참고문헌 (49)

1. Ahn, Y. M. and Shin, Y. J., 2020, Analysis of the program？for training pre-service Earth science teachers: Focusing？on college curriculum. Journal of the Korean Earth？Science Society, 41(4), 391-404. (in Korean) 

   원문보기 상세보기

2. An, J. E. and Kim, H. B., 2021, Pre-service teachers'？development of science teacher identity via planning,？enacting and reflecting inquiry-based biology instruction.？Journal of the Korean Association for Science？Education, 41(6), 519-531. (in Korean) 

3. Bryant, A., 2002, Re-grounding grounded theory. Journal？of Information Technology Theory and Application,？4(1), 25-42. 

4. Charmaz, K., 1990, Discovering' chronic illness: Using？grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30(11),？1161-1172. 

   상세보기

5. Charmaz. K., 1995, The body, identity, and self: Adapting？to impairment, The Sociological Quarterly, 36(4), 657-680, DOI:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00459.x. 

   상세보기

6. Charmaz, K., 2000, Grounded theory: Objectivist and？contructivist methods, In The Handbook of Qualitative？Research (2nd Edited by Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln,？T.). SAGE Publications, New York, USA, 509-535. 

7. Charmaz, K., 2002, Grounded theory analysis, In？Handbook of interview research (Edited by Gubrium, J.？F. and Holstein, J. A.). SAGE Publications, New York,？USA, 675-694. 

8. Charmaz, K., 2006, Constructing grounded theory a？practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE？Publications, New York, USA, ISBN: 9780761973522, 202 p. 

9. Charmaz, K., 2014, Constructing grounded theory. Sage？Publications, London, UK, 416 p. 

10. Charmaz, K., and Mitchell, R. G., 2001, Grounded theory？in ethnography. In Handbook of ethnography, 160-174,？DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608337. 

    

11. Choi, H. S. and Kim, J. B., 2010, A investigation of？conditional terms noted in multiple choice problems？about physics I - College scholastic ability test about？force and energy -. School Science Journal, 4(1), 33-45.？(in Korean) 

12. Choi, J. S., 2013, A study of the effectiveness of a？mathematics teacher's training program focused on the？construction of test items. Journal of Educational？Research in Mathematics, 23(2), 193-212. (in Korean) 

13. Choi, M. J., Kim, K. Y. and Lee, C. H., 2018, An analysis？of pre-service mathematics teachers' knowledge of？creating math test items. Research Institute of Curriculum？& Instruction, 22(3), 183-197. (in Korean) 

14. Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D., 2017, Research design:？Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.？SAGE Publications, New York, USA, 273 p. 

15. Dassa, L. and Derose, D. S., 2017, Get in the teacher？zone: a perception study of preservice teachers and their？teacher identity. Issues in Teacher Education, 26(1),？101-113. 

16. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., 1998, The landscape of？qualitative research. SAGE Publications, New York,？USA, 656 p. 

17. Glaser, B., 1978, Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the？methodology of grounded theory. University of？California, San Francisco, USA, 164 p. 

18. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A., 1967, The discovery of？grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.？Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick and London, USA？and London, 271 p. 

19. Greenberg, J. and Walsh, K., 2012, What teacher？preparation programs teach about K-12 assessment: A？review. National Council on Teacher Quality, New？York, USA, 50 p. (online available at www.nctq.org/p/publications/docs/assessment_report.pdf) 

20. Jo, Y. H., 2015, Field research and action research. The？Korean Society for the Study of Anthropology of？Education, 18(4), 1-49. (in Korean) 

21. Kim, S. W., 2007, A Study on analysis and alternatives of？performance assessment in high school science subject.？Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(4), 53-73. (in？Korean) 

22. Kim, Y., Park, J., Park, J., Lee, H. and Kim, Y., 2010,？Science teachers' perceptions and needs for courses in？science education subjects for science teacher preparation？program in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association？for Research in Science Education, 30(6), 785-798. (in？Korean) 

23. Ko, J. H., 2010, A study on improving the quality of the？assessment items by analyzing the types of their？modification. School Mathematics, 12(2), 113-136. (in？Korean) 

24. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, 2018, A？study on the improvement of school-level student？evaluation system by application of process-centered？evaluation. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and？Evaluation, Issue paper, Study material ORM 2018-39-7, 26 p. (in Korean) 

25. Laverty, J. T., Cooper, M. M. and Caballero, M. D., 2015,？Developing the next generation of physics assessments.？The American Association of Physics Teachers under a？Creative Commons Attribution, 187-190, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1507.00663 

    

26. Lee, K. Y. and An, H. S., 2005, Analysis of assessment？types, scoring methods and reliability of science？performance assessment in middle and high school.？Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？25(2), 173-183. (in Korean) 

27. Lewin, K., 1946, Action research and minority problems.？Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. 

    상세보기

28. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. and Borko, H., 1999, Nature,？sources and development of pedagogical content？knowledge for science teaching. J. Gess-Newsome and？N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content？knowledge, Dordrecht: Kluwer, Netherlands, 95-132. 

