$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

The Process of Partnership-Building in Public-Led Urban Regeneration Project : An Analysis of Sinchon Regeneration Project through Urban Regime Theory
공공주도 도시재생사업의 파트너십 형성과정 : 도시레짐이론을 통한 신촌 도시재생사업 분석 원문보기

國土計劃 : 大韓國土·都市計劃學會誌, v.55 no.3 = no.249, 2020년, pp.113 - 128  

Zoh, Hyunmin Daniel

초록이 없습니다.

참고문헌 (147)

  1. 10.17208/jkpa.2017.04.52.2.5 

  2. Kim, Hye Won, Lee, Jung Wook. What Explains the Successful Introduction of the Sinchon Yonsei Road Transit Mall? An Analysis Integrating Kingdon’s Multiple Stream Framework and Moore’s Political Management Perspective. 지방정부연구, vol.21, no.4, 209-237.

  3. 10.36700/KRUMA.2017.12.30.4.1 

  4. Lee, Kyung-Eun. Urban Development Policies and Urban Regime Change in Jeonju, Korea. 도시연구: 역사.사회.문화 = Korean journal of urban history, vol.7, 41-82.

  5. Lee, Na Young, Ahn, Jae Seob. ‘General Type of Neighborhood Regeneration’ Urban Regeneration Project and Promotion of Resident-Participation: Focusing on Garibong-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul. 한국도시지리학회지 = Journal of the korean urban geographical society, vol.20, no.3, 63-78.

  6. 이병민. 문화자산을 토대로 한 도시재생과 지역발전 -<서울동화축제> 사례를 중심으로-. 한국경제지리학회지 = Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea, vol.19, no.1, 51-67.

  7. Lee, Young Eun. Study on the Process and Effects of the Growth Machine Driven by Public Sector in the Urban Regeneration Projects. 공간과사회 = Space & environment, vol.28, no.3, 28-111.

  8. Lee, Jung-Hyung, Lee, Woon-Yong, Lee, Dong-Gyu. A Study on Improvement of Multi-Dimensional Urban Planning Policies as Private Initiated Urban Regeneration Methods. 도시설계: 한국도시설계학회 논문집, vol.18, no.1, 35-50.

  9. Jeon, Kyung-Sook. A Geographical Consideration and Suggestion on Urban Regeneration Research in Korea. 한국도시지리학회지 = Journal of the korean urban geographical society, vol.20, no.3, 13-32.

  10. Jung, Yong chan, Bae, Hyunhoe. The effect of local policy demand and citizen organization on the policy agenda: Based on urban regime theory. 韓國 行政 學報, vol.52, no.1, 259-291.

  11. Hong, Yeryun. Urban diversity regime in queer festivals of non-capital cities: a case study of Dague, Jeju and Busan. 공간과사회 = Space & environment, vol.29, no.2, 96-133.

  12. 10.4337/9781786434821.00027 

  13. Andersen, Ole Johan. Public–Private Partnerships: Organisational Hybrids as Channels for Local Mobilisation and Participation?1. Scandinavian political studies, vol.27, no.1, 1-21.

  14. Atkinson, Rob. Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration. Urban studies, vol.36, no.1, 59-72.

  15. Baeten, Guy. From community planning to partnership planning. Urban regeneration and shifting power geometries on the South Bank, London. GeoJournal, vol.51, no.4, 293-300.

  16. 10.4324/9780203214398 

  17. Bailey, R.C., 1999. Gay Politics, Urban Politics: Identity and Economics in the Urban Setting. New York: Columbia University Press. 

  18. Bassett, Keith. Partnerships, Business Elites and Urban Politics: New Forms of Governance in an English City?. Urban studies, vol.33, no.3, 539-556.

  19. Blanco, Ismael. Analysing Urban Governance Networks: Bringing Regime Theory Back in. Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, vol.31, no.2, 276-291.

  20. Between democratic network governance and neoliberalism: A regime-theoretical analysis of collaboration in Barcelona. Cities, vol.44, 123-130.

  21. Blanco, Ismael, Bonet, Jordi, Walliser, Andres. Urban governance and regeneration policies in historic city centres: Madrid and Barcelona. Urban research & practice, vol.4, no.3, 326-343.

  22. Boyle, R., 1990. “Regeneration in Glasgow: Stability, Collaboration and Inequity.” in Leadership and Urban Regeneration: Cities in North America and Europe, edited by Dennis R.J., and Parkinson, M., 109-132. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Incorporated. 

  23. Brennan, Angela, Rhodes, John, Tyler, Peter. The Distribution of SRB Challenge Fund Expenditure in Relation to Local-area Need in England. Urban studies, vol.36, no.12, 2069-2084.

