최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Living reviews in solar physics, v.17 no.1, 2020년, pp.2 -
Petrovay, Kristóf
AbstractA review of solar cycle prediction methods and their performance is given, including early forecasts for Cycle 25. The review focuses on those aspects of the solar cycle prediction problem that have a bearing on dynamo theory. The scope of the review is further restricted to the issue of pre...
Astron Astrophys Suppl JG Ables 15 383 1974 Ables JG (1974) Maximum entropy spectral analysis. Astron Astrophys Suppl 15:383-393
Sol Phys LA Aguirre 249 103 2008 10.1007/s11207-008-9160-5 Aguirre LA, Letellier C, Maquet J (2008) Forecasting the time series of sunspot numbers. Sol Phys 249:103-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9160-5
J Geophys Res HS Ahluwalia 103 12103 1998 10.1029/98JA00960 Ahluwalia HS (1998) The predicted size of cycle 23 based on the inferred three-cycle quasi-periodicity of the planetary index $$A_p$$. J Geophys Res 103:12103-12109. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA00960
Sol Phys R Arlt 247 399 2008 10.1007/s11207-007-9113-4 Arlt R (2008) Digitization of sunspot drawings by Staudacher in 1749-1796. Sol Phys 247:399-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9113-4
Sol Phys R Arlt 255 143 2009 10.1007/s11207-008-9306-5 Arlt R (2009) The butterfly diagram in the eighteenth century. Sol Phys 255:143-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9306-5. arXiv:0812.2233
Mon Not R Astron Soc R Arlt 433 3165 2013 10.1093/mnras/stt961 Arlt R, Leussu R, Giese N, Mursula K, Usoskin IG (2013) Sunspot positions and sizes for 1825-1867 from the observations by Samuel Heinrich Schwabe. Mon Not R Astron Soc 433:3165-3172. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt961. arXiv:1305.7400
Astron Astrophys R Arlt 595 A104 2016 10.1051/0004-6361/201629000 Arlt R, Senthamizh Pavai V, Schmiel C, Spada F (2016) Sunspot positions, areas, and group tilt angles for 1611-1631 from observations by Christoph Scheiner. Astron Astrophys 595:A104. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629000. arXiv:1608.07172
Mon Not R Astron Soc E Asvestari 467 1608 2017 10.1093/mnras/stx190 Asvestari E, Usoskin IG, Kovaltsov GA, Owens MJ, Krivova NA, Rubinetti S, Taricco C (2017) Assessment of different sunspot number series using the cosmogenic isotope $$^{44}$$Ti in meteorites. Mon Not R Astron Soc 467:1608-1613. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx190
Sol Phys T Ataç 233 139 2006 10.1007/s11207-006-1112-3 Ataç T, Özgüç A (2006) Overview of the solar activity during solar cycle 23. Sol Phys 233:139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-006-1112-3
Ap&SS AF Attia 344 5 2013 10.1007/s10509-012-1300-6 Attia AF, Ismail HA, Basurah HM (2013) A neuro-fuzzy modeling for prediction of solar cycles 24 and 25. Ap&SS 344:5-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1300-6
Astrophys J T Bai 363 299 1990 10.1086/169342 Bai T, Cliver EW (1990) A 154 day periodicity in the occurrence rate of proton flares. Astrophys J 363:299-309. https://doi.org/10.1086/169342
Space Sci Rev A Balogh 186 1 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0125-8 Balogh A, Hudson HS, Petrovay K, von Steiger R (2014) Introduction to the solar activity cycle: overview of causes and consequences. Space Sci Rev 186:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0125-8
Mon Not R Astron Soc T Baranyi 447 1857 2015 10.1093/mnras/stu2572 Baranyi T (2015) Comparison of Debrecen and Mount Wilson/Kodaikanal sunspot group tilt angles and the Joy’s law. Mon Not R Astron Soc 447:1857-1865. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2572. arXiv:1412.1355
Sol Phys T Baranyi 291 3081 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0930-1 Baranyi T, Győri L, Ludmány A (2016) On-line tools for solar data compiled at the Debrecen observatory and their extensions with the Greenwich sunspot data. Sol Phys 291:3081-3102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0930-1. arXiv:1606.00669
Astrophys J S Basu 758 43 2012 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/43 Basu S, Broomhall AM, Chaplin WJ, Elsworth Y (2012) Thinning of the Sun’s magnetic layer: the peculiar solar minimum could have been predicted. Astrophys J 758:43. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/43. arXiv:1208.5493
Astrophys J Lett JG Beck 575 L47 2002 10.1086/342636 Beck JG, Gizon L, Duvall TL Jr (2002) A new component of solar dynamics: north-south diverging flows migrating toward the equator with an 11 year period. Astrophys J Lett 575:L47-L50. https://doi.org/10.1086/342636
Space Sci Rev J Beer 125 67 2006 10.1007/s11214-006-9047-4 Beer J, Vonmoos M, Muscheler R (2006) Solar variability over the past several millennia. Space Sci Rev 125:67-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-006-9047-4
Astrophys J B Belucz 806 169 2015 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/169 Belucz B, Dikpati M, Forgács-Dajka E (2015) A Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model with multi-cellular meridional circulation in advection- and diffusion-dominated regimes. Astrophys J 806:169. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/169. arXiv:1504.00420
Geophys Res Lett A Berggren 36 11801 2009 10.1029/2009GL038004 Berggren A, Beer J, Possnert G, Aldahan A, Kubik P, Christl M, Johnsen SJ, Abreu J, Vinther BM (2009) A 600-year annual $$^{10}$$Be record from the NGRIP ice core, greenland. Geophys Res Lett 36:11801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038004
Sol Phys NJ Bhatt 260 225 2009 10.1007/s11207-009-9439-1 Bhatt NJ, Jain R, Aggarwal M (2009) Prediction of the maximum amplitude and timing of sunspot cycle 24. Sol Phys 260:225-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9439-1
Biesecker D, Upton L (2019) Solar cycle 25-call for predictions. Solar News 2019/1:1. https://www.nso.edu/solarnews/solar-cycle-25-call-for-predictions/
Blais A, Mertz D (2001) An introduction to neural networks. IBM Developer. http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-neural/
Sol Phys EM Blanter 289 4309 2014 10.1007/s11207-014-0568-9 Blanter EM, Le Mouël JL, Shnirman MG, Courtillot V (2014) Kuramoto model of nonlinear coupled oscillators as a way for understanding phase synchronization: application to solar and geomagnetic indices. Sol Phys 289:4309-4333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0568-9
Sol Phys E Blanter 291 1003 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0867-4 Blanter E, Le Mouël JL, Shnirman M, Courtillot V (2016) Kuramoto model with non-symmetric coupling reconstructs variations of the solar-cycle period. Sol Phys 291:1003-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0867-4
Sol Phys E Blanter 292 54 2017 10.1007/s11207-017-1078-3 Blanter E, Le Mouël JL, Shnirman M, Courtillot V (2017) Reconstruction of the north-south solar asymmetry with a Kuramoto model. Sol Phys 292:54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1078-3
Nature RN Bracewell 171 649 1953 10.1038/171649a0 Bracewell RN (1953) The sunspot number series. Nature 171:649-650. https://doi.org/10.1038/171649a0
Astron Astrophys R Brajša 496 855 2009 10.1051/0004-6361:200810862 Brajša R, Wöhl H, Hanslmeier A, Verbanac G, Ruždjak D, Cliver E, Svalgaard L, Roth M (2009) On solar cycle predictions and reconstructions. Astron Astrophys 496:855-861. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810862
Astrophys J Lett MK Browning 648 L157 2006 10.1086/507869 Browning MK, Miesch MS, Brun AS, Toomre J (2006) Dynamo action in the solar convection zone and tachocline: pumping and organization of toroidal fields. Astrophys J Lett 648:L157-L160. https://doi.org/10.1086/507869. arXiv:astro-ph/0609153
Astrophys J PJ Bushby 661 1289 2007 10.1086/516628 Bushby PJ, Tobias SM (2007) On predicting the solar cycle using mean-field models. Astrophys J 661:1289-1296. https://doi.org/10.1086/516628. arXiv:0704.2345
Astrophys J RA Calvo 444 916 1995 10.1086/175661 Calvo RA, Ceccato HA, Piacentini RD (1995) Neural network prediction of solar activity. Astrophys J 444:916-921. https://doi.org/10.1086/175661
Astrophys J R Cameron 659 801 2007 10.1086/512049 Cameron R, Schüssler M (2007) Solar cycle prediction using precursors and flux transport models. Astrophys J 659:801-811. https://doi.org/10.1086/512049. arXiv:astro-ph/0612693
Astrophys J R Cameron 685 1291 2008 10.1086/591079 Cameron R, Schüssler M (2008) A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles: consequences for prediction methods. Astrophys J 685:1291-1296. https://doi.org/10.1086/591079
Astrophys J RH Cameron 720 1030 2010 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1030 Cameron RH, Schüssler M (2010) Changes of the solar meridional velocity profile during cycle 23 explained by flows toward the activity belts. Astrophys J 720:1030-1032. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1030. arXiv:1007.2548
Astron Astrophys RH Cameron 548 A57 2012 10.1051/0004-6361/201219914 Cameron RH, Schüssler M (2012) Are the strengths of solar cycles determined by converging flows towards the activity belts? Astron Astrophys 548:A57. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219914. arXiv:1210.7644
Astron Astrophys RH Cameron 599 A52 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201629746 Cameron RH, Schüssler M (2017a) An update of Leighton’s solar dynamo model. Astron Astrophys 599:A52. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629746. arXiv:1611.09111
Astrophys J RH Cameron 843 111 2017 10.3847/1538-4357/aa767a Cameron RH, Schüssler M (2017b) Understanding solar cycle variability. Astrophys J 843:111. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa767a. arXiv:1705.10746
Astrophys J RH Cameron 719 264 2010 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/264 Cameron RH, Jiang J, Schmitt D, Schüssler M (2010) Surface flux transport modeling for solar cycles 15-21: effects of cycle-dependent tilt angles of sunspot groups. Astrophys J 719:264-270. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/264. arXiv:1006.3061
Astron Astrophys RH Cameron 557 A141 2013 10.1051/0004-6361/201321981 Cameron RH, Dasi-Espuig M, Jiang J, Işık E, Schmitt D, Schüssler M (2013) Limits to solar cycle predictability: cross-equatorial flux plumes. Astron Astrophys 557:A141. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321981. arXiv:1308.2827
J Geophys Res RH Cameron 119 680 2014 10.1002/2013JA019498 Cameron RH, Jiang J, Schüssler M, Gizon L (2014) Physical causes of solar cycle amplitude variability. J Geophys Res 119:680-688. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JA019498
Astrophys J Lett RH Cameron 823 L22 2016 10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L22 Cameron RH, Jiang J, Schüssler M (2016) Solar cycle 25: Another moderate cycle? Astrophys J Lett 823:L22. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L22. arXiv:1604.05405
Space Sci Rev RH Cameron 210 367 2017 10.1007/s11214-015-0230-3 Cameron RH, Dikpati M, Brandenburg A (2017) The global solar dynamo. Space Sci Rev 210:367-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0230-3. arXiv:1602.01754
Astron Astrophys M Carbonell 290 983 1994 Carbonell M, Oliver R, Ballester JL (1994) A search for chaotic behaviour in solar activity. Astron Astrophys 290:983-994
Sol Phys VMS Carrasco 291 2931 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0943-9 Carrasco VMS, Vaquero JM, Gallego MC, Sánchez-Bajo F (2016) A normalized sunspot-area series starting in 1832: an update. Sol Phys 291:2931-2940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0943-9. arXiv:1606.04280
Living Rev Sol Phys P Charbonneau 7 3 2010 10.12942/lrsp-2010-3 Charbonneau P (2010) Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev Sol Phys 7:3. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2010-3
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys P Charbonneau 73 198 2011 10.1016/j.jastp.2009.12.020 Charbonneau P, Barlet G (2011) The dynamo basis of solar cycle precursor schemes. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 73:198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.12.020
Astrophys J P Charbonneau 543 1027 2000 10.1086/317142 Charbonneau P, Dikpati M (2000) Stochastic fluctuations in a Babcock-Leighton model of the solar cycle. Astrophys J 543:1027-1043. https://doi.org/10.1086/317142
Astrophys J P Charbonneau 658 657 2007 10.1086/511177 Charbonneau P, Beaubien G, St-Jean C (2007) Fluctuations in Babcock-Leighton dynamos. II. Revisiting the Gnevyshev-Ohl rule. Astrophys J 658:657-662. https://doi.org/10.1086/511177
Astron Astrophys P Chatterjee 427 1019 2004 10.1051/0004-6361:20041199 Chatterjee P, Nandy D, Choudhuri AR (2004) Full-sphere simulations of a circulation-dominated solar dynamo: exploring the parity issue. Astron Astrophys 427:1019-1030. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041199
