[논문]자연공원 용도지구 설정을 위한 환경공간정보와 SOM(Self-Organizing map)을 활용한 지역 특성 도출 - 태안해안국립공원을 대상으로 -

이성희; 손용훈

doi:10.13087/kosert.2023.26.3.1

자연공원 용도지구 설정을 위한 환경공간정보와 SOM(Self-Organizing map)을 활용한 지역 특성 도출 - 태안해안국립공원을 대상으로 -
Deduction of regional characteristics using environmental spatial information and SOM (Self-Organizing map) for natural park zoning - Focused on Taeanhaean National Park - 원문보기

環境復元綠化 = Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, v.26 no.3, 2023년, pp.1 - 17

이성희 (서울대학교 환경대학원 협동과정조경학) , 손용훈 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경설계학과)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Korea's natural parks are managed by dividing them into four use districts: nature preservation district, natural environment district, cultural heritage district, and park village district within the park under the goal of 'conservation and sustainable use of natural parks'. However, the use districts divided in this way are designated by reflecting the results derived from the simple drawing overlapping method, and there is a limit in that objective and scientific evidence for this is insufficient. In addition, in Taeanhaean National Park, the case of this study, only a very small area of less than 1% of the nature preservation district is designated, and the natural environment district that serves as a buffer space is designated on an excessively wide scale, making it difficult to efficiently manage the national park. Therefore, the use district is not fulfilling its role. In this study, the purpose of this study was to present a method for analyzing the spatial characteristics of natural parks using environmental indicators and unsupervised learning analysis methods to set the use districts of natural parks. In this study, evaluation indicators that can evaluate the natural and human environments were derived, and the distribution patterns for each indicator were analyzed. Afterwards, by applying Self-Organizing Map (SOM) analysis, one of the unsupervised learning analysis methods, districts with similar characteristics were derived in Taeanhaean National Park, and the characteristics of each district were analyzed. As a result of the study, 7 districts with different characteristics were derived in Taeanhaean National Park, and by examining the contribution of each indicator together, it was possible to reveal that each district had different representative characteristics even though it was an adjacent area. This study evaluated natural parks by comprehensively considering the indicators of the natural and human environments. In addition, the SOM method used in the study is meaningful in that it can provide scientific and objective grounds for the existing zoning and apply it to the management plan.

주제어

표/그림 (5)

표 Table 1. Indicators used in this study
표 Table 2. Assignment of perceived land cover naturalness scores by Land cover classes
그림 Figure 1. Maps according to environment variable analysis
그림 Figure 2. Areas of Taeanhaean National Park derived from SOM analysis results
표 Table 3. Contribution of the environment variables to the SOM identified areas

참고문헌 (59)

Bacao, F., Lobo, V. and Painho, M.(2005)？Self-organizing maps as substitutes for？k-means clustering. In Computational？Science-ICCS 2005: 5th International？Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, May？22-25, 2005, Proceedings, Part III 5 (pp.？476-483). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Bagan, H., Takeuchi, W., Kinoshita, T., Bao, Y.？and Yamagata, Y. (2010). Land cover？classification and change analysis in the？Horqin Sandy Land from 1975 to 2007.？IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in？Applied Earth Observations and Remote？Sensing, 3(2), 168-177.

상세보기
Borhidi, A.(1995) Social behaviour types, the？naturalness and relative ecological？indicator values of the higher plants in the？Hungarian flora. Acta Bot Hung 39:？97-181.
Bruner, A. G., R. E. Gullison, R. E. Rice and G.？A. Da Fonseca(2001) Effectiveness of？parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.？science 291(5501): 125-128.

상세보기
Clark, S., Sisson, S. A. and A. Sharma(2020) Tools？for enhancing the application of？self-organizing maps in water resources？research and engineering. Advances in？Water Resources 143: 103676.

상세보기
Das, S., P. P. Adhikary, P. K. Shit and B.？Bera(2021) Urban wetland fragmentation？and ecosystem service assessment using？integrated machine learning algorithm and？spatial landscape analysis. Geocarto？International 1-19.
Dittrich, A., R. Seppelt, T. Vaclavik and A.F.？Cord(2017) Integrating ecosystem service？bundles and socio-environmental conditions-A national scale analysis from Germany.？Ecosystem Services 28: 273-282.