  24. Bruce, Alistair, Clarson, David. Assessing the potential and limits of community-based initiatives in urban regeneration: three decades of experience on Sheffield’s Manor estate. Regional studies, regional science, vol.4, no.1, 80-93.

  25. Collins, Timothy W. Unevenness in Urban Governance: Stadium Building and Downtown Redevelopment in Phoenix, Arizona. Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, vol.26, no.6, 1177-1196.

  26. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U., 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?, London & New York: Zed Books. 

  27. Couch, C., 1990. Urban Renewal: Theory and Practice, Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education. 

  28. Dahl, R.A., 1961. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven: Yale University Press. 

  29. Davies, Jonathan S.. The governance of urban regeneration: a critique of the ‘governing without government’ thesis. Public administration, vol.80, no.2, 301-322.

  30. Davies, Jonathan S.. Partnerships versus Regimes: Why Regime Theory Cannot Explain Urban Coalitions in the Uk. Journal of urban affairs, vol.25, no.3, 253-270.

  31. Davies, J.S., 2011. Partnerships and Regimes: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK, London: Routledge. 

  32. DEGEN, MÓNICA, GARCÍA, MARISOL. The Transformation of the ‘Barcelona Model’: An Analysis of Culture, Urban Regeneration and Governance. International journal of urban and regional research, vol.36, no.5, 1022-1038.

  33. Digaetano, Alan, Lawless, Paul. Urban Governance and Industrial Decline : Governing Structures and Policy Agendas in Birmingham and Sheffield, England, and Detroit, Michigan, 1980-1997. Urban affairs review, vol.34, no.4, 546-577.

  34. DiGaetano, Alan, Strom, Elizabeth. Comparative Urban Governance : An Integrated Approach. Urban affairs review, vol.38, no.3, 356-395.

  35. 10.4324/9780429450754 

  36. Dowding, Keith. Explaining Urban Regimes. International journal of urban and regional research, vol.25, no.1, 7-19.

  37. Dubben, N. and Williams, B., 2009. Partnerships in Urban Property Development, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 

  38. Elander, Ingemar. Partnerships and urban governance. International social science journal, vol.54, no.2, 191-204.

  39. 10.7208/chicago/9780226301631.001.0001 

  40. Fainstein, N.I. and Fainstein, S.S., 1983. “Regime Strategies, Communal Resistance, and Economic Forces.” in Restructuring the City: The Political Economy of Urban Redevelopment, edited by Fainstein, N.I. and Fainstein, S.S., 245-282. New York: Longman. 

  41. Foley, Paul, Martin, Steve. A new deal for the community? Public participation in regeneration and local service delivery. Policy and politics, vol.28, no.4, 479-492.

  42. Franz, Peter. Suburbanization and the Clash of Urban Regimes : Developmental Problems of East German Cities in a Free Market Environment. European urban and regional studies, vol.7, no.2, 135-146.

  43. Hall, Stephen, Nevin, Brendan. CONTINUITY AND CHANGE: A REVIEW OF ENGLISH REGENERATION POLICY IN THE 1990s. Regional studies, vol.33, no.5, 477-482.

  44. Hamilton, David K.. Developing Regional Regimes: A Comparison of Two Metropolitan Areas. Journal of urban affairs, vol.26, no.4, 455-477.

  45. Harding, Alan. Urban Regimes and Growth Machines toward a Cross-National Research Agenda. Urban affairs quarterly, vol.29, no.3, 356-382.

  46. HARDING, ALAN. Is There a ‘New Community Power’ and Why Should We Need One?*. International journal of urban and regional research, vol.20, no.4, 637-655.

  47. Harding, Alan. Urban Regimes in a Europe of the Cities?. European urban and regional studies, vol.4, no.4, 291-314.

  48. Hastings, Annette. Unravelling the Process of 'Partnership' in Urban Regeneration Policy. Urban studies, vol.33, no.2, 253-268.

  49. Healey, P., 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education. 

  50. Henry, Ian P., Paramio-Salcines, Juan Luis. Sport and the Analysis of Symbolic Regimes : A Case Study of the City of Sheffield. Urban affairs review, vol.34, no.5, 641-666.

  51. Hutchinson, J., 1995. “Can Partnerships Which Fail Succeed? The Case of City Challenge”, Local Government Policy Making, 22: 41-51. 

  52. Imbroscio, David L.. Overcoming the Neglect of Economics in Urban Regime Theory. Journal of urban affairs, vol.25, no.3, 271-284.

  53. Jacobs, J., 1970. “The Real Problem of Cities.” in Vital Little Plans: The Short Works of Jane Jacobs, edited by Jacobs, J., Zipp, S., and Storring, N., 198-223. Toronto: Random House Canada. 