Astron Astrophys T Chatzistergos 602 A69 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201630045 Chatzistergos T, Usoskin IG, Kovaltsov GA, Krivova NA, Solanki SK (2017) New reconstruction of the sunspot group numbers since 1739 using direct calibration and “backbone” methods. Astron Astrophys 602:A69. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630045. arXiv:1702.06183
Astrophys J Lett DY Chou 559 L175 2001 10.1086/323724 Chou DY, Dai DC (2001) Solar cycle variations of subsurface meridional flows in the sun. Astrophys J Lett 559:L175-L178. https://doi.org/10.1086/323724
Phys Rev Lett AR Choudhuri 98 13 131103 2007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.131103 Choudhuri AR, Chatterjee P, Jiang J (2007) Predicting solar cycle 24 with a solar dynamo model. Phys Rev Lett 98(13):131103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.131103. arXiv:astro-ph/0701527
Geophys Res Lett P Chylek 41 1689 2014 10.1002/2014GL059274 Chylek P, Klett JD, Lesins G, Dubey MK, Hengartner N (2014) The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as a dominant factor of oceanic influence on climate. Geophys Res Lett 41:1689-1697. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059274
Sol Phys F Clette 291 2629 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-1014-y Clette F, Lefèvre L (2016) The new sunspot number: assembling all corrections. Sol Phys 291:2629-2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-1014-y
Space Sci Rev F Clette 186 35 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2 Clette F, Svalgaard L, Vaquero JM, Cliver EW (2014) Revisiting the sunspot number. A 400-year perspective on the solar cycle. Space Sci Rev 186:35-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0074-2. arXiv:1407.3231
Sol Phys F Clette 291 2479 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-1017-8 Clette F, Cliver EW, Lefèvre L, Svalgaard L, Vaquero JM, Leibacher JW (2016a) Preface to topical issue: recalibration of the sunspot number. Sol Phys 291:2479-2486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-1017-8
Sol Phys F Clette 291 2733 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0875-4 Clette F, Lefèvre L, Cagnotti M, Cortesi S, Bulling A (2016b) The revised Brussels-Locarno sunspot number (1981-2015). Sol Phys 291:2733-2761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0875-4. arXiv:1507.07803
Space Sci Rev EW Cliver 186 169 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0093-z Cliver EW (2014) The extended cycle of solar activity and the Sun’s 22-year magnetic cycle. Space Sci Rev 186:169-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0093-z
Sol Phys EW Cliver 291 2891 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0929-7 Cliver EW (2016) Comparison of new and old sunspot number time series. Sol Phys 291:2891-2916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0929-7
Sol Phys TW Cole 30 103 1973 10.1007/BF00156178 Cole TW (1973) Periodicities in solar activity. Sol Phys 30:103-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00156178
New Astron Rev AJ Conway 42 343 1998 10.1016/S1387-6473(98)00041-4 Conway AJ (1998) Time series, neural networks and the future of the Sun. New Astron Rev 42:343-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-6473(98)00041-4
Astron Astrophys E Covas 605 A44 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201629130 Covas E (2017) Spatial-temporal forecasting the sunspot diagram. Astron Astrophys 605:A44. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629130. arXiv:1709.02796
Sol Phys E Covas 294 3 24 2019 10.1007/s11207-019-1412-z Covas E, Peixinho N, Fernandes J (2019) Neural network forecast of the sunspot butterfly diagram. Sol Phys 294(3):24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1412-z. arXiv:1801.04435
Astrophys Space Sci RG Currie 20 509 1973 10.1007/BF00642220 Currie RG (1973) Fine structure in the sunspot spectrum-2 to 70 years. Astrophys Space Sci 20:509-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642220
Sol Phys RS Dabas 250 171 2008 10.1007/s11207-008-9200-1 Dabas RS, Sharma K, Das RM, Pillai KGM, Chopra P, Sethi NK (2008) A prediction of solar cycle 24 using a modified precursor method. Sol Phys 250:171-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9200-1
Astron Astrophys M Dasi-Espuig 518 A7 2010 10.1051/0004-6361/201014301 Dasi-Espuig M, Solanki SK, Krivova NA, Cameron R, Peñuela T (2010) Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle. Astron Astrophys 518:A7. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014301. arXiv:1005.1774
Sol Phys F de Meyer 70 259 1981 10.1007/BF00151333 de Meyer F (1981) Mathematical modelling of the sunspot cycle. Sol Phys 70:259-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151333
Astrophys J Lett G de Toma 771 L22 2013 10.1088/2041-8205/771/2/L22 de Toma G, Chapman GA, Cookson AM, Preminger D (2013a) Temporal stability of sunspot umbral intensities: 1986-2012. Astrophys J Lett 771:L22. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/771/2/L22
Astrophys J G de Toma 770 89 2013 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/89 de Toma G, Chapman GA, Preminger DG, Cookson AM (2013b) Analysis of sunspot area over two solar cycles. Astrophys J 770:89. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/89
Astrophys J ML DeRosa 757 96 2012 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/96 DeRosa ML, Brun AS, Hoeksema JT (2012) Solar magnetic field reversals and the role of dynamo families. Astrophys J 757:96. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/96. arXiv:1208.1768
Astron Nachr A Diercke 336 53 2015 10.1002/asna.201412138 Diercke A, Arlt R, Denker C (2015) Digitization of sunspot drawings by Spörer made in 1861-1894. Astron Nachr 336:53. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201412138. arXiv:1411.7790
Astrophys J M Dikpati 649 498 2006 10.1086/506314 Dikpati M, Gilman PA (2006) Simulating and predicting solar cycles using a flux-transport dynamo. Astrophys J 649:498-514. https://doi.org/10.1086/506314
Geophys Res Lett M Dikpati 33 5102 2006 10.1029/2005GL025221 Dikpati M, de Toma G, Gilman PA (2006) Predicting the strength of solar cycle 24 using a flux-transport dynamo-based tool. Geophys Res Lett 33:5102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025221
Sol Phys M Dikpati 245 1 2007 10.1007/s11207-007-9016-4 Dikpati M, Gilman PA, de Toma G, Ghosh SS (2007) Simulating solar cycles in northern and southern hemispheres by assimilating magnetic data into a calibrated flux-transport dynamo. Sol Phys 245:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9016-4
Astrophys J Lett M Dikpati 673 L99 2008 10.1086/527360 Dikpati M, Gilman PA, de Toma G (2008) The Waldmeier effect: An artifact of the definition of Wolf sunspot number? Astrophys J Lett 673:L99-L101. https://doi.org/10.1086/527360
Astron Astrophys S D’Silva 272 621 1993 D’Silva S, Choudhuri AR (1993) A theoretical model for tilts of bipolar magnetic regions. Astron Astrophys 272:621
Astrophys Space Sci ZL Du 338 9 2012 10.1007/s10509-011-0906-4 Du ZL (2012) The solar cycle: a new prediction technique based on logarithmic values. Astrophys Space Sci 338:9-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-011-0906-4. arXiv:1110.5973
Astron J ZL Du 138 1998 2009 10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1998 Du ZL, Li R, Wang HN (2009) The predictive power of Ohl’s precursor method. Astron J 138:1998-2001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/138/6/1998
Science JA Eddy 192 4245 1189 1976 10.1126/science.192.4245.1189 Eddy JA (1976) The Maunder minimum. Science 192(4245):1189-1202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.192.4245.1189
Space Sci Rev I Ermolli 186 105 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0089-8 Ermolli I, Shibasaki K, Tlatov A, van Driel-Gesztelyi L (2014) Solar cycle indices from the photosphere to the corona: measurements and underlying physics. Space Sci Rev 186:105-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0089-8. arXiv:1705.07054
Astrophys J Y Fan 789 35 2014 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/35 Fan Y, Fang F (2014) A simulation of convective dynamo in the solar convective envelope: maintenance of the solar-like differential rotation and emerging flux. Astrophys J 789:35. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/35. arXiv:1405.3926
Phys Rev Lett JD Farmer 59 845 1987 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.845 Farmer JD, Sidorowich JJ (1987) Predicting chaotic time series. Phys Rev Lett 59:845-848. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.845
J Geophys Res J Feynman 87 6153 1982 10.1029/JA087iA08p06153 Feynman J (1982) Geomagnetic and solar wind cycles, 1900-1975. J Geophys Res 87:6153-6162. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA08p06153
Astrophys J GH Fisher 438 463 1995 10.1086/175090 Fisher GH, Fan Y, Howard RF (1995) Comparisons between theory and observation of active region tilts. Astrophys J 438:463. https://doi.org/10.1086/175090
Astron Astrophys M Fligge 346 313 1999 Fligge M, Solanki SK, Beer J (1999) Determination of solar cycle length variations using the continuous wavelet transform. Astron Astrophys 346:313-321
Mon Not R Astron Soc E Forgács-Dajka 374 282 2007 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11167.x Forgács-Dajka E, Borkovits T (2007) Searching for mid-term variations in different aspects of solar activity-looking for probable common origins and studying temporal variations of magnetic polarities. Mon Not R Astron Soc 374:282-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11167.x
Phys Rev E US Freitas 79 3 035201 2009 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.035201 Freitas US, Letellier C, Aguirre LA (2009) Failure in distinguishing colored noise from chaos using the “noise titration” technique. Phys Rev E 79(3):035201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.035201
Astron Astrophys P Frick 328 670 1997 Frick P, Galyagin D, Hoyt DV, Nesme-Ribes E, Schatten KH, Sokoloff D, Zakharov V (1997) Wavelet analysis of solar activity recorded by sunspot groups. Astron Astrophys 328:670-681
Sol Phys TK Friedli 291 2505 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0907-0 Friedli TK (2016) Sunspot observations of Rudolf Wolf from 1849-1893. Sol Phys 291:2505-2517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0907-0
New Astron PX Gao 43 91 2016 10.1016/j.newast.2015.08.004 Gao PX, Zhong J (2016) The curious temporal behavior of the frequency of different class flares. New Astron 43:91-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2015.08.004
Geomagn Aeron K Georgieva 57 776 2017 10.1134/S001679321707009X Georgieva K, Kilçik A, Nagovitsyn Y, Kirov B (2017) The ratio between the number of sunspot and the number of sunspot groups. Geomagn Aeron 57:776-782. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321707009X. arXiv:1710.01775
Sol Phys SM Gizzatullina 127 281 1990 10.1007/BF00152167 Gizzatullina SM, Rukavishnikov VD, Ruzmaikin AA, Tavastsherna KS (1990) Radiocarbon evidence of the global stochasticity of solar activity. Sol Phys 127:281-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152167
Observatory W Gleissberg 62 158 1939 Gleissberg W (1939) A long-periodic fluctuation of the sun-spot numbers. Observatory 62:158-159
W Gleissberg 1952 Die Häufigkeit der Sonnenflecken Gleissberg W (1952) Die Häufigkeit der Sonnenflecken. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin
Sol Phys W Gleissberg 2 231 1967 10.1007/BF00155925 Gleissberg W (1967) Secularly smoothed data on the minima and maxima of sunspot frequency. Sol Phys 2:231-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00155925
Astron Zh MN Gnevyshev 25 18 1948 Gnevyshev MN, Ohl AI (1948) On the 22-year cycle of solar activity. Astron Zh 25:18-20
Res Astron Astrophys A Goel 9 115 2009 10.1088/1674-4527/9/1/010 Goel A, Choudhuri AR (2009) The hemispheric asymmetry of solar activity during the last century and the solar dynamo. Res Astron Astrophys 9:115-126. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/9/1/010. arXiv:0712.3988
Serbian Astron J ÜD Göker 195 59 2017 10.2298/SAJ1795059G Göker ÜD, Singh J, Nutku F, Priyal M (2017) Temporal variations of different solar activity indices through the solar cycles 21-23. Serbian Astron J 195:59-70. https://doi.org/10.2298/SAJ1795059G
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys N Gopalswamy 176 26 2018 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.04.005 Gopalswamy N, Mäkelä P, Yashiro S, Akiyama S (2018) Long-term solar activity studies using microwave imaging observations and prediction for cycle 25. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 176:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.04.005. arXiv:1804.02544
