초록

용어보기논문에서 용어와 풀이말을 자동 추출한 결과로, 시범 서비스 중입니다. AI-Helper

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Grounded theory has raised many important debates since 1967 when was published “The Discovery of Grounded Theory” by Glaser and Strauss. But social welfare academics in Korea are indifferent to these debates relating to grounded theory. They have produced only grounded theory researches which rel...

Grounded theory has raised many important debates since 1967 when was published “The Discovery of Grounded Theory” by Glaser and Strauss. But social welfare academics in Korea are indifferent to these debates relating to grounded theory. They have produced only grounded theory researches which relied on Strauss’ method. This study mapped the configuration of grounded theory discourses and analyzed grounded theory resesrches in social welfare academics. Based on these maps and analyses, I proposed the directions and implications of grounded theory debates. Grounded theory has been divided into two versions, Glaser version and Strauss version. Two versions are different in research methods. And many writers has reinterpreted epistemologically and integrated grounded theory with other perspectives- feminism, critical theory, hermeneutics. Five distinctive characteristics were founded in social welfare researches using grounded theory: 1) quantitative superiority among various qualitative methods and methodological uniformity 2) not visualizing of Basic Social Process 3) lack of substantive theory 4) segmentalization of acts and contexts 5) unbalance between micro and macro, attribute and practice. We need to experiment methodologically and epistemologically diversities around the debates and to expand macrostructural contexts.

주제어