$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

고등학생을 위한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용
The Development and Application of a Science Education Program Based on Engineering Design Process for High School Students 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.3, 2023년, pp.321 - 331  

한화정 (공주대학교) ,  심규철 (공주대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 고등학교 학생을 위한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램을 개발하고, 이를 적용하여 고등학생의 과학 관련 태도와 공학 설계 능력에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램은 '바른 자세를 유지할 수 있는 건강 신발 만들기'이며 공학 설계 과정인 문제 정의, 정보 수집, 창안, 구현, 평가 및 반성 등의 과정을 거쳐 학생이 일상생활의 문제를 해결하기 위해 공학 설계 과정을 방법론적으로 사용하여 창의적인 해결방안을 창안할 수 있는 활동으로 구성하였다. 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육프로그램을 적용한 결과, 고등학생의 과학 관련 태도와 공학 설계 능력이 향상되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서 개발한 공학 설계 기반 과학 교육 프로그램은 고등학생의 과학 관련 태도와 공학 설계 능력 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 주고 있으며, 앞으로의 미래 과학 인재 양성을 위한 교수 학습 전략으로서 과학 교육에서 공학 설계 과정을 접목한 활동의 지속적인 운영과 확대가 필요함을 시사한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study aimed to develop an engineering design-based science education program for high school students and to investigate its effects on students' science-related attitudes and engineering design abilities. "Creating healthy shoes for maintaining proper posture program" was developed as an activ...

주제어

#고등학생   #공학 설계 과정   #과학 관련 태도   #공학 설계 능력  

표/그림 (5)

참고문헌 (107)

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2021).？Criteria for accrediting engineering program. Retrieved from？Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology website:？https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022-23-ETAC-Criteria.pdf 

  2. Aldahmash, A. H., & Alfarraj, Y. F. (2022). Exploring the integration of？engineering design practices in tenth-grade chemistry activities.？Frontiers in psychology, 13, 774022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.774022 

    상세보기 crossref

  3. Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008).？Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the？heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology,？17(5), 454-465. 

    상세보기

  4. Asunda, P. A., & Hill, R. B. (2017). Critical features of engineering design？in technology education. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 44(1),？25-48. 

  5. Bang, H. K., & Leem, Y. M. (2015). A study on shirts design for postural？stability of teenagers considering human sensibility ergonomics.？Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, 17(1), 139-148. 

  6. Burghardt, M. D. (2013). Interconnected STEM with engineering design？pedagogy. Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta,？Georgia. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/19811. 

  7. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design; A contemporary？approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology.？Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6-8. 

    상세보기

  8. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2009). Perspectives on K-12 engineering.？Retrieved from http://www.hofstra.edu/academics/colleges/seas/ctl/ctl_k12engr.html. 

  9. Budynas, R. G., & Nisbett, J. K. (2015). Shigley's mechanical engineering？design (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 

  10. Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design; a contemporary？approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. The？Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6-8. 

  11. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing？engineering education in P-12 classroom. Journal of Engineering？Education, 97(3), 369-387. 

  12. Capobianco, B. M., & Rupp, M. (2014). STEM teachers' planned and enacted？attempts at implementing engineering design-based instruction. School？Science & Mathematics, 114(6), 258-270. 

  13. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are？some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?. Psychological？bulletin, 143(1), 1-35. 

  14. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry？in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks.？Science Education, 86, 175-219. 

  15. Cho C. Y. (2008). Survey of faulty postures and associated factors among？Chinese adolescents. Journal of manipulative and physiological？therapeutics, 31(3), 224-229. 

  16. Cho, S., Ku, N. W., Kim, H., Lee, S., & Lee, I. (2019). OECD Programme？for international students assessment: An analysis of PISA 2018 Result.？(RRE 2019-11). Chungbuk: Korea Institute for Curriculum and？Evaluation. 

  17. Choi, Y. (2009). Graduate students' perceptions on the characteristics and？types of good teamwork. Asian Journal of Education, 10(3), 257-283. 

