Current regional development programs for less-developed regions have shortcomings, such as overlapped investment, arbitrary budget sharing, top-down process, etc. and also, are not enough to provoke voluntary driving force for development due to individual execution by different central government ...
Current regional development programs for less-developed regions have shortcomings, such as overlapped investment, arbitrary budget sharing, top-down process, etc. and also, are not enough to provoke voluntary driving force for development due to individual execution by different central government departments. As one of solutions to solve these problems, Presidential Committee on Balanced National Development has launched Revitalizing Program with Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs to provoke internal development ability and selected 70 local governments as Revitalizing Region. This paper tries to examine background of this program focusing on problems of current regional development programs, and suggest desirable support and driving procedure for this program. Problems of current development programs for less developed regions are analysed as; necessity of unitary policy program, less consideration of local autonomy and development demand, and similarity between programs. After introduction of standard operation procedure of Revitalizing Program, three strategies for desirable promotion of the program are suggested. Firstly, detailed business model for the program should be focused on software or brainware instead of hardware, with possible improving effect on the level of less-development. Secondly, effective implementation system should be established including appropriate stakeholders to build RIS in the end. Thirdly, objective evaluation and feedback system should be established with reasonable criteria, annual and 3-year based evaluation schemes, and carrots for local governments to drive revitalizing business more vividly and thus graduate earlier. As a conclusion, Revitalizing Program is scrutinized again to clarify natural-born shortcomings of the program itself and desirable directions to cure them in terms of formal aspect, substantial aspect and subjective aspect.
Current regional development programs for less-developed regions have shortcomings, such as overlapped investment, arbitrary budget sharing, top-down process, etc. and also, are not enough to provoke voluntary driving force for development due to individual execution by different central government departments. As one of solutions to solve these problems, Presidential Committee on Balanced National Development has launched Revitalizing Program with Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs to provoke internal development ability and selected 70 local governments as Revitalizing Region. This paper tries to examine background of this program focusing on problems of current regional development programs, and suggest desirable support and driving procedure for this program. Problems of current development programs for less developed regions are analysed as; necessity of unitary policy program, less consideration of local autonomy and development demand, and similarity between programs. After introduction of standard operation procedure of Revitalizing Program, three strategies for desirable promotion of the program are suggested. Firstly, detailed business model for the program should be focused on software or brainware instead of hardware, with possible improving effect on the level of less-development. Secondly, effective implementation system should be established including appropriate stakeholders to build RIS in the end. Thirdly, objective evaluation and feedback system should be established with reasonable criteria, annual and 3-year based evaluation schemes, and carrots for local governments to drive revitalizing business more vividly and thus graduate earlier. As a conclusion, Revitalizing Program is scrutinized again to clarify natural-born shortcomings of the program itself and desirable directions to cure them in terms of formal aspect, substantial aspect and subjective aspect.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.