참고문헌 (60)

1. 1. Chae S.H. Kim J. Kim Y.M. Kim S.-H. Kim J.H. Economic analysis on environmentally sound brine disposal with RO and RO-hybrid processes Desalin. Water Treat. 2017 78 1 11 10.5004/dwt.2017.20659 

   상세보기

2. 2. Lee C. Chae S.H. Yang E. Kim S. Kim J.H. Kim I.S. A comprehensive review of the feasibility of pressure retarded osmosis: Recent technological advances and industrial efforts towards commercialization Desalination 2020 491 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114501 

   상세보기

3. 3. Seo J. Kim Y.M. Chae S.H. Lim S.J. Park H. Kim J.H. An optimization strategy for a forward osmosis-reverse osmosis hybrid process for wastewater reuse and seawater desalination: A modeling study Desalination 2019 463 40 49 10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.012 

   상세보기

4. 4. Touati K. Tadeo F. Chae S.H. Kim J.H. Alvarez-Silva O. Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Renewable Energy Generation and Recovery Academic Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2017 

5. 5. Chae S.H. Seo J. Kim J. Kim Y.M. Kim J.H. A simulation study with a new performance index for pressure-retarded osmosis processes hybridized with seawater reverse osmosis and membrane distillation Desalination 2018 444 118 128 10.1016/j.desal.2018.07.019 

   상세보기

6. 6. Kramer E.M. Myers D.R. Osmosis is not driven by water dilution Trends Plant Sci. 2013 18 195 197 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.12.001 23298880 

   상세보기

7. 7. Achilli A. Childress A.E. Pressure retarded osmosis: From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation Review Desalination 2010 261 205 211 10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.017 

   상세보기

8. 8. Xu Y. Peng X. Tang C.Y. Fu Q.S. Nie S. Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module J. Membr. Sci. 2010 348 298 309 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.013 

   상세보기

9. 9. Blankert B. Kim Y. Vrouwenvelder H. Ghaffour N. Facultative hybrid RO-PRO concept to improve economic performance of PRO: Feasibility and maximizing efficiency Desalination 2020 478 10.1016/j.desal.2019.114268 

   상세보기

10. 10. Benjamin J. Arias M.E. Zhang Q. A techno-economic process model for pressure retarded osmosis based energy recovery in desalination plants Desalination 2020 476 10.1016/j.desal.2019.114218 

    상세보기

11. 11. Henry C.J. Brant J.A. Influence of membrane characteristics on performance in soil-membrane-water subsurface desalination irrigation systems J. Water Process Eng. 2019 32 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100984 

    상세보기

12. 12. Bacchin P. Colloid-interface interactions initiate osmotic flow dynamics Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017 533 147 158 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.08.034 

    상세보기

13. 13. Martin J.T. Kolliopoulos G. Papangelakis V.G. An improved model for membrane characterization in forward osmosis J. Membr. Sci. 2019 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117668 

    상세보기

14. 14. Abdelkader B. Sharqawy M.H. Temperature Effects and Entropy Generation of Pressure Retarded Osmosis Process Entropy 2019 21 1158 10.3390/e21121158 

    상세보기

15. 15. Wang Q. Zhou Z. Li J. Tang Q. Hu Y. Investigation of the reduced specific energy consumption of the RO-PRO hybrid system based on temperature-enhanced pressure retarded osmosis J. Membr. Sci. 2019 581 439 452 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.079 

    상세보기

16. 16. Sharqawy M.H. Banchik L.D. Lienhard J.H. Effectiveness–mass transfer units (ε–MTU) model of an ideal pressure retarded osmosis membrane mass exchanger J. Membr. Sci. 2013 445 211 219 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.027 

    상세보기

17. 17. He W. Wang Y. Shaheed M.H. Modelling of osmotic energy from natural salt gradients due to pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of detrimental factors and flow schemes J. Membr. Sci. 2014 471 247 257 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.002 

    상세보기

18. 18. Nelson P.C. Biological Physics: Energy, Information, Life W. H. Freeman New York, NY, USA 2004 

19. 19. Granik V.T. Smith B.R. Lee S.C. Ferrari M. Osmotic Pressures for Binary Solutions of Non-electrolytes Biomed. Microdevices 2002 4 309 321 10.1023/A:1020910407962 