    상세보기

  18. Choi, Y. (2021). Exploring the perception of integrated STEAM secondary？teachers on engineering design. Journal of Science Education, 45(3),？364-378. 

  19. Chong, H. R., Hong, S. H., Lee, M. K., & Kwon, H. M. (2018). Quality？strategy in the age of the 4th industrial revolution by technological？evolution, Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 46(3),？483-496. 

  20. Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design method: strategies for product design？(3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley. 

  21. Daugherty, M. K. (2009). The "T" and "E" in STEM. in international？technology education association (Ed.), The overlooked STEM？imperatives: technology and engineering K-12 education (pp. 18-25).？VA: International Technology Education Association. 

  22. Dieter, G., & Schmidt, L. C. (2013). Engineering design (5th ed.). New？York: McGraw-Hill Education. 

  23. Dym, C. L., Little, P., & Orwin, E. (2013). Engineering design: a？project-based introduction (4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley. 

  24. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005).？Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of？Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. 

  25. Duong, X., Nguyen, N., Nguyen, M., & Thao-Do, T. (2022). Applying STEM？engineering design process through designing and making of？electrostatic painting equipment in two rural schools in Vietnam. Jurnal？Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 1-10.. 

    상세보기

  26. Ellefson, M. R., Brinker, R. A., Vernacchio, V. J., & Schunn, C. D. (2008).？Design-based learning for biology. Biochemistry and Molecular？Biology Education, 36(4), 292-298. 

  27. Firesmith, D. (2007). Common requirements problems, their negative？consequences, and the industry best practices to help solve them.？Journal of Object Technology, 6(1), 17-33. 

    상세보기

  28. Guzey, S. S., & Aranda, M. L. (2017). Student participation in engineering？practices and discourse: An exploratory case study. Journal of？Engineering Education, 106(4), 585-606. 

  29. Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Morse, G. (2016). Student interest in？engineering design based science. School Science & Mathematics,？116(8), 411-419. 

  30. Hah, J., & Kim, M. S.(2010). The development of creative problem？finding/problem solving model for scientific gifted student. The Journal？of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 6(1), 17-33. 

  31. Haik, Y., & Shahin, T. (2011). Engineering design process (2nd ed.).？Stamford: Cengage Learning. 

  32. Han, H. J. (2018). Development and application of an engineering design？process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted？students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kongju National？University of Education, Gongju, South Korea). Retrieved from？http://dcollection.kongju.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId000000027992. 

  33. Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2019). Development of an engineering design？process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted？students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South？Korea. Asia-Pac. Sci. Educ. 2019, 5, 1-18. 

  34. Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2021). An analysis of elements of an engineering？design process presented in inquiry activities in high school scientific？inquiry-experiment textbooks. Teacher Education Research, 60(1),？157-170. 

  35. Han, J. (2011). Improvement of self-directed learning ability through？engineering design education. Journal of Engineering Education？Research, 14(1), 67-76. 

  36. Han, J. Y., & Bang, J. H. (2011). A Study on estimating the weight of？teamwork skill components for engineering Students. The Korean？Journal of Technology Education, 11(2), 18-37. 

  37. Han, S. W., & Kim, W. J. (2016). A study on the effects of communicative？competence on Information literacy of undergraduates. Journal of the？Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(1), 377-394. 

  38. Harris, K., & Rogers, G. E. (2008). Secondary engineering competencies:？A delphi study of engineering faculty. Journal of Industrial Teacher？Education, 45(1), 5-25. 

    상세보기

  39. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education:？foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. 

  40. Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative？design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive？psychology literature. Design studies, 29(2), 160-180. 

    상세보기

  41. Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D.,？& Carberry, A. (2011). Infusing engineering design into high school？STEM courses (report no. 165). Retrieved from May 23, 2023 from？https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/165 

  42. Hwang, S. (2017). Relationships between teamwork skills and thinking styles？in engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education Research,？20(2), 39-49. 

  43. Jay, E. S. & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding; the search for mechnism.？In M.A. Runco(Ed), The Creativity Research Handbook Volume？One(pp.257-293). Hampton Press, NJ; Cresskill. 

