$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

메타리터러시 연구동향 분석 - 정보 리터러시와의 차이를 중심으로 -
Metaliteracy Research Trends Analysis: Focused on the Difference from Information Literacy 원문보기

한국문헌정보학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, v.57 no.2, 2023년, pp.97 - 122  

홍소람 (광주대학교 문헌정보학과) ,  장우권 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

메타리터러시는 정보 리터러시의 재구조화된 결과물이다. 메타리러러시는 포스트모더니즘, 사회적 구성주의, 메타인지의 도입을 통해 정보 리터러시와 구분되었다. 그러나 메타리터러시 연구들이 이 개념적 차이를 반영하고 있는지는 검토되지 않았다. 따라서 이 연구의 목적은 메타리터러시 이론을 연구한 학술논문들에서 이 개념적 차이를 어떻게 반영하고 있는지 연구동향을 관찰하는 것이다. 이 연구는 문헌연구를 실시하고, 메타리터러시 연구 80편을 대상으로 빈도분석 및 지식 네트워크 분석(동시출현·서지결합)을 실시하였다. 결과는 다음과 같다. 동시출현분석 결과, 메타인지(빈도 1위)와 더불어 스킬(연결중심성 1위, 근접중심성 1위, 매개중심성 1위)로 나타났다. 메타리터러시는 스킬 기반의 정보 리터러시를 비판하기 때문에 이 결과는 정보 리터러시와 메타리터러시 개념이 혼재되어 있음을 시사한다. 한편 서지결합분석 결과, 서지결합도가 높은 논문은 정보 리터러시와 메타리터러시의 차이를 메타인지를 통해 설명하고 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Metaliteracy is a new framework that reframes information literacy. Metaliteracy is distinguished from information literacy through the intruduction of postmodernism, social constructivism and metacognition. However it has been not examined whether metaliteracy studies reflect the conceptual differe...

주제어

#메타리터러시   #정보 리터러시   #메타인지  

표/그림 (12)

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Choi, Jae-Hwang (2016). Considering core ideas of ACRL information literacy 'framework(2015)'.？Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(3), 171-191.？https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.171 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  2. Kim, Bongje (2018). Analysis of trends in Character Education research through a systematic？review of the literature: focusing on network text analysis and multidimensional scaling.？Journal of Moral & Ethics Education, 59, 185-213.？https://doi.org/10.18338/kojmee.2018..59.185 

    상세보기 crossref

  3. Kim, Hyeyoun (2017). Research trends in collaborative writing: a systematic review. Writing？Research, 34, 7-49. https://doi.org/10.31565/korrow.2017..34.001 

    상세보기 crossref

  4. Ko, Youngman (2010). Information Literacy. Seoul: Korean Library Association. 

  5. Kwahk, Kee-Young (2016). Social Network Analysis (Second Edition). Seoul: CrBooks. 

  6. Lee, Soosang (2012). Network Analysis Methodology. Seoul: Nonhyung. 

  7. Park, Jinseo & Hong, Ahjeong (2021). Analysis of the role of cultural intermediaries to activate？civic engagement. Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(3), 171-197.？http://doi.org/10.52758/kjle.2021.27.3.171 

    상세보기 crossref

  8. Suh, Jinwon (2009). A comparative study on the constructivism and the structuralism as the？educational methods. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(4),？81-92. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.4.200912.81 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  9. Yoo, Sarah (2018). A diagnostic analysis of LIS curriculum from the meta-literacy perspective.？Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 191-220.？https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.2.191 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  10. Yoon, Woolahm & Chang, Juyoung (2022). A review of domestic creativity researches in design:？a systematic literature review. The Korean Society of Science & Art, 40(2), 255-267.？https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2022.03.30.255 

    상세보기 crossref

  11. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). Information Literacy Competence Standards？for Higher Education. American Library Association. Available:？http://hdl.handle.net/11213/7668 

  12. Association of College and Research Libraries (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for？Higher Education. American Library Association. Available:？https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework 

  13. Beheshti, J., Bilal, D., Mackey, T. P., Limberg, L., Bartlett, J. C., Gwizdka, J., Jacobson, T. E.,？& Ishimura, Y. (2016). Information literacy: bridging the gap between theory and practice.？Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-6.？https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301019 

    상세보기 crossref

  14. Delello, J. A. & McWhorter, R. R. (2017). Reducing the digital divide: connecting older adults？to iPad technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 3-28.？https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815589985 

    상세보기 crossref

  15. ERIC Thesaurus (1966). Skills. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?qtskill&tiSkills 

  16. Evans, D. L., Bailey, S. G., Thumser, A. E., Trinder, S. L., Winstone, N. E., & Bailey, I. G.？(2020). The biochemical literacy framework: inviting pedagogical innovation in higher？education. Febs Open Bio, 10(9), 1720-1736. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12938 

    상세보기 crossref

  17. Fulkerson, D. M., Ariew, S, A., & Jacobson, T. E. (2017). Revisiting metacognition and metaliteracy？in the ACRL framework. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(1), 21-41.？https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.45 

    crossref

  18. George, R. & Luke, R. (1996). The critical place of information literacy in the trend towards？flexible delivery in higher education contexts. Australian Academic & Research Libraries,？27(3), 204-212. 

    상세보기

  19. Giddens, A. & Sutton, P. W. (2017). Essential Concepts in Sociology (2nd edition). 김봉석 옮김？(2018). 사회학의 핵심 개념들 (개정증보판). 파주: 동녘. 