    상세보기

20. 20. Huang H.-C. Xie R. New Osmosis Law and Theory: The New Formula that Replaces van’t Hoff Osmotic Pressure Equation arXiv 2012 1201.0912 

21. 21. Wilson A.D. Stewart F.F. Deriving osmotic pressures of draw solutes used in osmotically driven membrane processes J. Membr. Sci. 2013 431 205 211 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.042 

    상세보기

22. 22. Luo Y. Roux B. Simulation of Osmotic Pressure in Concentrated Aqueous Salt Solutions J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2009 1 183 189 10.1021/jz900079w 

    상세보기

23. 23. Oh Y. Lee S. Elimelech M. Lee S. Hong S. Effect of hydraulic pressure and membrane orientation on water flux and reverse solute flux in pressure assisted osmosis J. Membr. Sci. 2014 465 159 166 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.008 

    상세보기

24. 24. Blandin G. Myat D.T. Verliefde A.R.D. Le-Clech P. Pressure assisted osmosis using nanofiltration membranes (PAO-NF): Towards higher efficiency osmotic processes J. Membr. Sci. 2017 533 250 260 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.03.048 

    상세보기

25. 25. Brian P. Mass Transport in Reverse Osmosis Merten MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA 1966 

26. 26. Basdmadjian D. Mass Transfer Principles and Applications CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA 2004 

27. 27. Michaels A.S. New separation technique for the CPI Chem. Eng. Prog. 1968 64 31 43 

28. 28. Wijmans J.G. Baker R.W. The solution-diffusion model: A review J. Membr. Sci. 1995 107 1 21 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-I 

    상세보기

29. 29. Bird R.B. Stewart W.E. Lightfoot E.N. Transport Phenomena 2nd ed. JohnWiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2006 

30. 30. Brian P.L.T. Concentration polarization in reverse osmosis desalination with variable flux and incomplete salt rejection IEc Fundam. 1965 4 439 445 10.1021/i160016a014 

    상세보기

31. 31. Sourirajan S.K.S. Concentration Polarization Effects in Reverse Osmosis Using Porous Cellulose Acetate Membranes L Ec Process Des. Dev. 1968 7 41 48 

32. 32. Cohen-Tanugi D. McGovern R.K. Dave S.H. Lienhard J.H. Grossman J.C. Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination Energy Environ. Sci. 2014 7 1134 1141 10.1039/C3EE43221A 

    상세보기

33. 33. World Health Organization Total Dissolved Solids in Drinking-Water: Background Document for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality WHO Geneva, Switzerland 2003 

34. 34. Lim S.J. Kim Y.M. Park H. Ki S. Jeong K. Seo J. Chae S.H. Kim J.H. Enhancing accuracy of membrane fouling prediction using hybrid machine learning models Desalin. Water Treat. 2019 146 22 28 10.5004/dwt.2019.23444 

    상세보기

35. 35. Koutsou C.P. Yiantsios S.G. Karabelas A.J. Direct numerical simulation of flow in spacer-filled channels: Effect of spacer geometrical characteristics J. Membr. Sci. 2007 291 53 69 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.032 

    상세보기

36. 36. Ruiz-García A. Nuez I. Performance Assessment of SWRO Spiral-Wound Membrane Modules with Different Feed Spacer Dimensions Processes 2020 8 692 10.3390/pr8060692 

    상세보기

37. 37. Haidari A.H. Heijman S.G.J. van der Meer W.G.J. Optimal design of spacers in reverse osmosis Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018 192 441 456 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.10.042 

    상세보기

38. 38. Kim J. Jeong K. Park M. Shon H. Kim J. Recent Advances in Osmotic Energy Generation via Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO): A Review Energies 2015 8 11821 11845 10.3390/en81011821 

    상세보기

39. 39. Chae S.H. Kim Y.M. Park H. Seo J. Lim S.J. Kim J.H. Modeling and Simulation Studies Analyzing the Pressure-Retarded Osmosis (PRO) and PRO-Hybridized Processes Energies 2019 12 243 10.3390/en12020243 

    상세보기

40. 40. Cheng Z.L. Chung T.-S. Mass transport of various membrane configurations in pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) J. Membr. Sci. 2017 537 160 176 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.008 

    상세보기

41. 41. Atkins P.W. Julio D.P. Atkins’ Physical Chemistry 8th ed. W.H. Freeman New York, NY, USA 2006 

