[논문]PET-CT Normalization, Well Counter Correction에 따른 팬텀을 이용한 영상 평가

이충운; 유연욱; 문종운; 김윤철

PET-CT Normalization, Well Counter Correction에 따른 팬텀을 이용한 영상 평가
Evaluation of Image for Phantom according to Normalization, Well Counter Correction in PET-CT 원문보기

핵의학기술 = The Korean journal of nuclear medicine technology, v.27 no.1, 2023년, pp.47 - 54

이충운 (국립암센터 핵의학과) , 유연욱 (국립암센터 핵의학과) , 문종운 (국립암센터 핵의학과) , 김윤철 (국립암센터 핵의학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Purpose PET-CT imaging require an appropriate quality assurance system to achieve high efficiency and reliability. Quality control is essential for improving the quality of care and patient safety. Currently, there are performance evaluation methods of UN2-1994 and UN2-2001 proposed by NEMA and IEC for PET-CT image evaluation. In this study, we compare phantom images with the same experiments before and after PET-CT 3D normalization and well counter correction and evaluate the usefulness of quality control. Materials and methods Discovery 690 (General Electric Healthcare, USA) PET-CT equiptment was used to perform 3D normalization and well counter correction as recommended by GE Healthcare. Based on the recovery coefficients for the six spheres of the NEMA IEC Body Phantom recommended by the EARL. 20kBq/㎖ of 18F was injected into the sphere of the phantom and 2kBq/㎖ of 18F was injected into the body of phantom. PET-CT scan was performed with a radioacitivity ratio of 10:1. Images were reconstructed by appliying TOF+PSF+TOF, OSEM+PSF, OSEM and Gaussian filter 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6,5 mm with matrix size 128×128, slice thickness 3.75 mm, iteration 2, subset 16 conditions. The PET image was attenuation corrected using the CT images and analyzed using software program AW 4.7 (General Electric Healthcare, USA). The ROI was set to fit 6 spheres in the CT image, RC (Recovery Coefficient) was measured after fusion of PET and CT. Statistical analysis was performed wilcoxon signed rank test using R. Results Overall, after the quality control items were performed, the recovery coefficient of the phantom image increased and measured. Recovery coefficient according to the image reconstruction increased in the order TOF+PSF, TOF, OSEM+PSF, before and after quality control, RCmax increased by OSEM 0.13, OSEM+PSF 0.16, TOF 0.16, TOF+PSF 0.15 and RCmean increased by OSEM 0.09, OSEM+PSF 0.09, TOF 0.106, TOF+PSF 0.10. Both groups showed a statistically significant difference in Wilcoxon signed rank test results (P value<0.001). Conclusion PET-CT system require quality assurance to achieve high efficiency and reliability. Standardized intervals and procedures should be followed for quality control. We hope that this study will be a good opportunity to think about the importance of quality control in PET-CT

주제어

참고문헌 (17)

Lee MC. Current status and future perspective of？PET. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;36(1):1-7.？
Ko CS. Nuclear Medicine. 3rd ed. Korea med？publish; 2008. p. 81, p. 106？
AAPM publication. AAPM report no.126. PET-CT？acceptance testing and quality assurance.
General Electric Healthcare. Technical publication:？Discovery TM PET-CT 600 series user manual？5400906-1KO. Milwaukee, General Electric？company. 2019？
Korea Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist.？Guidelines for PET and PET-CT quality control？items and measurement methods. 2009？
National Electrical Manufacturers Association？NEMA standard publication NU 2-1994.？Performance measurements of positron emission tomography. National Electrical Manufacturers？Association. 1994？
National Electrical Manufacturers Association？NEMA standard publication NU 2-2001.？Performance measurements of positron emission tomography. National Electrical Manufacturers？Association. 2001？
Lee BI. Quality assurance and performance？evaluation of PET-CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging.？2008;42(2):137-44.？
Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M,？Gianolli L, Gilardi MC. Physical performance of？the new hybrid PET-CT Discovery-690. Med？Phys. 2011;38(10):394-411.？
Boellaard R, O'Doherty MJ, Weber WA,？Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et？al. FDG PET and PET-CT: EANM procedure？guidelines for tumor PET imaging: version 1.0.？Eur J Nucl Med. 2010;37:181.？
National Electrical Manufactures Association. Standards publication NU-2: Performance？measurements of positron emission tomographys. Rosslynm VA. 2007？
International Eletrotechnical Comission.？Characteristics and test conditions Part1:？Positron emission tomographys. Genevam？Switzerland. 1998？
Kaalep A, Burggraaff CN, Pieplenbosch S,？Verwer EE, Sera T, Zijlstra J, et al. Quantitative？implications of the updated EARL 2019 PET-CT？performance standards. EJNMMI Physics. 2019;6:28.？

상세보기
EARL PET-CT accreditation user manual？Version 3.3. 2021？
Sokole EB, Plachcinska A, Britten A,？Georgosopoulou ML, Tindale W, Klett R.？Routine quality control recommendations for？nuclear medicine instrumentation. EJNMMI.？2010;37:662-71.？
General Electric Healthcare. Technical publication:？Discovery TM MI and Discovery TM MI columbia？user manual 5720964-1EN. Milwaukee, General？Electric Company. 2019？
Kaalep A, Sera T, Bijndorp S, Yaqub M, Talsma？A, Lodge MA, et al. Feasibility of state of the art？PET-CT systems performance harmonisation.？EJNMMI. 2018;45:1344-61.？

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

PET-CT Normalization, Well Counter Correction에 따른 팬텀을 이용한 영상 평가
Evaluation of Image for Phantom according to Normalization, Well Counter Correction in PET-CT 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (17)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

연합인증

PET-CT Normalization, Well Counter Correction에 따른 팬텀을 이용한 영상 평가 Evaluation of Image for Phantom according to Normalization, Well Counter Correction in PET-CT 원문보기

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (17)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

저자의 다른 논문 :

이충운 (7) 유연욱 (9) 문종운 (4) 김윤철 (6)

관련 콘텐츠

원문 보기

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트

PET-CT Normalization, Well Counter Correction에 따른 팬텀을 이용한 영상 평가
Evaluation of Image for Phantom according to Normalization, Well Counter Correction in PET-CT 원문보기