[논문]영국 왕립생물학회의 학교 생명과학교육을 위한 교육과정 분석 연구를 통한 교육적 시사점

심규철

doi:10.14697/jkase.2023.43.1.49

영국 왕립생물학회의 학교 생명과학교육을 위한 교육과정 분석 연구를 통한 교육적 시사점
Educational Implications through Analysis of the School Biology Curriculum of the Royal Society of Biology for School Biology Education in the United Kingdom 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.1, 2023년, pp.49 - 57

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 영국의 학교 생명과학 교육을 위한 왕립생물학회(RSB)의 생명과학 교육과정을 분석하고, 한국의 생명과학 교육에 대한 시사점을 살펴보고자 하였다. 영국 RSB 학교 생명과학 교육과정은 3개의 차원(생명과학의 실천, 생명과학의 개념 및 생명과학의 응용)과 7개의 대질문(big questions)으로 구성된다. 영국 RSB 학교 생명과학교육과정은 5-11세, 11-16세, 16-19세의 연령별로 구성되어 체계화되어 있었다. 생명과학의 실천 차원에서 영국 RSB 학교 생명과학 교육과정은 생명과학 활동이 다른 공동체와 연계, 증거 기반 토론 등을 통해 소통하고 공유되어야 한다고 강조한다. 영국 RSB 학교 생명과학 교육과정의 개념 차원은 5-7세, 7-11세, 11-14세, 14-16세, 16-19세의 학교 수준과 연령을 고려하여 내용을 구체적으로 체계화되어 있었다. 우리나라 국가교육과정 생명과학의 핵심 개념과 비교할 때, 영국 RSB 생명과학 교육과정은 인간의 건강, 생물학적 구조와 기능, 생물학적 성장과 재생산, 생물학적 공존 등의 내용 요소들은 상당한 차이를 보였다. 영국 RSB 학교 생명과학 교육과정의 응용 차원에서는 보건 및 환경복지 증진을 위한 응용 방법 개발, 생명과학 지식의 영향평가 및 응용 등 3가지 주제가 학교 수준이나 연령에 상관없이 모든 학생에게 공통적으로 적용되고 있었다. 영국 RSB 생명과학 교육과정의 내용 체계를 고려하여 볼 때, 우리나라 생명과학 교육과정의 내용 체계를 연령이나 학교 수준은 물론 차원과 대질문을 고려한 연계성 강화를 위한 재구성 방안 연구의 필요성을 시사한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to analyze the school biology curriculum of the Royal Society of Biology (RSB) for school biology education in the United Kingdom (UK), and to examine the implications for Korean school biology education. The RSB school biology curriculum consists of three dimensions (the practices of biology, the concepts of biology, and the application of biology) and seven big questions. The contents of RSB school biology curriculum are structured according to age, 5-11, 11-16, and 16-19. The practices of biology of the UK RSB school biology curriculum emphasize biology activities should be linked to other communities and communicated and shared through evidence-based discussions. The concepts of biology dimension of the UK RSB school biology curriculum systematized the contents to be detailed considering school-level and ages with 5-7, 7-11, 11-14, 14-16, and 16-19 years old. The UK RSB biology curriculum is composed of human health, biological structure and function, biological growth and reproduction, and biological coexistence, showing a significant difference from Korean national curriculum when comparing the content elements with the core concepts of biology. In terms of the application of biology of the RSB school biology curriculum, three themes were commonly applied to all students, regardless of school level or age, such as development of application methods to promote health and environmental welfare, evaluation of the impact and application of biology knowledge. However, the content elements of the three themes were systematized according to the ages of 5-11, 11-16, and 16-19 years old. It is necessary to reorganize the contents of biology curriculum in Korea by referring to the content system of the UK RSB biology curriculum and to research ways to strengthen connectivity according to age or school level as well as dimensions and big questions.

