[논문]폐수 처리 위한 습지의 연구 환경 매핑: 서지학적 분석 및 종합 검토

최혜선; 전민수; 김이형

doi:10.17663/jwr.2023.25.2.145

[국내논문] 폐수 처리 위한 습지의 연구 환경 매핑: 서지학적 분석 및 종합 검토
Mapping the Research Landscape of Wastewater Treatment Wetlands: A Bibliometric Analysis and Comprehensive Review 원문보기

한국습지학회지 = Journal of wetlands research, v.25 no.2, 2023년, pp.145 - 158

(공주대학교 스마트인프라공학과) , (공주대학교 스마트인프라공학과) , 최혜선 (공주대학교 스마트인프라공학과) , 전민수 (공주대학교 스마트인프라공학과) , 김이형 (공주대학교 스마트인프라공학과)

초록
AI-Helper

인공습지(CW)는 도시 폐수처리를 위한 효과적인 기술로, 물리-화학적 및 생물학적 자연처리과정을 통해 오염 물질이 제거된다. 본 연구는 서지학적 분석 방법을 통하여 인공습지의 현재까지의 연구 진행 상황과 향후 연구 동향을 조사하였다. 인공습지를 통한 페수 처리 성능 평가 분석을 위하여 최근 출판된 논문(오픈 액세스 학술지 포함) 100편을 기반으로 종합적 분석 및 검토를 수행하였다. 분석 결과, 스페인, 중국, 이탈리아, 미국이 논문 출판수가 두드러지는 것으로 나타났다. 논문에서 가장 많이 사용된 핵심용어는 수질(n=19), 식물 정화(n=13), 강우유출수(n=11), 인(n=11) 순으로 나타났으며, 수질개선과 영양염류 제거에 대한 인공습지의 효율성 관련 연구가 폭넓게 연구되고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 검토된 다양한 유형의 인공습지 중 Hybrid 형태의 인공습지가 TSS(95.67%) 및BOD(88.67%)으로 오염물질 저감효율이 가장 높은 것으로 나타났으며, VSSF, HSSF는 TSS 제거(83.25% 및 78.83%)에 가장 효과적인 것으로 조사되었다. VSSF 습지는 가장 높은 COD 제거 효율(71.82%)을 보였다. 일반적으로 인공습지에서 물리적 처리(예: 침전, 여과, 흡착)와 생물학적 메커니즘(예: 생분해)은 TSS, BOD, COD 제거 효율에 영향을 미치기 때문이다. Hybrid 형태의 인공습지는 호기성 및 혐기성 조건, 다양한 식생 유형, 다양한 매체 구성 등의 다양한 인자와 여러 처리 과정을 통해 미생물 활성도 증가 및 질소 처리를 통해 TN(60.78%)의 높은 저감효과를 보였다. FWS 형태의 인공습지는 퇴적물에 결합된 인을 침전 및 식물의 흡수를 통해 높은TP 제거효율(54.50%)로 나타났습니다. 일반적으로 인공습지에는 식물 정화 능력이 뛰어난 Phragmites, Cyperus, Iris 및 Typha 이 적용되고 있다. 본 연구는 향후 도시 지역에서 발생되는 폐수 처리를 위한 지속 가능한 대안으로 제시 가능할 것으로 사료된다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Constructed wetlands (CWs) are effective technologies for urban wastewater management, utilizing natural physico-chemical and biological processes to remove pollutants. This study employed a bibliometric analysis approach to investigate the progress and future research trends in the field of CWs. A comprehensive review of 100 most-recently published and open-access articles was performed to analyze the performance of CWs in treating wastewater. Spain, China, Italy, and the United States were among the most productive countries in terms of the number of published papers. The most frequently used keywords in publications include water quality (n=19), phytoremediation (n=13), stormwater (n=11), and phosphorus (n=11), suggesting that the efficiency of CWs in improving water quality and removal of nutrients were widely investigated. Among the different types of CWs reviewed, hybrid CWs exhibited the highest removal efficiencies for BOD (88.67%) and TSS (95.67%), whereas VSSF, and HSSF systems also showed high TSS removal efficiencies (83.25%, and 78.83% respectively). VSSF wetland displayed the highest COD removal efficiency (71.82%). Generally, physical processes (e.g., sedimentation, filtration, adsorption) and biological mechanisms (i.e., biodegradation) contributed to the high removal efficiency of TSS, BOD, and COD in CW systems. The hybrid CW system demonstrated highest TN removal efficiency (60.78%) by integrating multiple treatment processes, including aerobic and anaerobic conditions, various vegetation types, and different media configurations, which enhanced microbial activity and allowed for comprehensive nitrogen compound removal. The FWS system showed the highest TP removal efficiency (54.50%) due to combined process of settling sediment-bound phosphorus and plant uptake. Phragmites, Cyperus, Iris, and Typha were commonly used in CWs due to their superior phytoremediation capabilities. The study emphasized the potential of CWs as sustainable alternatives for wastewater management, particularly in urban areas.

