$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

Contemplating the Assessment of Great River Ecosystems

Environmental monitoring and assessment, v.103 no.1/3, 2005년, pp.5 - 20  

Bolgrien, David W. ,  Angradi, Ted R. ,  Schweiger, E. William ,  Kelly, John R.

초록이 없습니다.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Angradi, T.R., Schweiger, E.W., Bolgrien, D.W., Kelly, J.R. and Scharold, J.S.: 2002, ‘Implications for inter-habitat variation for monitoring great river ecosystems: The EMAP-UMR experience’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Angradi.pdf. 

  2. Bioscience P.B. Bayley 45 153 1995 10.2307/1312554 Bayley, P.B.: 1995, ‘Understanding large river-floodplain ecosystems’, Bioscience 45, 153-158. 

  3. Berry, C.R., Jr. and Young, B.A.: 2001, ‘Population structure and habitat use of benthic fishes along the Missouri and Lower Yellowstone Rivers, Volume 1: Introduction to the Benthic Fishes Study’, U.S. Geological Survey, Cooperative Research Units, South Dakota State University, Brookings. Online at http://infolink.cr.usgs.gov/Science/BenthicFish/. 

  4. Hydrol. Processes D. Blevins 15 1347 2001 10.1002/hyp.215 Blevins, D. and Fairchild, J.: 2001, ‘Applicability of NASQAN data for ecosystem assessment on the Missouri River’, Hydrol. Processes 15, 1347-1362. 

  5. Hydrobiologia J. Cairns Jr. 263 1 1993 10.1007/BF00006084 Cairns, J., Jr., McCormick, P.V. and Niederlehner, B.R.: 1993, ‘A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health’, Hydrobiologia 263, 1-44. 

  6. Chipps, S.R., Hubbard, D., Haugerud, N., Powell, K. and Werlin, K.: 2002, ‘Quantifying spatial and temporal variation in floodplain wetlands: Implications for developing robust biomonitoring criteria for Upper Missouri River REMAP’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Chipps.pdf . 

  7. Coupe, R.H. and Mueller, D.K.: 2002, ‘The U.S. Geological Survey’s national water quality programs in the Mississippi River basin’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Coupe.pdf . 

  8. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. J.M. Dettmers 20 255 2001a 10.2307/1468320 Dettmers, J.M., Wahl, D.H., Soluk, D.A. and Gutreuter, S.: 2001a, ‘Life in the fast lane: Fish and foodweb structure in the main channel of large rivers’, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 20, 255-265. 

  9. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. J.M. Dettmers 58 933 2001b 10.1139/f01-046 Dettmers, J.M., Gutreuter, S., Wahl, D.H. and Soluk, D.A.: 2001b, ‘Patterns in abundance of fishes in main channels of the upper Mississippi River system’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 933-942. 

  10. Ecol. Monogr. M.D. Dixon 72 465 2002 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0465:RTSDOW]2.0.CO;2 Dixon, M.D., Turner, M.G. and Chunfang, J.: 2002, ‘Riparian tree seedling distribution on Wisconsin River sandbars: Controls at different spatial scales’, Ecol. Monogr. 72, 465-485. 

  11. Science M. Dynesius 266 753 1994 10.1126/science.266.5186.753 Dynesius, M. and Nilsson, C.: 1994, ‘Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world’, Science 266, 753-762. 

  12. Emery, E.: 2002, ‘A overview of ORSANCO’s biological monitoring and biocriteria development efforts’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Emery.pdf . 

  13. Emery, E.B. and Vicory, A.H, Jr.: 1998, ‘Biological Criteria Development for the Ohio River, USA’, in Proceedings of the National Water Quality Monitoring Conference, 1998. 

  14. Trans. Am. Fisheries Soc. E.B. Emery 132 791 2003 10.1577/T01-076 Emery, E.B., Simon, T.P., McCormick, F.H., Angermeier, P.A., DeShon, J.E., Yoder, C.O., Sanders, R.E., Pearson, W.D., Hickman, G.D., Reash, R.J. and Thomas, J.A.: 2003, ‘Development of a multimetric index for assessing the biological condition of the Ohio River’, Trans. Am. Fisheries Soc. 132, 791-808. 

