[논문]Exploring actors, their constellations, and roles in digital agricultural innovations

Maria, Kernecker; Maria, Busse; Andrea, Knierim

doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102952

[해외논문] Exploring actors, their constellations, and roles in digital agricultural innovations

Agricultural systems, v.186, 2021년, pp.102952 -

Maria, Kernecker (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research) , Maria, Busse (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research) , Andrea, Knierim (University of Hohenheim)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Abstract Agricultural innovations can emerge from multi-actor cooperation and so actors, their roles, and their activities will likely influence the character of novel farming practices. Recent studies suggest that such cooperation might be particularly relevant for the digitalization of farming, reflected in the transition from mechanical to data-based agricultural tools and practices, collectively referred to as smart farming technologies (SFT). Here, we aim to understand which actors are involved, the roles they have, and how they contribute to the innovation processes leading to SFT use in farm management. To do so, we selected 6 SFT innovations from different European regions. Timeline and constellation analyses were used to study the actors and their contribution to different phases of the innovation processes. We observed 13 different categories of actors that had three different types of actor roles: developer, supporter, and end-user. We found the highest number of both actor diversity and number of roles during the initiation phase, with a subsequent decrease over the next two phases. Farmers were the only actors who took on all 3 roles, and most actors were supporters. Farmer and IT-experts made up the most common constellation for agricultural apps. Constellations made up of farmers, advisors, and agri-tech actors were the most common in innovative practices dependent on GPS. The divide in the technological complexity and the degree of required learning and change for farmers in SFT innovation processes was reflected by the two innovation categories we studied, namely agricultural apps and in-field practices dependent on GPS. These could therefore constitute a defining difference in how to determine actor constellations in SFT innovation processes. Highlights We studied 6 digital agricultural innovations grouped into apps and practices. The process perspective provided insight to actor dynamics in each innovation. Actors and their constellations differ between each innovation group. Farmers take on more roles than other actors. Collaborations between IT-experts, advisors and farmers were central to innovations.

주제어

참고문헌 (91)

Balafoutis 21 2017 10.1007/978-3-319-68715-5_2 Precision Agriculture: Technology and Economic Perspectives Smart farming technologies - Description, taxonomy and economic impact
Annu. Rev. Sociol. Biddle 12 67 1986 10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435 Recent developments in role theory

상세보기
Land Use Policy Burton 70 334 2018 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.014 Traditional ecological knowledge from the internet? The case of hay meadows in Europe

상세보기
Precis. Agric. Busse 15 403 2014 10.1007/s11119-013-9337-2 Innovation mechanisms in German precision farming

상세보기
Sociol. Rural. Carolan 58 745 2018 10.1111/soru.12202 ‘Smart’ farming techniques as political ontology: access, sovereignty and the performance of neoliberal and not-so-neoliberal worlds

상세보기
Land Use Policy Carolan 79 179 2018 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.011 Lands changing hands: experiences of succession and farm (knowledge) acquisition among first-generation, multigenerational, and aspiring farmers

상세보기
J. Rural. Stud. Cofre-Bravo 69 53 2019 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004 Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: how farmers configure different support networks

상세보기
Self Identity Collier 4 45 2005 10.1080/13576500444000164 Role theory and social cognition: learning to think like a recycler

상세보기
Darnhofer 2012 Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic Farming systems research: An approach to inquiry
10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.22591-2 Daum, T., 2019. ICT Applications in Agriculture. In: Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability. Pasquale Ferranti, Elliot Berry, Anderson Jock. (1894 pages).
Agric. Syst. Dolinska 157 129 2017 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.07.002 Bringing farmers into the game. Strengthening farmers’ role in the innovation process through a simulation game, a case from Tunisia

상세보기
Agric. Syst. Dolinska 142 122 2016 10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.009 Farmers as agents in innovation systems. Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice

상세보기
Douthwaite 2005 Innovation Histories: A Method from Learning from Experience
J. Rural. Stud. Eastwood 49 1 2017 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008 Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies

상세보기
NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Eastwood 90 2019 Making sense in the cloud: farm advisory services in a smart farming future
Journal of Innovation Economics Faure 28 145 2019 10.3917/jie.028.0145 How to strengthen innovation support services in agriculture with regard to multi-stakeholder approaches

상세보기
Sustainability Fischer 8 476 2016 10.3390/su8050476 Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: a systematic exploration of the literature

상세보기
Agron. Sustain. Dev. Fleming 38 24 2018 10.1007/s13593-018-0501-y Is big data for big farming or for everyone? Perceptions in the Australian grains industry

상세보기
Comput. Electron. Agric. Fountas 115 40 2015 10.1016/j.compag.2015.05.011 Farm management information systems: current situation and future perspectives