Keyword

표/그림 (9)

표 Table 1. Data and input parameters used in the science mapping software
그림 Fig. 1. Trend in annual publication of documents and cumulative citations.
그림 Fig 2. Subject areas contributing to research on constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment
그림 Fig. 3. Contingency matrix showing the relationship of (a) keywords and year of publication; and (b) keywords and country.
그림 Fig. 4. Keyword-co-occurrence-visualization map used in scientific articles
그림 Fig. 5. Influent and effluent pollutant concentrations in different types of CWs
그림 Fig. 6. Efficiency of different types of constructed wetlands in treating various pollutants
그림 Fig. 7. CWs facility sizes and pollutant removal efficiency
그림 Fig. 8. Plants commonly used in CWs for wastewater treatment

참고문헌 (43)

Acero-Oliete, A., Lopez-Julian, P. L., Russo, B., &？Ruiz-Lozano, O. (2022). Comparative Efficiency of Two？Different Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment of Small Populations in Mediterranean Continental？Climate. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116511.

상세보기
Al-Snafi, A. E. (2015). The Constituents and Biological Effects？of Arundo donax - A Review. International Journal of？Phytopharmacy Research.
Avila, C., Pelissari, C., Sezerino, P. H., Sgroi, M., Roccaro,？P., & Garcia, J. (2017). Enhancement of total nitrogen？removal through effluent recirculation and fate of PPCPs？in a hybrid constructed wetland system treating urban？wastewater. Science of the Total Environment, 584-585.？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.024.

상세보기
Babatunde, A. O., Zhao, Y. Q., Burke, A. M., Morris, M.？A., & Hanrahan, J. P. (2009). Characterization of？aluminium-based water treatment residual for potential？phosphorus removal in engineered wetlands. Environmental？Pollution, 157(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.04.016.

상세보기
Bansal, S., Lishawa, S. C., Newman, S., Tangen, B. A., Wilcox,？D., Albert, D., Anteau, M. J., Chimney, M. J., Cressey,？R. L., DeKeyser, E., Elgersma, K. J., Finkelstein, S. A.,？Freeland, J., Grosshans, R., Klug, P. E., Larkin, D. J.,？Lawrence, B. A., Linz, G., Marburger, J., ... Windham-Myers, L. (2019). Typha (Cattail) Invasion in North？American Wetlands: Biology, Regional Problems,？Impacts, Ecosystem Services, and Management. In？Wetlands (Vol. 39, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01174-7.

상세보기
Breucker P., Cointet J., Hannud Abdo A., Orsal G., de？Quatrebarbes C., Duong T., Martinez C., Ospina Delgado？J.P., Medina Zuluaga L.D., Gomez Pena D.F., Sanchez？Castano T.A., Marques da Costa J., Laglil H., Villard？L., Barbier M. (2016). CorTexT Manager (version v2).？URL: https://docs.cortext.net
Brix, H. (1997). Do macrophytes play a role in constructed？treatment wetlands? Water Science and Technology,？35(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00047-4

상세보기
Brix, H. (2003). Plants used in constructed wetlands and their？functions. 1st International Seminar on the Use of Aquatic？Macrophites for Wastewater Treatment in Constructed？Wetlands.
Chou, C. H. (2009). Miscanthus plants used as an alternative？biofuel material: The basic studies on ecology and？molecular evolution. Renewable Energy, 34(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.12.027