  15. Hydrobiologia D.L. Galat 422 29 2000 10.1023/A:1017052319056 Galat, D.L. and Lipkin, R.: 2000, ‘Resorting ecological integrity of great rivers: Historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River’, Hydrobiologia 422, 29-48. 

  16. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. D.L. Galat 20 266 2001 10.2307/1468321 Galat, D.L. and Zweimuller, I.: 2001, ‘Conserving large-river fishes: Is the highway analogy an appropriate paradigm?’, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 20, 266-279. 

  17. Galat, D.L., Wildhaber, M.L. and Dieterman, D.J.: 2001, ‘Population structure and habitat use of benthic fishes along the Missouri and Lower Yellowstone Rivers, Vol 2: Spatial pattern of physical habitats’, http://infolink.cr.usgs.gov/Science/BenthicFish/ . 

  18. Galat, D.L. Berry, C.R., Guy, C.S., Pierce, C.L., Heuser, J. and Wildhaber, M.L.: 2002, ‘Multiple spatial scale fisheries research on the Missouri River’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Galat.pdf . 

  19. GAO: 2002, ‘Inconsistent state approaches complicate nation’s efforts to identify its most polluted waters’, GAO-02-186, Report to Congress, General Accounting Office. 

  20. 10.3133/cir1112 Gilliom, R.J., Alley, W.M. and Gurtz, M.E.: 1995, ‘Design of the National Water Quality Assessment Program: Occurrence and distribution of water quality conditions’, U.S. Geol. Survey Circular 1112. 

  21. Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center: 2004, ‘FY 2004 Monitoring and Research Work Plan’, http://www.gcmrc.gov/workplan/2004/GCMRC%202004%20Work%20Plan%206-26-03.pdf . 

  22. Gutreuter, S., Burkhardt, R. and Lubinski, K.: 1995, ‘Long Term Resource Monitoring Program Procedures: Fish monitoring’, National Biological Service, Environmental Management Technical Center, Onalaska, WI, LTRMP 95-P002-1. 

  23. Haverland, P.: 2002, ‘Missouri river monitoring-what is proposed?’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Haverland.pdf . 

  24. Hesse, L.W.: 2002, ‘Recovering the Missouri River ecosystem, biomonitoring, and the Missouri River Historical database (MRHD)’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Hesse.pdf . 

  25. Fisheries L.W. Hesse 18 5 1993 10.1577/1548-8446(1993)018<0005:TMRH>2.0.CO;2 Hesse, L.W. and Sheets, W.: 1993, ‘The Missouri River hydrosystem’, Fisheries 18, 5-14. 

  26. Environ. Monit Assess B.H. Hill 103 1 2005 10.1007/s10661-005-0208-9 Hill, B.H. and Blair, R.: 2005, ‘Monitoring the condition of our nation’s streams and rivers: From the mountains to the coasts’, Environ. Monit Assess. 103, 1-4 (this volume). 

  27. Hydrol. Processes R.P. Hooper 15 1089 2001 10.1002/hyp.205 Hooper, R.P., Aulenbach, B.T. and Kelly, V.J.: 2001, ‘The National Stream Quality Accounting Network: A Flux-Bsased Approach to Monitoring the Water Quality of Large Rivers’, Hydrol. Processes 15, 1089-1106. 

  28. Jackson, L.E., Kurtz, J.C. and Fisher, W.S. (eds): 2000, ‘Evaluation guidelines for ecological indicators’, EPA/620/R-99/005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC. 

  29. Regulated Rivers W.C. Johnson 3 229 1992 Johnson, W.C.: 1992, ‘Dams and riparian forests: Case study from the Upper Missouri River’, Regulated Rivers 3, 229-242. 

  30. Ecol. Monogr W.C. Johnson 46 59 1976 10.2307/1942394 Johnson, W.C., Burgess, R.L. and Keammerer, W.R.: 1976, ‘Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota’, Ecol. Monogr. 46, 59-84. 

  31. Lubinski, K.: 1993, ‘A conceptual model of the Upper Mississippi River system ecosystem’, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Management Technical Center, Onalaska, WI, EMTC 93-T001. 23 pp. 

