[논문]Measuring Academic Proficiency Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity

Kim, James S.; Sunderman, Gail L.

Measuring Academic Proficiency Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity

Educational researcher : a publication of the American Educational Research Association, v.34 no.8, 2005년, pp.3 - 13

Kim, James S. (The University of California, Irvine, Department of Education, 2001 Berkeley Place, Irvine, CA 92697) , Sunderman, Gail L. (. His research interests include federal education policy and the use of experimental methods to assess the effectiveness of compensatory education programs.)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The accountability requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 place high-poverty schools and racially diverse schools at a disadvantage because they rely on mean proficiency scores and require all subgroups to meet the same goals for accountability. In this article, student achievement data from six states are used to highlight differences in the demographic characteristics of schools identified as needing improvement and schools meeting the federal adequate yearly progress requirements. School-level data from Virginia and California are used to illustrate that these differences arise both from the selection bias inherent in using mean proficiency scores and from rules that require students in racially diverse schools to meet multiple performance targets. The authors suggest alternatives for the design of accountability systems that include using multiple measures of student achievement, factoring in student improvement on achievement tests in reading and mathematics, and incorporating state accountability ratings of school performance.

참고문헌 (32)

Abedi, Jamal. The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues. Educational researcher : a publication of the American Educational Research Association, vol.33, no.1, 4-14.

상세보기
Betts, Julian R, Danenberg, Anne. School Accountability in California: An Early Evaluation. Brookings papers on education policy, vol.2002, no.1, 123-197.

상세보기
10.4324/9781410600158
Bryk, Anthony S., Raudenbush, Stephen W.. Heterogeneity of variance in experimental studies: A challenge to conventional interpretations.. Psychological bulletin, vol.104, no.3, 396-404.

상세보기
State of California consolidated state application accountability workbook California State Department of Education 2003
Double API growth schools California State Department of Education 2004
Within our reach: How America can educate every child Chubb JE 2005
Education Next Chubb J 8 5 2005
Accountability systems and reporting Erpenbach WJ 2003
The Public Interest Finn CE 35 157 2004

상세보기
Paper presented at the National Center on Education and the Economy Policy Forum, Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act Haycock K 2003
Kane, Thomas J, Staiger, Douglas. Volatility in School Test Scores: Implications for Test-Based Accountability Systems. Brookings papers on education policy, vol.2002, no.1, 235-283.

상세보기
No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability Kane TJ 152 2003
Koretz, Daniel, Hamilton, Laura. Assessment of Students With Disabilities in Kentucky: Inclusion, Student Performance, and Validity. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, vol.22, no.3, 255-272.

상세보기
Educational Researcher Linn RL 4 29 2000 10.2307/1177052
Linn, Robert L.. Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations. Educational researcher : a publication of the American Educational Research Association, vol.32, no.7, 3-13.

상세보기
Linn, Robert L., Haug, Carolyn. Stability of School-Building Accountability Scores and Gains. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, vol.24, no.1, 29-36.

상세보기
Improving America’s schools, the role of incentives Meyer RH 197 1996
On equality of educational opportunity Mosteller F 1972
Murphy, Jerome. Title I of ESEA: The Politics of Implementing Federal Education Reform. Harvard educational review, vol.41, no.1, 35-63.

상세보기
Educating language-minority children National Research Council 1997
Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform National Research Council 1997
Penalizing diverse schools? Policy brief 03-4 Novak JR 2003
Dismantling desegregation Orfield G 53 1996
Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality Orfield G 2005
Prospects: Final report on student outcomes Puma MJ 1997
Schooling, statistics, and poverty: Can we measure school improvement? Raudenbush SW 2004
No child left behind? The politics and practice of school accountability Rudalevige A 23 2003
NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field Sunderman GL 2005
No Child Left Behind U.S. Department of Education 2001
10.1037/e492172006-019
State of Virginia consolidated state application accountability workbook Virginia Department of Education 2003

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper

안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증

Measuring Academic Proficiency Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

참고문헌 (32)

이 논문을 인용한 문헌

관련 콘텐츠

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

선택된 텍스트