Phys Rev Lett P Grassberger 50 346 1983 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.346 Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1983) Characterization of strange attractors. Phys Rev Lett 50:346-349. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.346
Mon Not R Astron Soc L Győri 465 1259 2017 10.1093/mnras/stw2667 Győri L, Ludmány A, Baranyi T (2017) Comparative analysis of Debrecen sunspot catalogues. Mon Not R Astron Soc 465:1259-1273. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2667. arXiv:1612.03274
Sol Phys DA Haber 220 371 2004 10.1023/B:SOLA.0000031405.52911.08 Haber DA, Hindman BW, Toomre J, Thompson MJ (2004) Organized subsurface flows near active regions. Sol Phys 220:371-380. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOLA.0000031405.52911.08
Astron Nachr J Halm 156 33 1901 10.1002/asna.19011560302 Halm J (1901) Über eine neue theorie zur erklärung der periodicität der solaren erscheinungen. Astron Nachr 156:33-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.19011560302
Astron Astrophys A Hanslmeier 509 A5 2010 10.1051/0004-6361/200913095 Hanslmeier A, Brajša R (2010) The chaotic solar cycle. I. Analysis of cosmogenic $$^{14}$$C-data. Astron Astrophys 509:A5. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913095
Space Sci Rev DH Hathaway 144 401 2009 10.1007/s11214-008-9430-4 Hathaway DH (2009) Solar cycle forecasting. Space Sci Rev 144:401-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9430-4
Hathaway DH (2010) Does the current minimum validate (or invalidate) cycle prediction methods? In: Cranmer SR, Hoeksema JT, Kohl JL (eds) SOHO-23: understanding a peculiar solar minimum, ASP conference series, vol 428. Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, p 307. arXiv:1003.4208
Living Rev Sol Phys DH Hathaway 12 4 2015 10.1007/lrsp-2015-4 Hathaway DH (2015) The solar cycle. Living Rev Sol Phys 12:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4. arXiv:1502.07020
Science DH Hathaway 327 1350 2010 10.1126/science.1181990 Hathaway DH, Rightmire L (2010) Variations in the Sun’s meridional flow over a solar cycle. Science 327:1350. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1181990
J Geophys Res DH Hathaway 121 A10 10 2016 10.1002/2016JA023190 Hathaway DH, Upton LA (2016) Predicting the amplitude and hemispheric asymmetry of solar cycle 25 with surface flux transport. J Geophys Res 121(A10):10. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023190. arXiv:1611.05106
Sol Phys DH Hathaway 151 177 1994 10.1007/BF00654090 Hathaway DH, Wilson RM, Reichmann EJ (1994) The shape of the sunspot cycle. Sol Phys 151:177-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654090
Sol Phys G Hawkes 293 109 2018 10.1007/s11207-018-1332-3 Hawkes G, Berger MA (2018) Magnetic helicity as a predictor of the solar cycle. Sol Phys 293:109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1332-3
Mon Not R Astron Soc G Hazra 472 2728 2017 10.1093/mnras/stx2152 Hazra G, Choudhuri AR (2017) A theoretical model of the variation of the meridional circulation with the solar cycle. Mon Not R Astron Soc 472:2728-2741. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2152. arXiv:1708.05204
Astrophys J S Hazra 789 5 2014 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/5 Hazra S, Passos D, Nandy D (2014) A stochastically forced time delay solar dynamo model: self-consistent recovery from a Maunder-like grand minimum necessitates a mean-field alpha effect. Astrophys J 789:5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/5. arXiv:1307.5751
Sol Phys G Hazra 290 1851 2015 10.1007/s11207-015-0718-8 Hazra G, Karak BB, Banerjee D, Choudhuri AR (2015) Correlation between decay rate and amplitude of solar cycles as revealed from observations and dynamo theory. Sol Phys 290:1851-1870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0718-8. arXiv:1410.8641
Astrophys J G Hazra 835 39 2017 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/39 Hazra G, Choudhuri AR, Miesch MS (2017) A theoretical study of the build-up of the Sun’s polar magnetic field by using a 3D kinematic dynamo model. Astrophys J 835:39. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/39. arXiv:1610.02726
Chaos R Hegger 9 413 1999 10.1063/1.166424 Hegger R, Kantz H, Schreiber T (1999) Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: the TISEAN package. Chaos 9:413. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166424
Sol Phys R Henwood 262 299 2010 10.1007/s11207-009-9419-5 Henwood R, Chapman SC, Willis DM (2010) Increasing lifetime of recurrent sunspot groups within the greenwich photoheliographic results. Sol Phys 262:299-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9419-5. arXiv:0907.4274
Astron Astrophys KM Hiremath 452 591 2006 10.1051/0004-6361:20042619 Hiremath KM (2006) The solar cycle as a forced and damped harmonic oscillator: long-term variations of the amplitudes, frequencies and phases. Astron Astrophys 452:591-595. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042619
Astrophys Space Sci KM Hiremath 314 45 2008 10.1007/s10509-007-9728-9 Hiremath KM (2008) Prediction of solar cycle 24 and beyond. Astrophys Space Sci 314:45-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-007-9728-9
Space Sci Rev JT Hoeksema 72 137 1995 10.1007/BF00768770 Hoeksema JT (1995) The large-scale structure of the heliospheric current sheet during the ulysses epoch. Space Sci Rev 72:137-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00768770
10.12942/lrsp-2009-1 Howe R (2009) Solar interior rotation and its variation. Living Rev Sol Phys 6:1. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2009-1. arXiv:0902.2406
Astrophys J Lett R Howe 701 L87 2009 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/L87 Howe R, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Hill F, Komm R, Schou J, Thompson MJ (2009) A note on the torsional oscillation at solar minimum. Astrophys J Lett 701:L87-L90. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/L87. arXiv:0907.2965
Astrophys J Lett R Howe 767 L20 2013 10.1088/2041-8205/767/1/L20 Howe R, Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Hill F, Komm R, Larson TP, Rempel M, Schou J, Thompson MJ (2013) The high-latitude branch of the solar torsional oscillation in the rising phase of cycle 24. Astrophys J Lett 767:L20. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/767/1/L20
10.1093/mnras/stx1318 Howe R, Davies GR, Chaplin WJ, Elsworth Y, Basu S, Hale SJ, Ball WH, Komm RW (2017) The Sun in transition? Persistence of near-surface structural changes through Cycle 24. Mon Not R Astron Soc 470:1935-1942. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1318. arXiv:1705.09099
Astrophys J Lett R Howe 862 L5 2018 10.3847/2041-8213/aad1ed Howe R, Hill F, Komm R, Chaplin WJ, Elsworth Y, Davies GR, Schou J, Thompson MJ (2018) Signatures of solar cycle 25 in subsurface zonal flows. Astrophys J Lett 862:L5. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aad1ed. arXiv:1807.02398
Sol Phys H Hudson 289 1341 2014 10.1007/s11207-013-0384-7 Hudson H, Fletcher L, McTiernan J (2014) Cycle 23 variation in solar flare productivity. Sol Phys 289:1341-1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0384-7. arXiv:1401.6474
Astrophys J CP Hung 814 151 2015 10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/151 Hung CP, Jouve L, Brun AS, Fournier A, Talagrand O (2015) Estimating the deep solar meridional circulation using magnetic observations and a dynamo model: a variational approach. Astrophys J 814:151. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/151. arXiv:1710.02084
Astrophys J CP Hung 849 160 2017 10.3847/1538-4357/aa91d1 Hung CP, Brun AS, Fournier A, Jouve L, Talagrand O, Zakari M (2017) Variational estimation of the large-scale time-dependent meridional circulation in the Sun: proofs of concept with a solar mean field dynamo model. Astrophys J 849:160. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa91d1. arXiv:1710.02114
Astron Astrophys H Iijima 607 L2 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201731813 Iijima H, Hotta H, Imada S, Kusano K, Shiota D (2017) Improvement of solar-cycle prediction: plateau of solar axial dipole moment. Astron Astrophys 607:L2. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731813. arXiv:1710.06528
Astrophys J Lett E Işık 813 L13 2015 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L13 Işık E (2015) A mechanism for the dependence of sunspot group tilt angles on cycle strength. Astrophys J Lett 813:L13. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L13. arXiv:1510.04323
10.1017/S1743921318001461 Işık E, Işık S, Kabasakal BB (2018) Sunspot group tilt angles from drawings for cycles 19-24. In: Banerjee D, Jiang J, Kusano K, Solanki S (eds) Long-term datasets for the understanding of solar and stellar magnetic cycles. IAU symposium, vol 340. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921318001461. arXiv:1804.10479
Geomagn Aeron VG Ivanov 52 999 2012 10.1134/S0016793212080130 Ivanov VG (2012) Joy’s law and its features according to the data of three sunspot catalogs. Geomagn Aeron 52:999-1004. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793212080130
10.2307/2981658 Izenman AJ (1983) J. R. Wolf and H. A. Wolfer: an historical note on the Zurich sunspot relative numbers. J R Stat Soc A 146:311-318. https://doi.org/10.2307/2981658. http://www.jstor.org/pss/2981658
Sol Phys J Javaraiah 281 827 2012 10.1007/s11207-012-0106-6 Javaraiah J (2012) The G-O rule and Waldmeier effect in the variations of the numbers of large and small sunspot groups. Sol Phys 281:827-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-0106-6. arXiv:1208.2862
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys J Jiang 176 34 2018 10.1016/j.jastp.2017.06.019 Jiang J, Cao J (2018) Predicting solar surface large-scale magnetic field of cycle 24. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 176:34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.06.019. arXiv:1707.00268
Mon Not R Astron Soc J Jiang 381 1527 2007 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12267.x Jiang J, Chatterjee P, Choudhuri AR (2007) Solar activity forecast with a dynamo model. Mon Not R Astron Soc 381:1527-1542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12267.x. arXiv:0707.2258
Astrophys J J Jiang 709 301 2010 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/301 Jiang J, Cameron R, Schmitt D, Schüssler M (2010a) Modeling the Sun’s open magnetic flux and the heliospheric current sheet. Astrophys J 709:301-307. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/301. arXiv:0912.0108
Astrophys J J Jiang 717 597 2010 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/597 Jiang J, Işik E, Cameron RH, Schmitt D, Schüssler M (2010b) The effect of activity-related meridional flow modulation on the strength of the solar polar magnetic field. Astrophys J 717:597-602. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/597. arXiv:1005.5317
Astron Astrophys J Jiang 528 A82 2011 10.1051/0004-6361/201016167 Jiang J, Cameron RH, Schmitt D, Schüssler M (2011a) The solar magnetic field since 1700. I. Characteristics of sunspot group emergence and reconstruction of the butterfly diagram. Astron Astrophys 528:A82. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016167. arXiv:1102.1266
Astron Astrophys J Jiang 528 A83 2011 10.1051/0004-6361/201016168 Jiang J, Cameron RH, Schmitt D, Schüssler M (2011b) The solar magnetic field since 1700. II. Physical reconstruction of total, polar and open flux. Astron Astrophys 528:A83. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016168. arXiv:1102.1270
Astrophys J J Jiang 791 5 2014 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/5 Jiang J, Cameron RH, Schüssler M (2014a) Effects of the scatter in sunspot group tilt angles on the large-scale magnetic field at the solar surface. Astrophys J 791:5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/5. arXiv:1406.5564
Space Sci Rev J Jiang 186 491 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0083-1 Jiang J, Hathaway DH, Cameron RH, Solanki SK, Gizon L, Upton L (2014b) Magnetic flux transport at the solar surface. Space Sci Rev 186:491-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0083-1. arXiv:1408.3186
Astrophys J Lett J Jiang 808 L28 2015 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L28 Jiang J, Cameron RH, Schüssler M (2015) The cause of the weak solar cycle 24. Astrophys J Lett 808:L28. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L28. arXiv:1507.01764