상세보기
Dramstad, W.E., M.S. Tveit, W.J. Fjellstad and？G.L.A. Fry(2006) Relationships between？visual landscape preferences and map-based？indicators of landscape structure. Landscape？and urban planning 78(4): 465-474.

상세보기
Frank, S., C. Furst, L. Koschke, A. Witt and F.？Makeschin(2013) Assessment of？landscape aesthetics-Validation of a？landscape metrics-based assessment by？visual estimation of the scenic beauty.？Ecological indicators 32: 222-231.

상세보기
Fu, M., J. Tian, Y. Ren, J. Li, W. Liu and Y.？Zhu(2019). Functional zoning and space？management of three-river-source national？park. Journal of Geographical Sciences？29(12): 2069-2084.
Geneletti, D. and I. van Duren(2008) Protected？area zoning for conservation and use: A？combination of spatial multicriteria and？multiobjective evaluation. Landscape and？urban planning 85(2): 97-110.

상세보기
Ge, G., Z. Shi, Y. Zhu, X. Yang and Y. Hao(2020)？Land use/cover classification in an arid？desert-oasis mosaic landscape of China？using remote sensed imagery: Performance？assessment of four machine learning？algorithms. Global Ecology and？Conservation 22: e00971.
Gosal, A. S., I. R. Geijzendorffer, T. Vaclavik, B.？Poulin, and G. Ziv(2019) Using social media,？machine learning and natural language？processing to map multiple recreational？beneficiaries. Ecosystem Services 38: 100958.
Gosal, A. S., and G. Ziv(2020) Landscape？aesthetics: Spatial modelling and mapping？using social media images and machine？learning. Ecological Indicators 117: 106638.
Grantham, H. S., A. Duncan, T. D. Evans, K. R.？Jones, H. L. Beyer, R. Schuster, J. Walston,？J. C. Ray, J. G. Robinson, M. Callow, T.？Clements, H. M. Costa, A. DeGemmis, P.？R. Elsen, J. Ervin, P. Franco, E. Goldman,？S. Goetz, A. Hansen, E. Hofsvang, P. Jantz,？S. Jupiter, A. Kang, P. Langhammer, W.？F. Laurance, S. Lieberman, M. Linkie, Y.？Malhi, S. Maxwell, M. Mendez, R.？Mittermeier, N. J. Murray, H. Possingham,？J. Radachowsky, S. Saatchi, C. Samper, J.？Silverman, A. Shapiro, B. Strassburg, T.？Stevens, E. Stokes, R. Taylor, T. Tear, R.？Tizard, O. Venter, P. Visconti, S. Wang and？J. E. M. Watson(2020) Anthropogenic？modification of forests means only 40% of？remaining forests have high ecosystem？integrity. Nature communications 11(1):？1-10.
Gu, Q., H. Hu, L. Ma, L. Sheng, S. Yang, X.？Zhang, M. Zhang, K. Zheng and L.？Chen(2019) Characterizing the spatial？variations of the relationship between land？use and surface water quality using？self-organizing map approach. Ecological？Indicators 102: 633-643.

상세보기
Hermes, J., C. Albert and C. von Haaren(2018)？Assessing the aesthetic quality of？landscapes in Germany. Ecosystem？services 31: 296-307.
Hilker, T., M. A. Wulder, N. C. Coops, J. Linke,？G. McDermid, J. G. Masek, F. Gao and？J. C. White(2009) A new data fusion？model for high spatial-and temporal？-resolution mapping of forest disturbance？based on Landsat and MODIS. Remote？Sensing of Environment 113(8): 1613-1627.

상세보기
Hull, V., W. Xu, W. Liu, S. Zhou, A. Vina, J.？Zhang, M. Tuanmu, J. Huang, M.？Linderman, X. Chen, Y. Huang, Z.？Ouyang and J. Liu(2011) Evaluating the？efficacy of zoning designations for？protected area management. Biological？Conservation 144(12): 3028-3037.

