$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

한국형 건강 관련 삶의 질 측정도구(Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument with 8-Items)의 심리계량적 내적구조 평가: 국민건강영양조사 8기 1차년도 자료 적용
Internal Structure of the Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument with 8-Items in a Nationally Representative Population 원문보기

Journal of Korean academy of nursing = 대한간호학회지, v.53 no.3, 2023년, pp.359 - 369  

이은현 (아주대학교 보건대학원)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

Purpose: This study evaluated the internal structure (structural validity, internal consistency, and measurement invariance) of the Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument with Eight Items (HINT-8), developed to measure Korean people's health-related quality of life. Methods: A secondary analysis ...

주제어

#건강관련 삶의 질   #심리계량적 속성   #결과의 재현성  

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).？Health-related quality of life (HRQOL): HRQOL concepts？[Internet]. Atlanta: CDC; 2018 [cited 2022 Dec 3]. Available？from: https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/concept.htm 

  2. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: The assessment, analysis？and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed.？Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. p. 1-566. 

  3. Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM. Quality of life assessment？in clinical trials: Methods and practice. New York (NY): Oxford？University Press; 1998. p. 1-360. 

  4. Ware JE. SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation？guide. Boston (MA): Health Institute, New England Medical？Center; 1997. p. 1-300. 

  5. EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement？of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 

    상세보기 crossref

  6. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin？D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new？five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life？Research. 2011;20(10):1727-1736.？https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x 

    상세보기 crossref

  7. Jo MW. Development of measurement tool for health related？quality of life in the Korea national health and nutrition examination？survey [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Disease Control？and Prevention Agency; 2014 [cited 2022 Dec 3]. Available？from: https://library.nih.go.kr/ncmiklib/archive/report/listRomsReport.do 

  8. Jo MW. Valuation of Korean health-related quality of life instrument？with 8 items (HINT-8). Cheongju: Korea Disease？Control and Prevention Agency; 2017 Apr. Report No.: 11-1352159-000695-01. 

  9. Ribeiro Santiago PH, Haag D, Macedo DM, Garvey G, Smith？M, Canfell K, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L for aboriginal Australians: A multi-method study. Health？and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):81.？https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01718-8 

    상세보기 crossref

  10. Boczor S, Daubmann A, Eisele M, Blozik E, Scherer M.？Quality of life assessment in patients with heart failure: Validity？of the German version of the generic EQ-5D-5L™.？BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1464.？https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7623-2 

    상세보기 crossref

  11. Zakershahrak M, Ribeiro Santiago PH, Sethi S, Haag D,？Jamieson L, Brennan D. Psychometric properties of the EQ-？5D-3L in South Australia: A multi-method non-preference-？based validation study. Current Medical Research and？Opinion. 2022;38(5):673-685.？https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2022.2031941 

    상세보기 crossref

  12. Kim SH, Kim M. Validity of the health-related quality of life？instrument with 8 items (HINT-8) in the Korean elderly:？A cross-sectional study. Journal of Korean Gerontological？Nursing. 2022;24(3):248-256. https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2022.24.3.248 

    상세보기 crossref

  13. Kim J, Jo MW, Lee HJ, Ahn SH, Son BH, Lee JW, et al.？Validity and reliability of the health-related quality of life？instrument with 8 items (HINT-8) in Korean breast cancer？patients. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. 2021;12(4):254-263. https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2021.0005 

    상세보기 crossref

  14. Kim J, Lee HJ, Jo MW. Health-related quality of life instrument？with 8 items for use in patients with type 2 diabetes？mellitus: A validation study in Korea. Journal of Preventive？Medicine and Public Health. 2022;55(3):234-242.？https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.020 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  15. Furr RM. Psychometrics: An introduction. 3rd ed. Thousand？Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2018. p. 1-568. 

  16. Lee EK, Jung SY. Associated factors with health-related quality of life among older adults with diabetes in Korea. Korean？Journal of Rehabilitation Nursing. 2022;25(2):61-69.？https://doi.org/10.7587/kjrehn.2022.61 

    상세보기 crossref

  17. Song HY, Jung GH. Factors Associated with the quality of life？of obese adults: The 8th Korea national health and nutrition？examination survey (2019). Journal of Korean Public Health？Nursing. 2022;36(2):170-183.？https://doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2022.36.2.170 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  18. McDonald RP. Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah？(NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999. p. 1-485. 

  19. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA).？Korea health statistics 2020: Korea national health and nutrition？examination survey (KNHANES VIII-2) [Internet].？Cheongju: KDCA; 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 9]. Available from:？https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/ 

  20. Megari K. Quality of life in chronic disease patients. Health？Psychology Research. 2013;1(3):e27.？https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2013.e27 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Golino HF, Epskamp S. Exploratory graph analysis: A new？approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological？research. PloS One. 2017;12(6):e0174035.？https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174035 

    상세보기 crossref

  22. Golino H, Christensen AP. EGAnet: Exploratory graph analysis-a framework for estimating the number of dimensions？in multivariate data using network psychometrics [computer？Program]. Version. 1.2.0. 2022. 

  23. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic？concepts, applications, and programming. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2016. p. 1-438. 

  24. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance？structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.？Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary？Journal. 1999;6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 

    상세보기 crossref

  25. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis？and determination of sample size for covariance structure？modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996;1(2):130-149.？https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130 

    상세보기 crossref

  26. Widaman KF, Reise SP. Exploring the measurement invariance？of psychological instruments: Applications in the？substance use domain. In: Bryant KJ, Windle M, West SG,？editors. The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances？from Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research. Washington,？DC: American Psychological Association; 1997. p. 281-324. 

  27. Chen YJ, Tang TLP. Attitude toward and propensity to engage？in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across？major among university students. Journal of Business Ethics. 2006;69(1):77-93.？https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9069-6 

    상세보기 crossref

  28. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of？measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A？Multidisciplinary Journal. 2007;14(3):464-504.？https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 

    상세보기 crossref

  29. Christensen AP, Golino H. Estimating the stability of psychological？dimensions via bootstrap exploratory graph analysis: A？Monte Carlo simulation and tutorial. Psych. 2021;3(3):479-500. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030032 

    상세보기 crossref

  30. Steenkamp JE, Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement？invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of？Consumer Research. 1998;25(1):78-90.？https://doi.org/10.1086/209528 

    상세보기 crossref

  31. Lee EH, Lee YW, Lee KW, Kim DJ, Kim SK. Development？and psychometric evaluation of a diabetes-specific quality-？of-life (D-QOL) scale. Diabetes Research and Clinical？Practice. 2012;95(1):76-84.？https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2011.08.022 

    상세보기 crossref

  32. Ryan RM, Frederick C. On energy, personality, and health:？Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being.？Journal of Personality. 1997;65(3):529-565.？https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x 

    상세보기 crossref

  33. Jung HS, Kwon J, Jeong S, Kim S. A comprehensive study of？happiness and quality of life in Korea. Sejong: Korea Institute？for Health and Social Affairs; 2019 Dec. Report No.: 19-52-01. 

  34. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford？PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international？consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of？measurement properties for health-related patient-reported？outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2010;63(7):737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 

    상세보기 crossref

  35. Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick？DL, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews？of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life？Research. 2018;27(5):1147-1157.？https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3 

    상세보기 crossref

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로