Astrophys J J Jiang 863 159 2018 10.3847/1538-4357/aad197 Jiang J, Wang JX, Jiao QR, Cao JB (2018) Predictability of the solar cycle over one cycle. Astrophys J 863:159. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad197. arXiv:1807.01543
Astrophys J J Jiang 871 16 2019 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf64a Jiang J, Song Q, Wang JX, Baranyi T (2019) Different contributions to space weather and space climate from different big solar active regions. Astrophys J 871:16. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf64a. arXiv:1901.00116
Sol Phys RP Kane 246 487 2007 10.1007/s11207-007-9059-6 Kane RP (2007) Solar cycle predictions based on extrapolation of spectral components: an update. Sol Phys 246:487-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9059-6
Sol Phys RP Kane 248 203 2008 10.1007/s11207-008-9125-8 Kane RP (2008) Prediction of solar cycle maximum using solar cycle lengths. Sol Phys 248:203-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9125-8
H Kantz 1997 Nonlinear time series analysis Kantz H, Schreiber T (1997) Nonlinear time series analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Astrophys J BB Karak 832 94 2016 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/94 Karak BB, Cameron R (2016) Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo: the role of downward pumping and the equatorward propagation of activity. Astrophys J 832:94. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/94. arXiv:1605.06224
Mon Not R Astron Soc BB Karak 410 1503 2011 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17531.x Karak BB, Choudhuri AR (2011) The Waldmeier effect and the flux transport solar dynamo. Mon Not R Astron Soc 410:1503-1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17531.x. arXiv:1008.0824
Sol Phys BB Karak 278 137 2012 10.1007/s11207-012-9928-5 Karak BB, Choudhuri AR (2012) Quenching of meridional circulation in flux transport dynamo models. Sol Phys 278:137-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-9928-5. arXiv:1111.1540
Astrophys J BB Karak 847 69 2017 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8636 Karak BB, Miesch M (2017) Solar cycle variability induced by tilt angle scatter in a Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model. Astrophys J 847:69. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8636. arXiv:1706.08933
Astrophys J Lett BB Karak 860 L26 2018 10.3847/2041-8213/aaca97 Karak BB, Miesch M (2018) Recovery from Maunder-like grand minima in a Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model. Astrophys J Lett 860:L26. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaca97. arXiv:1712.10130
Space Sci Rev BB Karak 186 561 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0099-6 Karak BB, Jiang J, Miesch MS, Charbonneau P, Choudhuri AR (2014) Flux transport dynamos: from kinematics to dynamics. Space Sci Rev 186:561-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0099-6
Phys Rev A MB Kennel 45 3403 1992 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.3403 Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HDI (1992) Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys Rev A 45:3403
Astrophys J A Kilcik 693 1173 2009 10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1173 Kilcik A, Anderson CNK, Rozelot JP, Ye H, Sugihara G, Ozguc A (2009) Nonlinear prediction of solar cycle 24. Astrophys J 693:1173-1177. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1173. arXiv:0811.1708
Astrophys J A Kilcik 731 30 2011 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/30 Kilcik A, Yurchyshyn VB, Abramenko V, Goode PR, Ozguc A, Rozelot JP, Cao W (2011) Time distributions of large and small sunspot groups over four solar cycles. Astrophys J 731:30. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/30. arXiv:1111.3999
Astrophys J Lett A Kilcik 794 L2 2014 10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L2 Kilcik A, Yurchyshyn VB, Ozguc A, Rozelot JP (2014) Solar cycle 24: curious changes in the relative numbers of sunspot group types. Astrophys J Lett 794:L2. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/L2
10.1007/s11207-018-1285-6 Kilcik A, Yurchyshyn V, Donmez B, Obridko VN, Ozguc A, Rozelot JP (2018) Temporal and periodic variations of sunspot counts in flaring and non-flaring active regions. Sol Phys 293:63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1285-6. arXiv:1705.09065
Astron Lett LL Kitchatinov 37 656 2011 10.1134/S0320010811080031 Kitchatinov LL, Olemskoy SV (2011) Does the Babcock-Leighton mechanism operate on the Sun? Astron Lett 37:656-658. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0320010811080031. arXiv:1109.1351
Astron Astrophys LL Kitchatinov 615 A38 2018 10.1051/0004-6361/201732549 Kitchatinov LL, Mordvinov AV, Nepomnyashchikh AA (2018) Modelling variability of solar activity cycles. Astron Astrophys 615:A38. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732549. arXiv:1804.02833
Astrophys J IN Kitiashvili 831 15 2016 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/15 Kitiashvili IN (2016) Data assimilation approach for forecast of solar activity cycles. Astrophys J 831:15. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/15
Astrophys J Lett IN Kitiashvili 688 L49 2008 10.1086/594999 Kitiashvili IN, Kosovichev AG (2008) Application of data assimilation method for predicting solar cycles. Astrophys J Lett 688:L49-L52. https://doi.org/10.1086/594999. arXiv:0807.3284
Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn IN Kitiashvili 103 53 2009 10.1080/03091920802396518 Kitiashvili IN, Kosovichev AG (2009) Nonlinear dynamical modeling of solar cycles using dynamo formulation with turbulent magnetic helicity. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 103:53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091920802396518. arXiv:0807.3192
Astron Astrophys Z Kolláth 501 695 2009 10.1051/0004-6361/200811303 Kolláth Z, Oláh K (2009) Multiple and changing cycles of active stars. I. Methods of analysis and application to the solar cycles. Astron Astrophys 501:695-702. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200811303. arXiv:0904.1725
Sol Phys RW Komm 156 17 1995 10.1007/BF00669572 Komm RW (1995) Hurst analysis of Mt. Wilson rotation measurements. Sol Phys 156:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00669572
Sol Phys R Komm 268 389 2011 10.1007/s11207-010-9552-1 Komm R, Ferguson R, Hill F, Barnes G, Leka KD (2011) Subsurface vorticity of flaring versus flare-quiet active regions. Sol Phys 268:389-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9552-1
Space Sci Rev R Komm 196 167 2015 10.1007/s11214-013-0023-5 Komm R, De Moortel I, Fan Y, Ilonidis S, Steiner O (2015) Sub-photosphere to solar atmosphere connection. Space Sci Rev 196:167-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0023-5
Sol Phys R Komm 292 122 2017 10.1007/s11207-017-1142-z Komm R, Howe R, Hill F (2017) Solar-cycle variation of subsurface-flow divergence: A proxy of magnetic activity? Sol Phys 292:122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1142-z
Sol Phys R Komm 293 145 2018 10.1007/s11207-018-1365-7 Komm R, Howe R, Hill F (2018) Subsurface zonal and meridional flow during cycles 23 and 24. Sol Phys 293:145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1365-7
Bull Astron Inst Czech M Kopecký 2 14 1950 Kopecký M (1950) Cycle de 22 ans de l’activité solaire. Bull Astron Inst Czech 2:14
Bull Astron Inst Czech M Kopecký 31 267 1980 Kopecký M, Ruzickova-Topolova B, Kuklin GV (1980) On the relative inhomogeneity of long-term series of sunspot indices. Bull Astron Inst Czech 31:267-283
Astron Astrophys NA Krivova 394 701 2002 10.1051/0004-6361:20021063 Krivova NA, Solanki SK (2002) The 1.3-year and 156-day periodicities in sunspot data: wavelet analysis suggests a common origin. Astron Astrophys 394:701-706. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021063
Astron Astrophys NA Krivova 396 235 2002 10.1051/0004-6361:20021340 Krivova NA, Solanki SK, Beer J (2002) Was one sunspot cycle in the 18th century really lost? Astron Astrophys 396:235-242. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021340
Sol Phys J Kurths 126 407 1990 10.1007/BF00153060 Kurths J, Ruzmaikin AA (1990) On forecasting the sunspot numbers. Sol Phys 126:407-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153060
Kuzanyan K, Obridko VN, Kotlyarov OL, Loskutov AY, Istomin IA (2008) Predictions of the magnitude of the forthcoming solar cycles using knowledge on the solar dynamo and singular spectrum analysis. In: Peter H (ed) 12th European solar physics meeting (ESPM-12). KIS, Freiburg, pp 2-69
Sol Phys F Labonville 294 6 82 2019 10.1007/s11207-019-1480-0 Labonville F, Charbonneau P, Lemerle A (2019) A dynamo-based forecast of solar cycle 25. Sol Phys 294(6):82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-019-1480-0
Sol Phys JL Le Mouël 292 43 2017 10.1007/s11207-017-1067-6 Le Mouël JL, Lopes F, Courtillot V (2017) Identification of Gleissberg cycles and a rising trend in a 315-year-long series of sunspot numbers. Sol Phys 292:43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1067-6
Geophys Res Lett JL Lean 35 L18701 2008 10.1029/2008GL034864 Lean JL, Rind DH (2008) How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006. Geophys Res Lett 35:L18701. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034864
Astron Astrophys L Lefèvre 536 L11 2011 10.1051/0004-6361/201118034 Lefèvre L, Clette F (2011) A global small sunspot deficit at the base of the index anomalies of solar cycle 23. Astron Astrophys 536:L11. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118034
Astrophys J RB Leighton 156 1 1969 10.1086/149943 Leighton RB (1969) A magneto-kinematic model of the solar cycle. Astrophys J 156:1. https://doi.org/10.1086/149943
Astrophys J A Lemerle 834 133 2017 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/133 Lemerle A, Charbonneau P (2017) A coupled 2 $$\times$$ 2D Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model. II. Reference dynamo solutions. Astrophys J 834:133. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/133. arXiv:1606.07375
Astrophys J A Lemerle 810 78 2015 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/78 Lemerle A, Charbonneau P, Carignan-Dugas A (2015) A coupled $$2\times 2$$D Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model. I. Surface magnetic flux evolution. Astrophys J 810:78. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/78. arXiv:1511.08548
Astron Astrophys R Leussu 592 A160 2016 10.1051/0004-6361/201628335 Leussu R, Usoskin IG, Arlt R, Mursula K (2016) Properties of sunspot cycles and hemispheric wings since the 19th century. Astron Astrophys 592:A160. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628335
Astron Astrophys R Leussu 599 A131 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201629533 Leussu R, Usoskin IG, Senthamizh Pavai V, Diercke A, Arlt R, Denker C, Mursula K (2017) Wings of the butterfly: sunspot groups for 1826-2015. Astron Astrophys 599:A131. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629533
Astrophys J Lett EH Levy 254 L19 1982 10.1086/183748 Levy EH, Boyer D (1982) Oscillating dynamo in the presence of a fossil magnetic field-the solar cycle. Astrophys J Lett 254:L19-L22. https://doi.org/10.1086/183748
Astrophys J J Li 758 115 2012 10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/115 Li J, Ulrich RK (2012) Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. Astrophys J 758:115. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/758/2/115. arXiv:1209.1642
Astron Astrophys KJ Li 368 285 2001 10.1051/0004-6361:20000547 Li KJ, Yun HS, Gu XM (2001) On long-term predictions of the maximum sunspot numbers of solar cycles 21 to 23. Astron Astrophys 368:285-291. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20000547
Publ Astron Soc Japan KJ Li 54 787 2002 10.1093/pasj/54.5.787 Li KJ, Irie M, Wang J, Xiong S, Yun H, Liang H, Zhan L, Zhao H (2002) Activity cycle of polar faculae. Publ Astron Soc Japan 54:787-792. https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/54.5.787
Sol Phys KJ Li 229 181 2005 10.1007/s11207-005-5001-y Li KJ, Gao PX, Su TW (2005) The Schwabe and Gleissberg periods in the Wolf sunspot numbers and the group sunspot numbers. Sol Phys 229:181-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-5001-y
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys KJ Li 135 72 2015 10.1016/j.jastp.2015.09.010 Li KJ, Feng W, Li FY (2015) Predicting the maximum amplitude of solar cycle 25 and its timing. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 135:72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.09.010
Astron Astrophys ZC Liang 619 A99 2018 10.1051/0004-6361/201833673 Liang ZC, Gizon L, Birch AC, Duvall TL, Rajaguru SP (2018) Solar meridional circulation from twenty-one years of SOHO/MDI and SDO/HMI observations. Helioseismic travel times and forward modeling in the ray approximation. Astron Astrophys 619:A99. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833673. arXiv:1808.08874