  32. Lubinski, K.: 2002, ‘Everything, something, nothing: Zen and the indicator use on the upper Mississippi River system’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Lubinski.pdf . 

  33. Fisheries Res. (Amsterdam) F.J. Margraf 55 1 2002 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00279-X Margraf, F.J. and Knight, C.T.: 2002, ‘Evaluation of fish sampling using rotenone in a navigation lock’, Fisheries Res. (Amsterdam) 55, 1-3. 

  34. Environ. Monit Assess. J.J. Messer 17 67 1991 10.1007/BF00402462 Messer, J.J., Linthurst, R.A. and Overton, W.S.: 1991, ‘An EPA program for monitoring ecological status and trends’, Environ. Monit Assess. 17, 67-78. 

  35. Miller, J.R., Turner, M.G., Stanley, E.H., Dixon, M.D. and Gergel, S.E.: 2002, ‘Ecological indicators for floodplain forests of the Wisconsin River’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Miller.pdf . 

  36. National Research Council 2002 ‘The Missouri River Ecosystem: Exploring the Prospects for Recovery,’ National Research Council: 2002, ‘The Missouri River Ecosystem: Exploring the Prospects for Recovery,’ National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 

  37. Olsen, A.R.: 2002, ‘Probability survey design alternatives for watershed-based streams and river monitoring programs’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Olsen.pdf . 

  38. Environ. Monit. Assess. A.R. Olsen 54 1 1999 10.1023/A:1005823911258 Olsen, A.R., Sedransk, J., Edwards, D., Gotway, C.A., Liggett, W., Rathburn, S.L., Reckhow, K.H. and Young, L.I.: 1999, ‘Statistical issues for monitoring ecological and natural resources in the United States’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 54, 1-45. 

  39. Paulsen, S: 2002, ‘EMAP strategic monitoring: Directions and challenges’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Paulsen.pdf 

  40. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. S.G. Paulsen 34 995 1998 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb04148.x Paulsen, S.G., Hughes, R.M. and Larsen, D.P.: 1998, ‘Critical elements in describing and understanding our nation’s aquatic resources’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34, 995-1005. 

  41. Bioscience N.J. Poff 47 769 1997 10.2307/1313099 Poff, N.J., Allen, J.D., Bain, M.B. Karr, J.R., Prestegaard, K.L., Richter, B.E., Sparks, R.E. and Stromberg, J.C.: 1997, ‘The natural flow regime’, Bioscience 47, 769-784. 

  42. Ponganis, D.: 2002, ‘Water quality monitoring and assessment on the Columbia and Missouri Rivers’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Ponganis.pdf . 

  43. Poulton, B.: 2002, ‘Macrointervebrate community characteristics in relation to longitudinal differences in biological condition: A framework for validation of metric responses to cumulative perturbations in the channalized Lower Missouri River’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Poulton.pdf . 

  44. Can. J. Bot. P.W. Reily 60 2410 1982 10.1139/b82-294 Reily, P.W. and Johnson, W.C.: 1982, ‘The effects of altered hydrologic regime on tree growth along the Missouri River in North Dakota’, Can. J. Bot. 60, 2410-2423. 

  45. Sauer, J.: 2002, ‘The long-term resource monitoring program: Ten years of macroinvertebrate monitoring on the Upper Mississippi River system’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Sauer.pdf . 

  46. Environ. Monit. Assess E.W. Schweiger 103 21 2005 10.1007/s10661-005-1010-4 Schweiger, E.W., Bolgrien, D.W., Angradi, T.R. and Kelly, J.R.: 2005, ‘Environmental monitoring and assessment of a great river ecosystem: The Upper Missouri River pilot’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 103, 21-40 (this issue). 

  47. Schweiger, E.W., Angradi, T.R., Bolgrien, D.W., Kelly, J.R. and Olsen, A.R.: 2002, ‘A robust design for Great River ecosystem monitoring and assessment’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Schweiger.pdf . 