  20. Goodsett, M. (2020a). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information？literacy online learning objects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102163.？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Goodsett, M. (2020b). Assessing the potential for critical thinking instruction in information literacy？online learning objects using best practices. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2),？227-254. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.4 

    상세보기 crossref

  22. Hartman, H. J. ed. (2002). Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and？Practice. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

  23. Hill, M., Salvaggio, M., Vinnedge, J., & Darden, A. (2020). Implementation and evaluation of？a self-directed learning activity for first-year medical students. Medical Education Online,？25(1), 1717780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1717780 

    상세보기 crossref

  24. Ingraham, B., Levy, P., & McKenna, C. (2007). Academic literacy in the 21st century. In Conole,？G. & Oliver, M. eds. Contemporary Perspectives in E-learning Research: Themes, Methods？and Impact on Practice. London, England: Routledge, 160-173. 

  25. Jacobson, T. & Mackey, T. (2013). Proposing a metaliteracy model to redefine information？literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 7(2), 84-91.？https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.2.138 

    crossref

  26. Kent, A., Lancour, H., & Narsi, W. Z. (2000). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science？(67). New York: Marcel Dekker. 

  27. Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. (2012). Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy.？Human IT, 11(2), 93-130. Available: https://humanit.hb.se/article/view/69 

  28. Lloyd, A. (2006). Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture. Journal of Documentation？62(5), 570-583. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610688723 

    상세보기 crossref

  29. Lotherington, H. (2004). Emergent meta literacies: what the Xbox has to offer the EQAO.？Linguistics and Education, 14, 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2004.02.007 

    상세보기 crossref

  30. Ma, J., Li, C., & Liang, H. N. (2019). Enhancing students' blended learning experience through？embedding metaliteracy. Education Research International, 2019, 6791058.？https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6791058 

    상세보기 crossref

  31. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2010, June 23). Re-conceptualizing information literacy as？a metaliteracy for social media. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on？Conceptions of Library and Information Science. London, England. Available:？https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:909868/FULLTEXT01.pdf 

  32. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy.？College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1 

    crossref

  33. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information Literacy to？Empower Learners. Cichago: Neal-Schuman. 

  34. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2019). Metaliterate Learning for the Post-Truth World.？Chicago: Neal-Schuman. 

  35. Mackey, T. P. (2020). Embedding metaliteracy in the design of a post-truth MOOC: building？communities of trust. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2), 346-361.？https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.9 

    상세보기 crossref

  36. Nierenberg, E. & Dahl, T. I. (2021). Is information literacy ability, and metacognition of that？ability, related to interest, gender, or education level? a cross-sectional study of higher？education students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(1).？https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211058907 

    상세보기 crossref

  37. O'Brien, K. L., Forte, M., Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2017). Metaliteracy as pedagogical？framework for learner-centered design in three MOOC platforms. Open Praxis, 9(3), 267-286.？Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.126417468022349 

    crossref

  38. O'Connell, J. (2012). Learning without frontiers: school libraries and meta-literacy in action. Access,？26(1), 4-7. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.038168567341804 

    crossref

  39. Odede, I. R. (2018). A comparative analysis of information literacy self-efficacy skills of postgraduate？students in library schools in South-South, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1917.？Available:？http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1917?utm_sourcedigitalcommons.unl.edu%2Flibphilprac%2F1917&utm_mediumPDF&utm_campaignPDFCoverPages 

  40. Onyancha, O. B. (2020). Knowledge visualization and mapping of information literacy, 1975-2018.？IFLA Journal, 46(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220906536 

    상세보기 crossref

  41. Petrucco, C. & Ferranti, C. (2017). Developing critical thinking in online search. Journal of？E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3), 35-45. Available:https://www.learntechlib.org/p/180979/ 

  42. Pinto, M., Pulgarin, A., & Escalona, M. I. (2014). Viewing information literacy concepts: a？comparison of two branches of knowledge. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2311-2329.？https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1166-6 

    상세보기 crossref

  43. Pinto, Maria., Fernandez-Pascual, R., Caballero-Mariscal, D., Sales, D, Guerrero, D., & Uribe, A.？(2019). Scientific production on mobile information literacy in higher education: a bibliometric？analysis (2006-2017). Scientometrics, 120(1), 57-85.？https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03115-x 

    상세보기 crossref

  44. Raish, V. & Rimland, E. (2016). Employer perceptions of critical information literacy skills and？digital badges. College & Research Libraries, 77(1), 87-113.？https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.1.87 

    crossref

  45. Schirato, T. & Webb, J. (2003). Bourdieu's concept of reflexivity as metaliteracy. Cultural Studies,？17(3/4), 539-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238032000083935 

    상세보기 crossref

  46. Stopar, K. & Bartol, T. (2019). Digital competences, computer skills and information literacy in？secondary education: mapping and visualization of trends and concepts. Scientometrics,？118(2), 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2990-5 

    상세보기 crossref

  47. Stordy, P. H. (2011). Taxonomy of literacies. Journal of Documentation, 71(3), 456-476.？https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2013-0128 

    상세보기 crossref

  48. Yu, C. & Zhao, C. G. (2021). Continuing the dialogue between writing experts and academic？librarians: A conceptual model of information-based academic writing in higher education.？The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6), 102454.？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102454 

    상세보기 crossref

  49. Zimmerman, M. S. & Ni, C. (2021). What we talk about when we talk about information literacy.？IFLA Journal, 47(4), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035221989367 

    상세보기 crossref

  50. Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities.？Washington, D. C. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. Available:？https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로