$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents

Journal of construction engineering and management, v.126 no.1, 2000년, pp.52 - 60  

Abdelhamid, Tariq S. (Student Member, ASCE) ,  Everett, John G. (Student Member, ASCE)

Abstract

Construction accident investigation techniques and reporting systems identify what type of accidents occur and how they occurred. Unfortunately, they do not properly address why the accident occurred by identifying possible root causes, which is only possible by complementing these techniques with theories of accident causation and theories of human error. The uniqueness of the construction industry dictates the need to tailor many of the contemporary accident causation models and human error theories. This paper presents an accident root causes tracing model (ARCTM) tailored to the needs of the construction industry. ARCTM proposes that accidents occur due to three root causes: (1) Failing to identify an unsafe condition that existed before an activity was started or that developed after an activity was started; (2) deciding to proceed with a work activity after the worker identifies an existing unsafe condition; and (3) deciding to act unsafe regardless of initial conditions of the work environment. In addition, ARCTM emphasizes the need to determine how unsafe conditions exist before or develop after an activity is started and proposes that these unsafe conditions are due to four causes: (1) Management actions/inactions; (2) unsafe acts of worker or coworker; (3) non-human-related event(s); (4) an unsafe condition that is a natural part of the initial construction site conditions. Thus, ARCTM acknowledges the possible contribution of both management and labor to the accident process. This perspective helps in better explaining accidents on construction sites and in identifying areas where prevention efforts should be directed, so that labor and management may provide more effective measures for preventing accident occurrence.(Author abstract)

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Accident prevention, a workers' education manual. 

  2. Accident facts . (1997). National Safety Council Itasca Ill. 

  3. Adams E. (1976). “Accident causation and the management system.” Profl. Safety 22(10) 26-29. 

  4. Management guide to loss control Bird F. 1974 

  5. Brown I. D. ( 1995). “Accident reporting and analysis.” Evaluation of human work J. R. Wilson and E. N. Corlett eds. Taylor & Francis London. 

  6. Occupational biomechanics Chaffin D. B. 1991 

  7. Cooper K. and Volard S. V. ( 1978). “The influence of the individual on industrial accidents.” Accident Prevention Toronto 15(5) 45-49. 

  8. Culver C. Florczak G. Castell R. Jr. Pelton G. and Connolly C. (1990). “Analysis of construction fatalities-The OSHA Data 1985-1988.” Rep. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) U.S. Department of Labor Washington D.C. 

  9. Culver C. Marshall M. and Connolly C. (1992). “Construction accidents: The workers' compensation data base 1985-1988.” Rep. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) U.S. Department of Labor Washington D.C. 

  10. Construction safety handbook Davies V. J. 1990 

  11. DeJoy D. M. (1990). “Toward a comprehensive human factors model of workplace accident causation.” Profl. Safety 35(5) 11-16. 

  12. Effective loss prevention Douglas H. 1976 

  13. 10.1016/0003-6870(91)90156-C Dwyer T. and Raftery A. E. (1991). “Industrial accidents are produced by social-relations of work-A sociological theory of industrial accidents.” Appl. Ergonomics 22(3) 167-178. 

  14. Friend M. A. and Kohn J. P. (1992). “A behavioral approach to accident prevention.” Occupational Hazards 54(10) 113-115. 

  15. Construction safety, security, and loss prevention Fullman J. B. 1984 

  16. Safety management in construction and industry Goldsmith D. 1987 

  17. Heath E. D. (1991). “Identifying those worker populations that are at higher levels of risk.” Am. Industrial Hygiene Assn. J. 52(4) A211-A212. 

  18. Industrial accident prevention Heinrich H. W. 1959 

  19. Industrial accident prevention Heinrich H. W. 1980 

  20. 10.1016/0169-8141(91)90033-I Helander M. G. (1991). “Safety hazards and motivation for safe work in the construction industry.” Int. J. Industrial Ergonomics London 8(4) 205-223. 

  21. Construction safety Hinze J. W. 1997 

  22. Occupational safety and accident prevention, behavioral strategies and methods Hoyos C. G. 1988 

  23. 10.1080/00224545.1957.9714280 Kerr W. (1957). “Complementary theories of safety psychology.” J. Social Psychology 45 3-9. 

  24. 10.1080/00140139508925202 Klumb P. L. (1995). “Cognitive failures and performance differences: Validation studies of a German version of the cognitive failures questionnaire.” Ergonomics 38(7) 1456-1467. 

  25. Krause T. R. Hidley J. H. and Lareau W. (1984). “Behavioral science applied to accident prevention.” Profl. Safety 29(7) 21-27. 

  26. Krause T. R. and Russell L. R. (1994). “The behavior-based approach to proactive accident investigation.” Profl. Safety 39(3) 22-28. 

  27. La Bette C. R. (1990). “Innovative procedures in construction safety.” Profl. Safety 35(4) 35-39. 

  28. MacCollum D. V. (1990). “Time for change in construction safety.” Profl. Safety 35(2) 17-20. 

  29. McClay R. E. (1989). “Toward a more universal model of loss incident causation-Part I.” Profl. Safety 35(1) 15-20. 

  30. McClay R. E. (1989). “Toward a more universal model of loss incident causation-Part II.” Profl. Safety 35(2) 34-39. 

  31. 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1 Norman D. A. (1981). “Categorization of action slips.” Psychological Rev. 88 1-14. 

  32. Techniques of safety management Petersen D. 1971 

  33. Safety management-A human approach Petersen D. 1975 

  34. Human Error-Reduction and Safety Management Petersen D. 1982 

  35. Construction safety practices and principles Peyton R. X. 1991 

  36. 10.1017/CBO9781139062367 

  37. Systems safety analysis: Error rates and costs Recht J. 1970 

  38. Rietze R. B. (1990). “Proactive construction management.” Profl. Safety 35(1) 14-16. 

  39. Rigby L. V. (1970). “The nature of human error.” Proc. Annu. Tech. Conf. Trans. of the Am. Soc. for Quality Control 475-566. 

  40. Rook L. Altman J. and Swain A. ( 1966). Human error quantification . Sandia Corp. Albuqerque N.M. 

  41. 10.1002/acp.2350040405 Wagenaar W. A. Hudson P. T. and Reason J. T. (1990). “Cognitive failures and accidents.” Appl. Cognitive Psychology 4 273- 294. 

  42. 10.1001/archpsyc.1971.01750070019002 Weaver D. A. (1971). “Symptoms of operational error.” Profl. Safety 17(10) 24-34. 

  43. “Heinrich revisited.” Zeller D. B. 1986 

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로