29. McMillan, J. H., 2018, Classroom assessment: Principles？and practice that enhance student learning and？motivation. Pearson Education, Massachusetts, USA,？560 p. 

30. Mertler, C. A., 2009, Action research: Teachers as？researchers in the classroom. SAGE Publications, New？York, USA, 288 p. 

31. Mills, G. E., 2000, Action research: A guide for the teacher？researcher. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA, 272 p. 

32. Ministry of Education and Korea Institute for Curriculum？and Evaluation, 2017, Performance assessment focusing？on the process, What should I do? (Secondary). Sejong:？Ministry of Education. Research report, Study material？ORM 2017-19-2, 29 p. (in Korean) 

33. Ministry of Education, 2015, General Introduction of？primary and secondary school curriculum. Notice No.？2015-74 of the Ministry of Education [Appendix 1]. (in？Korean) 

34. Ministry of Education, 2023, 2023 School anecdotal？records and guidelines. Sejong: Ministry of Education,？272 p. (in Korean) 

35. Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B. J.,？Charmaz, K. and Clarke, A. E., 2009, Developing？grounded theory: The second generation. Left Coast？Press, California, USA, 279 p. 

36. Noh, T. H., Kim, H. R., Han, J. Y. and Kang, H. S., 2017,？An analysis of the characteristics of the processes of？pre-service chemistry teachers in making written test？items using think-aloud method. Journal of The Korean？Association for Science Education, 37(2), 225-237. (in？Korean) 

37. Noh, T. H., Park, J. S. and Kang, H. S., 2016, Interactions？among PCK components of pre-service secondary？chemistry teachers considered in processes of making？written test items. Journal of The Korean Association？For Science Education, 36(5), 769-781. (in Korean) 

38. Park, C. and Hong, M. Y., 2002, A relative effectiveness？of item types for estimating science ability in TIMSS-R. Journal of the Korean Association for Science？Education, 22(1), 122-131. (in Korean) 

39. Park, H. J. and Park, H. E., 2011, Korean linguistic errors？on written tests of science in middle school 7th grade.？Journal of Education and Culture, 17(2), 339-366. (in？Korean) 

40. Park, H. J. and Shin, J. R., 2010, Errors on written tests of？science in middle school 7th grade: Matters. Journal of？the Korean Chemical Society, 54(6), 781-786. (in Korean) 

41. Park, J. D., 2009, An analysis of item components in？College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) and some？suggestions for multiple-choice type item development.？The Korean History Education Review, 111, 227-262.？(in Korean) 

42. Park, J. S., Kang, H. S. and Han, J. Y., 2017, The？influence of paired think-aloud problem solving on？interactions among PCK components considered in the？processes of making written test items by pre-service？chemistry teachers. Journal of The Korean Association？For Science Education, 37(3), 429-440. (in Korean) 

43. Piggot-Irvine, E., 2006, Sustaining excellence in experienced？principals? Critique of a professional learning community？approach. International Electronic Journal for Leadership？Learning, 10(16), 13 p. (online available at https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/iejll/index.php/iejll/article/view/616/278) 

44. Popham, W. J., 2011, Assessment literacy overlooked: A？teacher educator's confession. The Teacher Educator,？46(4), 265-273. 

    상세보기

45. Song, S. C., Lee, C. H. and Shim, K. C., 2014, A study？on science teachers' perception about science teacher？training curriculum. Teacher Education Research, 53(1),？15-27. (in Korean) 

46. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M., 1998, Basics of？qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for？developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, New？York, USA, ISBN: 9780803959392, 312 p. 

47. Stringer, E. T., 2007, Action research(3rd edition). SAGE？Publications, New York, USA, 279 p. 

48. Warford, M. K., 2011, The zone of proximal teacher？development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2),？252-258. 

49. Xu, Y., and Brown, G. T., 2016, Teacher assessment？literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and？Teacher Education, 58, 149-162. 

    상세보기