참고문헌 (40)

1. Hydrological Processes Arnold 19 3 563 2005 10.1002/hyp.5611 SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling 

   상세보기

2. Bagstad, K.J., Villa, F., Johnson, G., Voigt, B., 2011. ARIES-Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A Guide to Models and Data, Version 1.0 Beta. The ARIES Consortium, Bilbao, Spain. Retrieved November 27, 2012 from 〈http://www.ariesonline.org/toolkit.html〉. 

3. 10.3133/sir20125251 Bagstad, K.J., Semmens, D., Winthrop, R., Jaworski, D., Larson, J., 2012. Ecosystem Services Valuation to Support Decision Making on Public Lands: A Case Study for the San Pedro River, Arizona. Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5251. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. 

   

4. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012 Bagstad, K.J., Johnson, G.W., Voigt, B., Villa, F., 2013. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services, 4, 117-125 

   상세보기

5. Bagstad, K.J., Semmens, D.J., Waage, S., Winthrop, R. A comparative assessment of tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, this volume. 

6. Ecological Economics Boyd 63 616 2007 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002 What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units 

   상세보기

7. 10.2139/ssrn.1479820 Boyd, J., Krupnick, A., 2009. The Definition and Choice of Environmental Commodities for Nonmarket Valuation. Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 09-35. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. 

   

8. Ecosystem Services Braat 1 4 2012 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011 The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy 

   상세보기

9. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education Brookshire 144 60 2010 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2010.00075.x After restoration: a framework for preserving semi-arid regions in the Southwest 

   상세보기

10. Brunner, G.W., 2010. HEC-RAS, River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, CPD-69. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, CA. 

11. Burchell 2005 Sprawl Costs: Economic Impacts of Unchecked Development 

12. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), 2005. BLM Land Use Planning Handbook, H-1601-1. U.S. Department of Interior-Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC. 

13. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), 2012. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States. FES 12-24, DOE/EIS-0403. U.S. Department of Interior-Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC. 

14. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Daily 7 1 21 2009 10.1890/080025 Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver 

    상세보기

15. Ecological Modelling Elston 64 11 1992 10.1016/0304-3800(92)90047-I Sensitivity analysis in the presence of correlated parameter estimates 

    상세보기

16. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems Johnson 3 2 54 2012 10.4018/jaeis.2012070104 Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): a network flow approach to ecosystem service assessment 

    상세보기

17. 2011 Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services 

18. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering Kennedy 18 6 698 2013 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000655 Using the KINEROS2 modeling framework to evaluate the increase in storm runoff from residential development in a semiarid environment 

    상세보기

19. Kepner, W.G., Semmens, D.J., Heggem, D.T., Evanson, E.J., Edmonds, C.M., Scott, S.N., 2003. The San Pedro River Geo-data Browser and Assessment Tools. EPA/600/C-03/008. Retrieved November 30, 2012 from 〈http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/land-sci/san_pedro/index.html〉. 

20. Land Use Policy Kroll 29 521 2012 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008 Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics 

    상세보기

21. Mac Nish 285 2009 Ecology and Conservation of the San Pedro River Groundwater hydrology of the San Pedro River Basin 

22. Mendoza 53 2011 Natural Capital-Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services Water supply as an ecosystem service for hydropower and irrigation 

23. Water Resources Research Moran 44 W05S01 2008 10.1029/2007WR006083 Preface to special section on fifty years of research and data collection: U.S. Department of Agriculture Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed 

    상세보기

24. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Moran 149 59 2009 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.07.004 Partitioning evapotranspiration in semiarid grassland and shrubland ecosystems using time series of soil surface temperature 

    상세보기

25. Ecological Economics Nahlik 77 27 2012 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001 Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice 

    상세보기

26. Faculty of 1000 Biology Reports Nelson 2 53 2010 Modeling ecosystem services in terrestrial ecosystems 

27. Journal of Arid Environments Nie 82 147 2012 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.02.008 Hydrological impacts of mesquite encroachment in the Upper San Pedro watershed 

    상세보기

28. Water Resources Research Nijssen 33 711 1997 10.1029/96WR03517 Streamflow simulation for continental-scale river basins 

    상세보기

29. Applied Geography Norman 34 413 2012 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.01.006 Mapping socio-environmentally vulnerable populations access and exposure to ecosystem services at the U.S.-Mexico borderlands 

    상세보기

30. President′s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) 2011 Report to the President: Sustaining Environmental Capital: Protecting Society and the Economy 

31. Ruhl 2007 The Law and Policy of Ecosystem Services 

32. Semmens 2008 Hydrological Modelling in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas KINEROS2 and the AGWA modeling framework 

33. Steinitz 2003 Alternative Futures for Changing Landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora 

34. 2009 

35. Ecological Indicators Syrbe 21 80 2012 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013 Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting, and connecting areas and landscape metrics 

    상세보기

36. Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A., Wood, S.A., Sharp, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., Bernhartdt, J., Griffin, R., 2013. InVEST 2.5.3 User′s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford, CA. 

37. Journal of Environmental Management Vigerstol 92 2403 2011 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040 A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services 

    상세보기

38. Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales Villa 11 1 83 2011 10.7201/earn.2011.01.04 Scientific instruments for climate change adaptation: estimating and optimizing the efficiency of ecosystem services provision 

    상세보기

39. Waage, S., Armstrong, K., Hwang, L., 2011. New Business Decision Making Aids in An Era of Complexity, Scrutiny, and Uncertainty: Tools for Identifying, Assessing, and Valuing Ecosystem Services, BSR, San Francisco, California. Available from: 〈http://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_ESTM_WG_Comp_ES_Tools_Synthesis3.pdf〉 (accessed 23.05.13). 

40. 10.3133/sir20105233 Zhu, Z., Bergamaschi, B., Bernknopf, R., Clow, D., Dye, D., Faulkner, S., Forney, W., Gleason, R., Hawbaker, T., Liu, J., Lui, S., Prisley, S., Reed, B., Reeves, M., Rollins, M., Sleeter, B., Sohl, T., Stackpoole, S., Stehman, S., Striegl, R., Wein, A., Zhu, Z., 2010. A Method for Assessing Carbon Stocks, Carbon Sequestration, and Greenhouse-gas Fluxes in Ecosystems of the United States under Present Conditions and Future Scenarios. Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5233. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.