상세보기
Res. Policy Geels 33 6-7 897 2004 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory

상세보기
Research Ploicy Geels 36 3 399 2007 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways

상세보기
Eur. Sport Manag. Q. Gibson 5 443 2005 10.1080/16184740500430330 Insights from role theory: understanding golf tourism

상세보기
Agric. Hum. Values Glenna 28 213 2011 10.1007/s10460-010-9275-9 How farmers matter in shaping agricultural technologies: social and structural characteristics of wheat growers and wheat varieties

상세보기
Hall 2006 World Bank. Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. Hekkert 76 4 584 2009 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.013 Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims

상세보기
Agric. Syst. Hermans 115 117 2013 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.006 The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems

상세보기
J. Agric. Educ. Ext. Hermans 21 35 2015 10.1080/1389224X.2014.991113 Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems

상세보기
J. Rural. Stud. Higgins 55 193 2017 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.011 Ordering adoption: materiality, knowledge and farmer engagement with precision agriculture technologies

상세보기
2012 Consensual Qualitative Research: A Practical Resource for Investigating Social Science Phenomena
Agric. Hum. Values Hoffmann 24 3 355 2007 10.1007/s10460-007-9072-2 Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development?

상세보기
Hoffmann 2009 Rural Extension Volume 1: Basic Issues and Concepts
Njas - Wageningen J. Life Sci. Ingram 2019 10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.006 Searching for meaning: co-constructing ontologies with stakeholders for smarter search engines in agriculture

상세보기
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Ingram 4 2020 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00066 What are the implications of digitalisation for agricultural knowledge?

상세보기
Ison 141 2012 Farming Systems into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic Systems practice: Making the systems in farming systems research effective
NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Jakku 100285 2018 “If they don’t tell us what they do with it, why would we trust them?” trust, transparency and benefit-sharing in Smart Farming
Comput. Electron. Agric. Kamilaris 143 23 2017 10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.037 A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture

상세보기
10.1007/s11119-019-09651-z Kernecker, M., Knierim, A., Wurbs, A., Kraus,T. and Borges, F. 2019. Experience versus expectation: farmers' perceptions of smart farming technologies for cropping systems across Europe. Precision Agriculture (online first).

상세보기
10.1787/9789264167445-en Klerkx, L. (2012). The role of innovation brokers in the agricultural innovation system. In: Improving Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems. OECD Conference Proceedings. 237-245.doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264167445-en.
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. Klerkx 76 849 2009 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001 Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector

상세보기
Food Policy Klerkx 40 74 2013 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.02.004 Achievements and challenges of innovation co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors: a comparative study

상세보기
Global Food Security Klerkx 24 2020 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347 Dealing with the game-changing technologies of agriculture 4.0: how do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways?

상세보기
Agric. Syst. Klerkx 103 390 2010 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012 Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment

상세보기
Agric. Syst. Klerkx 113 39 2012 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.006 Design process outputs as boundary objects in agricultural innovation projects: functions and limitations

상세보기
Klerkx 457 2012 Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions
NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Klerkx 90 2019 A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: new contributions and a future research agenda
Livest. Sci. Kling-Eveillard 2020 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104057 Farmers’ representations of the effects of precision livestock farming on human-animal relationships

상세보기
J. Agric. Educ. Ext. Knickel 15 131 2009 10.1080/13892240902909064 Towards a better conceptual framework for innovation processes in agriculture and rural development: from linear models to systemic approaches

상세보기
Knierim 259 2013 Partizipation und Klimawandel Zur Rolle der Forschenden beim Praktizieren von Partizipation
Knierim 2015 WP 1. Deliverable 1.2 Report of the AgriSPIN Project Support to innovation processes: a theoretical point of departure
NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Knierim 90 2019 Smart farming technology innovations-insights and reflections from the German smart-AKIS hub
Konig, O., and Schattenhofer, K. , 2008. Einfuhrung in die Gruppendynamik. Carl-Auer Verlag, Heidelberg, 3rd edition.
J. Ext. Syst. Koutsouris 28 1 18 2012 Facilitation and brokerage: new roles for extension
Journal of Rural Studies Koutsouris 73 176 2020 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.046 Supporting bottom-up innovative initiatives throughout the spiral of innovations: Lessons from rural Greece

상세보기
Kuckartz 2014 Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software
Leeuwis 2004 Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension
Lewin 340 1947 Readings in Social Psychology Group decision and social change
10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.003 Lioutas, E.D., Charatsari, C., La Rocca, G. and De Rosa, M., 2019. Key questions on the use of big data in farming: an activity theory approach. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences.90-91, 100297.

