removal operation.
표 Table 3. Change of microcystins concentrations with time when 30 ppm of polyaluminium chloride was treated
표 Table 4. Removal efficiency and removal capacity of the physico-chemical algal removal technologies

참고문헌 (37)

Ahn C-Y, Lee CS, Choi JW, Lee S, and Oh H-M. 2015. Global occurrence of harmful？cyanobacterial blooms and N, P-limitation？strategy for bloom control. Korean J Environ？Biol. 33: 1-6. [Korean Literature]
Byeon KD, Kim GY, Lee I, Lee S, Park J, Hwang T,？and Joo JC. 2016. Investigation and evaluation？of algae removal technologies applied in？domestic rivers and lakes. J Korean Soc？Environ Eng. 38: 387-394. [Korean Literature]
Camargo JA, Alonso A. 2006. Ecological and？toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen？pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global？assessment. Environ Int. 32: 831-849.
Carmichael WW, Boyer GL. 2016. Health impacts？from cyanobacteria harmful algae blooms:？Implications for the North American Great？Lakes. Harmful Algae. 54: 194-212.

상세보기
Cheong C-J. 2008. Removal of microalgae using？inorganic coagulants in coagulation and？sedimentation processes for water treatment.？J. Korean Soc Environ Eng. 30: 85-89.？[Korean Literature]
Chernova E, Sidelev S, Russkikh I, Korneva L,？Solovyova V, Mineeva N, Stepanova I,？Zhakovskaya Z. 2020. Spatial distribution？of cyanotoxins and ratios of microcystin to？biomass indicators in the reservoirs of the？Volga, Kama and Don Rivers, the European？part of Russia. Limnologica. 84: 125819.

상세보기
Falconer I, Bartram J, Chorus I, Kuiper-Goodman？T, Utkilen H, Burch M, Codd G. 1999.？Safe levels and safe practices, pp. 155-178.？In I Chorus and J Bartram (eds.), Toxic？Cyanobacteria in Water-A Guide to their？Public Health Consequences, Monitoring？and Management, E&FN Spon, London,？UK.
Fastner J, Humpage A. 2021. Hepatotoxic cyclic？peptides-microcystins and nodularins, pp.？21-52. In I Chorus and M Welker (eds.),？Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water-A Guide to？their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring？and Management, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca？Raton, FL, USA.
Funari E, Testai E. 2008. Human health risk？assessment related to cyanotoxins exposure.？Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 38: 97-125.

상세보기
Haddix PL, Hughley CJ, Lechevallier MW. 2007.？Occurrence of microcystins in 33 US water？supplies. Journal-American Water Works？Association 99: 118-125.
Huisman J, Codd GA, Paerl HW, Ibelings BW,？Verspagen JM, Visser PM. 2018. Cyanobacterial？blooms. Nature Reviews Microbiology 16:？471-483.
Ji X, Verspagen JM, Stomp M, Huisman J. 2017.？Competition between cyanobacteria and？green algae at low versus elevated CO 2 :？Who will win, and why? J Exp Bot. 68:？3815-3828.

