The philosophical concept "Unhappy Consciousness" created in Hegel"s The Phenomenology of Spirit, representing his dialectical ontology, gives us a few essential clues which can be possible to read Hamlet in comprehensive ways. Human"s consciousness, called "changeable consciousness" by Hegel, denie...
The philosophical concept "Unhappy Consciousness" created in Hegel"s The Phenomenology of Spirit, representing his dialectical ontology, gives us a few essential clues which can be possible to read Hamlet in comprehensive ways. Human"s consciousness, called "changeable consciousness" by Hegel, denies himself/herself and searches for essence from something ideal(the immutable; God) which is opposed to himself/herself. On the second phase, as the Christ unifies essence and nonessence with making himself Gestalt in this world by his incarnation(alienation), consciousness is sublated(aufgehoben) to the immutable in the coarse of alienating itself, losing its substance, and becomes the simple movement of consciousness itself. However, the movement of consciousness contains the limitation of subjectivity(lacking universality). On the last third phase, after cognizing the limitation or the impossibility of itself, posing itself as a substance(objectivity; humble thing), the consciousness achieves the in-and-for-itself state, or a subject. Hamlet is loaded with the duty of revenge and cognizes the underworld when he meets the ghost of his father. The ghost, the real in Lacan"s term, exteriorly, is the gap which cannot be rationalized only with revenge and, interiorly, Hamlet"s truth(essence) which has no way to be expressed. Hamlet alienates(denies) himself, regarding the kingdom of Denmark as a prison. The situation of the kingdom is the whole nightmare as the ghost appears at night, the places of Claudius, Gertrude and Hamlet are "condensed" and "displaced" even in the day time. Also their languages, composed of oximorons or puns, in a sense, are too hypercritical and vain, like floating desires which lack their substances. Borrowing Hegel"s term, we may call it the specific without the universal or the situation that is full of extreme subjectivity. The full grown subjectivity of Hamlet appears well enough in his too early(murdering Polonius) or too late(delaying the revenge) behaviors. Nevertheless, considering differences between him and the play(art), he faces with a momentous turn. In spite of his abundant fret and agony, his own work or drama is not written yet. Therefore he has neither his own substance nor universal. Having a few chances, Hamlet returns to his truth and becomes a subject. As a prince and soldier Fortinbras does his utmost even at a humiliating duty, also as a handsome youth Laertes shows hypocritical rhetorics at the tomb of his sister, both they play their mirror-roles for Hamlet. He identifies himself with them. Becoming a foil, posing himself as a humble substance(seam of universality), Hamlet willingly turns himself into "the vanishing mediator" who ends up the raging illness of Denmark. According to Lacan, it is the state that a subject comes back to the place which his destiny already written in.
The philosophical concept "Unhappy Consciousness" created in Hegel"s The Phenomenology of Spirit, representing his dialectical ontology, gives us a few essential clues which can be possible to read Hamlet in comprehensive ways. Human"s consciousness, called "changeable consciousness" by Hegel, denies himself/herself and searches for essence from something ideal(the immutable; God) which is opposed to himself/herself. On the second phase, as the Christ unifies essence and nonessence with making himself Gestalt in this world by his incarnation(alienation), consciousness is sublated(aufgehoben) to the immutable in the coarse of alienating itself, losing its substance, and becomes the simple movement of consciousness itself. However, the movement of consciousness contains the limitation of subjectivity(lacking universality). On the last third phase, after cognizing the limitation or the impossibility of itself, posing itself as a substance(objectivity; humble thing), the consciousness achieves the in-and-for-itself state, or a subject. Hamlet is loaded with the duty of revenge and cognizes the underworld when he meets the ghost of his father. The ghost, the real in Lacan"s term, exteriorly, is the gap which cannot be rationalized only with revenge and, interiorly, Hamlet"s truth(essence) which has no way to be expressed. Hamlet alienates(denies) himself, regarding the kingdom of Denmark as a prison. The situation of the kingdom is the whole nightmare as the ghost appears at night, the places of Claudius, Gertrude and Hamlet are "condensed" and "displaced" even in the day time. Also their languages, composed of oximorons or puns, in a sense, are too hypercritical and vain, like floating desires which lack their substances. Borrowing Hegel"s term, we may call it the specific without the universal or the situation that is full of extreme subjectivity. The full grown subjectivity of Hamlet appears well enough in his too early(murdering Polonius) or too late(delaying the revenge) behaviors. Nevertheless, considering differences between him and the play(art), he faces with a momentous turn. In spite of his abundant fret and agony, his own work or drama is not written yet. Therefore he has neither his own substance nor universal. Having a few chances, Hamlet returns to his truth and becomes a subject. As a prince and soldier Fortinbras does his utmost even at a humiliating duty, also as a handsome youth Laertes shows hypocritical rhetorics at the tomb of his sister, both they play their mirror-roles for Hamlet. He identifies himself with them. Becoming a foil, posing himself as a humble substance(seam of universality), Hamlet willingly turns himself into "the vanishing mediator" who ends up the raging illness of Denmark. According to Lacan, it is the state that a subject comes back to the place which his destiny already written in.
주제어
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.