최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기인지과학 = Korean journal of cognitive science, v.34 no.4, 2023년, pp.315 - 347
왕상 (서울학교 인지과학협동과정) , 주혜리 (건국대학교 영어영문학과) , 고성룡 (서울대학교 심리학과)
This study aimed to investigate the semantic preview effect in the parafoveal processing of words that are presented in advance in the parafoveal area ahead of the fixation point, benefiting word processing in the fovea. Using the boundary technique in eye-tracking experiments, 25 Chinese-Korean bil...
배성봉, 이광오 (2016). 한자 점화가 한글 표기 한자어 재인에 미치는 효과. 언어과학연구, 79,?139-156
왕 상 (2013). Parafoveal semantic preview effect in reading of Chinese-Korean bilinguals. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
이상은, 주혜리, 고성룡 (2020). 우리글 읽기에서 형태소정보의 미리보기 효과. 인지과학 31(2),?23-54.
이주혜 (2015). 우리글 읽기에서 나타나는 중심와주변부 의미 미리보기 효과. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
코마츠요시타카 (2017). 시선 추적을 통한 일본어 읽기에서 보이는 중심와주변의 의미처리 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
Abbott, M. J., Angele, B., Ahn, Y. D., & Rayner, K. (2015). Skipping syntactically illegal the previews:?The role of predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(6),?1703-1714.
Altarriba, G., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2001). Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish&English bilinguals. Perception &?Psychophysics, 63, 875-890.
Angele, B., Laishley, A. E., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). The effect of high- and low-frequency?previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,?Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1181-1203.
Antunez, M., Mancini, S., Hernandez-Cabrera, J., Hoversten, L., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2021).?Cross-linguistic semantic preview benefit in Basque-Spanish bilingual readers: Evidence from?fixation-related potentials. Brain and Language, 214, 104905.
Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for?subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412.
Balota, D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal?visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364-390.
Bobb, S. C., Von Holzen, K., Mayor, J., Mani, N., & Carreiras, M. (2020). Co-activation of the l2 during?l1 auditory processing: An erp cross-modal priming study. Brain and Language, 203, 104739.
Dimitropoulou, M., Dunabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Two words, one meaning: Evidence of?automatic co-activation of translation equivalents. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 188.
Dodge, R. (1907). An Experimental Study of Visual Fixation. The Psychological Review: Monograph Supplements,?8(4), i-95.
Dunabeitia, J., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Masked Translation Priming Effects With Highly?Proficient Simultaneous Bilinguals. Experimental Psychology, 57(2), 98-107.
Duyck, W., & Warlop, N. (2009). Translation priming between the native language and a second?language: New evidence from Dutch-French bilinguals. Experimental Psychology, 56(3), 173-179.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for Visual Word Recognition and Orthographical?Depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 104-115.
Gerard, L., & Scarborough, D. (1989). Language-Specific Lexical Access of Homographs by Bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 305-315.
Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. (2014). Semantic Preview Benefit During Reading. Journal of Experimental?Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 166-190.
Hutzler, F., Schuster, S., Marx, C., & Hawelka, S. (2019). An investigation of parafoveal masks with the?incremental boundary paradigm. PloS one, 14(2), Article e0203013.
Inhoff, A. (1989). Parafoveal Processing of Words and Saccade Computation During Eye Fixations in?Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 544-555.
Inhoff, W. (1990). Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role of letter and word?units. Acta Psychologica, 73, 281-297.
Kroll, J., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for?Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language,?33(2), 149-174.
Laubrock, J., & Hohenstein, S. (2012). Orthographic consistency and parafoveal preview benefit: A?resource-sharing account of language differences in processing of phonological and semantic codes. The?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 292-293.
Li, S., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred?viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 1146-1156.
Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Martin, M. C. (2010). Inhibitory processes in bilingual language comprehension:?Evidence from spanish-english interlexical homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2),?232-244.
Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899-917.
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading.?Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
Meuter, R., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of?Language Selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 25-40.
Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating?information across saccades in word identification and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human?Perception & Performance, 18, 148-162.
Rayner, K. (1975a). Parafoveal identification during a fixation in reading. Acta Psychologica, 39, 271-282.
Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of?Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211-236.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological?Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye?fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 40(4), 473-483.
Rayner, K., & Juhasz, B. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European?Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 340-352.
Rayner, K., McConkie, G., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive?Psychology, 12(2), 206-226.
Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
Rayner, K., Schotter, E., & Drieghe, D. (2014). Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading?revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1067-1072.
Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe. D., & Liversedge, S.P. (2011). Eye Movements and Word Skipping?During Reading: Effects of Word Length and Predictability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human?Perception and Performance 37(2), 514.
Reichle, E., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in?reading: Comparisons to other models. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(4), 445-476.
Schotter, E. (2013). Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language,?69(4), 619-633.
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K., (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception &?Psychophysics, 74(1), 5-35.
Sohn, M. (1999). The Korean Language, Cambridge University Press
Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information?from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(3), 561-566.
Yang, J., Wang, S., Chen, H., Rayner, K. (2009). The Time Course of Semantic and Syntactic Processing?in Chinese Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Movements. Memory & Cognition, 37,?1164-176.
Yang, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., Rayner, K.(2009) .Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from character n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and?Performance. 35, 1192-1204.
Yang, J. (2013). Preview effects of plausibility and character order in reading Chinese transposed words:?evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 18-34
Zhou, X., & Marslen, W. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese.?Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 579-606.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.