초록

용어보기논문에서 용어와 풀이말을 자동 추출한 결과로, 시범 서비스 중입니다. AI-Helper

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In this essay, I examine how philosophical counseling should encounter psychological counseling. In section two, I introduce OcJean Kim’s opinion on philosophical counseling, a response from psychological counseling, and analyze its implication. She criticizes my distinction between philosophical co...

In this essay, I examine how philosophical counseling should encounter psychological counseling. In section two, I introduce OcJean Kim’s opinion on philosophical counseling, a response from psychological counseling, and analyze its implication. She criticizes my distinction between philosophical counseling and psychological counseling according to non-directiveness and reciprocity. She argues that philosophical counseling as well as psychological counseling cannot be a kind of therapy and it has directive aspects. Based on too much rigorous distinction between them, I argue, her assertion does not reflect reality, and logo therapy suggested as a typical philosophical counseling remains in the boundary of psychological counseling. In section three, I try to establish the identity of philosophical counseling. I show that non-directiveness and reciprocity cannot be substantial characters of philosophical counseling because it is a process of dialogue to help clients do philosophical thinking and that it is a kind of philosophical practice. In section four, I scrutinize Gerd Achenbach’s and Suk-Soo Kim’s assertions on the relationship between philosophical counseling and psychological counseling. I hold that philosophical counseling requires counselors to take professional training because it deals with important decisions in life and that we need to secure its independent territory before its cooperation and competition with psychological counseling.

주제어