이 연구는 축구 팀 경기력 평가의 내용분석을 목적으로 델파이 조사방법을 활용하여 축구 전문가 35명에게 4차에 걸친 설문 조사를 거쳐 자료를 수집하고 분석하였다. 델파이 조사 결과 팀 경기력에 영향을 주는 요인은 팀구성능력, 전술/전략, 환경, 컨디션으로 분류된 4개 영역의 54개 항목으로 분류되었다. 4차에 걸친 델파이 조사를 통해 4점대(보통이다)가 2항목, 5점대(중요하다)가 21개 항목, 6점대(매우 중요하다)가 31개로 나타났다. 합의도는 델파이 반복에 따라 증가하여 4차의 경우 대부분 0.9정도로 나타났고, 수렴도는 2차 조사의 수렴도를 1로 보았을 때 4차의 경우 0.2에서 0.5사이에 대부분의 수렴도가 존재하였다. 베이지안 기법을 통해 평가한 베이즈 추정량은 델파이 방법을 통해 구해진 중요도와 약간의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 54개의 항목을 분석한 결과 축구 팀 경기력 평가에 매우 중요한 요인은 체력요인 5개, 기초기술능력요인 3개, 경기이해능력요인 5개, 전술요인 3개, 경기분석요인 2개, 환경요인 2개, 심리상태요인 4개, 동기부여요인 3개, 정신력요인 2개, 준비과정요인 2개로 나타났다. 이 연구는 축구 팀 경기력 평가에 영향을 주는 요인을 델파이기법을 통해 모두 탐색하고자 하였다. 또한 탐색된 요인의 중요성을 베이지안 방법을 이용하여 추정함으로써 축구 팀 경기력 평가에 필요한 요인에 가중치를 부여할 수 있는 근거를 마련하였다.
이 연구는 축구 팀 경기력 평가의 내용분석을 목적으로 델파이 조사방법을 활용하여 축구 전문가 35명에게 4차에 걸친 설문 조사를 거쳐 자료를 수집하고 분석하였다. 델파이 조사 결과 팀 경기력에 영향을 주는 요인은 팀구성능력, 전술/전략, 환경, 컨디션으로 분류된 4개 영역의 54개 항목으로 분류되었다. 4차에 걸친 델파이 조사를 통해 4점대(보통이다)가 2항목, 5점대(중요하다)가 21개 항목, 6점대(매우 중요하다)가 31개로 나타났다. 합의도는 델파이 반복에 따라 증가하여 4차의 경우 대부분 0.9정도로 나타났고, 수렴도는 2차 조사의 수렴도를 1로 보았을 때 4차의 경우 0.2에서 0.5사이에 대부분의 수렴도가 존재하였다. 베이지안 기법을 통해 평가한 베이즈 추정량은 델파이 방법을 통해 구해진 중요도와 약간의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 54개의 항목을 분석한 결과 축구 팀 경기력 평가에 매우 중요한 요인은 체력요인 5개, 기초기술능력요인 3개, 경기이해능력요인 5개, 전술요인 3개, 경기분석요인 2개, 환경요인 2개, 심리상태요인 4개, 동기부여요인 3개, 정신력요인 2개, 준비과정요인 2개로 나타났다. 이 연구는 축구 팀 경기력 평가에 영향을 주는 요인을 델파이기법을 통해 모두 탐색하고자 하였다. 또한 탐색된 요인의 중요성을 베이지안 방법을 이용하여 추정함으로써 축구 팀 경기력 평가에 필요한 요인에 가중치를 부여할 수 있는 근거를 마련하였다.
This study has been collected and analysed 4 panels using Delphi method on 35 experts in order to identify the significant indicators of team performance in the field of football. Results of the Delphi surrey, between of 54 factors have been categorized that the factors would possibly depend the tea...
This study has been collected and analysed 4 panels using Delphi method on 35 experts in order to identify the significant indicators of team performance in the field of football. Results of the Delphi surrey, between of 54 factors have been categorized that the factors would possibly depend the team performance. They are composed of team organization ability category, tactic/strategy category, environment category, and conditional category. Within the 4 Delphi panels with 54 factors, the results have shown that 2 factors were on 4 points (Normal), 21 factors were on 5 points (Important) and 31 factors were on 6 points (Very important). The consensus and convergence have been considered to evaluate the expertise opinion within the Delphi method that about 0.9 value of consensus has found on 4th panel as much as the sequences of Delphi. The convergence based on 2nd panel (=1) has been found that most in 4thpanel were existed between 0.2 and 0.5. There was difference between the significance value using Delphi method and the estimate using Bayesian technique, such that was calculated by the results of 3rd panel as pre-range and the results of 4th panel as standard-range. As the results of the analysis of 54 factors, the most significant factors found were 5 fitness factor, 3 essential technique, 5 understanding game , 3 tactics , 2 match analytical factor, 2 environmental factors , 4 mental factors, 3 motivational factors, 2 psychological factors and 2 preparation factors . This study were significant factors in order to analyse team performance that the Delphi method has been used in order to explore all significant factors influenced on team performance. Also, to estimate the significances of explored factors is to provide the evidence which could proof the significant factors for the analysis of team performance.
This study has been collected and analysed 4 panels using Delphi method on 35 experts in order to identify the significant indicators of team performance in the field of football. Results of the Delphi surrey, between of 54 factors have been categorized that the factors would possibly depend the team performance. They are composed of team organization ability category, tactic/strategy category, environment category, and conditional category. Within the 4 Delphi panels with 54 factors, the results have shown that 2 factors were on 4 points (Normal), 21 factors were on 5 points (Important) and 31 factors were on 6 points (Very important). The consensus and convergence have been considered to evaluate the expertise opinion within the Delphi method that about 0.9 value of consensus has found on 4th panel as much as the sequences of Delphi. The convergence based on 2nd panel (=1) has been found that most in 4thpanel were existed between 0.2 and 0.5. There was difference between the significance value using Delphi method and the estimate using Bayesian technique, such that was calculated by the results of 3rd panel as pre-range and the results of 4th panel as standard-range. As the results of the analysis of 54 factors, the most significant factors found were 5 fitness factor, 3 essential technique, 5 understanding game , 3 tactics , 2 match analytical factor, 2 environmental factors , 4 mental factors, 3 motivational factors, 2 psychological factors and 2 preparation factors . This study were significant factors in order to analyse team performance that the Delphi method has been used in order to explore all significant factors influenced on team performance. Also, to estimate the significances of explored factors is to provide the evidence which could proof the significant factors for the analysis of team performance.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.