  54. Jessop, Bob. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International social science journal, vol.50, no.1, 29-45.

  55. Jones, Phil, Evans, James. Urban Regeneration, Governance and the State: Exploring Notions of Distance and Proximity. Urban studies, vol.43, no.9, 1491-1509.

  56. Judd, D.R. and Laslo, D., 2013. “The Regime Moment: The Brief but Storied Career of Urban Regimes in American Cities.” in American Urban Politics in a Global Age, edited by Kantor, P. and Judd, D.R., 35-46. London & New York: Routledge. 

  57. Kantor, Paul, Savitch, H. V., Haddock, Serena Vicari. The Political Economy of Urban Regimes : A Comparative Perspective. Urban affairs review, vol.32, no.3, 348-377.

  58. Keating, M., 1991. Comparative Urban Politics: Power and the City in the United States, Canada, Britain, and France, Aldershot, England: E. Elgar. 

  59. Keith, M. and Pile, S., 1993. Place and the Politics of Identity, London & New York: Routledge. 

  60. Kim, Chung-Ho, Kim, Kyung-Hwan. The Political Economy of Korean Government Policies on Real Estate. Urban studies, vol.37, no.7, 1157-1169.

  61. Kim, J.Y.. Cultural entrepreneurs and urban regeneration in Itaewon, Seoul. Cities, vol.56, 132-140.

  62. La Grange, Adrienne, Jung, Hee Nam. The commodification of land and housing: the case of South Korea. Housing studies, vol.19, no.4, 557-580.

  63. Lau, Mandy. Flexibility with a Purpose: Constructing the Legitimacy of Spatial Governance Partnerships. Urban studies, vol.51, no.9, 1943-1959.

  64. Le Galès, P., 1995. “Urban Regime and Urban Governance: Towards a Sociological View”, Paper presented at Communication with ECPR Meeting Bordeaux, Bordeaux. 

  65. Lichfield, D., 1992. Urban Regeneration for the 1990s. London: London Planning Advisory Committee. 

  66. Mackintosh, Maureen. Partnership: Issues of policy and negotiation. Local economy : LE : journal of the London Economic Policy Unit, vol.7, no.3, 210-224.

  67. Marichal, J., 2000. “We All Win: Regimes and the Symbolic Politics of Stadium Development”, Paper presented at 30th annual meeting of Urban Affairs Association. Los Angeles: Wilshire Grand Hotel. 

  68. 10.69554/KVFI5223 Marra, G., Barosio, M., Eynard, E., Marietta, C., Tabasso, M., and Melis, G., 2016. “From Urban Renewal to Urban Regeneration: Classification Criteria for Urban Interventions. Turin 1995-2015: Evolution of Planning Tools and Approaches”, Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 9(4): 367-380. 

  69. Matthews, Peter. From Area-Based Initiatives to Strategic Partnerships: Have We Lost the Meaning of Regeneration?. Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, vol.30, no.1, 147-161.

  70. McCarthy, John. Dublin's temple bar-a case study of culture‐led regeneration. European planning studies, vol.6, no.3, 271-281.

  71. McCarthy, John. Entertainment-led Regeneration: the Case of Detroit. Cities, vol.19, no.2, 105-111.

  72. McCarthy, J., 2007. Partnership, Collaborative Planning and Urban Regeneration, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. 

  73. Miles, Steven, Paddison, Ronan. Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration. Urban studies, vol.42, no.5, 833-839.

  74. Misener, Laura, Mason, Daniel S.. Urban Regimes and the Sporting Events Agenda: A Cross-National Comparison of Civic Development Strategies. Journal of sport management, vol.22, no.5, 603-627.

  75. Misener, Laura, Mason, Daniel S.. Fostering Community Development through Sporting Events Strategies: An Examination of Urban Regime Perceptions1,2. Journal of sport management, vol.23, no.6, 770-794.

  76. Moini, Giulio. How participation has become a hegemonic discursive resource: towards an interpretivist research agenda. Critical policy studies, vol.5, no.2, 149-168.

  77. Mossberger, Karen, Stoker, Gerry. The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory : The Challenge of Conceptualization. Urban affairs review, vol.36, no.6, 810-835.

  78. Oatley, Nick. Competitive urban policy and the regeneration game. The Town planning review, vol.66, no.1, 1-.

  79. ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister), 2004. Urban Regeneration Companies Policy Stocktake, London: ODPM. 

  80. Peck, Jamie. Too many partners... The future for regeneration partnerships. Local economy : LE : journal of the London Economic Policy Unit, vol.9, no.3, 251-265.