Astrophys Space Sci CH Lin 352 361 2014 10.1007/s10509-014-1931-x Lin CH (2014) A statistical study of the subsurface structure and eruptivity of solar active regions. Astrophys Space Sci 352:361-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-014-1931-x. arXiv:1512.07007
Astrophys J CH Lin 860 48 2018 10.3847/1538-4357/aac026 Lin CH, Chou DY (2018) Solar-cycle variations of meridional flows in the solar convection zone using helioseismic methods. Astrophys J 860:48. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac026
Astrophys J Lett W Livingston 757 L8 2012 10.1088/2041-8205/757/1/L8 Livingston W, Penn MJ, Svalgaard L (2012) Decreasing sunspot magnetic fields explain unique 10.7 cm radio flux. Astrophys J Lett 757:L8. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/757/1/L8
J Geophys Res M Lockwood 106 16021 2001 10.1029/2000JA000115 Lockwood M (2001) Long-term variations in the magnetic fields of the Sun and the heliosphere: their origin, effects, and implications. J Geophys Res 106:16021-16038. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000115
Living Rev Sol Phys M Lockwood 10 4 2013 10.12942/lrsp-2013-4 Lockwood M (2013) Reconstruction and prediction of variations in the open solar magnetic flux and interplanetary conditions. Living Rev Sol Phys 10:4. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2013-4
Sol Phys I Lopes 257 1 2009 10.1007/s11207-009-9372-3 Lopes I, Passos D (2009) Solar variability induced in a dynamo code by realistic meridional circulation variations. Sol Phys 257:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9372-3
Space Sci Rev I Lopes 186 535 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0066-2 Lopes I, Passos D, Nagy M, Petrovay K (2014) Oscillator models of the solar cycle. Towards the development of inversion methods. Space Sci Rev 186:535-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0066-2. arXiv:1407.4918
Astron Astrophys B Löptien 606 A28 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201731064 Löptien B, Birch AC, Duvall TL, Gizon L, Proxauf B, Schou J (2017) Measuring solar active region inflows with local correlation tracking of granulation. Astron Astrophys 606:A28. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731064. arXiv:1705.08833
Astron Lett AY Loskutov 27 745 2001 10.1134/1.1415865 Loskutov AY, Istomin IA, Kotlyarov OL, Kuzanyan KM (2001) A study of the regularities in solar magnetic activity by singular spectral analysis. Astron Lett 27:745-753. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1415865
Geophys Res Lett JJ Love 39 L10103 2012 10.1029/2012GL051818 Love JJ, Rigler EJ (2012) Sunspot random walk and 22-year variation. Geophys Res Lett 39:L10103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051818
Sol Phys VI Makarov 163 267 1996 10.1007/BF00148001 Makarov VI, Makarova VV (1996) Polar faculae and sunspot cycles. Sol Phys 163:267-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148001
Sol Phys VI Makarov 119 45 1989 10.1007/BF00146211 Makarov VI, Makarova VV, Sivaraman KR (1989) Do polar faculae on the Sun predict a sunspot cycle? Sol Phys 119:45-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146211
Astrophys J S Mandal 851 70 2017 10.3847/1538-4357/aa97dc Mandal S, Karak BB, Banerjee D (2017) Latitude distribution of sunspots: analysis using sunspot data and a dynamo model. Astrophys J 851:70. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa97dc. arXiv:1711.00222
Water Resour Res BB Mandelbrot 5 321 1969 10.1029/WR005i002p00321 Mandelbrot BB, Wallis JR (1969) On forecasting the sunspot numbers. Water Resour Res 5:321-340. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR005i002p00321
Sun and Geosphere G Maris 1 1 8 2006 Maris G, Oncica A (2006) Solar cycle 24 forecasts. Sun and Geosphere 1(1):8-11
Astron Astrophys D Martin-Belda 586 A73 2016 10.1051/0004-6361/201527213 Martin-Belda D, Cameron RH (2016) Surface flux transport simulations: effect of inflows toward active regions and random velocities on the evolution of the Sun’s large-scale magnetic field. Astron Astrophys 586:A73. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527213. arXiv:1512.02541
Astron Astrophys D Martin-Belda 597 A21 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201629061 Martin-Belda D, Cameron RH (2017) Inflows towards active regions and the modulation of the solar cycle: a parameter study. Astron Astrophys 597:A21. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629061. arXiv:1609.01199
Astrophys J D Mason 645 1543 2006 10.1086/503761 Mason D, Komm R, Hill F, Howe R, Haber D, Hindman BW (2006) Flares, magnetic fields, and subsurface vorticity: a survey of GONG and MDI data. Astrophys J 645:1543-1553. https://doi.org/10.1086/503761
Knowl Illus Mag Sci EW Maunder 17 173 1894 Maunder EW (1894) A prolonged sunspot minimum. Knowl Illus Mag Sci 17:173-176
Sol Phys BH McClintock 287 215 2013 10.1007/s11207-013-0338-0 McClintock BH, Norton AA (2013) Recovering Joy’s law as a function of solar cycle, hemisphere, and longitude. Sol Phys 287:215-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0338-0. arXiv:1305.3205
Astrophys J BH McClintock 797 130 2014 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/130 McClintock BH, Norton AA, Li J (2014) Re-examining sunspot tilt angle to include anti-Hale statistics. Astrophys J 797:130. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/130. arXiv:1412.5094
McCracken KG, Beer J (2008) The 2300 year modulation in the galactic cosmic radiation. In: Caballero R et al (eds) Proceedings of the 30th international cosmic ray conference, vol 1. UNAM, Mexico City, pp 549-552
Astrophys J AA Michelson 38 268 1913 10.1086/142033 Michelson AA (1913) Determination of periodicities by the harmonic analyzer with an application to the sun-spot cycle. Astrophys J 38:268. https://doi.org/10.1086/142033
Astrophys J Lett MS Miesch 785 L8 2014 10.1088/2041-8205/785/1/L8 Miesch MS, Dikpati M (2014) A three-dimensional Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model. Astrophys J Lett 785:L8. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/785/1/L8. arXiv:1401.6557
Adv Space Res MS Miesch 58 1571 2016 10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.018 Miesch MS, Teweldebirhan K (2016) A three-dimensional Babcock-Leighton solar dynamo model: initial results with axisymmetric flows. Adv Space Res 58:1571-1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.018. arXiv:1511.03613
Phys Rev Lett PD Mininni 85 5476 2000 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5476 Mininni PD, Gómez DO, Mindlin GB (2000) Stochastic relaxation oscillator model for the solar cycle. Phys Rev Lett 85:5476-5479. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5476
Sol Phys D Moss 250 221 2008 10.1007/s11207-008-9202-z Moss D, Sokoloff D, Usoskin I, Tutubalin V (2008) Solar grand minima and random fluctuations in dynamo parameters. Sol Phys 250:221-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9202-z. arXiv:0806.3331
MSFC (2017) Solar cycle 24 prediction. http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml
Astrophys J Lett A Muñoz-Jaramillo 720 L20 2010 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L20 Muñoz-Jaramillo A, Nandy D, Martens PCH, Yeates AR (2010) A double-ring algorithm for modeling solar active regions: unifying kinematic dynamo models and surface flux-transport simulations. Astrophys J Lett 720:L20-L25. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L20. arXiv:1007.1262
Astrophys J A Muñoz-Jaramillo 753 146 2012 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/146 Muñoz-Jaramillo A, Sheeley NR, Zhang J, DeLuca EE (2012) Calibrating 100 years of polar faculae measurements: implications for the evolution of the heliospheric magnetic field. Astrophys J 753:146. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/146. arXiv:1303.0345
Phys Rev Lett A Muñoz-Jaramillo 111 4 041106 2013 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.041106 Muñoz-Jaramillo A, Balmaceda LA, DeLuca EE (2013a) Using the dipolar and quadrupolar moments to improve solar-cycle predictions based on the polar magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett 111(4):041106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.041106. arXiv:1308.2038
Astrophys J Lett A Muñoz-Jaramillo 767 L25 2013 10.1088/2041-8205/767/2/L25 Muñoz-Jaramillo A, Dasi-Espuig M, Balmaceda LA, DeLuca EE (2013b) Solar cycle propagation, memory, and prediction: insights from a century of magnetic proxies. Astrophys J Lett 767:L25. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/767/2/L25. arXiv:1304.3151
10.1007/s11207-016-0898-x Muraközy J, Baranyi T, Ludmány A (2016) An alternative measure of solar activity from detailed sunspot datasets. Sol Phys 291:2941-2950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0898-x. arXiv:1603.05870
Adv Space Res K Mursula 25 1939 2000 10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00608-0 Mursula K, Zieger B (2000) The 1.3-year variation in solar wind speed and geomagnetic activity. Adv Space Res 25:1939-1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(99)00608-0
Astron Lett YA Nagovitsyn 23 742 1997 Nagovitsyn YA (1997) A nonlinear mathematical model for the solar cyclicity and prospects for reconstructing the solar activity in the past. Astron Lett 23:742-748
Astron Lett YA Nagovitsyn 35 564 2009 10.1134/S1063773709080064 Nagovitsyn YA, Nagovitsyna EY, Makarova VV (2009) The Gnevyshev-Ohl rule for physical parameters of the solar magnetic field: the 400-year interval. Astron Lett 35:564-571. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773709080064
Astron Lett YA Nagovitsyn 42 703 2016 10.1134/S1063773716090048 Nagovitsyn YA, Pevtsov AA, Osipova AA, Tlatov AG, Miletskii EV, Nagovitsyna EY (2016) Two populations of sunspots and secular variations of their characteristics. Astron Lett 42:703-712. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773716090048
10.1002/asna.201613035 Nagovitsyn YA, Pevtsov AA, Osipova AA (2017) Long-term variations in sunspot magnetic field-area relation. Astron Nachr 338:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201613035. arXiv:1608.01132
Astron Nachr M Nagy 334 964 2013 10.1002/asna.201211971 Nagy M, Petrovay K (2013) Oscillator models of the solar cycle and the Waldmeier effect. Astron Nachr 334:964. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201211971. arXiv:1404.3668
Sol Phys M Nagy 292 167 2017 10.1007/s11207-017-1194-0 Nagy M, Lemerle A, Labonville F, Petrovay K, Charbonneau P (2017a) The effect of “rogue” active regions on the solar cycle. Sol Phys 292:167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1194-0. arXiv:1712.02185
Climate Dyn M Nagy 48 1883 2017 10.1007/s00382-016-3179-3 Nagy M, Petrovay K, Erdélyi R (2017b) The Atlanto-Pacific multidecadal oscillation and its imprint on the global temperature record. Climate Dyn 48:1883-1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3179-3
Astrophys J NJ Nelson 762 73 2013 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/73 Nelson NJ, Brown BP, Brun AS, Miesch MS, Toomre J (2013) Magnetic wreaths and cycles in convective dynamos. Astrophys J 762:73. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/73. arXiv:1211.3129
Astron Nachr R Neuhäuser 339 219 2018 10.1002/asna.201813481 Neuhäuser R, Arlt R, Richter S (2018) Reconstructed sunspot positions in the Maunder minimum based on the correspondence of Gottfried Kirch. Astron Nachr 339:219-267. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.201813481. arXiv:1807.10241
Sci Rep KK Ng 6 21028 2016 10.1038/srep21028 Ng KK (2016) Prediction methods in solar sunspots cycles. Sci Rep 6:21028. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21028
Sol Phys AA Norton 261 193 2010 10.1007/s11207-009-9479-6 Norton AA, Gallagher JC (2010) Solar-cycle characteristics examined in separate hemispheres: phase, Gnevyshev gap, and length of minimum. Sol Phys 261:193-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9479-6. arXiv:1001.3186
J Phys: Conf Ser AA Norton 440 012038 2013 10.1088/1742-6596/440/1/012038 Norton AA, Jones EH, Liu Y (2013) How do the magnetic field strengths and intensities of sunspots vary over the solar cycle? J Phys: Conf Ser 440:012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/440/1/012038
Space Sci Rev AA Norton 186 251 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0100-4 Norton AA, Charbonneau P, Passos D (2014) Hemispheric coupling: comparing dynamo simulations and observations. Space Sci Rev 186:251-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0100-4. arXiv:1411.7052
