[논문]Identification of Target Chicken Populations by Machine Learning Models Using the Minimum Number of SNPs

Seo, Dongwon; Cho, Sunghyun; Manjula, Prabuddha; Choi, Nuri; Kim, Young-Kuk; Koh, Yeong Jun; Lee, Seung Hwan; Kim, Hyung-Yong; Lee, Jun Heon

doi:10.3390/ani11010241

[해외논문] Identification of Target Chicken Populations by Machine Learning Models Using the Minimum Number of SNPs 원문보기

Animals an open access journal from MDPI, v.11 no.1, 2021년, pp.241 -

Seo, Dongwon (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea) , Cho, Sunghyun (seotuna@cnu.ac.kr (D.S.)) , Manjula, Prabuddha (cshcshh@cnu.ac.kr (S.C.)) , Choi, Nuri (prabuddhamanjula@yahoo.com (P.M.)) , Kim, Young-Kuk (slee46@cnu.ac.kr (S.H.L.)) , Koh, Yeong Jun (Division of Animal and Dairy Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea) , Lee, Seung Hwan (seotuna@cnu.ac.kr (D.S.)) , Kim, Hyung-Yong (cshcshh@cnu.ac.kr (S.C.)) , Lee, Jun Heon (prabuddhamanjula@yahoo.com (P.M.))

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Simple SummaryClassifying a target population at the genetic level can provide important information for the preservation and commercial use of a breed. In this study, the minimum number of markers was used in combination, to distinguish target populations based on high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array data. Subsequently, a genome-wide association study for filtering target-population-specific SNPs between the case and control groups and principal component analysis with machine learning algorithms could be used to explore various combinations with the minimum number of markers. In addition, the optimal combination of SNP markers was able to produce stable results for the target population in verification studies, in which samples were analyzed.AbstractA marker combination capable of classifying a specific chicken population could improve commercial value by increasing consumer confidence with respect to the origin of the population. This would facilitate the protection of native genetic resources in the market of each country. In this study, a total of 283 samples from 20 lines, which consisted of Korean native chickens, commercial native chickens, and commercial broilers with a layer population, were analyzed to determine the optimal marker combination comprising the minimum number of markers, using a 600 k high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Machine learning algorithms, a genome-wide association study (GWAS), linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to distinguish a target (case) group for comparison with control chicken groups. In the processing of marker selection, a total of 47,303 SNPs were used for classifying chicken populations; 96 LD-pruned SNPs (50 SNPs per LD block) served as the best marker combination for target chicken classification. Moreover, 36, 44, and 8 SNPs were selected as the minimum numbers of markers by the AdaBoost (AB), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT) machine learning classification models, which had accuracy rates of 99.6%, 98.0%, and 97.9%, respectively. The selected marker combinations increased the genetic distance and fixation index (Fst) values between the case and control groups, and they reduced the number of genetic components required, confirming that efficient classification of the groups was possible by using a small number of marker sets. In a verification study including additional chicken breeds and samples (12 lines and 182 samples), the accuracy did not significantly change, and the target chicken group could be clearly distinguished from the other populations. The GWAS, PCA, and machine learning algorithms used in this study can be applied efficiently, to determine the optimal marker combination with the minimum number of markers that can distinguish the target population among a large number of SNP markers.

Keyword

참고문헌 (49)

1. Yeung R.M. Morris J. Consumer perception of food risk in chicken meat Nutr. Food Sci. 2001 10.1108/00346650110409092

상세보기
2. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs) Major Statistics of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 2019 Available online: http://library.mafra.go.kr/skyblueimage/28195.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2020)
3. Shim J.-M. Seo D.-W. Seo S. Kim J.-J. Min D.-M. Kim J. Jeon J.-T. Lee J.-H. Discrimination of Korean cattle (Hanwoo) with imported beef from USA based on the SNP markers Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2010 30 918 922 10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.6.918

원문보기 상세보기
4. Oh J.-D. Song K.-D. Seo J.-H. Kim D.-K. Kim S.-H. Seo K.-S. Lim H.-T. Lee J.-B. Park H.-C. Ryu Y.-C. Genetic traceability of black pig meats using microsatellite markers Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014 27 926 10.5713/ajas.2013.13829 25050032

원문보기 상세보기
5. Kim K. Seo M. Kang H. Cho S. Kim H. Seo K.-S. Application of logitboost classifier for traceability using snp chip data PLoS ONE 2015 10 e0139685 10.1371/journal.pone.0139685 26436917

상세보기
6. Choi N.-R. Hoque M.R. Seo D.-W. Sultana H. Park H.-B. Lim H.-T. Heo K.-N. Kang B.-S. Jo C. Lee J.-H. ISAG-recommended Microsatellite Marker Analysis among Five Korean Native Chicken Lines J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2012 54 401 409 10.5187/JAST.2012.54.6.401

원문보기 상세보기
7. Dalvit C. De Marchi M. Cassandro M. Genetic traceability of livestock products: A review Meat Sci. 2007 77 437 449 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.05.027 22061927

