[논문]정보통신기술 기반 지식정보관리 프레임워크를 통한 한국 정부 조직 혁신에 관한 탐구: 외교부를 중심으로

이진경

doi:10.3743/kosim.2023.40.2.211

정보통신기술 기반 지식정보관리 프레임워크를 통한 한국 정부 조직 혁신에 관한 탐구: 외교부를 중심으로
Organizational Innovation in the Korean Government via an ICT-based IKM Framework: A focus on the MOFA 원문보기

정보관리학회지 = Journal of the Korean society for information management, v.40 no.2, 2023년, pp.211 - 241

이진경 (외교부 소속 주제네바대표부)

초록
AI-Helper

급속히 발전하고 있는 정보통신기술은 기업과 조직의 운영시스템에도 영향을 미치고 있으며, 다수의 산업 분야에서 혁신적인 정보 및 지식관리 전략을 수립하기 위해 많은 연구가 진행되고 있다. 외교부는 지난 20년간 지식정보관리 관련 시스템의 많은 부분에 디지털 기술을 적용하고 있으나, 그에 맞는 전략을 분석하기 위한 기존 연구는 미흡한 실정이다. 본 연구는 인터뷰 및 외교부 내부 혁신 보고서 분석을 통해 현재 한국 외교부의 지식정보관리의 개념과 제약 사항을 진단하고, 외교부가 조직의 양면성 역량과 수용능력을 강화하여, 조직 혁신을 촉진하는 지식정보 관리체계를 제공하는 방법을 평가하는 목적으로 수행되었다. 외교부의 지식정보관리는 디지털 기술 변화에 적응할 수 있는 동적인 역량을 갖추고 있으나, 본질적인 내부의 한계(기밀 문서 처리구조, 지식정보관리 관련 협업체계 부재)와 외부의 한계(국내 정치 상황, 정부 조직의 위계질서)에 직면하고 있다. 이러한 내부적 한계와 외부적 요인으로 인한 영향을 최소화하는 방안을 마련하는 조직의 양면성 역량과 수용능력 증진을 통해 외교부가 조직 혁신을 위한 지식정보관리 체계를 개발해야 하는 것으로 관찰된다. 이를 위해 실질적으로 활용 가능한 IKM 시스템 개발을 위한 이후의 세부 연구에는 변화하는 환경에 대비한 직군 간 대화와 직원 역량 강화 방안이 포함되어야 할 것이다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

With rapidly changing technological implementation of operating systems of businesses, the Ministry of foreign affairs (MOFA) of the Republic of Korea (ROK) has been undergoing digital transformation to its overall operations with the intent to innovate information and knowledge management (IKM) strategies since the mid-2000s. However, assessment as to the effectiveness of implemented IKM has been inadequately analyzed. This study aims to assess the concepts and limitations of the MOFA's current IKM strategies and the methods it employs to deliver its IKM framework, in light of strengthening the organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity, and also fostering organizational innovation through a qualitative study that involves interviews and analysis of reports from MOFA. The MOFA's IKM possesses dynamic capabilities to adapt to changing digital technologies. However, the institution's IKM is constrained by limitations associated with the utilization of the IKM system such as a structure that handles confidential documents and a lack of a collaborative system for IKM, and external limitations such as changes in the domestic political situation governing MOFA's priorities and the hierarchy of government organizations. Consequently, developing the organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity was not possible. To develop an IKM framework for organizational innovation, the MOFA must devise a way to minimize the impact of external changes by overcoming internal limitations. To that end, a detailed study on the development of a practically usable IKM system should include establishing a dialogue between job groups and enhancing employee competency in preparation for a changing environment.

주제어

표/그림 (4)

그림 SECI Model and Codification and Socialization strategies (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995) Source: Self-edition based on the SECI Model
그림 Building Strategic Capabilities Source: Self-edition based on the integration Absorptive Capacity and Organizational Ambidexterity (Rothaermel & Alexander, 2009; Zahra & George, 2002)
표 Interview participants
표 The MOFA's IKM Platforms and information sharing bulletin boards

참고문헌 (47)

Adesina, A. O. & Ocholla, D. N. (2019). The SECI model in knowledge management practices: past, present and？future. Mousaion, 37(3), 34 pages. Available: https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.25159/2663-659X/6557