Sol Phys VN Obridko 248 191 2008 10.1007/s11207-008-9138-3 Obridko VN, Shelting BD (2008) On prediction of the strength of the 11-year solar cycle no. 24. Sol Phys 248:191-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9138-3
Geophys Res Lett AR Ochadlick Jr 20 1471 1993 10.1029/93GL01593 Ochadlick AR Jr, Kritikos HN, Giegengack R (1993) Variations in the period of the sunspot cycle. Geophys Res Lett 20:1471-1474. https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL01593
Sol Phys MG Ogurtsov 220 93 2004 10.1023/B:sola.0000023439.59453.e5 Ogurtsov MG (2004) New evidence for long-term persistence in the Sun’s activity. Sol Phys 220:93-105. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:sola.0000023439.59453.e5
ISRN Astron Astrophys MG Ogurtsov 2011 640817 2011 10.5402/2011/640817 Ogurtsov MG, Lindholm M (2011) Statistical effects in the solar activity cycles during AD 1823-1996. ISRN Astron Astrophys 2011:640817. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/640817
Soln Dannye AI Ohl 12 84 1966 Ohl AI (1966) Forecast of sunspot maximum number of cycle 20. Soln Dannye 12:84
Astron Astrophys K Oláh 501 703 2009 10.1051/0004-6361/200811304 Oláh K, Kolláth Z, Granzer T, Strassmeier KG, Lanza AF, Järvinen S, Korhonen H, Baliunas SL, Soon W, Messina S, Cutispoto G (2009) Multiple and changing cycles of active stars. II. results. Astron Astrophys 501:703-713. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200811304. arXiv:0904.1747
Sol Phys R Oliver 169 215 1996 10.1007/BF00153842 Oliver R, Ballester JL (1996) Rescaled range analysis of the asymmetry of solar activity. Sol Phys 169:215-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153842
Phys Rev E R Oliver 58 5650 1998 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5650 Oliver R, Ballester JL (1998) Is there memory in solar activity? Phys Rev E 58:5650-5654. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5650
Geomagn Aeron AA Osipova 57 1092 2017 10.1134/S0016793217080199 Osipova AA, Nagovitsyn YA (2017) The Waldmeier effect for two sunspot populations. Geomagn Aeron 57:1092-1100. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793217080199
Astron Astrophys Rev M Ossendrijver 11 287 2003 10.1007/s00159-003-0019-3 Ossendrijver M (2003) The solar dynamo. Astron Astrophys Rev 11:287-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-003-0019-3
Astron Astrophys AJH Ossendrijver 313 938 1996 Ossendrijver AJH, Hoyng P, Schmitt D (1996) Stochastic excitation and memory of the solar dynamo. Astron Astrophys 313:938-948
J Space Weather Space Clim MJ Owens 7 27 A33 2017 10.1051/swsc/2017034 Owens MJ, Lockwood M, Hawkins E, Usoskin I, Jones GS, Barnard L, Schurer A, Fasullo J (2017) The Maunder minimum and the Little Ice Age: an update from recent reconstructions and climate simulations. J Space Weather Space Clim 7(27):A33. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2017034
Phys Rev Lett M Paluš 83 3406 1999 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3406 Paluš M, Novotná D (1999) Sunspot cycle: A driven nonlinear oscillator? Phys Rev Lett 83:3406-3409. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3406
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys S Panchev 69 2391 2007 10.1016/j.jastp.2007.07.011 Panchev S, Tsekov M (2007) Empirical evidences of persistence and dynamical chaos in solar terrestrial phenomena. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 69:2391-2404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.07.011
Astrophys J EN Parker 122 293 1955 10.1086/146087 Parker EN (1955) Hydromagnetic dynamo models. Astrophys J 122:293-314. https://doi.org/10.1086/146087
Astrophys J D Passos 744 172 2012 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/172 Passos D (2012) Evolution of solar parameters since 1750 based on a truncated dynamo model. Astrophys J 744:172. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/172
Astron Astrophys D Passos 607 A120 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201730568 Passos D, Miesch M, Guerrero G, Charbonneau P (2017) Meridional circulation dynamics in a cyclic convective dynamo. Astron Astrophys 607:A120. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730568. arXiv:1702.02421
Geophys Res Lett KI Paularena 22 3001 1995 10.1029/95GL02802 Paularena KI, Szabo A, Richardson JD (1995) Coincident 1.3-year periodicities in the $$ap$$ geomagnetic index and the solar wind. Geophys Res Lett 22:3001-3004. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL02802
Sol Phys WD Pesnell 252 209 2008 10.1007/s11207-008-9252-2 Pesnell WD (2008) Predictions of solar cycle 24. Sol Phys 252:209-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9252-2
Sol Phys WD Pesnell 289 2317 2014 10.1007/s11207-013-0470-x Pesnell WD (2014) Predicting solar cycle 24 using a geomagnetic precursor pair. Sol Phys 289:2317-2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0470-x
Space Weather WD Pesnell 14 10 2016 10.1002/2015SW001304 Pesnell WD (2016) Predictions of solar cycle 24: How are we doing? Space Weather 14:10-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015SW001304
Sol Phys WD Pesnell 293 112 2018 10.1007/s11207-018-1330-5 Pesnell WD, Schatten KH (2018) An early prediction of the amplitude of solar cycle 25. Sol Phys 293:112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1330-5
Living Rev Sol Phys GJD Petrie 12 5 2015 10.1007/lrsp-2015-5 Petrie GJD (2015) Solar magnetism in the polar regions. Living Rev Sol Phys 12:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-5
Space Sci Rev GJD Petrie 210 77 2017 10.1007/s11214-015-0189-0 Petrie GJD, Ettinger S (2017) Polar field reversals and active region decay. Space Sci Rev 210:77-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0189-0
Astrophys J GJD Petrie 699 871 2009 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/871 Petrie GJD, Patrikeeva I (2009) A comparative study of magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and chromosphere at equatorial and polar latitudes. Astrophys J 699:871-884. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/871. arXiv:1010.6041
Space Sci Rev GJD Petrie 186 325 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0064-4 Petrie GJD, Petrovay K, Schatten K (2014) Solar polar fields and the 22-year activity cycle: observations and models. Space Sci Rev 186:325-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0064-4
Petrovay K (2000) What makes the Sun tick? The origin of the solar cycle. In: Wilson A (ed) The solar cycle and terrestrial climate, solar and space weather. ESA Special Publication, vol SP-463. ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, p 3. arXiv:astro-ph/0010096
Astron Nachr K Petrovay 328 777 2007 10.1002/asna.200710804 Petrovay K (2007) On the possibility of a bimodal solar dynamo. Astron Nachr 328:777-780. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200710804. arXiv:0708.2131
10.1017/S1743921309992560 Petrovay K (2010a) Harmonic analysis approach to solar cycle prediction and the Waldmeier effect. In: Kosovichev A, Andrei A, Rozelot JP (eds) Solar and stellar variability: impact on earth and planets, IAU symposium, vol 264. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 150-154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921309992560
Living Rev Sol Phys K Petrovay 7 6 2010 10.12942/lrsp-2010-6 Petrovay K (2010) Solar cycle prediction. Living Rev Sol Phys 7:6. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2010-6. arXiv:1012.5513
10.1017/S1743921318001254 Petrovay K, Nagy M (2018) Rogue active regions and the inherent unpredictability of the solar dynamo. In: Banerjee D, Jiang J, Kusano K, Solanki S (eds) Long-term datasets for the understanding of solar and stellar magnetic cycles. IAU symposium, vol 340. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921318001254. arXiv:1804.03427
Astron Astrophys K Petrovay 632 A87 2019 10.1051/0004-6361/201936099 Petrovay K, Talafha M (2019) Optimization of surface flux transport models for the solar polar magnetic field. Astron Astrophys 632:A87. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936099. arXiv:1909.06125
Petrovay K, Chaterjee P, Choudhuri A (2006) Helical magnetic fields in solar active regions: theory vs. observations. Publ Astron Dep Eotvos Lorand Univ 17:5
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys K Petrovay 176 15 2018 10.1016/j.jastp.2017.12.011 Petrovay K, Nagy M, Gerják T, Juhász L (2018) Precursors of an upcoming solar cycle at high latitudes from coronal green line data. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 176:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.12.011. arXiv:1802.05628
Space Sci Rev AA Pevtsov 186 285 2014 10.1007/s11214-014-0082-2 Pevtsov AA, Berger MA, Nindos A, Norton AA, van Driel-Gesztelyi L (2014) Magnetic helicity, tilt, and twist. Space Sci Rev 186:285-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-014-0082-2
Astrophys J VV Pipin 741 1 2011 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/1 Pipin VV, Kosovichev AG (2011) The asymmetry of sunspot cycles and Waldmeier relations as a result of nonlinear surface-shear shaped dynamo. Astrophys J 741:1. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/1. arXiv:1105.1828
Phys Scripta VV Pipin 84 6 065903 2011 10.1088/0031-8949/84/06/065903 Pipin VV, Sokoloff DD (2011) The fluctuating $$\alpha$$-effect and Waldmeier relations in the nonlinear dynamo models. Phys Scripta 84(6):065903. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/84/06/065903. arXiv:1110.2255
Astron Astrophys VV Pipin 542 A26 2012 10.1051/0004-6361/201118733 Pipin VV, Sokoloff DD, Usoskin IG (2012) Variations of the solar cycle profile in a solar dynamo with fluctuating dynamo governing parameters. Astron Astrophys 542:A26. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118733. arXiv:1112.6218
Kinemat Phys Celest Bodies MI Pishkalo 24 242 2008 10.3103/S0884591308050036 Pishkalo MI (2008) Preliminary prediction of solar cycles 24 and 25 based on the correlation between cycle parameters. Kinemat Phys Celest Bodies 24:242-247. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0884591308050036
Astrophys J T Podladchikova 850 81 2017 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93ef Podladchikova T, Van der Linden R, Veronig AM (2017) Sunspot number second differences as a precursor of the following 11-year sunspot cycle. Astrophys J 850:81. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa93ef. arXiv:1712.05782
WH Press 1992 Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing 2 Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. The art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
J Geophys Res CP Price 97 19113 1992 10.1029/92JA01459 Price CP, Prichard D, Hogenson EA (1992) Do the sunspot numbers form a ‘chaotic’ set? J Geophys Res 97:19113. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA01459
Astrophys J Lett M Priyal 793 L4 2014 10.1088/2041-8205/793/1/L4 Priyal M, Banerjee D, Karak BB, Muñoz-Jaramillo A, Ravindra B, Choudhuri AR, Singh J (2014) Polar network index as a magnetic proxy for the solar cycle studies. Astrophys J Lett 793:L4. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/793/1/L4. arXiv:1407.4944
Qian B, Rasheed K (2004) Hurst exponent and financial market predictability. In: Hamza MH
(ed) Financial engineering and applications (FEA 2004). Acta Press, pp 203-209
Astrophys J É Racine 735 46 2011 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/46 Racine É, Charbonneau P, Ghizaru M, Bouchat A, Smolarkiewicz PK (2011) On the mode of dynamo action in a global large-eddy simulation of solar convection. Astrophys J 735:46. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/46
Earth Planets Space GK Rangarajan 50 91 1998 10.1186/BF03352090 Rangarajan GK (1998) Sunspot variability and an attempt to predict solar cycle 23 by adaptive filtering. Earth Planets Space 50:91-100. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03352090
Astron Astrophys R Rezaei 541 A60 2012 10.1051/0004-6361/201118635 Rezaei R, Beck C, Schmidt W (2012) Variation in sunspot properties between 1999 and 2011 as observed with the Tenerife Infrared Polarimeter. Astron Astrophys 541:A60. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118635. arXiv:1203.1444
Astron Astrophys R Rezaei 578 A43 2015 10.1051/0004-6361/201425557 Rezaei R, Beck C, Lagg A, Borrero JM, Schmidt W, Collados M (2015) Variation in sunspot properties between 1999 and 2014. Astron Astrophys 578:A43. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425557
Sol Phys JG Richard 223 319 2004 10.1007/s11207-004-1165-0 Richard JG (2004) The eight-Schwabe-cycle pulsation. Sol Phys 223:319-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-004-1165-0