상세보기
8. Burt D.W. Chicken genome: Current status and future opportunities Genome Res. 2005 15 1692 1698 10.1101/gr.4141805 16339367

상세보기
9. Hillier L.W. Miller W. Birney E. Warren W. Hardison R.C. Ponting C.P. Bork P. Burt D.W. Groenen M.A. Delany M.E. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2014 423 695 777 10.1038/nature03154

상세보기
10. Groenen M.A. Megens H.-J. Zare Y. Warren W.C. Hillier L.W. Crooijmans R.P. Vereijken A. Okimoto R. Muir W.M. Cheng H.H. The development and characterization of a 60K SNP chip for chicken BMC Genom. 2011 12 274 10.1186/1471-2164-12-274

상세보기
11. Kranis A. Gheyas A.A. Boschiero C. Turner F. Yu L. Smith S. Talbot R. Pirani A. Brew F. Kaiser P. Development of a high density 600K SNP genotyping array for chicken BMC Genom. 2013 14 59 10.1186/1471-2164-14-59

상세보기
12. Karniol B. Shirak A. Baruch E. Singrün C. Tal A. Cahana A. Kam M. Skalski Y. Brem G. Weller J. Development of a 25-plex SNP assay for traceability in cattle Anim. Genet. 2009 40 353 356 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01846.x 19292709

상세보기
13. Futema M. Bourbon M. Williams M. Humphries S.E. Clinical utility of the polygenic LDL-C SNP score in familial hypercholesterolemia Atherosclerosis 2018 277 457 463 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.06.006 30270085

상세보기
14. Vignal A. Milan D. SanCristobal M. Eggen A. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics Genet. Sel. Evol. 2002 34 275 305 10.1186/1297-9686-34-3-275 12081799

상세보기
15. Suekawa Y. Aihara H. Araki M. Hosokawa D. Mannen H. Sasazaki S. Development of breed identification markers based on a bovine 50K SNP array Meat Sci. 2010 85 285 288 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.01.015 20374900

상세보기
16. Brooks A. Creighton E.K. Gandolfi B. Khan R. Grahn R.A. Lyons L.A. SNP Miniplexes for Individual Identification of Random-Bred Domestic Cats J. Forensic Sci. 2016 61 594 606 10.1111/1556-4029.13026 27122395

상세보기
17. Kumar H. Panigrahi M. Chhotaray S. Parida S. Chauhan A. Bhushan B. Gaur G.K. Mishra B.P. Singh R.K. Comparative analysis of five different methods to design a breed-specific SNP panel for cattle Anim. Biotechnol. 2019 9 1 7 10.1080/10495398.2019.1646266

상세보기
18. Mitchell T.M. Machine learning and data mining Commun. ACM 1999 42 30 36 10.1145/319382.319388

상세보기
19. Guinand B. Topchy A. Page K. Burnham-Curtis M. Punch W. Scribner K. Comparisons of likelihood and machine learning methods of individual classification J. Hered. 2002 93 260 269 10.1093/jhered/93.4.260 12407212

상세보기
20. Bertolini F. Galimberti G. Calò D. Schiavo G. Matassino D. Fontanesi L. Combined use of principal component analysis and random forests identify population-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms: Application in cattle breeds J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2015 132 346 356 10.1111/jbg.12155 25781205

상세보기
21. Bertolini F. Galimberti G. Schiavo G. Mastrangelo S. Di Gerlando R. Strillacci M. Bagnato A. Portolano B. Fontanesi L. Preselection statistics and Random Forest classification identify population informative single nucleotide polymorphisms in cosmopolitan and autochthonous cattle breeds Animal 2017 12 12 19 10.1017/S1751731117001355 28643617

상세보기
22. Pasupa K. Rathasamuth W. Tongsima S. Discovery of significant porcine SNPs for swine breed identification by a hybrid of information gain, genetic algorithm, and frequency feature selection technique BMC Bioinform. 2020 21 1 28 10.1186/s12859-020-3471-4 32456608

상세보기
23. Schiavo G. Bertolini F. Galimberti G. Bovo S. Dall’Olio S. Costa L.N. Gallo M. Fontanesi L. A machine learning approach for the identification of population-informative markers from high-throughput genotyping data: Application to several pig breeds Animal 2020 14 223 232 10.1017/S1751731119002167 31603060

상세보기
24. Judge M. Kelleher M. Kearney J. Sleator R. Berry D. Ultra-low-density genotype panels for breed assignment of Angus and Hereford cattle Animal 2017 11 938 947 10.1017/S1751731116002457 27881206

상세보기
25. Yoo J. Koo B. Kim E. Heo J.M. Comparison of growth performance between crossbred Korean native chickens for hatch to 28 days CNU J. Agric. Sci. 2015 42 23 27 10.7744/cnujas.2015.42.1.023

원문보기 상세보기
26. Jin S. Jayasena D. Jo C. Lee J. The breeding history and commercial development of the Korean native chicken World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2017 73 163 174 10.1017/S004393391600088X