  44. Jeon, J. H., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Qualitative Analysis of the Creative Design？Process of Elementary School Students in STEAM Class. Journal of？Korean Elementary Science Education, 37(2), 93-109. 

  45. Jeong, E., Park, J., Lee, S., Yoon, H. G., Kim, H., Kang, H., Lee, J., Kim,？Y., & Jeong, J. (2022). A qualitative study on the cause of low science？affective achievement of elementary, middle, and high school students？in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？42(3), 325-340. 

  46. Jin, S. A. (2019). Case Study and Industry Demand Investigation on？technological convergence education related to the 4th industrial？revolution: Focused on electronics, software, and automobile. The？Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(2), 36-48. 

  47. Jo, Y., & Yun, Y.(2014). A comparison of the mathematics curriculum of？Korea and Japan in viewpoint of promotion of key competencies.？Journal of Educational Reserach in Mathmatics, 24(1), 45-65. 

  48. Johnson, S. D. (1987). Teaching problem solving. The Technology Teacher,？46(5), 15-17. 

  49. Johri, A., Williams, C.B., & Pembridge, J.J. (2013). Creative collaboration:？A case study of the role of computers in supporting representational？and relational interaction in student engineering design teams.？International Journal of Engineering Education, 29, 33-44. 

    상세보기

  50. Jung, H. M., & Kim, Y. S. (2006). High school students' posture management？behavior and related factors. Journal of the Korean Society of Maternal？and Child Health, 10(1), 21-30. 

  51. Kang, I., Kim, H., & Kim, D. (2012). A case study on the learning effects？of the STEAM education using open-source softwares in terms of？students' interest in and attitudes toward science. Secondary Education？Reserach, 60(4), 1105-1134. 

  52. Kang, G. A., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. J. (2015). Exploration of problem solving？program including creative thinking skills in the idea generation and？verification stages as method for fostering creativity of elementary？school student. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education,？34(1), 95-108. 

  53. Khandani, S. (2005). Engineering design process. Retrieved from May 23,？2023 from http://saylor.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/ME101-4.1-Engineering-Design-Process.pdf 

  54. Kim, H. J., & Park, S. S. (2018). Operational implication of R-WeSET？program through women students and companies' perception and？assessment on the basis of NCS key competency. Journal of？Engineering Education Research, 21(1), 27-36. 

  55. Kim, J., & Chung, J. (2015). Analyzing structural relationships between team？leadership, team process and team effectiveness in project-based？learning for engineering students. Journal of Educational Technology,？31(4), 909-948. 

  56. Kim, N. H., & Shim, K. C. (2017). Educational implications for science？education of STEAM-based research and education(STEAM R&E) projects for secondary school students. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 37(1), 125-133. 

  57. Kim, Y., Huh, H., Lee, C., & Kim, K. (2013). A study on engineering？professionals' recognition about engineering education in primary and？Secondary School. Korean Institute of Industrial Educations, 38(2),？136-155. 

  58. Kim, Y., Kang, J., & Heo, N. (2015). An analysis on scientifically gifted？students' image and perception of the engineering. Journal of？Gifted/Talented Education, 25(1), 95-117. 

  59. Kim, W. (2012). Building conceptual framework to bring up talents capable？of creative fusion: From the perspective of fusion between science？and technology and art. The Journal of the Korean Society for the？Gifted and Talented, 11(1), 97-119. 

  60. Kuk, S. (2021). Analyse der argumentationsstruktur und - typologie von fake？news - am beispiel der fake news uber Covid-19. Koreanische？Zeitschrift fur Germanistik, 62(1), 349-366. 

  61. Kwak, Y., Kim, C. J., Lee, Y. R., & Jeong, D. S. (2006). Investigation？on elementary and secondary students' interest in science. The Journal？of The Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 260-268. 

  62. Kwon, H., & Park, K. (2009). Engineering design: A facilitator for science,？technology, engineering, and mathematics [STEM] Education. Journal？of Science Education, 33(2), 207-219. 