상세보기
Huang, F., K. Yin, J. Huang, L. Gui and P.？Wang(2017) Landslide susceptibility？mapping based on self-organizing-map？network and extreme learning machine.？Engineering Geology 223: 11-22.

상세보기
Hunziker, M. and F. Kienast(1999) Potential？impacts of changing agricultural activities？on scenic beauty - a prototypical？technique for automated rapid assessment.？Landscape ecology 14(2): 161-176.

상세보기
IUCN and World Commission on Protected？Areas(WCPA)(2017) IUCN Green List of？Protected and Conserved Areas: Standard,？Version 1.1. Gland, Switzerland.
Jalas, J.(1955) Hemerobe und hemerochore？Pflanzenarten: Ein terminologischer？Reformversuch. Acta Soc. Pro Fauna？Flora Fenn 72: 1-15.
Ji, C. Y.(2000) Land-use classification of？remotely sensed data using Kohonen？self-organizing feature map neural？networks. Photogrammetric engineering？and remote sensing 66(12): 1451-1460.
Kalteh, A. M., P. Hjorth and R. Berndtsson(2008)？Review of the self-organizing map (SOM)？approach in water resources: Analysis,？modelling and application. Environmental？Modelling & Software, 23(7): 835-845.

상세보기
Kim, D. E. and Y. H. Son(2021) Evaluation of？Perceived Naturalness of Urban Parks？Using Hemeroby Index. Journal of the？Korean Institute of Landscape？Architecture 49(2): 89-100.
Kim, Y. M., S. Zerbe, and I. Kowarik(2002)？Human impact on flora and habitats in？Korean rural settlements. Preslia 409-419.
Kohonen, T.(1998). The self-organizing map.？Neurocomputing 21(1-3): 1-6.
Koo, K.(2020) Application of an ecological？engineering approach in evaluating？protected area at local scales. Journal of？Environmental Impact Assessment 29(2):？144-155.
Koo, K.A. and S.U. Park(2020) Prioritizing？ecologically important areas under？land-use changes in Jeju Island, Jeju,？Korea. Journal of the Korean Geographical？Society 55(3): 253-264.
Koo, K.A., C.M. Im and B.Y. Yang(2022)？Advancement on an Ecosystem-based？Assessment System to Determine a New？Special-purpose District in Terms of？National Park Management. The？Geographical Journal of Korea 56(4):？353-366.
Kowarik, I.(1988) Zum Einfluss des Menschen？auf Flora undVegetation. Theoretische？Konzepte und ein Quantifizierungsansatz？amBeispiel von Berlin (West). Berlin.？Schriftenreihe des Fachbereichs.？Landschaftsentwicklung der TU Berlin？Berlin 56(1): 280.
Krajter Ostoic, S., A. M. Marin, M. Kicic and？D. Vuletic, D(2020) Qualitative？exploration of perception and use of？cultural ecosystem services from？tree-based urban green space in the city？of Zagreb (Croatia). Forests 11(8): 876.

상세보기
Krausman, P.R.(1999) Some basic principles of？habitat use. Grazing behavior of livestock？and wildlife 70: 85-90.
Liu, X. and J. Li(2008) Scientific solutions for？the functional zoning of nature reserves？in China. Ecological Modelling 215(1-3):？237-246.
Ministry of Environment(2007) Study on？objectification of ecosystem protection？area designation standards.
Ministry of Environment(2008) 2nd National Park？Feasibility Study Criteria and Natural Park？System Improvement Research Report.
Ministry of Environment(2019) 3rd National Park？Feasibility Study Criteria and Natural Park？System Improvement Research Report.
Nagendra, H.(2002) Opposite trends in response？for the Shannon and Simpson indices of？landscape diversity. Applied geography？22(2): 175-186.

상세보기
Park, Y., H. Lee, K. Kim, G. Lee, J. Choi, S.？Heo and G. Seo(2008) Development of？designation criteria for ecological？protected areas and its application？methodology. Journal of Environmental？Impact Assessment 17(3): 177-188.
Park, Y. S., Y. S. Kwon, S. J. Hwang and S.？Park(2014) Characterizing effects of？landscape and morphometric factors on？water quality of reservoirs using a？self-organizing map. Environmental？Modelling & Software 55: 214-221.