  81. Pierre, Jon. Can Urban Regimes Travel in Time and Space? Urban Regime Theory, Urban Governance Theory, and Comparative Urban Politics. Urban affairs review, vol.50, no.6, 864-889.

  82. Roberts, P. and Sykes, H., 1999. Urban Regeneration: A Handbook, London & Thousand Oaks: Sage. 

  83. Roberts, P., Sykes, H., and Granger, R., 2000. Urban Regeneration, London & Thousand Oaks: Sage. 

  84. ROUSSEAU, MAX. Re-imaging the City Centre for the Middle Classes: Regeneration, Gentrification and Symbolic Policies in ‘Loser Cities’. International journal of urban and regional research, vol.33, no.3, 770-788.

  85. Sagan, Iwona, Grabkowska, Maja. Urban Regeneration in Gdańsk, Poland: Local Regimes and Tensions Between Top-Down Strategies and Endogenous Renewal. European planning studies, vol.20, no.7, 1135-1154.

  86. Shin, HaeRan. Cultural Festivals and Regional Identities in South Korea. Environment and planning. D, Society & space, vol.22, no.4, 619-632.

  87. Shin, HaeRan, Park, Se Hoon, Sonn, Jung Won. The emergence of a multiscalar growth regime and scalar tension: the politics of urban development in Songdo New City, South Korea. Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, vol.33, no.6, 1618-1638.

  88. Sites, William. The Limits of Urban Regime Theory : New York City under Koch, Dinkins, and Giuliani. Urban affairs review, vol.32, no.4, 536-557.

  89. Smith, Neil. New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy. Antipode, vol.34, no.3, 427-450.

  90. Stoker, G., 1995. “Regime Theory and Urban Politics.” in Theories of Urban Politics, edited by Judge, D., Stoker, G., and Wolman, H., 54-71. London: Sage. 

  91. Stoker, G, Mossberger, K. Urban Regime Theory in Comparative Perspective. Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, vol.12, no.2, 195-212.

  92. Stone, C.N., 1987. “Summing up: Urban Regimes, Development Policy, and Political Arrangements.” in The Politics of Urban Development, edited by Stone, N.C. and Sanders, T.H., 269-290. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. 

  93. Stone, C.N., 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. 

  94. Stone, Clarence N.. Urban Regimes and the Capacity to Govern: A Political Economy Approach. Journal of urban affairs, vol.15, no.1, 1-28.

  95. Stone, Clarence N.. Looking Back to Look Forward : Reflections on Urban Regime Analysis. Urban affairs review, vol.40, no.3, 309-341.

  96. Stone, Clarence N.. Reflections on Regime Politics : From Governing Coalition to Urban Political Order. Urban affairs review, vol.51, no.1, 101-137.

  97. Strange, I.R., 1993. “Public-private Partnership and the Politics of Economic Regeneration in Sheffield c.1985-1991”, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sheffield. 

  98. Swyngedouw, Erik, Moulaert, Frank, Rodriguez, Arantxa. Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy. Antipode, vol.34, no.3, 542-577.

  99. Taylor, Peter, Turok, Ivan, Hastings, Annette. Competitive Bidding in Urban Regeneration: Stimulus or Disillusionment for the Losers?. Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, vol.19, no.1, 45-63.

  100. Tilson, Barbara, Mawson, John, Beazley, Mike, Burfitt, Alex, Collinge, Chris, Hall, Stephen, Loftman, Patrick, Nevin, Brendan, Srbljanin, Alan. Partnerships for regeneration: The single regeneration budget challenge fund round one. Local government studies, vol.23, no.1, 1-15.

  101. TRETTER, ELIOT M.. SCALES, REGIMES, AND THE URBAN GOVERNANCE OF GLASGOW. Journal of urban affairs, vol.30, no.1, 87-102.

  102. Ward, Kevin. Rereading urban regime theory: a sympathetic critique. Geoforum ; journal of physical, human, and regional geosciences, vol.27, no.4, 427-438.

  103. Ward, K G. Coalitions in Urban Regeneration: A Regime Approach. Environment & planning. A, vol.29, no.8, 1493-1506.

  104. Wood, Andrew M.. Domesticating Urban Theory? US Concepts, British Cities and the Limits of Cross-national Applications. Urban studies, vol.41, no.11, 2103-2118.

  105. Yang, You-Ren, Chang, Chih-hui. An Urban Regeneration Regime in China: A Case Study of Urban Redevelopment in Shanghai's Taipingqiao Area. Urban studies, vol.44, no.9, 1809-1826.

  106. Zukin, S., 1995. The Cultures of Cities, UK: Blackwell Publishers. 

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로