상세보기
27. Seo D. Lee D.H. Choi N. Sudrajad P. Lee S.-H. Lee J.-H. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium and analysis of genetic diversity in Korean chicken lines PLoS ONE 2018 13 e0192063 10.1371/journal.pone.0192063 29425208

상세보기
28. Nei M. Genetic Distance between Populations Am. Nat. 1972 106 283 292 10.1086/282771

상세보기
29. Kamvar Z.N. Tabima J.F. Grünwald N.J. Poppr: An R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction PeerJ 2014 2 e281 10.7717/peerj.281 24688859

상세보기
30. Zheng X. Levine D. Shen J. Gogarten S.M. Laurie C. Weir B.S. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data Bioinformatics 2012 28 3326 3328 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606 23060615

상세보기
31. Weir B.S. Cockerham C.C. ESTIMATING F-STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE Int. J. Org. Evol. 1984 38 1358 1370 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x

상세보기
32. Chang C.C. Chow C.C. Tellier L.C. Vattikuti S. Purcell S.M. Lee J.J. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets Gigascience 2015 4 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 25722852

상세보기
33. Alexander D.H. Lange K. Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation BMC Bioinform. 2011 12 246 10.1186/1471-2105-12-246

상세보기
34. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing R Core Team Vienna, Austria 2013 Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.2015.02.10 (accessed on 1 November 2020)
35. Kuhn M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package J. Stat. Softw. 2008 28 1 26 Available online: http://www.math.chalmers.se/Stat/Grundutb/GU/MSA220/S18/caret-JSS.pdf.2008.11.10 (accessed on 1 November 2020) 10.18637/jss.v028.i05 27774042
36. Breiman L. Random Forests Mach. Learn. 2001 45 5 32 10.1023/A:1010933404324
37. Kégl B. The return of AdaBoost. MH: Multi-class Hamming trees arXiv 2013 1312.6086
38. Singh A. Thakur N. Sharma A. A Review of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom) New Delhi, India 16–18 March 2016 1310 1315 Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7724478.2016.03.16 (accessed on 1 November 2020)
39. Tharwat A. Linear vs. quadratic discriminant analysis classifier: A tutorial Int. J. Appl. Pattern Recognit. 2016 3 145 180 10.1504/IJAPR.2016.079050
40. Altman D.G. Bland J.M. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity BMJ Br. Med. J. 1994 308 1552 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552 8019315

상세보기
41. Guo H. Li C. Wang X. Li Z. Sun G. Li G. Liu X. Kang X. Han R. Genetic diversity of mtDNA D-loop sequences in four native Chinese chicken breeds Br. Poult. Sci. 2017 58 490 497 10.1080/00071668.2017.1332403 28541756

상세보기
42. Dimauro C. Cellesi M. Steri R. Gaspa G. Sorbolini S. Stella A. Macciotta N.P.P. Use of the canonical discriminant analysis to select SNP markers for bovine breed assignment and traceability purposes Anim. Genet. 2013 44 377 382 10.1111/age.12021 23347105

상세보기
43. Pérez-Enciso M. Zingaretti L.M. A guide on deep learning for complex trait genomic prediction Genes 2019 10 553 10.3390/genes10070553

상세보기
44. Alves A.A.C. da Costa R.M. Bresolin T. Fernandes Júnior G.A. Espigolan R. Ribeiro A.M.F. Carvalheiro R. Albuquerque L.G.d. Genome-wide prediction for complex traits under the presence of dominance effects in simulated populations using GBLUP and machine learning methods J. Anim. Sci. 2020 10.1093/jas/skaa179 32474602

상세보기
45. Bermingham M.L. Pong-Wong R. Spiliopoulou A. Hayward C. Rudan I. Campbell H. Wright A.F. Wilson J.F. Agakov F. Navarro P. Application of high-dimensional feature selection: Evaluation for genomic prediction in man Sci. Rep. 2015 5 10312 10.1038/srep10312 25988841

상세보기
46. Ramos A.M. Megens H.J. Crooijmans R.P.M.A. Schook L.B. Groenen M.A.M. Identification of High Utility SNPs for Population Assignment and Traceability Purposes in the Pig Using High-throughput Sequencing Anim. Genet. 2011 42 613 620 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02198.x 22035002

상세보기
47. Ciampolini R. Cecchi F. Spinetti I. Rocchi A. Biscarini F. The Use of Genetic Markers to Estimate Relationships between Dogs in the Course of Criminal Investigations BMC Res. Notes 2017 10 414 10.1186/s13104-017-2722-6 28818115

상세보기
48. Carroll E.L. Bruford M.W. DeWoody J.A. Leroy G. Strand A. Waits L. Wang J. Genetic and Genomic Monitoring with Minimally Invasive Sampling Methods Evol. Appl. 2018 11 1094 1119 10.1111/eva.12600 30026800

상세보기
49. Biscarini F. Marini S. Stevanato P. Broccanello C. Bellazzi R. Nazzicari N. Developing a parsimonius predictor for binary traits in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) Mol. Breed. 2015 35 10 10.1007/s11032-015-0197-5

상세보기

LOADING...

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증