주제어

표/그림 (9)

표 Table 1. Dimensions and big questions of the framework for 5-19 ages school biology, RSB,UK
표 Table 2. Content framework for the biology field of 2015 revision of science national curriculum, Korea
표 Table 3. Content framework for the biology field of 2022 revision of science national curriculum, Korea
표 Table 4. Big questions and theme of the practices of biology dimension of the framework for 5-19 ages school biology
표 Table 5. Comparison of the practices of biology dimension between 2015 & 2022 revision of science national curriculum, Korea and the 5-19 biology curriculum of RSB, UK
표 Table 6. Big questions and theme of the core concepts of biology dimension of the framework for 5-19 ages school biology
표 Table 7. Comparison of the core concepts of biology dimension between 2015 & 2022 revision of science national curriculum, Korea and the 5-19 biology curriculum of RSB, UK
표 Table 8. Big questions and theme of the application of biology dimension of the framework for 5-19 ages school biology
표 Table 9, Learning content of the application of biology dimension of the 5-19 biology curriculum of RSB, UK

참고문헌 (48)

AAAS (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: a tool for curriculum reform.？New York: Oxford University Press.
Australian Curriculum Assessment, and Reporting Authority [ACARA]？(2022). Science: F-10 version 9.0 about the learning area. Retrieved？Aug 31 2022 from https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/learning-areas/science/
California Department of Education (CDoE) (2018). 2016 Science framework？for california public schools - kindergarten through grade twelve. The？California Department of Education, Sacramento, U.S.A.
Choi, S. H., Park, H. Y., & Kim, Y. S. (2015). Changes in the gifted middle？school students' cognitive structures related to the scientific inquiry process as a result of explicit instruction. Biology Education, 43(3),？276-288.
Department for Education, UK. (DfE, UK) (2015). National curriculum in？England: science programmes of study. Department for Education, UK.
Department for Education, UK. (DfE, UK) (2016). DfE strategy 2015-2020:？World class education and care. Department for Education, UK.
Department of Education, U.S. (DoE, U.S.) (2015). Every student succeeds？act(ESSA). Department of Education, U.S.A.
Helin, J. (2021). Transformative competencies - how to define and implement？competencies for SDG target 4.7. Helsingki, Finland: Bridge 47.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2022). Climate Change 2022. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts,？Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to？the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on？Climate Change [H.-O. Portner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S.？Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegria, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S.？Loschke, V. Moller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University？Press.
Jung, U., & Lee, Y. (2018). Content analysis on the curriculum achievement？standards in the software？mathematics？science convergence teaching？and learning material. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer？Education, 21(5), 11-23.
Korea Employment Information Service (KEIS) (2020). Prospects of mid-to long-term manpower supply and demand: 2018-2028 overview[중장기 인력수급 전망: 2018-2028 overview]. Sejong, Korea: Korea？Employment Information Service and Ministry of Employment and？Labor.
Kim, D., & Kim, S. (2017). Understanding and issues on core competency？and competency-based curriculum in higher education. The Journal of？Core Competency Education Research, 2(1), 23-45.
Kim, H., Kang, N., Kim, M., Maeng, S., Park, J., Baek, Y., Son, J., Shim,？K., Oh, P., Lee, K., Jeong, E., & Han, I. (2017). Basic Research for？Next Generation Science Education Standards (Research Rep.). Seoul:？Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
Kim, S., & Jun, Y. (2020). Development and application of experiential？learning program for high school STEAM convergence class. Journal？of Field-based Lesson Studies, 1(1), 119-143.
Kwak, Y. (2012). Research on ways to improve science teaching methods？to develop students' key competencies. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 32(5), 855-865.
Kwak, Y., Son, J, Kim, M., & Ku, J. (2014). Research on ways to improve？science curriculum focused on key competencies and creative fusion？education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？34(3), 321-330.
Lim, Y. (2016). A study on the ways of presenting key competencies in？the 2015 revised national curriculum and the implications from the？scotland's 'Curriculum for ex-cellence'. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(5), 143-167.
Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Smit, S., Ellingrud, K., Meaney, M.,？& Robinson, O. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19 (Research？Rep.). McKinsey Global Institute.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015). 2015 revised national curriculum -？Science [2015 개정 교육과정 -과학]. MOE Notice No. 2015-74 [A？separate volume 9].
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2020). After COVID-19, for the future？education transformation, Top 10 Policy Tasks (Draft) [코로나 이후,？미래교육 전환을 위한 10대 정책과제(안)]. Sejong: Ministry of？Education.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021). Key point of a general guideline of？2022 revised national curriculum [2022 개정 교육과정 총론 주요 사항]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2022). 2022 revised national curriculum [2022？개정 교육과정]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MOSIFP) (2017). Mid - to？long-term comprehensive measures for the intelligence society in？response to the fourth industrial revolution (Research Rep.). Gwacheon,？Gyeonggi: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning.
National Research Council, U.S. (NRC, U.S.) (2012). A Framework for K12？Science Education - Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas.？Washington, D.C., USA: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by？states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OECD (2016). E2030 conceptual framework: key competencies for 2030？(DeSeCo 2.0). OECD.
OECD (2018) The future we want. the future of education and skills:？education 2030. OECD.
OECD (2019a). OECD future of education and skills 2030 : learning compass 2030. OECD.
OECD (2019b). OECD future of education and skills 2030 : transformative？competencies 2030. OECD.
Pratt, H. (2013). The NSTA Reader's Guide to the Next Generation Science？Standards. Arlingtion, USA: NSTA Press.
Royal Society, UK (2008). A 'state of the nation' report 2008: Science and？mathematics education, 14-19. London, UK: The Royal Society.
Royal Society of Biology, UK (RSB, UK) (2019). Biology changing the？world: Royal Society of Biology strategic plan 2019-2021. London,？UK: The Royal Society of Biology.
Royal Society of Biology, UK (RSB, UK) (2021). Evolving 5-19 biology:？recommendations and framework for 5-19 biology curricula. London,？UK: The Royal Society of Biology.
Royal Society Science Policy Centre, UK (RSSPC, UK) (2014). Vision for？science and mathematics education. London, UK: The Royal Society.
School of Science and Technology, Singapore (SST, Singapore) (2017).？Shaping future innovations, the SST way. School of Science and？Technology, Singapore.
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Colony/ Geneva:？World Economic Forum.
Seol, Y. (2020). Transformational competency-based education according to？future-oriented educational design plans. Korean Journal of General？Education, 14(3), 25-38.
Shim, K. C., Han, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Trends in international？researches of biology/science education focused on science competency？research. Biology Education, 46(1), 111-118.
Shim, K. C., Kang, Y. S., Shin, J. B., & Kim, H. S. (2004). An analysis？of learning contents in the life science textbooks under the 7th？curriculum: on the unit of stimuli and response. Biology Education,？32(2), 114-123.
Shim, K. C., Son, J., Lee, B. W., Lee, Y. J., and Han, H. J. (2021). A？study on the mid to long Term development plan for gifted science？academies and science high school [영재학교？과학고 중장기 발전방안 연구]. (Research Rep.). Ministry of Education and Korea Education？Development Institute.
Smit, S., Tache, T., Lund, S., Manyika, J., & Thiel, L. (2020). The future？of work in Europe - Automation, workforce transitions, and the shifting？geography of employment. McKinsey Global Institute.
Song, J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J., Min, B., Park, S.,？Bae, S., Son, Y., Son, J., Oh, P., Lee, J., Im, H., Jeong, D., Joung,？Y., & Jeong, J. (2018). Development of Science Education Standards？for Next Generation [미래세대를 위한 과학교육표준 개발] (Research？Rep.). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and？Creativity.
Song, S. C., & Shim, K. C. (2018). Analysis of science key competencies？in inquiry activity of integrated science textbooks. Biology Education,？46(2), 222-236.
UBS (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and？investment implications of the fourth industrial revolution. UBS White？Paper for the World Economic Forum, Annual Meeting 2016.
UNESCO (2016). Global monitoring of target 4.7, themes in national？curriculum frameworks, background paper prepared for the 2016 global？education monitoring report. IBE-UNESCO.
UNESCO (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public？action. UNESCO.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2022). State of the global？climate 2021. (Report WMO-No. 1290) Switzerland: World？Meteorological Organization.
WPP, & Kantar (2019). BrandZ TM Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2019. (Report) WPP and Kantar.

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증