  63. Kwon, S. (2017). Exploring the background of integrating engineering design？and technical writing. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(4),？203-241. 

  64. Lammi, M., Denson, C., & Asunda, P. (2018). Search and review of the？literature on engineering design challenges in secondary school？settings. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 8(2),？49-66. 

  65. Lee, D., Yi, H., & Nam, Y. (2023). The effect of engineering design based？ocean clean up lesson on STEAM attitude and creative engineering？problem solving propensity. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science？Society, 44(1), 79-89. 

  66. Lee, D., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. J. (2014). The introduction of design thinking？to science education and exploration of its characterizations as a？method for group creativity education. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 34(2), 93-105. 

  67. Lee, H., Park, K., Kwon, H., & Seo, B. (2013). Development and？implementation of engineering design and scientific inquiry based？STEM education program. Korean Journal of Teacher Education,？29(3), 301-326. 

  68. Lee, H., Kwon, D., Jeon, J., & Lee, H. (2022). Effect analysis on attitudes？towards STEM and career perception according to the development？and application of STEM thinking classroom program to improve math？and science competency of secondary school students. Teacher？Education Research, 61(2), 231-246. 

  69. Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., & Oh, H. (2014). Development and application？of integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and？Mathematics) education model based on scientific inquiry. Journal of？the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 63-78. 

  70. Lee, J., & Jang, S. (2016). The effects of design-based learning on elementary？students' interaction process, conceptual understanding, and attitude？toward science. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and？Instruction, 16(1), 1103-1124. 

  71. Lee, J., Ku. J., Choi, W., Shim, K. C., & Shin, M. K. (2020). Analysis？of achievement characteristics by achievement standard of the middle？school curriculum based on the national assessment of educational？achievement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？40(5), 473-483. 

  72. Lee, J. Y., & Shim, K. C. (2019). The effect of problem-based STEAM？program on the science-related attitudes, and the perception about the？STEAM instruction for high school students. Biology Education, 47(1),？59-71. 

  73. Lee, Y. E., & Lee, H. (2014). The effects of engineering design and scientific？inquiry based STEAM education programs on the interest, self-efficacy？and career choices of middle school students. Journal of Research in？Curriculum Instruction, 18(3), 513-540. 

  74. Lim, J., Ryu, K., & Kim, B. (2017). An Exploratory Study on the Direction？of Education and Teacher Competencies in the 4th Industrial？Revolution. The Journal of Korean Education, 44(2), 5-32. 

  75. Massachusetts Department of Education (MDE). (2006). Massachusetts？science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Malden:？Massachusetts Department of Education. 

  76. Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science？through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: better overall？science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of？Engineering Education, 97(1), 71-85. 

  77. Meier, S. L., Hovde, R. L., & Meier, R. L. (1996). Problem solving: teachers'？perceptions, content area models, and interdisciplinary connections.？School Science and Mathematics, 96(5), 230-237. 

    상세보기

  78. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015). Science national curriculum. Sejong:？Ministry of Education. 

  79. Ministry of Education (MOE). (2020). The master plan for science education？(2020-2024). Sejong: Ministry of Education. 

  80. Nam, Y., Lee, S. J., & Paik, S. H. (2016) The impact of engineering？integrated science (EIS) curricula on first-year technical high school？students' attitudes toward science and perceptions of engineering.？Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science& Technology Education？12(7). 1881-1907. 

  81. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education？standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 

  82. National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for k-12 science？education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington？D.C.: National Academies Press. 

  83. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states,？by states. Washington DC: National Academies Press. 

  84. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006).？Schooling for tomorrow: Think scenarios,rethink education. Paris,？France: OECD. 

  85. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Eng ineering desig n: a systematic approach？(2nd ed.). (K. Wallace, L. Blessing & F. Bauert, Trans.). London:？Springer-Verlag (Original work published 1984). 

  86. Park. H. & Baek, Y. S. (2014). Content Standards for K-9 Engineering？Education. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 17(4), 87-94. 