상세보기
Arsac, L. (2014). South Korea's geopolitics: on the road to "influential diplomacy." Territory and Seas,？8, 108-136. Available: https://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeIdNODE06138574
Bawden, D. (1990). User-oriented evaluation of information systems and services. Aldershot: Gower.
Birkinshaw, J. & Gibson, C. (2004, July 15). Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization. MIT Sloan？Management Review. Available:？https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/building-ambidexterity-into-an-organization/
Boynton, A. C., Zmud, R. W., & Jacobs, G. C. (1994). The influence of IT management practice on IT？use in large organizations. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 299-318. https://doi.org/10.2307/249620

상세보기
Bryman, A. (2001). Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation.？Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

상세보기
Corrall, S. (2008). An interview with Sheila Corrall: Interview by Margaret Adolphus. Available:？https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/archived/librarians/info/interviews/corrall.htm
Daniel, J. (2011). Sampling Essentials: Practical Guidelines for Making Sampling Choices. California: SAGE？Publications.
Daspit, J. J. & D'Souza, D. E. (2013). Understanding the multi-dimensional nature of absorptive capacity.？Journal of Managerial Issues, 25(3), 299-316. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43488823

상세보기
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know.？Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
De long (1997). Building the knowledge-based organization: how culture drive knowledge behaviors. Centers？for Business Innovation-working paper, 1-29
Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management？Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121.？https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11 3.0.CO;2-E

상세보기
Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. A. (2000). The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to？management. New York: Random House Business.
Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (2000). What's your Strategy for Managing Knowledge? In The？Knowledge Management Yearbook 2000-2001. London: Routledge.
Hislop, D. (2005). Knowledge Management in Organizations: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University？Press.
Im, "John" J. H. & Seo, J. W. (2005). E-government in South Korea: planning and implementation. Electronic？Government, an International Journal, 2(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2005.007094？

상세보기
Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative？innovation, and ambidexterity: the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach？Business Review, 57(4), 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396721

상세보기
Joshi, K. D., Chi, L., Datta, A., & Han, S. (2010). Changing the competitive landscape: continuous innovation？through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 472-495.？https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0298

상세보기
Klinger, N. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity and absorptive capacity. Otago Management Graduate Review,？14, 21-30.
Lee, C. S. & Kelkar, R. S. (2013). ICT and knowledge management: perspective from the SECI model.？The Electronic Library, 31(2), 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471311312401

상세보기
Leonard, D. & Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management？Review, 40(3), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165946

상세보기
Levinthal, D. A. & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2),？95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009

상세보기
Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Systems with？Applications, 20(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00044-0

상세보기
Mahler, J. G. (2009). Organizational Learning at NASA: The Challenger and Columbia Accidents. Washington:？Georgetown University Press.
Ministry of Economy and Finance (2022). The announcement of the "New Growth 4.0 Strategic Promotion？Plan". Available:？https://www.moef.go.kr/com/cmm/fms/FileDown.do?atchFileIdATCH_000000000021982&fileSn3
Ministry of Foreign Affaris (2017). Innovation Roadmap of the MOFA of the Republic of Korea.
Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2017). 50 years of e-Government history. Available:？https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type001/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsIdBBSMSTR_000000000012&nttId73253
Natek, S. & Zwilling, M. (2016). Knolwedge management system support SECI model of knowledge-creating？process. TIIM, 16(251).
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the？dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
O'Leary, N. (2014). Learning informally to use teaching games for understanding: the experiences of a？recently qualified teacher. European Physical Education Review, 20(3), 367-384.？https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X14534359

상세보기
O'Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002

상세보기
O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: a profile comparison？approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
Orlikowski, W. J. & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches？and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1-28.？https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.1

상세보기
Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. In Knowledge in Organizations. London: Routledge.
Rothaermel, F. T. & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role？of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780.？https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404

상세보기
Schopflin, K. & Walsh, M. (2019). Practical Knowledge and Information Management. London: Facet Publishing.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York:？Doubleday/Currency.
Stoddart, L. (2020). Determining the impact of knowledge sharing initiatives in international organizations:？Case studies. IFLA Journal, 46(1), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035219870198

상세보기
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic？Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.？https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7 3.0.CO;2-Z

상세보기
Tushman, M. L. & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary？change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852

상세보기
Vasconcelos, A. C., Martins, J. T., Ellis, D., & Fontainha, E. (2019). Absorptive capacity: a process and？structure approach. Journal of Information Science, 45(1), 68-83.？https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551518775306

상세보기
Volberda, H. W. & Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: from evolution？to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2111- 2136.？https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00414.x

상세보기
Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320-330.？https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589

상세보기
Ward, S. & Carter, D. (2019). Information as an asset - today's board agenda: the value of rediscovering？gold. Business Information Review, 36(2), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382119844639

상세보기
Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy？of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995？

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증