상세보기
Dierberg, F. E., Juston, J. J., DeBusk, T. A., Pietro, K., &？Gu, B. (2005). Relationship between hydraulic efficiency？and phosphorus removal in a submerged aquatic？vegetation-dominated treatment wetland. Ecological？Engineering, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.12.018

상세보기
Fernandez-Fernandez, M. I., de la Vega, P. T. M.,？Jaramillo-Moran, M. A., & Garrido, M. (2020). Hybrid？constructed wetland to improve organic matter and？nutrient removal. Water (Switzerland), 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12072023

상세보기
Garcia-Avila, F., Patino-Chavez, J., Zhinin-Chimbo, F.,？Donoso-Moscoso, S., Flores del Pino, L., & Aviles-Anazco, A. (2019). Performance of Phragmites Australis？and Cyperus Papyrus in the treatment of municipal？wastewater by vertical flow subsurface constructed？wetlands. International Soil and Water Conservation？Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.04.001

상세보기
Garcia-Herrero, L., Lavrnic, S., Guerrieri V. Toscano, A.,？Milani, M., & Cirelli, G. L., & Vittuari, M. (2022).？Cost-benefit of green infrastructures for water？management: A sustainability assessment of full-scale？constructed wetlands in Northern and Southern Italy.？Ecological Engineering, 185, 106797.
Gorgoglione, A., & Torretta, V. (2018). Sustainable？management and successful application of constructed？wetlands: A critical review. In Sustainability (Switzerland).？https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113910

상세보기
Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar,？Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and？cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2).？https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9

상세보기
Hassan, I., Chowdhury, S. R., Prihartato, P. K., & Razzak,？S. A. (2021). Wastewater treatment using constructed？wetland: Current trends and future potential. Processes,？9(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111917

상세보기
Hechmi, N., Aissa, N. Ben, Abdenaceur, H., & Jedidi, N.？(2014). Evaluating the phytoremediation potential of？Phragmites australis grown in pentachlorophenol and？cadmium co-contaminated soils. Environmental Science？and Pollution Research, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1997-y

상세보기
Herrera-Melian, J. A., Mendoza-Aguiar, M., AlonsoGuedes, R., Garcia-Jimenez, P., Carrasco-Acosta, M.,？& Ranieri, E. (2020). Multistage horizontal subsurface？flow vs. hybrid constructed wetlands for the treatment？of raw urban wastewater. Sustainability (Switzerland),？12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125102

상세보기
Hernandez, M. E., Galindo-Zetina, M., & Juan Carlos, H.？H. (2018). Greenhouse gas emissions and pollutant？removal in treatment wetlands with ornamental plants？under subtropical conditions. Ecological Engineering,？114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.001

상세보기
Ibrahim, H. M. S., Barco, A., & Borin, M. (2017). D1 -？Plant species used in floating treatments wetlands: A？decade of experiments in North Italy. 12th Annual SWS？European Chapter Meeting.
Kadlec, R. H., & Wallace, S. D. (2009). Treatment Wetlands,？Second Edition. In Treatment Wetlands, Second Edition.
Kotsia, D., Deligianni, A., Fyllas, N. M., Stasinakis, A. S.,？& Fountoulakis, M. S. (2020). Converting treatment？wetlands into "treatment gardens": Use of ornamental？plants for greywater treatment. Science of the Total？Environment, 744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140889

상세보기
Lakho, F. H., Le, H. Q., Mattheeuws, F., Igodt, W., Depuydt,？V., Desloover, J., Rousseau, D. P. L., & van Hulle, S.？W. H. (2021). Decentralized grey and black water reuse？by combining a vertical flow constructed wetland and？membrane based potable water system: Full scale？demonstration. Journal of Environmental Chemical？Engineering, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104688

상세보기
Meena, A. K., Rao, M. M., Singh, A., & Kumari, S. (2010).？Physicochemical and preliminary phytochemical studies？on the rhizome of Acorus calamus Linn. International？Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Mohamed, A. Y. A., Siggins, A., Healy, M. G., O hUallachain,？D., Fenton, O., & Tuohy, P. (2022). A novel hybrid？coagulation-constructed wetland system for the？treatment of dairy wastewater. Science of the Total？Environment, 847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157567