  87. Park, H., Kim, Y., Noh, S., Jeong, J. S., Lee, E, A., Yu. E., Lee, D., Park,？J., & Baek, Y. S. (2012). Developmental study of science education？content standards. Journal of the Korean Association for Science？Education,32(4), 729-750. 

  88. Park. M. J., & Park, J. S. (2003). Effect of a posture training program on？cobb angle and knowledge of posture of elementary school students.？Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 33(5), 643-650. 

  89. Park, N. J., & Choi, E. J. (2006). A study of variables affecting the？information literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and？Information Science, 40(3), 215-232. 

  90. Park, S., Ju, E., & Jang, S. (2020). Analysis of creative ideas of elementary？teachers in the "Designing a Vertical Farm" Activity. Biology？Education, 48(4), 581-595. 

  91. Precharattana, M., Sanium, S., Pongsanon, K., Ritthipravat, P., Chuechote,？S., & Kusakunniran, W. (2023). Blended engineering design process？learning activities for secondary school students during COVID-19？epidemic: Students' learning activities and perception. Education？Sciences, 13(2), 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020159 

    상세보기 crossref

  92. Roy, R. (1993). Case studies of creativity in innovative product development.？Design Studies, 14, 423-443. 

    상세보기

  93. Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (1994). Problem finding, creativity, and？giftedness. Roeper Review, 16(4), 235-241. 

    상세보기

  94. Ryu, J., & Kim, J. (2021). Perspective of college Environment and Career？of Gifted Female Students Majoring in Science and Engineering.？Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 31(4), 499-519. 

    상세보기

  95. Ryu, S, G., & Park, J. S. (2008). Relationship Between Problem Finding？Ability and Problem Solving Ability in Chemistry. Journal of the？Korean Chemical Society, 52(2), 179-185. 

  96. Shahat, M. A., Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Amri, M. (2022). Investigating？Pre-Service Science Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Teaching？Science Through Engineering Design Processes. Interdisciplinary？Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2291.？https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/12121 

    상세보기 crossref

  97. Shim, J., Lee, Y., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM？education, and addressing the issues facing STEAM in the Korean？context. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？35(4), 709-723. 

  98. Shin, S., Ha, M., & Lee, J. K. (2018). A comparative study of teacher and？student's perception on 'interesting science class'. Journal of？Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(22), 451-476. 

    상세보기

  99. Shin, Y., Kang, H., Kwak, Y., Lee, S., Lee, S. Y., Lee, I., & Ha, J. (2020).？Research on ways to implement sustainable student-participating？science curriculum to improve students' affectional attitudes(Research？Report BD2001001). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement？of Science and Creativity. 

  100. Song, S. C., Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2017a). A study on the science？related attitudes of scientifically middle school gifted students？according to gender and talented division. Biology Education, 45(3),？355-370. 

  101. Song, S. C., Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2017b). A study on perceptions？of scientifically gifted middle school students about engineering design？process. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 355-370. 

  102. Song, C., Son, Y., & Song, C. (2017). Self-management skill and labor？market outcome of university graduates. The Journal of Core？Competency Education Research, 2(1), 47-67. 

  103. Song, S. C., & Shim, K. C. (2017). A study on the awareness of pre-service？science teachers about secondary education in future intelligence？information society. Biology Education, 45(3), 404-417. 

  104. Vale, I., Barbosa, A., Peixoto, A., & Fernandes, F. (2022). Solving problems？through engineering design: An exploratory study with pre-service？teachers. Education Sciences, 12(12), 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120889 

    상세보기 crossref

  105. Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N., &？Afifah, R.M.A. (2020). The steps of the engineering design process？(EDP) in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal？for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345-1360. 

  106. Yi, H., & Nam, Y. (2019). Development and application of engineering based？engineering？science integrated program for teaching the concept of？'Light' and 'Sound'. School Science Journal, 13(3), 221-224. 

  107. You, J. W., & Ryu, D. H. (2016). The effects of extracurricular participation,？peer interaction, and student-faculty interaction on the teamwork？competency of students majoring in natural sciences. Journal of？Educational Studies, 47(2), 153-178. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로