상세보기
Long 2004 Development Sociology. Actor Perspectives
J. Theory Soc. Behav. Lynch 37 379 2007 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00349.x Modeling role enactment: linking role theory and social cognition

상세보기
Res. Policy Markard 37 4 596 2008 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework

상세보기
Meynard 457 2012 Farming Systems Research 405 into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic Re-design and co-design of farming systems. An overview of methods and practices
Moschitz, H. and Stolze, M. 2018. How can we make sense of smart technologies for sustainable agriculture? -a discussion paper. In: 13th European IFSA Symposium. Book of Abstracts. International Farming Systems Association (Eds.), Chania (Greece): 1-5 July 2018.
Int. J. Agric. Sustain. Ndah 16 228 2018 10.1080/14735903.2018.1447227 From dogmatic views on conservation agriculture adoption in Zambia towards adapting to context

상세보기
Newing 2010 Conducting Research in Conservation: Social Science Methods and Practice
Hist. Soc. Res. Ohlhorst 40 258 2015 Constellation analysis as a means of interdisciplinary innovation research: theory formation from the bottom up
Precis. Agric. Paustian 18 701 2017 10.1007/s11119-016-9482-5 Adoption of precision agriculture technologies by German crop farmers

상세보기
Phillips 2018 13th European IFSA Symposium. Book of Abstracts. International Farming Systems Association (Eds.), Chania (Greece): 1-5 July 2018 An investigation of social media’s roles in knowledge exchange by farmers
Agric. Syst. Pigford 164 116 2018 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007 Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions

상세보기
NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Regan 100292 2019 ‘Smart farming’ in Ireland: a risk perception study with key governance actors
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. Reichardt 106 11 2016 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.029 Analyzing interdependencies between policy mixes and technological innovation systems: the case of offshore wind in Germany

상세보기
Knowledge Rice 1 4 499 1980 10.1177/107554708000100402 Reinvention in the innovation process

상세보기
NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Rijswijk 90 100313 2019 10.1016/j.njas.2019.100313 Digitalisation in the New Zealand Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System: Initial understandings and emerging organisational responses to digital agriculture

상세보기
Rogers 1995 Diffusion of Innovations
J. Rural. Stud. Rotz 68 112 2019 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023 Automated pastures and the digital divide: how agricultural technologies are shaping labour and rural communities

상세보기
SCAR 2012 Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Transition -A Reflection Paper. Brussels
Environ Sci Policy Schmid 56 67 2016 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.003 Policy-induced innovations networks on climate change adaptation - an ex-post analysis of collaboration success and its influencing factors

상세보기
Schot 20 537 2008 Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy
J. Sci. Food Agric. Shepherd 2018 Priorities for science to overcome hurdles thwarting the full promise of the ‘digital agriculture’revolution
2010 The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy. An International Research Handbook
Computer Standards and Interfaces Suprem 35 355 2013 10.1016/j.csi.2012.09.002 A review on application of technology systems, standards and interfaces for agriculture and food sector

상세보기
TAP 2016 Common Framework on Capacity Development for Agricultural Innovation Systems: Conceptual Background
NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Turner 76 99 2016 10.1016/j.njas.2015.12.001 Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand agricultural innovation system: identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics

상세보기
J. Rural. Stud. Turner 76 152 2020 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.022 Revealing power dynamics and staging conflicts in agricultural system transitions: case studies of innovation platforms in New Zealand

상세보기
Environ. Policy Gov. Van Bommel 19 400 2009 10.1002/eet.526 Social learning for solving complex problems: a promising solution or wishful thinking? A case study of multi-actor negotiation for the integrated management and sustainable use of the Drentsche aa area in the Netherlands

상세보기
Van den Bosch 1996 Paper presented at Innovation Pressure Conference, 15-7 March 1996, Tampere, Finland How innovation impacts society. Patterns and mechanisms through which innovation projects contribute to transitions
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. Walter 114 6148 2017 10.1073/pnas.1707462114 Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture

상세보기
Wielinga 2008 Networks with Free Actors: Encouraging Sustainable Innovations Animal Husbandry by Using the FAN Approach (Free Actors in Networks): Networking Is Sensing Opportunities!
Studies in Agricultural Economics Wielinga 119 26 2017 10.7896/j.1043 Generating space for innovations in agriculture: the AgriSpin project

상세보기
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions Wittmayer 24 45 2017 10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003 Actor roles in transition: insights from sociological perspectives

상세보기
Wolfert 266 2014 2014 Annual SRII Global Conference A future internet collaboration platform for safe and healthy food from farm to fork
Precis. Agric. Zhang 13 693 2012 10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5 The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review

상세보기

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

[해외논문] Exploring actors, their constellations, and roles in digital agricultural innovations

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

주제어

참고문헌 (91)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

원문 URL 링크

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트