상세보기
Peng, J., X. Chen, Y. Liu, H. Lu and X. Hu(2016)？Spatial identification of multifunctional？landscapes and associated influencing？factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei？region, China. Applied Geography 74:？170-181.

상세보기
Peng, J., X. Hu, S. Qiu, J. Meersmans and Y.？Liu(2019) Multifunctional landscapes？identification and associated development？zoning in mountainous area. Science of the？Total Environment 660: 765-775.

상세보기
Plexida, S.G., A.I. Sfougaris, I.P. Ispikoudis and？V.P. Papanastasis(2014) Selecting？landscape metrics as indicators of spatial？heterogeneity-a comparison among？Greek landscapes. International Journal？of Applied Earth Observation and？Geoinformation 26: 26-35.
Polasky, S., E. Nelson, D. Pennington and K.A.？Johnson(2011) The impact of land-use？change on ecosystem services, biodiversity？and returns to landowners: a case study？in the state of Minnesota. Environmental？and Resource Economics 48(2): 219-242.

상세보기
Sengl, P., M. Magnes, L. Erdos and C. Berg(2017)？A test of naturalness indicator values to？evaluate success in grassland restoration.？Community Ecology 18(2): 184-192.

상세보기
Sharp, R., H.T. Tallis, T. Ricketts, A.D. Guerry,？S.A. Wood, R.C. Kramer and K.？Vigersto(2014) InVEST user's guide. The？Natural Capital Project: Stanford, CA,？USA.
Slater, S. J., R. W. Christiana and J. Gustat(2020)？Peer Reviewed: Recommendations for？keeping parks and green space accessible？for mental and physical health during？COVID-19 and other pandemics.？Preventing chronic disease 17.
Song, S., Z. Liu, C. He and W. Lu(2020)？Evaluating the effects of urban expansion？on natural habitat quality by coupling？localized shared socioeconomic pathways？and the land use scenario dynamics-urban？model. Ecological Indicators 112: 106071.
Sun, X., Z. Jiang, F. Liu and D. Zhang(2019)？Monitoring spatio-temporal dynamics of？habitat quality in Nansihu Lake basin,？eastern China, from 1980 to 2015.？Ecological Indicators 102: 716-723.

상세보기
Terrado, M., S. Sabater, B. Chaplin-Kramer, L.？Mandle, G. Ziv and V. Acuna(2016)？Model development for the assessment of？terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in？conservation planning. Science of the total？environment 540: 63-70.
Ahn, T.M., Heo, H.Y., Lee, J.Y., Yoon, M.H.,？Shin, M.J. and J.K. Choi(2009) The Study？on the Management Suggestion and？Current Conditions of Marine and Coastal National？Park in Korea. Journal of National Park？Research 1(1):13-28.
Visconti, P., S. Butchart, T. Brooks, P.？Langhammer, D. Marnewick, S. Vergara,？A. Yanosky and J. Watson(2019)？Protected area targets post-2020. Science？364(6437): 239-241.

상세보기
Walz, U. and C. Stein(2014) Indicators of？hemeroby for the monitoringof？landscapes in Germany. Journal for？Nature Conservation 22(3):279-289.

상세보기
Winter, S.(2012) Forest naturalness assessment as？a component of biodiversity monitoring？and conservation management. Forestry？85(2): 293-304.

상세보기
Xu, W., X. Li, S. L. Pimm, V. Hull, J. Zhang,？L. Zhang, Y. Xiao, H. Zheng and Z.？Ouyang(2016) The effectiveness of the？zoning of China's protected areas.？Biological Conservation 204: 231-236.

상세보기
Yutian, L. U., X. U. Sun, L. I. U. Songxue, and？W. U. Jiayu(2022) An approach to urban？landscape character assessment: Linking？urban big data and machine learning.？Sustainable Cities and Society 103983.
Zhou, Y., Shen, Y., Yang, X., Wang, Z., & Xu,？L. (2021). Where to Revitalize, and How?？A Rural Typology Zoning for China. Land,？10(12), 1336.

상세보기
Natural Capital Project (2020)？https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/https://www.korea.kr/news/policyNewsView.do?newsId148830206

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format