참고문헌 (35)

1. AIAA, 1999. Assessment of Experimental Uncertainty with Application to Wind Tunnel Testing. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Standard S-071A-1995. AIAA. Reston, VA. 

2. J. Hydraul. Res. Barua 36 2 235 1998 10.1080/00221689809498635 Some aspects of turbulent flow structure in large alluvial rivers 

   상세보기

3. Boiten 2000 Hydrometry 

4. Frizell, K.W., Vermeyen, T.B., 2007. Comparing Apples and Oranges: Teledyne/RDI StreamPro ADCP and the OTT QLiner River Discharge Measurement System. In: Proceedings of Hydraulic Measurements and Experimental Methods (HMEM) Conference, Lake Placid, New York, USA. 

5. 10.3133/ofr92493 Fulford, J.M., 1992. Characteristics of US Geological Survey Discharge Measurements for Water Year 1990. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-493, Reston, VA. 

   

6. Fulford, J.M., Sauer, V.B., 1986. Comparison of velocity interpolation methods for computing open-channel discharge. In: Subitsky. S.Y. (Ed.), Selected papers in the hydrologic sciences. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper. 2290, pp. 139-144. 

7. J. Hydraul. Eng. Garcia 138 8 684 2012 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000558 Variance of discharge estimates sampled using ADCPs from moving platforms 

   상세보기

8. J. Hydraul. Eng. Gonzalez-Castro 133 12 1390 2007 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1390) Framework for estimating uncertainty of ADCP measurements from a moving boat by standardized uncertainty analysis 

   상세보기

9. Gunawan, B., 2010. A Study of Flow Structures in a Two-stage Channel Using Field Data. A Physical Model and Numerical Modelling. PhD Thesis Dissertation, The University of Birmingham, UK. 

10. Water and Environment Journal Gunawan 24 147 2010 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2009.00170.x Using an acoustic Doppler current profiler in a small river 

    상세보기

11. GUM, 1993. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. ISBN 92-67-10188-9. BIPM. IEC. IFCC. ISO. IUPAC. IUPAP. OIML. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. 

12. Hinze 1959 Turbulence: An Introduction to its Mechanisms and Theory 

13. Herschy 2009 Streamflow Measurement, Routledge 

14. J. Hydraul. Eng. Huang 138 1 4 2012 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000492 Uncertainty model for in situ quality control of stationary ADCP open-channel discharge measurement 

    상세보기

15. ISO 748, 2007. Hydrometry-Measurement of Liquid Flow in Open Channels Using Current-meters and Floats. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 748, Geneva, Switzerland. 

16. ISO 1088, 2007. Hydrometry-Velocity-area Methods Using Current-Meters-Collection and Processing of Data for Determination of Uncertainties in Flow Measurement. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 1088, Geneva, Switzerland. 

17. Marsden, R., 2005. StreamPro ADCP Performance Characteristics. Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Eighth Working Conference on Current Measurement Technology. 

18. J. Hydraul. Eng. Mueller 133 12 1411 2007 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1411) Errors in acoustic Doppler profiler velocity measurements caused by flow disturbance 

    상세보기

19. Mueller 2009 Measuring discharge with ADCPs from a moving boat 

20. 10.1061/40737(2004)268 Muste, M., Yu, K., Gonzalez-Castro, J., Starzmann, E., 2004a. Methodology for estimating ADCP measurement uncertainty in open-channel flows. In: Proceedings of the World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2004 (EWRI). Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 

    

21. Flow Meas. Instrum. Muste 15 1 17 2004 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2003.09.002 Practical aspects of ADCP data use for quantification of mean river flow characteristics: Part II: fixed-vessel measurements 

    상세보기

22. J. Hydraul. Eng. Muste 136 5 275 2010 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000173 Near-transducer errors in ADCP measurements: experimental findings 

    상세보기

23. Muste, M., Lee, K., 2011. Development of the Decision-aid Tool. Phase I: Review of the Available Decision-aid Tools for Implementation of Uncertainty Analysis. Report to the WMO Project Assessment of the Performance of Flow Measurement Instruments and Techniques, Iowa City, Iowa. 

24. Hydrol. Sci. J. Muste 57 4 643 2012 10.1080/02626667.2012.675064 Standardized uncertainty analysis for hydrometry: a review of relevant approaches and implementation examples 

    상세보기

25. Pobanz, K., Le Coz, J., Pierrefeu, G., 2011. Intercomparison of ADCPs on the Rhone downstream of Genissiat Dam. Groupe Doppler France, Intercomparison ADCP 2, IRSTEA, Lyon, France. 

26. RDI, 2010. Section-by-Section (SxS) Pro Data Acquisition and Processing Software Package, Teledyne RD Instruments, Poway, CA. 

27. RDI, 2012a. StreamPro & Section by Section Software Operation Manual, Teledyne RD Instruments, Poway, CA. 

28. RDI, 2012b. StreamPro ADCP Guide, Teledyne RD Instruments, Poway, CA. 

29. RDI, 2012c. WinRiver II Software User’s Guide. Teledyne RD Instruments, Poway, CA. 

30. 10.1061/40856(200)162 Rehmel, M.S., 2006. Field Evaluation of shallow-water acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurements. In: Proceedings of ASCE-EWRI Congress, May 21-25, Omaha, NE. 

    

31. 10.3133/ofr011 Simpson, M.R., 2001. Discharge measurements using a broadband acoustic Doppler current profiler. US Geological Survey Open File Report, Reston, VA. 

    

32. J. Hydraul. Res. Stone 45 6 752 2007 10.1080/00221686.2007.9521813 Evaluating velocity measurement techniques in shallow streams 

    상세보기

33. J. Hydraul. Eng. Szupiany 133 1299 2007 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:12(1299) Comparison of fixed- and moving-vessel flow measurements with an aDP in a large river 

    상세보기

34. USGS, 2011. Exposure Time for ADCP Moving-Boat Discharge Measurements Made During Steady Flow Conditions. USGS Office of Surface Water Technical Memorandum 2011.08. 

35. WMO, 2011. Assessment of the Performance of Flow Measurement Instruments and Techniques. World Meteorological Organization Project. Personal communication. Commission for Hydrology, Geneva, Switzerland. 

활용도 Top5 논문

더보기

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.