42. 42. Kargol A. Modified Kedem–Katchalsky equations and their applications J. Membr. Sci. 2000 174 43 53 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00367-7 

    상세보기

43. 43. Kedem O. Katchalsky A. Thermodynamics analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta 1958 27 229 246 10.1016/0006-3002(58)90330-5 

    상세보기

44. 44. Pietruszka M. Jarzyńska M. Derivation of Practical Kedem Katchalsky Equations for Membrane Substance Transport Old New Concepts Phys. 2008 5 459 474 10.2478/v10005-007-0041-8 

    상세보기

45. 45. Spiegler K.S. Kedem O. Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis) Criteria for efficient membranes Desalination 1966 1 311 326 10.1016/S0011-9164(00)80018-1 

    상세보기

46. 46. Ahmed F.N. Modified Spiegler-Kedem Model to Predict the Rejection and Flux of Nanofiltration Processes at High NaCl Concentrations Master’s Thesis University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada 2013 

47. 47. Attarde D. Jain M. Gupta S.K. Modeling of a forward osmosis and a pressure-retarded osmosis spiral wound module using the Spiegler-Kedem model and experimental validation Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016 164 182 197 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.03.039 

    상세보기

48. 48. Field R. Wu J.J. On boundary layers and the attenuation of driving forces in forward osmosis and other membrane processes Desalination 2018 s429 167 174 10.1016/j.desal.2017.12.001 

    상세보기

49. 49. Morrow C.P. Childress A.E. Evidence, Determination, and Implications of Membrane-Independent Limiting Flux in Forward Osmosis Systems Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019 53 4380 4388 10.1021/acs.est.8b05925 30887806 

    상세보기

50. 50. Bui N.-N. Arena J.T. McCutcheon J.R. Proper accounting of mass transfer resistances in forward osmosis: Improving the accuracy of model predictions of structural parameter J. Membr. Sci. 2015 492 289 302 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.02.001 

    상세보기

51. 51. Wang Y. Zhang M. Liu Y. Xiao Q. Xu S. Quantitative evaluation of concentration polarization under different operating conditions for forward osmosis process Desalination 2016 398 106 113 10.1016/j.desal.2016.07.015 

    상세보기

52. 52. Wu J.J. Field R.W. On the understanding and feasibility of “Breakthrough” Osmosis Sci. Rep. 2019 9 16464 10.1038/s41598-019-53417-6 31712620 

    상세보기

53. 53. Nagy E. Hegedüs I. Tow E.W. Lienhard V.J.H. Effect of fouling on performance of pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) and forward osmosis (FO) J. Membr. Sci. 2018 565 450 462 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.039 

    상세보기

54. 54. Nagy E. A general, resistance-in-series, salt- and water flux models for forward osmosis and pressure-retarded osmosis for energy generation J. Membr. Sci. 2014 460 71 81 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.021 

    상세보기

55. 55. Field R.W. Wu J.J. Mass transfer limitations in forward osmosis: Are some potential applications overhyped? Desalination 2013 318 118 124 10.1016/j.desal.2013.01.025 

    상세보기

56. 56. Yip N.Y. Tiraferri A. Phillip W.A. Schiffman J.D. Hoover L.A. Kim Y.C. Elimelech M. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011 45 4360 4369 10.1021/es104325z 21491936 

    상세보기

57. 57. Kook S. Swetha C.D. Lee J. Lee C. Fane T. Kim I.S. Forward Osmosis Membranes under Null-Pressure Condition: Do Hydraulic and Osmotic Pressures Have Identical Nature? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018 52 3556 3566 10.1021/acs.est.7b05265 29465233 

    상세보기

58. 58. Zeghadnia L. Robert J.L. Achour B. Explicit solutions for turbulent flow friction factor: A review, assessment and approaches classification Ain Shams Eng. J. 2019 10 243 252 10.1016/j.asej.2018.10.007 

    상세보기

59. 59. Zavitsas A.A. Properties of Water Solutions of Electrolytes and Nonelectrolytes J. Phys. Chem. B 2001 105 7805 7817 10.1021/jp011053l 

    상세보기

60. 60. Davenport D.M. Deshmukh A. Werber J.R. Elimelech M. High-Pressure Reverse Osmosis for Energy-Efficient Hypersaline Brine Desalination: Current Status, Design Considerations, and Research Needs Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018 5 467 475 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00274 

    상세보기