  48. Regulated Rivers T.P. Simon 11 283 1995 10.1002/rrr.3450110305 Simon, T.P. and Emery, E.B.: 1995, ‘Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify water resources quality in great rivers’, Regulated Rivers 11, 283-298. 

  49. Bioscience R.E. Sparks 45 168 1995 10.2307/1312556 Sparks, R.E.: 1995, ‘Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains’, Bioscience 45, 168-182. 

  50. Sparks, R.E.: 2002, ‘What makes a river great?’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Sparks.pdf . 

  51. Regulated Rivers R.E. Sparks 14 155 1998 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199803/04)14:2<155::AID-RRR494>3.0.CO;2-B Sparks, R.E. and Spink A.: 1998, ‘Disturbance, succession and ecosystem processes in rivers and estuaries: Effects of extreme hydrologic events’, Regulated Rivers 14, 155-159. 

  52. Environ. Manag. R.E. Sparks 14 699 1990 10.1007/BF02394719 Sparks, R.E., Bayley, P.B., Kohler, S.L. and Osborne, L.L.: 1990, ‘Disturbance and recovery of large floodplain rivers’, Environ. Manag. 14, 699-709. 

  53. Sparks, R.E, Braden, J.B., Demissie, M., Mitra, P., Schneider, D.W., White, D.C. and Xia, R.: 2000, ‘Technical support of public decision to restore floodplain ecosystems: A status report on the Illinois River Project, USA’, In: A. J. M. Smits, P. H. Niehuis, and R.S.E.W. Leuven (eds), New Approaches River Manag. p. 225-247. 

  54. Stoddard, J.L.: 2002, ‘Monitoring flowing waters-principles and approaches in EMAP’, presentation at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Stoddard%20-%20Flowing%20Waters.pdf 

  55. Sullivan, J. Stoltenberg, D., Manoyan, S., Huang, S., Zdanowicz, R. and Redmon, W.: 2002, ‘Upper Mississippi River water quality assessment’, Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Water Quality Technical Section, http://www.epa.gov/R5water/umr_wq_assess.htm . 

  56. Theil, P.A. and Sauer, J.S.: 1999, ‘Long Term Resource Monitoring Program procedures: Macroinvertebrate monitoring’, LTRMP 95-P002, U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Science Center, LaCrosse, WI. 

  57. Thorp, J.H.: 2002, ‘Life on the Mississippi and other Great Rivers: Conceptual understanding leading to assessment designs’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Thorp.pdf . 

  58. Regulated Rivers: Reservoir Management J.E. Tibbs 14 257 1998 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199805/06)14:3<257::AID-RRR500>3.0.CO;2-9 Tibbs, J.E. and Galat, D.L.: 1998, ‘The influence of river stage on endangered Least Terns and their fish prey in the Mississippi River (USA)’, Regulated Rivers: Reservoir Management 14, 257-266. 

  59. USACOE: 1997, ‘An Evaluation of the Upper Mississippi River Systems Environmental Management Program, Report to Congress’, December, 1997, USACOE Rock Island District. 

  60. USEPA: 2002, ‘Consolidated assessment and listing methodology: Toward a compendium of best practices 1st edition’, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. 

  61. USEPA: 2003, ‘Elements of a state water monitoring and assessment program’, EPA 841-B-03-003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, D.C. 

  62. Welcomme, R.L.: 1985, ‘River fisheries’, Food and Agriculture Organization Fisheries Technical Paper 262. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 

  63. Wright, J.F., Sutcliffe, D.W., and Furse, M.T. (eds): 2000, ‘Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPAC and other techniques’, Freshwater Biological Association, UK. 

  64. Regulated Rivers: Reservoir Management Y. Yin 14 217 1998 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199803/04)14:2<217::AID-RRR499>3.0.CO;2-S Yin, Y.: 1998, ‘Flooding and forest succession in a modified stretch along the Upper Mississippi River’, Regulated Rivers: Reservoir Management 14, 217-225. 

  65. Yoder, C.O.: 2002, ‘An overview of fish assemblage assessment in great and large rivers of the Ohio River basin’, presented at the EMAP Symposium, Kansas City, MO, http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/symposia/symp2002/Yoder%20-%20Fish.pdf . 

관련 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로