상세보기
Joo JC, Park JR, Ahn CH, Kim GY, Lee MJ.？2018. Decision-making protocol to select？the optimal algae removal technologies for？water bodies with different characteristics.？The Magazine of the Korean Society of Civil？Engineers 66: 26-31. [Korean Literature]
Kal B-S, Mun H-S, Hong S-H, Park C-D, Min K-O,？Park J-B. 2020. A study on the applicability of？load duration curve for the management of？nonpoint source pollution in Seohwacheon？basin. Journal of the Korean Association of？Geographic Information Studies 23: 174-191.？[Korean Literature]
KEC. 2012. Algae Reduction Technology to Improve？Safety of Aquatic Ecosystem, pp. 135-208.？Korea Environment Corporation, Incheon,？Republic of Korea. [Korean Literature]
Kim D-S, Lee H-K, Maeng S-J, Hwang S-J, Shin J-K. 2003. An evaluation of aquatic environment？in the Okchon stream-embayment watershed,？Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology and？Environment. 36: 181-190. [Korean Literature]
Kim H-B, Park H-K, Shin K, Moon J-S. 2010.？The characteristics of toxin production in？the Korean toxic cyanobacteria. J Korean？Soc Water Environ. 26: 834-840. [Korean？Literature]
Kim S, Chung S, Park H, Cho Y, Lee H. 2019.？Analysis of environmental factors associated？with cyanobacterial dominance after river？weir installation. Water 11: 1163.
Kim S-K, Kim D-K, Kang S, Ahn J, Kim I-H,？Yun S, Lee S, Lee W. 2013. Removal of？algae by natural coagulants of soil origin. J？Korean Soc Environ Eng. 35: 883-888.？[Korean Literature]
Lee CS, Ahn C-Y, La HJ, Lee S, Oh H-M. 2013.？Technical and strategic approach for the？control of cyanobacterial bloom in fresh？waters. Korean J Environ Biol. 31: 233-242. [Korean Literature]
MOE. 2016. Standard Methods for Analysis of？Water Pollution. Ministry of Environment,？Republic of Korea, Sejong, Republic of？Korea. [Korean Literature]
Nazari-Sharabian M, Ahmad S, and Karakouzian？M. 2018. Climate change and eutrophication:？A short review. Engineering, Technology？and Applied Science Research 8: 3668-3672.
Noh S, Park H, Choi H, Lee J. 2014. Effect of？climate change for cyanobacteria growth？pattern in Chudong station of Lake Daechung.？J Korean Soc Water Environ. 30: 377-385.？[Korean Literature]
Oh K-H, Cho Y-C. 2015. Evaluation of contamination？level of the sediments from Chusori and？Chudong areas in Daechung Reservoir. J？Korean Soc Environ Eng. 37: 277-284.？[Korean Literature]
Oh K-H, Han AW, Cho Y-C. 2010. Analysis of？sequence diversity of mcyA gene involved in？microcystin synthesis in Korean reservoirs.？Korean J Microbiol. 46: 162-168. [Korean？Literature]
Oh K-H, Jeong D-H, Yang S-Y, Jeon T-W, Cho？Y-C. 2013. Effects of submerged aerator on？the growth of algae in Daechung Reservoir.？J Korean Soc Environ Eng. 35: 268-275.？[Korean Literature]
Oh Y-T, Park J-C, Kim D-S, Rhyu JK. 2004. Pollutant？characteristics of nonpoint source runoff？in Okcheon stream. J Korean Soc Water？Environ. 20: 657-663. [Korean Literature]
Paerl HW, Tucker CS. 1995. Ecology of blue-green algae in aquaculture ponds. J World？Aquac Soc. 26: 109-131.

상세보기
Park C, Yoon D, Park SH, Park N-S. 2019. An？experimental study for removing algae？particles using a metal mesh membrane.？Desalin Water Treat. 149: 52-57.
Park H-K, Lee H-J, Kim E-K, Jung D-I. 2005.？Characteristics of algal abundance and statistical？analysis of environmental factors in Lake？Paldang. J Korean Soc Water Environ. 21:？584-594. [Korean Literature]
Reynolds CS, Walsby AE. 1975. Water-blooms.？Biol Rev. 50: 437-481.
Shi L, Du X, Liu H, Chen X, Ma Y, Wang R,？Tian Z, Zhang S, Guo H, Zhang H. 2021.？Update on the adverse effects of microcystins？on the liver. Environ Res. 195: 110890.

상세보기
Shin J-K, Kang B-G, Hwang S-J. 2016. Water-blooms (green-tide) dynamics of algae alert？system and rainfall-hydrological effects in？Daecheong Reservoir, Korea. Korean Journal？of Ecology and Environment 49: 153-175.？[Korean Literature]
Shin J-K, Kim H, Kim SW, Chong S-A, Moon？BC, Lee S, Choi JW. 2014. A practical new？technology of removing algal bloom: K-water gate water combine. Korean Journal？of Ecology and Environment 47: 214-218.？[Korean Literature]
Walls JT, Wyatt KH, Doll JC, Rubenstein EM, Rober？AR. 2018. Hot and toxic: Temperature regulates？microcystin release from cyanobacteria. Sci？Total Environ. 610: 786-795.

상세보기
Wert EC, Korak JA, Trenholm RA, Rosario-Ortiz？FL. 2014. Effect of oxidant exposure on the？release of intracellular microcystin, MIB,？and geosmin from three cyanobacteria？species. Water Res. 52: 251-259.
Yang J, Tang H, Zhang X, Zhu X, Huang Y,？Yang Z. 2018. High temperature and pH？favor Microcystis aeruginosa to outcompete？Scenedesmus obliquus. Environ Sci Pollut Res.？25: 4794-4802.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증