Geophys Res Lett JD Richardson 21 1559 1994 10.1029/94GL01076 Richardson JD, Paularena KI, Belcher JW, Lazarus AJ (1994) Solar wind oscillations with a 1.3 year period. Geophys Res Lett 21:1559-1560. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01076
Nature E Rieger 312 623 1984 10.1038/312623a0 Rieger E, Kanbach G, Reppin C, Share GH, Forrest DJ, Chupp EL (1984) A 154-day periodicity in the occurrence of hard solar flares? Nature 312:623-625. https://doi.org/10.1038/312623a0
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys NR Rigozo 73 11-12 1294 2011 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.09.005 Rigozo NR, Souza Echer MP, Evangelista H, Nordemann DJR, Echer E (2011) Prediction of sunspot number amplitude and solar cycle length for cycles 24 and 25. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 73(11-12):1294-1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2010.09.005
10.1029/2006JA012130 Rouillard AP, Lockwood M, Finch I (2007) Centennial changes in the solar wind speed and in the open solar flux. J Geophys Res 112(A11):5103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012130
Sol Phys D Ruždjak 292 179 2017 10.1007/s11207-017-1199-8 Ruždjak D, Brajša R, Sudar D, Skokić I, Poljančić Beljan I (2017) A relationship between the solar rotation and activity analysed by tracing sunspot groups. Sol Phys 292:179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-017-1199-8. arXiv:1711.03723
Astron Astrophys A Ruzmaikin 319 L13 1997 Ruzmaikin A (1997) On the origin of sunspots. Astron Astrophys 319:L13-L16
Sol Phys A Ruzmaikin 149 395 1994 10.1007/BF00690625 Ruzmaikin A, Feynman J, Robinson P (1994) Long-term persistence of solar activity. Sol Phys 149:395-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690625
J Geophys Res M Rypdal 117 A04103 2012 10.1029/2011JA017283 Rypdal M, Rypdal K (2012) Is there long-range memory in solar activity on timescales shorter than the sunspot period? J Geophys Res 117:A04103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017283. arXiv:1111.4787
Mon Not R Astron Soc V Sarp 481 2981 2018 10.1093/mnras/sty2470 Sarp V, Kilcik A, Yurchyshyn V, Rozelot JP, Ozguc A (2018) Prediction of solar cycle 25: a non-linear approach. Mon Not R Astron Soc 481:2981-2985. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2470
Geophys Res Lett KH Schatten 20 2275 1993 10.1029/93GL02431 Schatten KH, Pesnell WD (1993) An early solar dynamo prediction: cycle 23 is approximately cycle 22. Geophys Res Lett 20:2275-2278. https://doi.org/10.1029/93GL02431
Geophys Res Lett KH Schatten 14 632 1987 10.1029/GL014i006p00632 Schatten KH, Sofia S (1987) Forecast of an exceptionally large even-numbered solar cycle. Geophys Res Lett 14:632-635. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL014i006p00632
Geophys Res Lett KH Schatten 5 411 1978 10.1029/GL005i005p00411 Schatten KH, Scherrer PH, Svalgaard L, Wilcox JM (1978) Using dynamo theory to predict the sunspot number during solar cycle 21. Geophys Res Lett 5:411-414. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL005i005p00411
Geophys Res Lett KH Schatten 23 605 1996 10.1029/96GL00451 Schatten KH, Myers DJ, Sofia S (1996) Solar activity forecast for solar cycle 23. Geophys Res Lett 23:605-608. https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00451
10.1017/S0074180900021379 Schmidt HU (1968) Magnetohydrodynamics of an active region. In: Kiepenheuer KO (ed) Structure and development of solar active regions, IAU symposium, vol 35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0074180900021379
Astron Astrophys M Schüssler 459 945 2006 10.1051/0004-6361:20065871 Schüssler M, Baumann I (2006) Modeling the Sun’s open magnetic flux. Astron Astrophys 459:945-953. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20065871
Astron Astrophys M Schüssler 618 A89 2018 10.1051/0004-6361/201833532 Schüssler M, Cameron RH (2018) Origin of the hemispheric asymmetry of solar activity. Astron Astrophys 618:A89. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833532. arXiv:1807.10061
Astron Astrophys V Senthamizh Pavai 584 A73 2015 10.1051/0004-6361/201527080 Senthamizh Pavai V, Arlt R, Dasi-Espuig M, Krivova NA, Solanki SK (2015) Sunspot areas and tilt angles for solar cycles 7-10. Astron Astrophys 584:A73. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527080. arXiv:1508.07849
Astron Astrophys T Serre 360 319 2000 Serre T, Nesme-Ribes E (2000) Nonlinear analysis of solar cycles. Astron Astrophys 360:319-330
Astrophys J NR Sheeley Jr 140 731 1964 10.1086/147966 Sheeley NR Jr (1964) Polar faculae during the sunspot cycle. Astrophys J 140:731. https://doi.org/10.1086/147966
10.12942/lrsp-2005-5 Sheeley NR Jr (2005) Surface evolution of the Sun’s magnetic field: a historical review of the flux-transport mechanism. Living Rev Sol Phys 2:5. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2005-5
Sol Phys T Shirai 222 199 2004 10.1023/B:SOLA.0000043565.83411.ec Shirai T (2004) Time variation of the solar neutrino fluxes from Super-Kamiokande data. Sol Phys 222:199-201. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOLA.0000043565.83411.ec
Adv Space Res C Simard 58 1522 2016 10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.041 Simard C, Charbonneau P, Dubé C (2016) Characterisation of the turbulent electromotive force and its magnetically-mediated quenching in a global EULAG-MHD simulation of solar convection. Adv Space Res 58:1522-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.041. arXiv:1604.01533
Astrophys Space Sci AK Singh 362 199 2017 10.1007/s10509-017-3180-2 Singh AK, Bhargawa A (2017) An early prediction of 25th solar cycle using Hurst exponent. Astrophys Space Sci 362:199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3180-2
Sol Phys HB Snodgrass 163 21 1996 10.1007/BF00165454 Snodgrass HB, Dailey SB (1996) Meridional motions of magnetic features in the solar photosphere. Sol Phys 163:21-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165454
Astron Astrophys SK Solanki 396 1029 2002 10.1051/0004-6361:20021436 Solanki SK, Krivova NA, Schüssler M, Fligge M (2002) Search for a relationship between solar cycle amplitude and length. Astron Astrophys 396:1029-1035. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021436
Rep Prog Phys S Solanki 69 563 2006 10.1088/0034-4885/69/3/R02 Solanki S, Inhester B, Schüssler M (2006) The solar magnetic field. Rep Prog Phys 69:563-668. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/69/3/R02
Astron Astrophys M Stix 20 9 1972 Stix M (1972) Non-linear dynamo waves. Astron Astrophys 20:9
Nature G Sugihara 344 734 1990 10.1038/344734a0 Sugihara G, May RM (1990) Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature 344:734-741. https://doi.org/10.1038/344734a0
Astrophys J X Sun 798 114 2015 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/114 Sun X, Hoeksema JT, Liu Y, Zhao J (2015) On polar magnetic field reversal and surface flux transport during solar cycle 24. Astrophys J 798:114. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/114. arXiv:1410.8867
Sol Phys L Svalgaard 291 2981 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0921-2 Svalgaard L (2016) Reconstruction of solar extreme ultraviolet flux 1740-2015. Sol Phys 291:2981-3010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0921-2. arXiv:1506.04408
Sol Phys L Svalgaard 292 4 2017 10.1007/s11207-016-1023-x Svalgaard L (2017) A recount of sunspot groups on Staudach’s drawings. Sol Phys 292:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-1023-x
J Geophys Res L Svalgaard 110 A9 12103 2005 10.1029/2005JA011203 Svalgaard L, Cliver EW (2005) The IDV index: its derivation and use in inferring long-term variations of the interplanetary magnetic field strength. J Geophys Res 110(A9):12103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011203
J Geophys Res L Svalgaard 112 A11 10111 2007 10.1029/2007JA012437 Svalgaard L, Cliver EW (2007) Interhourly variability index of geomagnetic activity and its use in deriving the long-term variation of solar wind speed. J Geophys Res 112(A11):10111. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012437. arXiv:0706.0961
Sol Phys L Svalgaard 291 2653 2016 10.1007/s11207-015-0815-8 Svalgaard L, Schatten KH (2016) Reconstruction of the sunspot group number: the backbone method. Sol Phys 291:2653-2684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0815-8. arXiv:1506.00755
Sol Phys L Svalgaard 58 225 1978 10.1007/BF00157268 Svalgaard L, Duvall TL Jr, Scherrer PH (1978) The strength of the Sun’s polar fields. Sol Phys 58:225-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157268
Geophys Res Lett L Svalgaard 32 1104 2005 10.1029/2004GL021664 Svalgaard L, Cliver EW, Kamide Y (2005) Sunspot cycle 24: Smallest cycle in 100 years? Geophys Res Lett 32:1104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021664
Sol Phys L Svalgaard 292 34 2017 10.1007/s11207-016-1024-9 Svalgaard L, Cagnotti M, Cortesi S (2017) The effect of sunspot weighting. Sol Phys 292:34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-1024-9
Astrophys J Lett M Švanda 670 L69 2007 10.1086/524059 Švanda M, Kosovichev AG, Zhao J (2007) Speed of meridional flows and magnetic flux transport on the Sun. Astrophys J Lett 670:L69-L72. https://doi.org/10.1086/524059. arXiv:0710.0590
Astrophys J Lett M Švanda 680 L161 2008 10.1086/589997 Švanda M, Kosovichev AG, Zhao J (2008) Effects of solar active regions on meridional flows. Astrophys J Lett 680:L161. https://doi.org/10.1086/589997. arXiv:0805.1789
SWPC (2009) Solar cycle 24 prediction. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/solar-cycle-24-prediction-updated-may-2009
Geophys Res Lett A Szabo 22 1845 1995 10.1029/95GL01737 Szabo A, Lepping RP, King JH (1995) Magnetic field observations of the 1.3-year solar wind oscillations. Geophys Res Lett 22:1845-1848. https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL01737
Sol Phys RJ Thompson 148 383 1993 10.1007/BF00645097 Thompson RJ (1993) A technique for predicting the amplitude of the solar cycle. Sol Phys 148:383-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00645097
Sol Phys AG Tlatov 260 465 2009 10.1007/s11207-009-9451-5 Tlatov AG (2009) The minimum activity epoch as a precursor of the solar activity. Sol Phys 260:465-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-009-9451-5
Astrophys J AG Tlatov 717 357 2010 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/357 Tlatov AG, Vasil’eva VV, Pevtsov AA (2010) Distribution of magnetic bipoles on the Sun over three solar cycles. Astrophys J 717:357-362. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/357
Sol Phys K Tlatova 293 118 2018 10.1007/s11207-018-1337-y Tlatova K, Tlatov A, Pevtsov A, Mursula K, Vasil’eva V, Heikkinen E, Bertello L, Pevtsov A, Virtanen I, Karachik N (2018) Tilt of sunspot bipoles in solar cycles 15 to 24. Sol Phys 293:118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1337-y. arXiv:1807.07913
H Tong 1993 Non-linear time series: a dynamical system approach Tong H (1993) Non-linear time series: a dynamical system approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Astrophys Space Sci BP Tritakis 82 463 1982 10.1007/BF00651452 Tritakis BP (1982) Evidence of interdependence within 22-year solar cycles. Astrophys Space Sci 82:463-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00651452
Astrophys J S Tsuneta 688 1374 2008 10.1086/592226 Tsuneta S, Ichimoto K, Katsukawa Y, Lites BW, Matsuzaki K, Nagata S, Orozco Suárez D, Shimizu T, Shimojo M, Shine RA, Suematsu Y, Suzuki TK, Tarbell TD, Title AM (2008) The magnetic landscape of the Sun’s polar region. Astrophys J 688:1374-1381. https://doi.org/10.1086/592226. arXiv:0807.4631
Mon Not R Astron Soc HH Turner 74 82 1913 10.1093/mnras/74.2.82 Turner HH (1913a) On a simple method of detecting discontinuities in a series of recorded observations, with an application to sun-spots, suggesting that they are caused by a meteor swarm. Mon Not R Astron Soc 74:82-109. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/74.2.82
Astrophys J DC Turner 855 108 2018 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf1c Turner DC, Ladde GS (2018) Stochastic modelling, analysis, and simulations of the solar cycle dynamic process. Astrophys J 855:108. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf1c
Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A G Udny Yule 226 267 1927 10.1098/rsta.1927.0007 Udny Yule G (1927) On a Method of Investigating Periodicities in Disturbed Series, with Special Reference to Wolfer’s Sunspot Numbers. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A 226:267-298
Astrophys J L Upton 792 142 2014 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/142 Upton L, Hathaway DH (2014a) Effects of meridional flow variations on solar cycles 23 and 24. Astrophys J 792:142. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/142. arXiv:1408.0035
