AbstractUrban waste waters were treated with pure ozone or combinations of ozone, hydrogen peroxide and/or UV radiation to study the course of resulting BOD (biological oxygen demand)‐time profiles and to propose a kinetic model. BOD‐time profiles of chemically treated waste waters show ...
AbstractUrban waste waters were treated with pure ozone or combinations of ozone, hydrogen peroxide and/or UV radiation to study the course of resulting BOD (biological oxygen demand)‐time profiles and to propose a kinetic model. BOD‐time profiles of chemically treated waste waters show an initial lag period that first order kinetic models cannot describe. A second order kinetic model is then proposed that satisfactorily fits experimental BOD‐time profiles, except when hydrogen peroxide has been used. In these cases, BOD‐time profiles present the highest lag periods observed. By applying this model, three parameters are determined: the biokinetic constant (k) which is an index of the biological removal rate; the potential amount of biodegradable matter (BODT), and the measure of the size of inocula and microbial activities of microoganisms (λ). The model was checked with experimental results of BOD‐time profiles corresponding to both untreated and chemically ozonated urban waste waters. Ozonated waste waters showed the highest values of k and BODT, which implies an improvement of waste water biodegradability after ozonation. However, values of λ corresponding to ozonated waste waters presented lower values than those of untreated waste waters. This was due to the lag period observed in the BOD‐time profile, which was a consequence of a lack of microorganism acclimation to ozonated waste waters. The effect of the ozone does, pH and carbonates during ozonation on COD (chemical oxygen demand) and the above indicated parameters was also studied. There was an optimum ozone dose which was 138 mg/l for this specific system. This led to the highest biodegradable fraction (φ) and the highest biokinetic constant (39% increase in φ and 4.7‐ fold increase in the value of k, respectively, compared to untreated waste waters.). Another significant fact was that a higher COD reduction was observed in the absence of carbonate during ozonation at basic pH values. In addition, the percentage of variation in the biodegradable fraction (Δφ) of ozonated waste water increased compared to the untreated waste water at acid pH. The results suggest that ozonolysis, the direct molecular ozone way of reaction, due to its selective character, increases the biodegradability of waste water more than other chemically advanced oxidation processes based on hydroxyl radical reactions.
AbstractUrban waste waters were treated with pure ozone or combinations of ozone, hydrogen peroxide and/or UV radiation to study the course of resulting BOD (biological oxygen demand)‐time profiles and to propose a kinetic model. BOD‐time profiles of chemically treated waste waters show an initial lag period that first order kinetic models cannot describe. A second order kinetic model is then proposed that satisfactorily fits experimental BOD‐time profiles, except when hydrogen peroxide has been used. In these cases, BOD‐time profiles present the highest lag periods observed. By applying this model, three parameters are determined: the biokinetic constant (k) which is an index of the biological removal rate; the potential amount of biodegradable matter (BODT), and the measure of the size of inocula and microbial activities of microoganisms (λ). The model was checked with experimental results of BOD‐time profiles corresponding to both untreated and chemically ozonated urban waste waters. Ozonated waste waters showed the highest values of k and BODT, which implies an improvement of waste water biodegradability after ozonation. However, values of λ corresponding to ozonated waste waters presented lower values than those of untreated waste waters. This was due to the lag period observed in the BOD‐time profile, which was a consequence of a lack of microorganism acclimation to ozonated waste waters. The effect of the ozone does, pH and carbonates during ozonation on COD (chemical oxygen demand) and the above indicated parameters was also studied. There was an optimum ozone dose which was 138 mg/l for this specific system. This led to the highest biodegradable fraction (φ) and the highest biokinetic constant (39% increase in φ and 4.7‐ fold increase in the value of k, respectively, compared to untreated waste waters.). Another significant fact was that a higher COD reduction was observed in the absence of carbonate during ozonation at basic pH values. In addition, the percentage of variation in the biodegradable fraction (Δφ) of ozonated waste water increased compared to the untreated waste water at acid pH. The results suggest that ozonolysis, the direct molecular ozone way of reaction, due to its selective character, increases the biodegradability of waste water more than other chemically advanced oxidation processes based on hydroxyl radical reactions.