상세보기
Morandi, C., Schreiner, G., Moosmann, P., & Steinmetz, H.？(2021). Elevated vertical-flow constructed wetlands for？light greywater treatment. Water (Switzerland), 13(18).？https://doi.org/10.3390/w13182510

상세보기
Perbangkhem, T., & Polprasert, C. (2010). Biomass production？of papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) in constructed wetland？treating low-strength domestic wastewater. Bioresource？Technology, 101(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.062

상세보기
Pranckute, R. (2021). Web of science (Wos) and Scopus:？The titans of bibliographic information in today's？academic world. In Publications. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Rai, U. N., Tripathi, R. D., Singh, N. K., Upadhyay, A. K.,？Dwivedi, S., Shukla, M. K., Mallick, S., Singh, S. N.,？& Nautiyal, C. S. (2013). Constructed wetland as an？ecotechnological tool for pollution treatment for？conservation of Ganga river. Bioresource Technology,？148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.005

상세보기
Resende, J. D., Nolasco, M. A., & Pacca, S. A. (2019). Life？cycle assessment and costing of wastewater treatment？systems coupled to constructed wetlands. Resources,？Conservation and Recycling, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.034

상세보기
Reyes, N. J. D. G., Geronimo, F. K. F., Guerra, H. B., &？Kim, L. H. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis and Comprehensive Review of Stormwater Treatment Wetlands:？Global Research Trends and Existing Knowledge Gaps.？In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 15, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032332

상세보기
Saleem, H., Arslan, M., Rehman, K., Tahseen, R., & Afzal,？M. (2019). Phragmites australis - a helophytic grass？- can establish successful partnership with phenol-degrading bacteria in a floating treatment wetland. Saudi？Journal of Biological Sciences, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.01.014

상세보기
Schnabel, B., Wright, S., Miller, R., Bryant, L. D., Kjeldsen,？T. R., Maconachie, R., Gbanie, S. P., Bangura, K. S.,？& Kamara, A. J. (2022). Urban surface water quality？and the potential of phytoremediation to improve water？quality in peri-urban and urban areas in sub-Saharan？Africa - a review. Water Supply, 22(11), 8372-8404.？https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.352

상세보기
Sun, Y., Tang, K., Song, H., Jiang, D., Chen, S., Tu, W.,？Cai, L., Huang, H., & Zhang, F. (2022). The Effect of？Domestic Sewage Treatment on Islands Using Ecological？Treatment Processes: A Case Study of Haimen Island,？Fujian Province. International Journal of Environmental？Research and Public Health, 19(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315440

상세보기
Syranidou, E., Christofilopoulos, S., & Kalogerakis, N. (2017).？Juncus spp.-The helophyte for all (phyto)remediation？purposes? In New Biotechnology (Vol. 38). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.12.005

상세보기
UN-Habitat; WHO. Progress on Wastewater Treatment:？Global Status and Acceleration Needs for SDG Indicator？6.3.1; United Nations Human Settlements Programme？(UN-Habitat) and World Health Organization (WHO):？Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
Vymazal, J. (2013). The use of hybrid constructed wetlands？for wastewater treatment with special attention to nitrogen？removal: A review of a recent development. In Water？Research (Vol. 47, Issue 14). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.029

상세보기
Vymazal, J., & Kropfelova, L. (2015). Wastewater Treatment？in Constructed Wetlands with Horizontal Sub-Surface？Flow. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 1542).
Vymazal, J. (2022). The Historical Development of？Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. In Land？(Vol. 11, Issue 2). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020174

상세보기
Wang, Q., & Waltman, L. (2016). Large-scale analysis of？the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web？of Science and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2).？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.003

상세보기
Wu, H., Zhang, J., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W., Hu, Z., Liang,？S., Fan, J., & Liu, H. (2015). A review on the sustainability？of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Design？and operation. In Bioresource Technology (Vol. 175).？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.068

상세보기
Zhang, L., Wang, X. C., Dzakpasu, M., Cao, T., Zhang,？H., Liu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Integrated environmental？influences quantification of pilot-scale constructed？wetlands based on modified ecological footprint？assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 843.？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157039

상세보기
Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: the？use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers.？Scientometrics, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

상세보기

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증