Astrophys J L Upton 780 5 2014 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/5 Upton L, Hathaway DH (2014b) Predicting the Sun’s polar magnetic fields with a surface flux transport model. Astrophys J 780:5. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/5. arXiv:1311.0844
Geophys Res Lett LA Upton 45 8091 2018 10.1029/2018GL078387 Upton LA, Hathaway DH (2018) An updated solar cycle 25 prediction with AFT: the modern minimum. Geophys Res Lett 45:8091-8095. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078387. arXiv:1808.04868
Living Rev Sol Phys IG Usoskin 14 3 2017 10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9 Usoskin IG (2017) A history of solar activity over millennia. Living Rev Sol Phys 14:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-017-0006-9
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys IG Usoskin 176 69 2018 10.1016/j.jastp.2017.09.018 Usoskin IG (2018) Comment on the paper by Popova, et al. On a role of quadruple component of magnetic field in defining solar activity in grand cycles. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 176:69-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.09.018. arXiv:1710.05203
Astron Astrophys IG Usoskin 370 L31 2001 10.1051/0004-6361:20010319 Usoskin IG, Mursula K, Kovaltsov GA (2001) Was one sunspot cycle lost in late xviii century? Astron Astrophys 370:L31-L34. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20010319
Astron Astrophys IG Usoskin 471 301 2007 10.1051/0004-6361:20077704 Usoskin IG, Solanki SK, Kovaltsov GA (2007) Grand minima and maxima of solar activity: new observational constraints. Astron Astrophys 471:301-309. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077704. arXiv:0706.0385
Astrophys J Lett IG Usoskin 700 L154 2009 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L154 Usoskin IG, Mursula K, Arlt R, Kovaltsov GA (2009a) A solar cycle lost in 1793-1800: early sunspot observations resolve the old mystery. Astrophys J Lett 700:L154-L157. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L154. arXiv:0907.0063
Sol Phys IG Usoskin 254 345 2009 10.1007/s11207-008-9293-6 Usoskin IG, Sokoloff D, Moss D (2009b) Grand minima of solar activity and the mean-field dynamo. Sol Phys 254:345-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9293-6
Astron Astrophys IG Usoskin 581 A95 2015 10.1051/0004-6361/201526652 Usoskin IG, Arlt R, Asvestari E, Hawkins E, Käpylä M, Kovaltsov GA, Krivova N, Lockwood M, Mursula K, O’Reilly J, Owens M, Scott CJ, Sokoloff DD, Solanki SK, Soon W, Vaquero JM (2015) The Maunder minimum (1645-1715) was indeed a grand minimum: a reassessment of multiple datasets. Astron Astrophys 581:A95. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526652. arXiv:1507.05191
Sol Phys IG Usoskin 291 2685 2016 10.1007/s11207-015-0838-1 Usoskin IG, Kovaltsov GA, Lockwood M, Mursula K, Owens M, Solanki SK (2016) A new calibrated sunspot group series since 1749: statistics of active day fractions. Sol Phys 291:2685-2708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0838-1. arXiv:1512.06421
J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys J Uwamahoro 71 569 2009 10.1016/j.jastp.2008.12.003 Uwamahoro J, McKinnell L, Cilliers PJ (2009) Forecasting solar cycle 24 using neural networks. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys 71:569-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.12.003
Adv Space Res JM Vaquero 40 929 2007 10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.087 Vaquero JM (2007) Historical sunspot observations: a review. Adv Space Res 40:929-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.087. arXiv:astro-ph/0702068
Sol Phys JM Vaquero 250 199 2008 10.1007/s11207-008-9211-y Vaquero JM, Trigo RM (2008) Can the solar cycle amplitude be predicted using the preceding solar cycle length? Sol Phys 250:199-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9211-y
Astron Astrophys JM Vaquero 577 A71 2015 10.1051/0004-6361/201525962 Vaquero JM, Kovaltsov GA, Usoskin IG, Carrasco VMS, Gallego MC (2015a) Level and length of cyclic solar activity during the Maunder minimum as deduced from the active-day statistics. Astron Astrophys 577:A71. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525962. arXiv:1503.07664
Adv Space Res JM Vaquero 55 1546 2015 10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.006 Vaquero JM, Nogales JM, Sánchez-Bajo F (2015b) Sunspot latitudes during the Maunder minimum: a machine-readable catalogue from previous studies. Adv Space Res 55:1546-1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.006. arXiv:1501.05989
Sol Phys JM Vaquero 291 3061 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0982-2 Vaquero JM, Svalgaard L, Carrasco VMS, Clette F, Lefèvre L, Gallego MC, Arlt R, Aparicio AJP, Richard JG, Howe R (2016) A revised collection of sunspot group numbers. Sol Phys 291:3061-3074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0982-2. arXiv:1609.04882
Sol Phys A Vigouroux 152 267 1994 10.1007/BF01473214 Vigouroux A, Delachie P (1994) Sunspot numbers uncertainties and parametric representations of solar activity variations. Sol Phys 152:267-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01473214
Astron Astrophys IOI Virtanen 604 A8 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201730415 Virtanen IOI, Virtanen II, Pevtsov AA, Yeates A, Mursula K (2017) Reconstructing solar magnetic fields from historical observations. II. Testing the surface flux transport model. Astron Astrophys 604:A8. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730415
Virtanen IOI, Virtanen II, Pevtsov AA, Bertello L, Yeates A, Mursula K (2019) Reconstructing solar magnetic fields from historical observations. V. Testing the reconstruction method. Astron Astrophys 627:A11
YI Vitinsky 1963 Prognozi solnechnoi aktivnosti Vitinsky YI (1963) Prognozi solnechnoi aktivnosti. Nauka, Leningrad
YI Vitinsky 1973 Tsiklichnost i prognozi solnechnoi aktivnosti Vitinsky YI (1973) Tsiklichnost i prognozi solnechnoi aktivnosti. Nauka, Leningrad
YI Vitinsky 1986 Statistika Pyatnoobrazovatel’noy Deyatel’nosti Solntsa Vitinsky YI, Kopecký M, Kuklin GV (1986) Statistika Pyatnoobrazovatel’noy Deyatel’nosti Solntsa. Nauka, Moscow
Sol Phys MV Vokhmyanin 293 31 2018 10.1007/s11207-018-1245-1 Vokhmyanin MV, Zolotova NV (2018) Sunspot positions and areas from observations by Galileo Galilei. Sol Phys 293:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1245-1
Astr Mitt Zürich M Waldmeier 14 105 1935 Waldmeier M (1935) Neue Eigenschaften der Sonnenfleckenkurve. Astr Mitt Zürich 14:105-130
M Waldmeier 1961 The sunspot activity in the years 1610-1960 Waldmeier M (1961) The sunspot activity in the years 1610-1960. Schultheiss & Co., Zürich
Space Sci Rev YM Wang 210 351 2017 10.1007/s11214-016-0257-0 Wang YM (2017) Surface flux transport and the evolution of the Sun’s polar fields. Space Sci Rev 210:351-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0257-0
Astrophys J Lett YM Wang 694 L11 2009 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/L11 Wang YM, Sheeley NR (2009) Understanding the geomagnetic precursor of the solar cycle. Astrophys J Lett 694:L11-L15. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/L11
Astrophys J YM Wang 707 1372 2009 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1372 Wang YM, Robbrecht E, Sheeley NR (2009) On the weakening of the polar magnetic fields during solar cycle 23. Astrophys J 707:1372-1386. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1372
Astron Astrophys J Warnecke 609 A51 2018 10.1051/0004-6361/201628136 Warnecke J, Rheinhardt M, Tuomisto S, Käpylä PJ, Käpylä MJ, Brandenburg A (2018) Turbulent transport coefficients in spherical wedge dynamo simulations of solar-like stars. Astron Astrophys 609:A51. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628136. arXiv:1601.03730
Astrophys J FT Watson 787 22 2014 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/22 Watson FT, Penn MJ, Livingston W (2014) A multi-instrument analysis of sunspot umbrae. Astrophys J 787:22. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/22. arXiv:1511.07300
WWS Wei 2005 Time series analysis: univariate and multivariate methods 2 Wei WWS (2005) Time series analysis: univariate and multivariate methods, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley, Reading
Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn NO Weiss 30 305 1984 10.1080/03091928408219262 Weiss NO, Cattaneo F, Jones CA (1984) Periodic and aperiodic dynamo waves. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 30:305-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091928408219262
Astron Astrophys T Whitbread 607 A76 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201730689 Whitbread T, Yeates AR, Muñoz-Jaramillo A, Petrie GJD (2017) Parameter optimization for surface flux transport models. Astron Astrophys 607:A76. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730689. arXiv:1708.01098
Astrophys J T Whitbread 863 116 2018 10.3847/1538-4357/aad17e Whitbread T, Yeates AR, Muñoz-Jaramillo A (2018) How many active regions are necessary to predict the solar dipole moment? Astrophys J 863:116. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad17e. arXiv:1807.01617
Astron Astrophys T Willamo 601 A109 2017 10.1051/0004-6361/201629839 Willamo T, Usoskin IG, Kovaltsov GA (2017) Updated sunspot group number reconstruction for 1749-1996 using the active day fraction method. Astron Astrophys 601:A109. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629839. arXiv:1705.05109
Sol Phys T Willamo 293 69 2018 10.1007/s11207-018-1292-7 Willamo T, Usoskin IG, Kovaltsov GA (2018) A test of the active-day fraction method of sunspot group number calibration: dependence on the level of solar activity. Sol Phys 293:69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1292-7. arXiv:1803.10501
Astrophys J AL Wilmot-Smith 652 696 2006 10.1086/508013 Wilmot-Smith AL, Nandy D, Hornig G, Martens PCH (2006) A time delay model for solar and stellar dynamos. Astrophys J 652:696-708. https://doi.org/10.1086/508013
Geophys J Int DE Winch 160 487 2005 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02472.x Winch DE, Ivers DJ, Turner JPR, Stening RJ (2005) Geomagnetism and Schmidt quasi-normalization. Geophys J Int 160:487-504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02472.x
Sol Phys LM Winter 291 9-10 3011 2016 10.1007/s11207-016-0901-6 Winter LM, Pernak RL, Balasubramaniam KS (2016) Comparing SSN index to X-ray flare and coronal mass ejection rates from solar cycles 22-24. Sol Phys 291(9-10):3011-3023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0901-6. arXiv:1605.00503
Astr Mitt Zürich R Wolf 1 3 1850 Wolf R (1850) Mittheilungen über die Sonnenflecken I. Astr Mitt Zürich 1:3-13
Astron Astrophys CJ Wu 615 A93 2018 10.1051/0004-6361/201731892 Wu CJ, Usoskin IG, Krivova N, Kovaltsov GA, Baroni M, Bard E, Solanki SK (2018) Solar activity over nine millennia: a consistent multi-proxy reconstruction. Astron Astrophys 615:A93. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731892. arXiv:1804.01302
Sol Phys AR Yeates 289 631 2014 10.1007/s11207-013-0301-0 Yeates AR (2014) Coronal magnetic field evolution from 1996 to 2012: continuous non-potential simulations. Sol Phys 289:631-648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0301-0. arXiv:1304.0609
Mon Not R Astron Soc AR Yeates 436 3366 2013 10.1093/mnras/stt1818 Yeates AR, Muñoz-Jaramillo A (2013) Kinematic active region formation in a three-dimensional solar dynamo model. Mon Not R Astron Soc 436:3366-3379. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1818. arXiv:1309.6342
Astrophys J AR Yeates 673 544 2008 10.1086/524352 Yeates AR, Nandy D, Mackay DH (2008) Exploring the physical basis of solar cycle predictions: flux transport dynamics and persistence of memory in advection- versus diffusion-dominated solar convection zones. Astrophys J 673:544-556. https://doi.org/10.1086/524352. arXiv:0709.1046
Sol Phys AR Yeates 290 3189 2015 10.1007/s11207-015-0660-9 Yeates AR, Baker D, van Driel-Gesztelyi L (2015) Source of a prominent poleward surge during solar cycle 24. Sol Phys 290:3189-3201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0660-9. arXiv:1502.04854
Astrophys J TV Zaqarashvili 709 749 2010 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/749 Zaqarashvili TV, Carbonell M, Oliver R, Ballester JL (2010) Magnetic Rossby waves in the solar tachocline and Rieger-type periodicities. Astrophys J 709:749-758. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/749. arXiv:0911.4591
YB Zeldovich 1984 Magnetic fields in astrophysics Zeldovich YB, Ruzmaikin AA, Sokoloff DD (1984) Magnetic fields in astrophysics. Gordon & Breach, New York
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.