참고문헌 (23)
1 Rice , R. G. , Browning , M. E. :Ozone Treatment of Industrial Waste Water. New Jersey (USA), 1981 .
2 Scott , J. P. , Ollis , D. F. : Integration of chemical and biological oxidation processes for water treatment: Review and recommendations. Environ. Prog. 14 ( 1995 ), 88 – 103 .
3 Karrer , N. J. , Ryhiner , G. , Heinzle , E. : Applicability test for combined biological‐chemical treatment of waste waters containing biorefractory compounds. Water Res. 31 ( 1997 ), 1013 – 1020 .
4 Narkis , N. , Schneider‐Rotel , M. : Evaluation of ozone‐induced biodegradability of waste water treatment plant effluent. Water Res. 14 ( 1980 ), 929 – 939 .
8 Xu , S. , Hasselbland , S. : A simple biological method to estimate the readily biodegradable organic matter in waste water. Water Res. 30 ( 1996 ), 1023 – 1025 .
9 Ramalho , R. S. (Reverté, S. A., ed.): Trataemiento de Aguas Residuales. Barcelone (Spain), 1991 , 50 – 62 , 42 – 43 .
10 Zimmerman , R. , Richard , D. : Understanding the effects of ozonation on a combined municipal/industrial secondary effluent. Ozone Sci. Eng. 11 ( 1990 ), 107 – 114 .
11 Maoyu , Y. : An autocatalytic model for the kinetics of BOD test. Water Res. 24 ( 1990 ), 1091 – 1095 .
12 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. APHA‐AWWA‐WPCF. (15th edition). Washington (USA), 1980 .
13 Stover , E. L. , Wang , L. W. , Medley , D. R. : Ozone‐assisted biological treatment of industrial waste waters containing biorefractory compounds. Ozone Sci. Eng. 4 ( 1982 ), 177 – 194 .
14 Gilbert , E. : Biodegradability of ozonation products as a function of COD and DOC elimination by example of substituted aromatic substances. Water Res. 21 ( 1987 ), 1273 – 1278 .
15 Calvosa , L. , Monteverdi , A. , Rindone , B. , Riva , G. : Ozone oxidation of compounds resistant to biological degradation. Water Res. 25 ( 1991 ), 985 – 993 .
16 Moore , W. A. , Kroner , R. C. , Ruchhof , C. C. : Dichromate reflux method for determination of oxygen consumed. Anal. Chem. 21 ( 1949 ), 953 – 957 .
17 Xu , B. J. : Principles of Water Supply and Sewage Disposal in Present Age. Qinghua University Press , China , 1993 .
18 Langlais , B. , Reckhow , D. A. , Brink , D. R. : Ozone in Water Treatment. Application and Engineering ,( 2nd edition ). Chelsea (MI, USA) : Lewis Publishers, INC , 1981 , 2 – 8 , 133 – 296 .
19 Legube , B. , Doré , M. , Langlais , B. , Bourbigot , M. M. , Gouesbet , G. : Changes in the chemical nature of a biologically treated waste water during disinfection by ozone. Ozone Sci. Eng. 9 ( 1987 ), 63 – 84 .
20 Stockinger , H. , Heinzle , E. , Kut , O. M. : Removal of chloro and nitro aromatic waste water pollutants by ozonation and biotreatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29 ( 1995 ), 2016 – 2022 .
21 Buxton , G. V. , Greenstock , C. L. , Helman , W. P. , Ross , A. B. : Critical review of rate constant for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (OH/O) in aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 17 ( 1988 ), 513 – 886 .
22 Staehelin , J. , Hoigné , J. : Decomposition of ozone in water in the presence of organic solutes acting as promoters and inhibitors of radical chain reactions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19 ( 1985 ), 1206 – 1213 .
23 Glaze , W. H. :(Eckenfelder, W. W., Bowers, A. R., Roth, J. A., eds.).An overview of advanced oxidation processes: Current status and kinetic model. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium of Chemical Oxidation, vol. 3. Lancaster, Pennsylvania (USA), 1994 .
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.